Home
Login Register
Alpha Integrated RE    Last:0.48   -

SABANA REIT

 Post Reply 301-320 of 1690
 
Joelton
    15-May-2024 10:10  
Contact    Quote!
ESR attempts to halt Sabana Reit&rsquo s May 24 EGM
The meeting is to be held by Sabana&rsquo s external manager to consider resolutions raised by activist investor Quarz Capital and four other unitholders of the Reit
 
SABANA Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust&rsquo s (Sabana Reit) sponsor ESR Group has filed an application to the High Court of Singapore to stop the Reit&rsquo s May 24 extraordinary general meeting (EGM).
 
On Tuesday (May 14), the Reit manager said this was to allow for the final disposal of HC/OA 19/2024, which is the originating application filed by trustee HSBC Institutional Trust Services to seek a declaration that amendments to the trust deed are required to implement the resolutions approved at last year&rsquo s EGM.
 
ESR had also sought to block last year&rsquo s meeting, though its application for an interim injunction to do so was dismissed by the High Court.
 
At the EGM which was eventually held on Aug 7, unitholders of Sabana Reit voted in favour of its internalisation. Two resolutions were passed at the meeting &ndash one to remove Sabana Real Estate Investment Management as the Reit&rsquo s manager, and the other to effect the internalisation of the Reit management function.
 
The May 24 EGM is to be held by Sabana&rsquo s external manager to consider resolutions set out by a Mar 25, 2024 requisition letter issued by activist investor Quarz Capital and four other unitholders of the Reit.
 
These resolutions were subsequently revised in an April 18 letter.
 
As ESR seeks to hold the EGM in abeyance ahead of its scheduled date on May 24, the manager of Sabana Reit said it will provide further updates on ESR&rsquo s application should material developments arise.
 
ESR has further requested liberty to apply for further directions in respect of the EGM, and for the costs of the court application to be provided.
 
It also asked for further, or other relief, as the court sees fit.
 
 
Joelton
    23-Apr-2024 10:42  
Contact    Quote!
Sabana Reit sponsor will not need to abstain from voting on trust deed amendments: SGX RegCo
As the trust deed is a constituent document governing Sabana Reit, any amendments thereto would affect all unitholders, including the sponsor and its related parties, the regulator says
 
SABANA Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust : M1GU 0%&rsquo s (Sabana Reit) sponsor, ESR Group, and its related parties will not need to abstain from voting on any proposed trust deed amendments, the Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo) said.
 
This is because the amendments will affect all unitholders, which include the sponsor and its related parties, according to a reply letter dated Apr 18 that was released on Monday (Apr 22).
 
The response comes amid the Reit&rsquo s move to internalise its management function following a vote by unitholders at an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on Aug 7, 2023.
 
SGX RegCo noted that ESR Group, which was against internalisation, participated in the voting process along with its related parties at the time. The sponsor owns the manager and has a 20.6 per cent interest in Sabana Reit.
 
Sabana Reit&rsquo s sponsor, trustee, manager and the Sabana Growth Internalisation Committee (SGIC) separately consulted the SGX RegCo and Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) on whether the sponsor and its related parties should abstain from voting.
 
In January, the trustee filed a court application to seek a declaration that amendments to the trust deed are required to implement the resolutions approved at the August 2023 EGM, and that its power to certify certain amendments to the trust deed is discretionary rather than obligatory.
 
&ldquo As the trust deed is a constituent document governing Sabana Reit, any amendments thereto would affect all unitholders, including the sponsor and its related parties,&rdquo SGX RegCo noted.
 
It added that trust deed amendments are not proposed to benefit the interest of any specific unitholder, but to effect the internalisation. All unitholders, including ESR Group and its related parties, should be able to vote.
 
Therefore, should an EGM be necessary, the regulator is of the view that there is no requirement under listing rules for the sponsor and its related parties to be &ldquo disenfranchised from voting&rdquo on the trust deed amendments.
 
The regulator also urged all parties to work cohesively so their needs are satisfactorily met. It is cognisant that any further delay in implementing the internalisation would not be in the interest of unitholders.
 
 
Secret_Squirrel
    21-Apr-2024 11:52  
Contact    Quote!
SABANA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.
 
