Post Reply
601-620 of 645
Take a look at the time and sales of this counter at the last few minutes.
At 1658hrs price was push down to $4.21. However at 1659 onwards price push up to $4.24 including after 5.00pm at 1704 hrs . I think there is support to prevent price from dropping
bishan22 ( Date: 29-Dec-2014 10:33) Posted:
Changing trend if can clear 4.25. Good luck.
bishan22 ( Date: 24-Dec-2014 10:46) Posted:
|
|
|
Changing trend if can clear 4.25. Good luck.
bishan22 ( Date: 24-Dec-2014 10:46) Posted:
|
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/singapore/ccs-seeks-feedback-on/1534382.html
if the proposer went thru, it will be a very nice dividend stock to hold...........
Good show today.
No hurry, cum if it is below 4.00.
Now everybody is fearful of this stock. Time to buy when everybody is fearful? Or only buy when they are more fearful?
edchai ( Date: 14-Nov-2014 16:20) Posted:
Approaching $4.00 &hellip .
spore1 ( Date: 08-Nov-2014 17:11) Posted:
| Everyday drop so much. May go below $4 any moment.think $3.50 can accumulate for long |
|
|
|
Approaching $4.00 &hellip .
spore1 ( Date: 08-Nov-2014 17:11) Posted:
| Everyday drop so much. May go below $4 any moment.think $3.50 can accumulate for long |
|
Everyday drop so much. May go below $4 any moment.think $3.50 can accumulate for long
Strategy is different for a trader vs an investor.
A trader cuts loss and moves on to an attractive stock to earn back what he/she lost. The skill set is a good understanding of charting, price monitoring, plus understanding fundamental analysis thoroughly. He does not stay invested in a single stock for a long period of time.
An investor ignores charts and do not monitor prices at all, but has very strong fundamental analysis. He stays on investing in a stock for many years, like 10, 20 years maybe.
There are in between the two extremes.
As I see it, SIA Enginneering could still be a good long term hold simply because it is a good biz. As mentioned earlier, this co would not pass Benjamin Graham' s criteria for long term hold. But my own intuition tells me it' s gonna get better ( I could be wrong), simply because oil price is falling and SIA Engineering would benefit greatly from it.
However, the trader in me would study the charts, cut and buy back when price dips to a low. Charts can also help to spot recovery mdoes.
bishan22 ( Date: 06-Nov-2014 08:38) Posted:
| Profit down. Let it find its support price again. |
|
Profit down. Let it find its support price again.
It' s really a steep drop today. Tough on shareholders.
Secret_Squirrel ( Date: 05-Nov-2014 20:31) Posted:
Didn' t know it will drop so much  ..after the earnings report.
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 02-Nov-2014 22:10) Posted:
Very helpful, thanks. Not vested in SIA Engineering.
|
|
|
|
Didn' t know it will drop so much
..after the earnings report.
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 02-Nov-2014 22:10) Posted:
Very helpful, thanks. Not vested in SIA Engineering.
Secret_Squirrel ( Date: 02-Nov-2014 22:08) Posted:
Earning report on 4 November 2014. Earning might affect shares price. Keep a close look at SGX website.
|
|
|
|
Very helpful, thanks. Not vested in SIA Engineering.
Secret_Squirrel ( Date: 02-Nov-2014 22:08) Posted:
Earning report on 4 November 2014. Earning might affect shares price. Keep a close look at SGX website.
bishan22 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 17:07) Posted:
Forming another base camp to hit higher.
|
|
|
|
Earning report on 4 November 2014. Earning might affect shares price. Keep a close look at SGX website.
bishan22 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 17:07) Posted:
Forming another base camp to hit higher.
bishan22 ( Date: 30-Oct-2014 21:12) Posted:
|
|
|
Forming another base camp to hit higher.
bishan22 ( Date: 30-Oct-2014 21:12) Posted:
Next summit 475.
bishan22 ( Date: 20-Oct-2014 18:58) Posted:
Closed with a long white candle. Swee...
|
|
|
|
My apologies, SIA Engineering also has a bullish MACD weekly crossover like SATS.
The others are Wilmar Intl, Mapletree Ind Trust. SPH, SATs
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 15:32) Posted:
Having cleared the BG air, I could consider SIA Eng as a recovery stock, however, for safety, SATs is more attractive due to the fact that it has a MACD crossover on the weekly chart, and positive upswing.
The range of upswing, however, may not be attractive as some other counters with similar MACD weekly crossover. These are all considered safer investments for mid term.
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 15:26) Posted:
Actually, I read the fool article, it is not very precise, a little alak here and there. When you use Benjamin Graham' s name, you gotta stick to his principles, the title is wd BG buy SIA engineering.
Now looking at the fail for 5, 6, 7, the answer is no.
That' s what I mean when I say analysts always paint one picture to colour their own argument, using heavy names.
|
|
|
|
Having cleared the BG air, I could consider SIA Eng as a recovery stock, however, for safety, SATs is more attractive due to the fact that it has a MACD crossover on the weekly chart, and positive upswing.
