mostly fake news lah.. i have a feeling that most of the western media always like to spread bad about china...if u notice..
 
A Flood of Toxic Loans in China Is a Bonanza for Debt Buyers
Bloomberg News
,
&lrm May&lrm &lrm 15&lrm , &lrm 2019&lrm &lrm 5&lrm :&lrm 00&lrm &lrm AM
-
Investors have more bargaining power as banks market NPLs: CDH
-
Bad loan packages become bigger and cheaper as supply jumps
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-14/a-flood-of-toxic-loans-in-china-is-a-bonanza-for-debt-buyers?srnd=premium-asia
' Big Short" investor Steve Eisman is worried about the bond market is where the pain will be.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/big-short-investor-steve-eisman-is-worried-about-the-bond-market-its-where-the-pain-will-be.html
 
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/big-short-investor-steve-eisman-is-worried-about-the-bond-market-its-where-the-pain-will-be.html
 
Chinese Onshore Defaults On Pace For Another Record Year In 2019
by: Adem Tumerkan
https://speculatorsanonymous.com/articles/chinese-onshore-defaults-2019/
 
Getting right to it. . .
Two months ago &ndash I wrote about the record-breaking onshore defaults that have plagued corporate China in 2018.
And &ndash further &ndash I hypothesized that this trend will continue over the next year.
(You can read that article here if you haven&rsquo t yet &ndash I even disclosed how I was personally playing the wave of coming defaults).
Now &ndash only a few months into 2019 &ndash and things are looking dire in corporate China.
Let me explain. . .
Thus far &ndash 2019&rsquo s shaping up as another record year for Chinese corporate defaults.
To give you some perspective &ndash in just the first four months of this year &ndash Chinese firms have defaulted on roughly 40 billion in yuan ($5.8 billion USD) worth of domestic bonds.
And &ndash according to Bloomberg &ndash that&rsquo s 350% more than during the same period last year.
Making matters worse &ndash many of these defaults are large Chinese firms. And some are even going right into bankruptcy.
For instance &ndash four huge private firms in Shandong (China&rsquo s third wealthiest province) have filed bankruptcy over the last few months.
Other firms haven&rsquo t out-right declared bankruptcy &ndash but are already behind many billions in missed bond-payments.
For example &ndash Neoglory Holding Group (a property investment conglomerate) has missed payments of seven-billion-yuan so far in 2019. (And this comes after they missed repaying interest and principle to bond holders in September 2018).
Another example &ndash Citic Guoan Group Company (which has interests ranging from financial investments to the property markets) defaulted on three-billion-yuan worth of bonds last month. And has at least another 15-billion-yuan worth of onshore bonds outstanding that are maturing.
It&rsquo s clear that unless anything substantially changes &ndash the trend&rsquo s set for another record-year of defaults throughout China.
But after the recent trade-deal breakdown &ndash and increased tariffs &ndash I think things will be much worse than the mainstream expects.
You see &ndash China&rsquo s stuck between a rock-and-hard-place. . .
On the one side &ndash Chinese firms are suffering softer sales and slowing growth. This is crippling their ability to repay maturing bonds.
And on the other side &ndash Chinese firms are feeling the effects of the Federal Reserve&rsquo s tightening (and a stronger U.S. dollar).
They&rsquo re having difficulty refinancing and repaying dollar-debts (of which there&rsquo s $2.25 trillion that Chinese firms owe over the next 30 months).
Thus &ndash the Chinese government has repeatedly pressed banks to extend credit to private domestic corporations (specifically small-and-medium sized firms).
But the problem here is &ndash most debt is denominated in U.S. dollars
Meaning &ndash Chinese firms need U.S. dollars to repay their loans.
But &ndash like I wrote about a couple weeks ago &ndash Chinese banks are suffering their own dollar-shortage.
Take a look at the combined dollar-liabilities of China&rsquo s four largest commercial banks. . .
First &ndash it was Chinese firms that were short on dollars-assets compared to dollar-liabilities.
Now &ndash   major Chinese banks are short on dollar-assets compared to dollar-liabilities.
What&rsquo s next? Will we see Chinese banks begin to default?
I wouldn&rsquo t be surprised. . .
For instance &ndash two weeks ago &ndash China Minsheng Investment Group (a private equity investment firm) defaulted on dollar-debts worth $800 million &ndash with $300 million of that debt guaranteed  by China Construction Bank.
And so far &ndash investors remain confident that the bank will honor that $300 million dollar-debt.
But &ndash with Chinese banks already drained of dollar-assets &ndash they can&rsquo t afford to be stuck paying all these corporate defaults.
And eventually &ndash the market will begin to notice. . .
The current situation in China has a striking similarity to what Japan dealt with in the 1990&rsquo s &ndash when overly-inflated asset bubbles (which were pumped up by years of cheap debt) began collapsing.
Unfortunately &ndash like Japan learned &ndash the further the asset side sinks, the more difficult the liabilities side becomes to deal with.
(Eventually &ndash Japanese banks suffered credit rating downgrades and found it difficult to raise dollars from overseas to refinance massive loans which turned into non-performing assets).
So &ndash in summary &ndash I expect further stress in corporate China. Especially as the yuan weakens (making it difficult to repay dollar-debts).
This stress will effect the Chinese banking sector  &ndash which is reaching a &lsquo tipping-point&rsquo &ndash and make the system highly fragile.
Eventually &ndash the grossly indebted Chinese economy will deflate &ndash showing how horrible the malinvestment was over the years of cheap money.
According to Hyman Minsky&rsquo s Financial Instability Hypothesis (FIH) &ndash the Chinese economy is in the &lsquo Ponzi Stage&rsquo .
This is the last stage in the bubble. When debtor cash-flows can&rsquo t cover interest payments or repay the principle due &ndash and soon must liquidate assets &ndash causing prices to collapse.
Maybe next time, more will understand that &ldquo the bigger the boom, the bigger the eventual bust.&rdquo
https://speculatorsanonymous.com/articles/chinese-onshore-defaults-2019/
 