Annual General Meeting::Voluntary
Date & Time
23 Apr 2024 10:30 AM
Location
Hope@New Tech Park, 151 Lorong Chuan, #02-06 (Lobby F) Singapore 556741
 

 
MrBear12
    20-Apr-2024 07:47  
Contact    Quote!
Calling Jandec,
What is your view?
This can keep long long??
 
 
sealTeam3
    19-Apr-2024 14:51  
Contact    Quote!
If it' s so tough, ESR should just volunteer to internalize the manager then! Internalization, afterall, will benefit all unitholders right.. ooops, I guess it' s hard to give up on the profit  wink  why share when one can have it all.. 
It' s funny that people blame it on the good guys who try to make it fair for everyone. Should question the one who creates the problem in the first place  cheeky 
 
 
Joelton
    16-Apr-2024 10:14  
Contact    Quote!
Sabana Reit to hold requisitioned EGM on or before May 25
 
THE manager of Sabana Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust (Reit) said on Monday (Apr 15) that it intends to convene the requisitioned extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on or before May 25.
 
This is to consider the resolutions proposed in the requisition notice released on Mar 26, in which the requisitioners requested that the requisitioned resolutions be tabled at the annual general meeting (AGM) on Apr 23, or the EGM be held right after the AGM at the same venue.
 
The manager added that due to the closeness in time between the AGM and EGM, it is unable to accede to the requisitioners&rsquo request, as it needs time to prepare for the convening of the EGM according to relevant regulatory and legal requirements.
 
The notice of the requisitioned EGM as well as the circular containing material information relating to the requisitioned resolutions will be issued to unitholders in due course, in accordance with the relevant notice period required under the trust deed, said the manager.
 

 
Joelton
    16-Apr-2024 10:13  
Contact    Quote!
Sabana Reit&rsquo s occupancy falls to 83% more staff resign from manager amid internalisation uncertainties
 
SABANA Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust (Sabana Reit) has reported a decline in portfolio occupancy in the first quarter of 2024, due to the repossession of properties at Penjuru Lane.
 
The manager said in a business update on Monday (Apr 15) that its portfolio occupancy slipped from 91.2 per cent in Q4 2023 to 83 per cent in Q1 2024, due to the repossession of 33 and 35 Penjuru Lane, which were previously master-leased.
 
Meanwhile, the manager noted it has faced high staff attrition amid the uncertainties following Quarz Capital&rsquo s bid to internalise the manager function of the Reit.
 
The total resignation rate for the manager since the internalisation bid began last June has climbed to 47.6 per cent as at Apr 15. While some replacements have been hired, not all vacancies are filled, and the manager said it will continue to &ldquo proactively hire to fill vacancies&rdquo .
 
Sabana Reit has also incurred over S$7.2 million in expenses in connection with holding extraordinary general meetings requisitioned for the purpose of internalisation, as well as internalisation expenses.
 
Donald Han, chief executive officer of the manager, said it has been a &ldquo very difficult&rdquo first quarter for the Reit, amid the uncertainties arising from the internalisation process.
 
&ldquo These challenges have been compounded by the unexpected turn of 33 and 35 Penjuru Lane repossession on Mar 8, 2024 where portfolio occupancy slid to 83 per cent,&rdquo he added.
 
Excluding the Penjuru Lane properties, portfolio occupancy would have remained stable at 91.3 per cent.
 
Sabana Reit filed a claim last November against Kleio One-Solution for possession of the Penjuru lane premises and payment of arrears in rent and other payments owed to the Reit. 
 
The Reit has taken possession of the properties, and is currently pursuing the necessary legal proceedings to claim approximately S$4 million from Kleio, the manager said.
 
Han noted that the remarketing of the properties is progressing well, and the manager is &ldquo anticipating offers from third party logistic firms&rdquo .
 
Meanwhile, the property at 1 Tuas Ave 4 &ndash which has been undergoing an asset enhancement initiative &ndash is progressing towards a June 2024 temporary occupation permit (TOP) date, and the manager is currently engaging prospective tenants. 
 
The Reit signed new and renewed leases totalling 139,426 square feet in the first quarter, with a positive 23.7 per cent rental reversion.
 
Aggregate leverage rose slightly to 35.6 per cent as at March 2024, from 34.3 per cent in December 2023. Average all-in financing cost climbed to 4.01 per cent from 3.89 per cent over the same period.
 
 
eddyeddy
    15-Apr-2024 23:21  
Contact    Quote!
Very bad result !

MrBear12      ( Date: 15-Apr-2024 22:57) Posted:

https://sabana.listedcompany.com/news.html/id/2487432

See 1q results yourself.

People quitting the reit.

Sinking ship.

Get your life jacket and hop on the next lifeboat.

 
 
MrBear12
    15-Apr-2024 22:57  
Contact    Quote!
https://sabana.listedcompany.com/news.html/id/2487432

See 1q results yourself.