The range of upswing, however, may not be attractive as some other counters with similar MACD weekly crossover. These are all considered safer investments for mid term.
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 15:26) Posted:
Actually, I read the fool article, it is not very precise, a little alak here and there. When you use Benjamin Graham' s name, you gotta stick to his principles, the title is wd BG buy SIA engineering.
Now looking at the fail for 5, 6, 7, the answer is no.
That' s what I mean when I say analysts always paint one picture to colour their own argument, using heavy names.
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 15:22) Posted:
Benjamin Graham said:
1. Adequate size of enterprise. sales > $100mln. Pass
2. Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition. Current ratio> 2 (pass), LT debt < net current assets (pass)
3. Earnings stability. positive eps for past 10 years. (pass for past 5 yrs)
4. Dividend record. Uninterrupted payments for 20 yrs. (pass for 5 yrs)
5. Earnings growth - 30% increase in eps over 10 yrs (fail for 5 yrs only 8%)
6. Moderae PE below 15 (fail, PE is 21.35)
7. Moderate Price to assets < 1.5 (fail, Price to bk is 3.75)
|
|
|
|
Actually, I read the fool article, it is not very precise, a little alak here and there. When you use Benjamin Graham' s name, you gotta stick to his principles, the title is wd BG buy SIA engineering.
Now looking at the fail for 5, 6, 7, the answer is no.
That' s what I mean when I say analysts always paint one picture to colour their own argument, using heavy names.
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 15:22) Posted:
Benjamin Graham said:
1. Adequate size of enterprise. sales > $100mln. Pass
2. Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition. Current ratio> 2 (pass), LT debt < net current assets (pass)
3. Earnings stability. positive eps for past 10 years. (pass for past 5 yrs)
4. Dividend record. Uninterrupted payments for 20 yrs. (pass for 5 yrs)
5. Earnings growth - 30% increase in eps over 10 yrs (fail for 5 yrs only 8%)
6. Moderae PE below 15 (fail, PE is 21.35)
7. Moderate Price to assets < 1.5 (fail, Price to bk is 3.75)
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 03:23) Posted:
Never did see Benjamin Graham gripe about current ratio.
I think acid test ratio is more critical for purposes of assessing liquidty, and for that I' d go further to scrutinise accounts receivable.
Not sure where the fool pick this up, let me check my Benjamin Graham book for clues. I never do trust analysts, they like to sensationalise and how lian, coz it' s not their money being invested.
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Graham said:
1. Adequate size of enterprise. sales > $100mln. Pass
2. Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition. Current ratio> 2 (pass), LT debt < net current assets (pass)
3. Earnings stability. positive eps for past 10 years. (pass for past 5 yrs)
4. Dividend record. Uninterrupted payments for 20 yrs. (pass for 5 yrs)
5. Earnings growth - 30% increase in eps over 10 yrs (fail for 5 yrs only 8%)
6. Moderae PE below 15 (fail, PE is 21.35)
7. Moderate Price to assets < 1.5 (fail, Price to bk is 3.75)
Kyoto2008 ( Date: 01-Nov-2014 03:23) Posted:
Never did see Benjamin Graham gripe about current ratio.
I think acid test ratio is more critical for purposes of assessing liquidty, and for that I' d go further to scrutinise accounts receivable.
Not sure where the fool pick this up, let me check my Benjamin Graham book for clues. I never do trust analysts, they like to sensationalise and how lian, coz it' s not their money being invested.
tobias_i_d ( Date: 26-Sep-2014 17:08) Posted:
However, working in SIA&rsquo s favour is the apparently low risk that an investment in the company carries. The company carries negligible debt of only S$25m, which is peanuts for a company with a book value of around S$1.4b. It also pales into insignificance when compared to the net current asset value of the company, which stands at just over S$930m.
The healthy balance sheet leaves SIA with a current ratio of three, which is comfortably above the value of two that Benjamin Graham would hope to see.
details below:
http://www.fool.sg/2014/09/24/would-benjamin-graham-buy-sia-engineering-company-limited/
|
|
|
|
Never did see Benjamin Graham gripe about current ratio.
I think acid test ratio is more critical for purposes of assessing liquidty, and for that I' d go further to scrutinise accounts receivable.
Not sure where the fool pick this up, let me check my Benjamin Graham book for clues. I never do trust analysts, they like to sensationalise and how lian, coz it' s not their money being invested.
tobias_i_d ( Date: 26-Sep-2014 17:08) Posted:
However, working in SIA&rsquo s favour is the apparently low risk that an investment in the company carries. The company carries negligible debt of only S$25m, which is peanuts for a company with a book value of around S$1.4b. It also pales into insignificance when compared to the net current asset value of the company, which stands at just over S$930m.
The healthy balance sheet leaves SIA with a current ratio of three, which is comfortably above the value of two that Benjamin Graham would hope to see.
details below:
http://www.fool.sg/2014/09/24/would-benjamin-graham-buy-sia-engineering-company-limited/
|
|