Getting right to it. . .
Two months ago &ndash I wrote about the record-breaking onshore defaults that have plagued corporate China in 2018.
And &ndash further &ndash I hypothesized that this trend will continue over the next year.
(You can read that article here if you haven&rsquo t yet &ndash I even disclosed how I was personally playing the wave of coming defaults).
Now &ndash only a few months into 2019 &ndash and things are looking dire in corporate China.
Let me explain. . .
Thus far &ndash 2019&rsquo s shaping up as another record year for Chinese corporate defaults.
To give you some perspective &ndash in just the first four months of this year &ndash Chinese firms have defaulted on roughly 40 billion in yuan ($5.8 billion USD) worth of domestic bonds.
And &ndash according to Bloomberg &ndash that&rsquo s 350% more than during the same period last year.
Making matters worse &ndash many of these defaults are large Chinese firms. And some are even going right into bankruptcy.
For instance &ndash four huge private firms in Shandong (China&rsquo s third wealthiest province) have filed bankruptcy over the last few months.
Other firms haven&rsquo t out-right declared bankruptcy &ndash but are already behind many billions in missed bond-payments.
For example &ndash Neoglory Holding Group (a property investment conglomerate) has missed payments of seven-billion-yuan so far in 2019. (And this comes after they missed repaying interest and principle to bond holders in September 2018).
Another example &ndash Citic Guoan Group Company (which has interests ranging from financial investments to the property markets) defaulted on three-billion-yuan worth of bonds last month. And has at least another 15-billion-yuan worth of onshore bonds outstanding that are maturing.
It&rsquo s clear that unless anything substantially changes &ndash the trend&rsquo s set for another record-year of defaults throughout China.
But after the recent trade-deal breakdown &ndash and increased tariffs &ndash I think things will be much worse than the mainstream expects.
You see &ndash China&rsquo s stuck between a rock-and-hard-place. . .
On the one side &ndash Chinese firms are suffering softer sales and slowing growth. This is crippling their ability to repay maturing bonds.
And on the other side &ndash Chinese firms are feeling the effects of the Federal Reserve&rsquo s tightening (and a stronger U.S. dollar).
They&rsquo re having difficulty refinancing and repaying dollar-debts (of which there&rsquo s $2.25 trillion that Chinese firms owe over the next 30 months).
Thus &ndash the Chinese government has repeatedly pressed banks to extend credit to private domestic corporations (specifically small-and-medium sized firms).
But the problem here is &ndash most debt is denominated in U.S. dollars
Meaning &ndash Chinese firms need U.S. dollars to repay their loans.
But &ndash like I wrote about a couple weeks ago &ndash Chinese banks are suffering their own dollar-shortage.
Take a look at the combined dollar-liabilities of China&rsquo s four largest commercial banks. . .
First &ndash it was Chinese firms that were short on dollars-assets compared to dollar-liabilities.
Now &ndash   major Chinese banks are short on dollar-assets compared to dollar-liabilities.
What&rsquo s next? Will we see Chinese banks begin to default?
I wouldn&rsquo t be surprised. . .
For instance &ndash two weeks ago &ndash China Minsheng Investment Group (a private equity investment firm) defaulted on dollar-debts worth $800 million &ndash with $300 million of that debt guaranteed  by China Construction Bank.
And so far &ndash investors remain confident that the bank will honor that $300 million dollar-debt.
But &ndash with Chinese banks already drained of dollar-assets &ndash they can&rsquo t afford to be stuck paying all these corporate defaults.
