No need 1.3x NAV, 1.2x or even 1.1x will make many of us here very happy 🤣
volvo125 ( Date: 18-Aug-2025 21:52) Posted:
|
Thanks tch77_pt75, for the video link.
The comment section on YFH is at ~1.01.00 timestamp.
Joey Choi using his proprietary software 1GT and find all short and long terms bullish signals still intact with no emerging sign of weakness even after the price crossed the major psychological barrier $1.0, as at 15 Aug. He believed the price is heading towards $1.10 and even $1,20. He felt that the price still has a lot more legs to go.
With JC professional technical assessment confirming YFH still strong bullish technical posture and momentum, we might all really have a chance to see YFH price breaking well beyond it's NAV to the likes of Centurion, LHN or Boustead.
tch77_pt75 ( Date: 18-Aug-2025 19:00) Posted:
|
https://links.sgx.com/1.0.0/corporate-announcements/86PEZANBKGHN441D/e22f162e5eead666e41e4b59a5f542edec8a8caaa970d44b2c786591c564c942
Para 2 of the quoted post below refers. Indeed, YZJF has now team up with Vincent again thru his company ICH! Just when investors thought old Ren will focus on the soon to be YZJM and somehow YZJF will be left on its own, he is now telling the investing community that YZJF has 100m to invest along with ICH. Let' s see how the market respond tomorrow. 
Para 2 of the quoted post below refers. Indeed, YZJF has now team up with Vincent again thru his company ICH! Just when investors thought old Ren will focus on the soon to be YZJM and somehow YZJF will be left on its own, he is now telling the investing community that YZJF has 100m to invest along with ICH. Let' s see how the market respond tomorrow. 
HVRRVH ( Date: 08-Dec-2023 09:53) Posted:
|
YZJFH to anchor ICHAM 100m investment fund.
Apparently, MD of ICHAM is Vincent Toe.....haha.
Apparently, MD of ICHAM is Vincent Toe.....haha.
if the discount is a lot. then it is fair to offer it to shareholders first. allow over subscribe from shareholders. any left over then sell to the other buyers.
extra money is good for expansion but if it is at the expense of shareholders it is not so good.
so better to let those shareholders have a bite first.
extra money is good for expansion but if it is at the expense of shareholders it is not so good.
so better to let those shareholders have a bite first.
https://www.youtube.com/live/VsOCd7-I374?si=LGGeegm915vdOaaA
There is a segment on YZJFH uptrend as of 15 Aug 2025
There is a segment on YZJFH uptrend as of 15 Aug 2025
I did my part too.
 
 
Dear Sirs,
 
I refer to the circular in relation to the above subject matter.
By now, I supposed you would have received numerous queries with regard to the mentioned 20% dilution.
It is of grave concern to all shareholders.  We need time to digest the explanation and decide on the most appropriate action to take.
Telling the rational of the dilution only at the EGM is definitely too rush and unfair to us. 
I believe many would prefer a clarification prior to the EGM.
Hence, an announcement before hand, would be greatly appreciated.
 
Best regards
ok I also sent in my query. Let' s see what' s next. 
Ref: The Proposed dilution of equity interest in YZJ Maritime arising from the Proposed Placement
Thank you and looking forward to a clarification by the company soonest. 
Ref: The Proposed dilution of equity interest in YZJ Maritime arising from the Proposed Placement
 
a) Status of my holding: Individual
b) Full name: 
c) NRIC: 
d) Email address:
 
It is mentioned in the circular that, among other things, the proposed private share placement will dilute YZJF&rsquo s equity interest in YZJM by at least 20% or more. As a current YZJF shareholder, I am concerned that this would imply that a very steep discount would be given to the subscribers of placement shares, to the tune of even 50% of post spin YZJM&rsquo s NAV as follows: 
 
Placement with 20% dilution 
New shares issued: 3.52b x 20% / 1-20% = 880m placement shares
Placement amount : $250M
Implied placement price: 250M / 880m =0.284 per share. 
 
Even though the price discovery of YZJM will only be known upon listing post spin off, based on the information from the circular where it was stated that the Remaining Group&rsquo s NAV is expected to be $0.54 post spin, it is estimated that YZJM&rsquo s post spin NAV per share will be around $0.58 [$0.54 + $0.57 = $1.11 as per 1H25&rsquo s NAV]. The imply placement price of $0.284 seems detrimental to the existing shareholders. Accordingly, I would appreciate it that the company can quickly clarify the matter to all shareholders through appropriate channel of communications such as SGX announcement. 
 
As an existing shareholder, I can accept dilution in relation to private share placement and I am just seeking clarification, as from the circular, it also appears that the dilution is pertaining to YZJF&rsquo s equity interest becoming 0% post placement and distribution. Is the 20% dilution pertaining to only YZJF' s equity interest as it would hold 0% of YZJM post placement and spin off or applies to all existing shareholders?
As an existing shareholder, I can accept dilution in relation to private share placement and I am just seeking clarification, as from the circular, it also appears that the dilution is pertaining to YZJF&rsquo s equity interest becoming 0% post placement and distribution. Is the 20% dilution pertaining to only YZJF' s equity interest as it would hold 0% of YZJM post placement and spin off or applies to all existing shareholders?
Thank you and looking forward to a clarification by the company soonest. 
 
Regards,
The key unsettling issue here is the projected 10% reduction in NAV/share due to the implied steep 50% discount granted to the new pp shares, not so much on the 20% dilution concern, because as long as the new pp shareholders pay an equitable price without compromising (or without compromising too much) on the existing shareholders value, meaning the post pp issued NAV/share will remain unchanged (or if change to lower, the level ought to be reasonable and certainly not a straight and immediate 10% loss to NAV/share.), then this 20% dilution is just a face value reduction in control to existing shareholders, a necessary and inevitable step every coy must take to raise capital.
It is the steep discount granted to the new pp shareholders that we existing shareholders must contest and seek clarification.
pkli899 ( Date: 18-Aug-2025 13:39) Posted:
|
I received last week.
Hope they give a reply to the crucial issue before EGM.
10% dilution is almost unheard of for the many PP I been thru with other counters.
20% would be ridiculous if it is the case.
Why are the choosen few given such privilege?
Hope they give a reply to the crucial issue before EGM.
10% dilution is almost unheard of for the many PP I been thru with other counters.
20% would be ridiculous if it is the case.
Why are the choosen few given such privilege?
Hard copy Proxy Form and Notice of EGM received. Price actions wise $1.04 seems to provide strong support with resistance at $1.06. For a start post spin just aim for the combined prices to above the combined NAVs. Hopefully the management will clarify the dilution issue soonest. Lets the count down to EGM begins, let?s go!
Good morning all.
Once again, thank you volvo125 for the effort.
Once again, thank you volvo125 for the effort.
Hope YZJFH can also take a look at this too
tch77_pt75 ( Date: 15-Aug-2025 14:03) Posted:
|
I have just sent a suggestion to the YFH mgt through IR, see if they will consider.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: YZJF Circular dated 12Aug, Suggestion of FAQ.
1:54 PM (2 minutes ago)
to Zhou, Kamal
Hi Zhou Yan,
I believe many shareholders may have sent in their questions in the past few days and many more may be doing so in the next 2 weeks.
May I suggest to the management, to kindly consider issuing a FAQ a few days before the EGM, to address and clarify as much as possible, the questions and concerns raised by the shareholders ? 
I believe many of these questions raised would have their varying degree of material implications, such as the one I raised, the issue of not just a mere face value 20% dilution impact but a more grave implicit 10% loss in the NAV/share post spin off post pp issuance due to the steep discount implied. 
I believe, many shareholders will need time to digest the clarifications to their concerns as well as the underlying implications, so that they can come to the EGM with a clearer understanding of the whole deal before they can confidently caste their votes.
The release of a FAQ will greatly facilitate the conduct of the EGM in a more positive and engaging manner.
Appreciate if you could kindly convey my suggestion to the Management.
Thank you very much.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: YZJF Circular dated 12Aug, Suggestion of FAQ.
1:54 PM (2 minutes ago)
to Zhou, Kamal
Hi Zhou Yan,
I believe many shareholders may have sent in their questions in the past few days and many more may be doing so in the next 2 weeks.
May I suggest to the management, to kindly consider issuing a FAQ a few days before the EGM, to address and clarify as much as possible, the questions and concerns raised by the shareholders ? 
I believe many of these questions raised would have their varying degree of material implications, such as the one I raised, the issue of not just a mere face value 20% dilution impact but a more grave implicit 10% loss in the NAV/share post spin off post pp issuance due to the steep discount implied. 
I believe, many shareholders will need time to digest the clarifications to their concerns as well as the underlying implications, so that they can come to the EGM with a clearer understanding of the whole deal before they can confidently caste their votes.
The release of a FAQ will greatly facilitate the conduct of the EGM in a more positive and engaging manner.
Appreciate if you could kindly convey my suggestion to the Management.
Thank you very much.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Volvo125 and HVRRVH for the sharing. 
volvo125 ( Date: 16-Aug-2025 16:42) Posted:
|
also not to forget the open shorts positions.  think they are bleeding badly already.  if post spin off the marine go crazy they will have to find ways to cover.  if this is the group trying to buy then don' t sell cheaply.
 