And eventually &ndash the market will begin to notice. . .
The current situation in China has a striking similarity to what Japan dealt with in the 1990&rsquo s &ndash when overly-inflated asset bubbles (which were pumped up by years of cheap debt) began collapsing.
Unfortunately &ndash like Japan learned &ndash the further the asset side sinks, the more difficult the liabilities side becomes to deal with.
(Eventually &ndash Japanese banks suffered credit rating downgrades and found it difficult to raise dollars from overseas to refinance massive loans which turned into non-performing assets).
So &ndash in summary &ndash I expect further stress in corporate China. Especially as the yuan weakens (making it difficult to repay dollar-debts).
This stress will effect the Chinese banking sector  &ndash which is reaching a &lsquo tipping-point&rsquo &ndash and make the system highly fragile.
Eventually &ndash the grossly indebted Chinese economy will deflate &ndash showing how horrible the malinvestment was over the years of cheap money.
According to Hyman Minsky&rsquo s Financial Instability Hypothesis (FIH) &ndash the Chinese economy is in the &lsquo Ponzi Stage&rsquo .
This is the last stage in the bubble. When debtor cash-flows can&rsquo t cover interest payments or repay the principle due &ndash and soon must liquidate assets &ndash causing prices to collapse.
Maybe next time, more will understand that &ldquo the bigger the boom, the bigger the eventual bust.&rdquo
| Week of 6 May 2019 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Institutional investors net sell (-S$135.9m) vs. (+S$88.3m) a week ago |   |   |   |   | ||
| Retail investors net buy (+S$273.3m) vs. (-S$136.7m) a week ago |   |   |   |   | ||
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Top 10 Institution Net Buy (+) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 6 May | Top 10 Institution Net Sell (-) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 6 May |   |
| Singtel | Z74 | 25.8 | DBS | D05 | (56.4) |   |
| ST Engineering | S63 | 15.0 | Venture Corporation | V03 | (30.6) |   |
| Jardine Cycle & Carriage | C07 | 9.9 | UOB  | U11 | (22.9) |   |
| CapitaLand Mall Trust | C38U | 7.4 | CapitaLand | C31 | (18.5) |   |
| SGX | S68 | 6.6 | Sembcorp Marine | S51 | (17.6) |   |
| SATS | S58 | 3.5 | OCBC | O39 | (15.6) |   |
| City Developments | C09 | 3.3 | CapitaLand Commercial Trust | C61U | (10.4) |   |
| Jardine Strategic  | J37 | 3.1 | ComfortDelGro | C52 | (8.4) |   |
| Keppel REIT | K71U | 2.8 | AEM Holdings | AWX | (7.2) |   |
| Best World International | CGN | 2.7 | Suntec REIT | T82U | (6.8) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Top 10 Retail Net Buy (+) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 6 May | Top 10 Retail Net Sell (-) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 6 May |   |
| DBS | D05 | 72.5 | ST Engineering | S63 | (12.9) |   |
| UOB | U11 | 55.7 | Singtel | Z74 | (12.9) |   |
| OCBC | O39 | 48.4 | SGX | S68 | (6.1) |   |
| Venture Corporation | V03 | 27.4 | Yangzijiang Shipbuilding | BS6 | (5.2) |   |
| Genting Singapore | G13 | 20.2 | CapitaLand Mall Trust | C38U | (4.2) |   |
| Sembcorp Marine | S51 | 19.3 | Wilmar International | F34 | (2.9) |   |
| CapitaLand | C31 | 17.0 | Mapletree Logistics Trust | M44U | (2.8) |   |
| City Developments | C09 | 10.1 | Sheng Siong Group | OV8 | (2.5) |   |
| Suntec REIT | T82U | 9.0 | Haw Par Corporation | H02 | (2.3) |   |
| AEM Holdings | AWX | 8.8 | StarHub | CC3 | (2.1) |   |
DBS broke 26....the other 2 olso kenna hit........... as expected...... on significant exposure to China and Greater China.
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/stocks/stocks-to-watch-dbs-keppel-corp-sarine-technologies-nordic-group-swee-hong
 