 
agreed with the thinking about nta dilution. ie sell too cheaply away. ifact give away.
since this is now in grow area there is no need to raise the $250m. if wnat in can buy from open market or pay same same nta at least.  to buy $250m worth one will not likely get it at nta.
however open price for a growth stock is not much related to nta. it will be market perception of many things like. what is the grow be like. how long. how porfitable.
is the bosses behind the buy up still keen or running away.
it is buyers money power versus sellers shares available.
 
since this is now in grow area there is no need to raise the $250m. if wnat in can buy from open market or pay same same nta at least.  to buy $250m worth one will not likely get it at nta.
however open price for a growth stock is not much related to nta. it will be market perception of many things like. what is the grow be like. how long. how porfitable.
is the bosses behind the buy up still keen or running away.
it is buyers money power versus sellers shares available.
 
The current shares with ongoing spin off narratives in play for reference :-
LHN $0.82 @ 1.33x NAV
Centurion $1.73 @ 1.26x NAV
Boustead $1.51 @ 1.3x NAV
At $1.06, YFH is still " just" at 0.95x NAV (if you take the interim 1H25 NAV 1.11) or 0.91x NAV (if you take FY24 NAV 1.17).
There are probably going to be 1~3 rate cuts by end 2025, starting from Sep.
It' s anybody guess if YFH cum spin off price will move towards 1.3x NAV, or at current price, up to a further 36% upside @1.11 NAV assumption, or up to a further 44% upside @1.17 NAV assumption.
However, ex spin off, based on the past 3 years historical high growth potential of the maritime business, YMD valuation should likely grow very fast, while YFH will continue to remain a steady dividend income yield play with a very sizeable NAV base.
Your call.
LHN $0.82 @ 1.33x NAV
Centurion $1.73 @ 1.26x NAV
Boustead $1.51 @ 1.3x NAV
At $1.06, YFH is still " just" at 0.95x NAV (if you take the interim 1H25 NAV 1.11) or 0.91x NAV (if you take FY24 NAV 1.17).
There are probably going to be 1~3 rate cuts by end 2025, starting from Sep.
It' s anybody guess if YFH cum spin off price will move towards 1.3x NAV, or at current price, up to a further 36% upside @1.11 NAV assumption, or up to a further 44% upside @1.17 NAV assumption.
However, ex spin off, based on the past 3 years historical high growth potential of the maritime business, YMD valuation should likely grow very fast, while YFH will continue to remain a steady dividend income yield play with a very sizeable NAV base.
Your call.
stonkmaster ( Date: 15-Aug-2025 07:49) Posted:
|
Ok, let me explain one more time.
The projected NAV of the post spin off YMD is ~$2.0b or $2000m. If no further pp (proposed placement) of $250m, existing shareholders will retain 100% control.
Now with pp, the EGM circular stipluated a clause :- 
xxxxxxx
as at the Latest Practicable Date, the Company envisages that based on an amount of up to S$250 million to be raised from the Proposed Placement, it will result in a percentage reduction of 20.0% or more of the Company& rsquo s equity interest in YZJ Maritime, under Rule 805(2)(b)
xxxxx
Regardless how I read the above, this 20% dilution is still attributed to the additional proposed placement $250m and the impact will result in YFM, not due to the YFH/YFM capital reduction exercise.
It seems to me that the issuance of this $250m to these new group of so called " sophisticated" investors (AI and Institution Investors) will cause a 20% dilution to all the existing shareholders due to the final enlarged share base value (~$2B + $250m) = ~$2250m.
Just a quick crude workout. The post spin off original base is ~$2000m. If the new placement increase the value by $500m to $2500m, then the original group of shareholders will see their ownership become 2000/2500 = 80%, or their ownership are diluted by 20%.
However, the share placement is only for $250m, not $500m, yet this issuance can impact a 20% dilution. This implicitly means that this new shares are going to be issued at a steep 50% discount. 
Else, to effect a 20% dilution with a " just" price without compromising on existing shareholders value, the amount raised should be $500m. Existing shareholders portion would then be (2000/2500) = 80%, and new sharesholders would be (500/2500) = 20%.  In this case, existing shareholders would still see a 20% dilution in control but the supposedly post spin off YMD NAV/share will remain unchange, meaning we will not see a theoretical 10% loss in the NAV.
Why 10% loss in NAV in the original case ? This is the simulation :-
Post spin off YMD =  3480m shares O/S at NAV $2000m, or 2000/3480 = $0.575/share
To effect a 20% dilution on existing shareholders, the new YMD will issue pp = (3480/0.8 minus 3480) = 870m new shares. However, these shares are issued at 50% discount such that only $250m is collected, instead of $500m.
Hence post spin off post pp $250m YMD =  4350m shares O/S at NAV $2250m ( 3480+870 = 4350m shares O/S), or $0.517/share
The loss in NAV value = (0.575 minus 0.517) = $0.058/share or 10%.
SInce YFH/YMD is an introductory spin off, we could reasonably assume YMD will commence its Day 1 trading with the NAV as a key reference in its debut price discovery. Mr Market will theorectically markdown YMD by 10% at the start.
 
The projected NAV of the post spin off YMD is ~$2.0b or $2000m. If no further pp (proposed placement) of $250m, existing shareholders will retain 100% control.
Now with pp, the EGM circular stipluated a clause :- 
xxxxxxx
as at the Latest Practicable Date, the Company envisages that based on an amount of up to S$250 million to be raised from the Proposed Placement, it will result in a percentage reduction of 20.0% or more of the Company& rsquo s equity interest in YZJ Maritime, under Rule 805(2)(b)
xxxxx
Regardless how I read the above, this 20% dilution is still attributed to the additional proposed placement $250m and the impact will result in YFM, not due to the YFH/YFM capital reduction exercise.
It seems to me that the issuance of this $250m to these new group of so called " sophisticated" investors (AI and Institution Investors) will cause a 20% dilution to all the existing shareholders due to the final enlarged share base value (~$2B + $250m) = ~$2250m.
Just a quick crude workout. The post spin off original base is ~$2000m. If the new placement increase the value by $500m to $2500m, then the original group of shareholders will see their ownership become 2000/2500 = 80%, or their ownership are diluted by 20%.
However, the share placement is only for $250m, not $500m, yet this issuance can impact a 20% dilution. This implicitly means that this new shares are going to be issued at a steep 50% discount. 
Else, to effect a 20% dilution with a " just" price without compromising on existing shareholders value, the amount raised should be $500m. Existing shareholders portion would then be (2000/2500) = 80%, and new sharesholders would be (500/2500) = 20%.  In this case, existing shareholders would still see a 20% dilution in control but the supposedly post spin off YMD NAV/share will remain unchange, meaning we will not see a theoretical 10% loss in the NAV.
Why 10% loss in NAV in the original case ? This is the simulation :-
Post spin off YMD =  3480m shares O/S at NAV $2000m, or 2000/3480 = $0.575/share
To effect a 20% dilution on existing shareholders, the new YMD will issue pp = (3480/0.8 minus 3480) = 870m new shares. However, these shares are issued at 50% discount such that only $250m is collected, instead of $500m.
Hence post spin off post pp $250m YMD =  4350m shares O/S at NAV $2250m ( 3480+870 = 4350m shares O/S), or $0.517/share
The loss in NAV value = (0.575 minus 0.517) = $0.058/share or 10%.
SInce YFH/YMD is an introductory spin off, we could reasonably assume YMD will commence its Day 1 trading with the NAV as a key reference in its debut price discovery. Mr Market will theorectically markdown YMD by 10% at the start.
 
fenghuo ( Date: 16-Aug-2025 15:06) Posted:
|
Working backward using 7.2%, you have assumed the placement price to be $0.94 pre spin or $0.47 post spin . If this is the case, I think existing holders is ok cos 7.2% dilution is only related to voting power. In term of NAV dilution, this same example is 0.9% and again no existing share holders will make noise. We are contemplating a 20% dilution to existing share holders using current outstanding shares and it work out to placement price of 50% to theorectically post spin YZJM' s NAV of $0.58 and that' s why we are alarmed. 
fenghuo ( Date: 16-Aug-2025 15:06) Posted:
|