" DBS: Citi Investment Research has downgraded DBS from ' buy' to ' neutral' and lowered its target price from S$31.10 to S$27 due to its exposure to China amid uncertainties over a US-China trade deal. This after the United States increased tariffs on US$200 billion of Chinese imports from 10 to 25 per cent on Friday. The research unit said DBS is the most exposed of its peers to the China market, and may be impacted by market risks and potential interest cuts. It added " DBS will prefer to keep fuller capital buffers than pay higher dividends" . DBS shares closed down 0.19 per cent, or S$0.05 at S$26.55 on Friday."
 
Aft xd, another 40ponts
Sgvale ( Date: 09-May-2019 09:20) Posted:
|
If I remember correctly, DBS has the largest exposure to China and Greater China among tghe 3 banks by value.  IMO.
Sgvale ( Date: 09-May-2019 09:20) Posted:
|
Can pick some bank counter. DBS.
What is the 25% increase in tariff going to do to the Chinese Companies?......Biz sentiment...........consumer sentiments...............  How will our bank be affected? 
How much more default before it affects our Bank' s exposure to China and Greater China?
Luzern ( Date: 08-May-2019 09:34) Posted:
|
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-07/china-defaults-hit-record-in-2018-the-2019-pace-is-triple-that?srnd=premium-asia
China Defaults Hit Record in 2018. The 2019 Pace Is Triple That.
Bloomberg News,
&lrm May&lrm &lrm 8&lrm , &lrm 2019&lrm &lrm 5&lrm :&lrm 00&lrm &lrm AM
-
Neoglory has the inglorious title of biggest 2019 defaulter
-
A state-linked issuer is among the five biggest in year so far
 
Update: China still " preparing" delegation for US trip despite Donald Trump' s threat to increase tariffs
Updated: 4:29pm, 6 May, 2019
China is still preparing to send a delegation to Washington for the trade talks despite the latest threats by US President Donald Trump to increase tariffs, Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said on Monday.
" There have been many times that the US side has threatened to increase tariffs," Geng said when asked about Trump' s tweets on Sunday which threatened to impose punitive tariffs on US$200 billion of imports from China tariffs beginning on Friday. China' s positions are clear and the US side is well aware of them."
" [We have hoped] to make progress in our trade talks and [we] hope the US side can work together with us and move in the same direction so we can achieve a deal that can benefit both sides. Everyone in China and abroad is very concerned about the next round of talks, and we are also learning about the relevant changes. The Chinese delegation is preparing to go to the US for the negotiations."  
Liu could depart Beijing on Thursday, three days later than previously scheduled, and leave Washington a day later, the source who has been briefed on the latest arrangements confirmed.
https://www.scmp.com/economy/global-economy/article/3008973/china-vice-premier-liu-he-likely-delay-us-trip-three-days
So this has happened, with Trump gaining the upper hand on good US data and slowing China data.  Trump is pushing China knowing he has the advantage and China is hurting.  Trump can afford to drag this longer with the strong US economy and Rate Cut if needed to back him up.
Luzern ( Date: 29-Mar-2019 14:44) Posted:
|
HNA Unit Faces Seizures After Default on Interest Payment
 
-
Firm needs to repay debt by April 17 to prevent asset freeze
-  
Cross-default triggered on its HK$766 million loan facility
-
 
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-16/hna-unit-defaults-on-interest-payment-faces-asset-seizures?srnd=premium-asia
 
| Week of 25 to 28 March 2019 |   |   |   |   |   |
| Institutional investors net buy (+S$16.7m) vs. (-S$33.5m) a week ago |   |   | |||
| Retail investors net buy (+S$83.4m) vs. (-S$89.2m) a week ago |   |   |   | ||
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Top 10 Institution Net Buy (+) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 25 to 28 Mar | Top 10 Institution Net Sell (-) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 25 to 28 Mar |
| CapitaLand | C31 | 21.4 | OCBC | O39 | (38.2) |
| Ascendas REIT | A17U | 19.0 | Keppel Infrastructure Trust | A7RU | (13.1) |
| Jardine Matheson | J36 | 11.9 | SIA | C6L | (8.9) |
| Venture Corporation | V03 | 10.7 | GSH Corporation | BDX | (7.3) |
| ComfortDelGro | C52 | 10.4 | City Developments | C09 | (6.7) |
| UOL Group | U14 | 10.0 | CapitaLand Mall Trust | C38U | (6.0) |
| Thai Beverage | Y92 | 6.4 | SPH | T39 | (5.4) |
| Singtel | Z74 | 5.9 | StarHub  | CC3 | (4.3) |
| Dairy Farm International | D01 | 5.5 | Best World International | CGN | (3.6) |
| Mapletree North Asia Commercial Trust | RW0U | 3.9 | SGX | S68 | (3.5) |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Top 10 Retail Net Buy (+) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 25 to 28 Mar | Top 10 Retail Net Sell (-) Stocks (S$M) | Stock Code | Week of 25 to 28 Mar |
| OCBC | O39 | 46.5 | CapitaLand | C31 | (18.2) |
| Keppel Infrastructure Trust | A7RU | 14.2 | Thai Beverage | Y92 | (10.2) |
| UOB | U11 | 12.5 | UOL Group | U14 | (5.8) |
| DBS | D05 | 11.2 | ComfortDelGro | C52 | (5.5) |
| SIA | C6L | 9.0 | Ascendas REIT | A17U | (5.2) |
| SGX | S68 | 8.4 | Dairy Farm International | D01 | (3.9) |
| AEM Holdings | AWX | 7.9 | Mapletree North Asia Commercial Trust | RW0U | (3.4) |
| GSH Corporation | BDX | 7.3 | Keppel REIT | K71U | (2.6) |
| StarHub | CC3 | 5.9 | Far East Hospitality Trust | Q5T | (2.3) |
| City Developments | C09 | 4.9 | Fraser Logistics & Industrial Trust | BUOU | (2.1) |
China, U.S. Pore Over Details of Agreement Text to End Trade War
 -
Mnuchin sends tweet saying talks concluded, were constructive
-
Officials want no discrepencies in translations: People
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-29/china-u-s-said-to-pore-over-details-of-text-to-end-trade-war?srnd=premium-asia
Luzern ( Date: 29-Mar-2019 14:44) Posted:
|
I am not expecting much from the current US-China Trade talk.  There is unlikely to be anything concrete result or committement.    Both sides are still testing the others.  It is most likely going to drag a little more while both sides look for and fight for more leverage.  Delay tactics until the other side stumble into an unfavourable/bad positions. 
IMO, DYODD
IMO, DYODD
Investment banking fees fall a quarter to US$173 mil in 1Q: Refinitiv
 
28/03/19, 05:03 pm
SINGAPORE (Mar 28): Singapore investment banking activities generated US$172.8 million ($234 million) in fees in the first quarter ended Wednesday, which was 24.8% lower compared to a year ago.
This according to the latest 1Q19 Singapore Investment Banking Review preliminary data published yesterday by Thomson Reuter& rsquo s Refinitiv.
Advisory fees for completed mergers and acquisitions (M& A) came in 63.6% lower at US$45.2 million from a record high of US$124.0 million in 1Q18.
The report also saw ECM underwriting fees increased 279.1% y-o-y to a six-year high of US$60.8 million, while fees from DCM underwriting fees also increased 14.9% to US$51.9 million.
Syndicated lending fees however saw a 66.5% decline to US$14.9 million, after a strong 1Q18.................
https://www.theedgesingapore.com/investment-banking-fees-fall-quarter-us173-mil-1q-refinitiv
 
By:  Samantha Chiew
SINGAPORE (Mar 28): Singapore investment banking activities generated US$172.8 million ($234 million) in fees in the first quarter ended Wednesday, which was 24.8% lower compared to a year ago.
This according to the latest 1Q19 Singapore Investment Banking Review preliminary data published yesterday by Thomson Reuter& rsquo s Refinitiv.
Advisory fees for completed mergers and acquisitions (M& A) came in 63.6% lower at US$45.2 million from a record high of US$124.0 million in 1Q18.
 
The report also saw ECM underwriting fees increased 279.1% y-o-y to a six-year high of US$60.8 million, while fees from DCM underwriting fees also increased 14.9% to US$51.9 million.
Syndicated lending fees however saw a 66.5% decline to US$14.9 million, after a strong 1Q18.................
https://www.theedgesingapore.com/investment-banking-fees-fall-quarter-us173-mil-1q-refinitiv