People quitting the reit.

Sinking ship.

Get your life jacket and hop on the next lifeboat.
 
 
RumbaRambo
    15-Apr-2024 12:23  
Contact    Quote!
At almost all SG REITs the sponsor has such a big stake that it can block any trust deed amendments. So SG is stuck with the external manager model although there is consensus that the external model is superior. The regulator allows external managers to be replaced by just a 50% majority. Why isn' t that possible for internalisation? 

Joelton      ( Date: 13-Apr-2024 13:36) Posted:

Sabana REIT&rsquo s unitholder explains why Trust Deed changes need EGM
 
In another shot across the bow of Sabana Industrial REIT&rsquo s contentious internalisation journey, unitholder Chan Wai Kheong, better known as Charlie Chan, has written to Sabana REIT&rsquo s manager in support of HSBC Institutional Trust&rsquo s (the Trustee).
 
For those that were present at the REIT&rsquo s March 8 EGM, the Trustee bore the brunt of unitholders&rsquo somewhat contentious questions and comments. The EGM was requisitioned mainly by Quarz Capital Asia. On March 25, Quarz requisitioned a third EGM.  
 
In his letter, which was co-signed and supported by three more unitholders, Chan pointed out that the Trust Deed and its provisions should reign supreme and amended only with a supermajority. He likens the Trust Deed to a country&rsquo s constitution. The government can change with 51% but the constitution can only be amended by a two-thirds majority in parliament.
 
&ldquo I look to the Trust Deed to set out the structure of our investment vehicle and to regulate who can make investments for the REIT and what the REIT can invest in. The structure and setup of the external manager are all clearly spelt out,&rdquo Chan writes in his letter. " The Sabana Trustee is seeking to act properly in accordance with good corporate governance in wanting to put forward trust deed amendments for unitholders to consider and approve but a few unitholders are trying to prevent the democratic process from running its course," he says, adding that the Trustee is seeking guidance from the Court and the Court process should be respected. 
 
Chan reminds us that back in July last year, the Trustee had already warned unitholders that it would have to hold two or more EGMs to approve specific and necessary amendments to the Trust Deed by way of extraordinary resolution.
 
On Apr 9, the Trustee spelt out these amendments in Appendix C to its announcement to unitholders.   These include the treatment of the New Internalised Manager as an Authorised Investment of the REIT restriction of holding 20% or more of the internalised REIT disclosure of interest Lending, Borrowing and Raising Money for the Manager and establishment of, acquisition of and/or investments into subsidiaries of the Manager.
 
The amendments to the Trust Deed are key changes. The treatment of the New Internalised Manager as an authorised investment of the REIT is one of the main changes and key to internalisation, or else Quarz&rsquo s raison d&rsquo ê tre for internalisation falls flat. The Trust Deed does not authorise Sabana REIT to hold unlisted shares in a company providing internal REIT management functions and to invest in its own manager. If this is not amended, there is a risk that Sabana REIT is operating in breach of its Trust Deed which could result in action taken by either unitholders or other stakeholders, the Trustee cautions.
 
Additionally, if Clause 16.4 of the Trust Deed is not amended, the New Internalised Manager would not be permitted to invest trust monies into securities of, or lend trust monies to, itself or its subsidiaries such as the Property Manager.
 
&ldquo The Trust Deed should give Sabana Industrial REIT the flexibility, if it chooses to replicate the Existing Property Management Structure, to permit the New Internalised Manager to hold and provide funding from Sabana Industrial REIT to a property manager subsidiary,&rdquo the Trustee says.
 
Moreover, upon internalisation, unitholders will be regarded as having an interest in the shares of the New Internalised Manager in proportion to their respective unitholding in Sabana REIT.
 
&ldquo Accordingly, a unitholder will have to meet and maintain certain qualifications prescribed by the MAS if it acquires, holds or controls 20% or more of the units of Sabana REIT, such as being a fit and proper person,&rdquo the Trustee says. If this Trust Deed amendment is not adopted, the New Internalised Manager will not have the ability to " clawback" units that were acquired above the permitted limit without MAS approval so as to resolve the relevant breaches of the Regulatory Requirements under the Securities & Futures Act and its capital markets services licence. 
 
Coincidentally, Volare, who has voted with Quarz in the Quarz requisitioned EGMs, raised its stake to 17.01% as announced on SGXnet on Apr 9.
 
Also on Apr 9, the Trustee had stated that piecemeal proposals to avoid an EGM, which will allow all Unitholders to properly consider the internalisation including Trust Deed amendments, do not serve the interests of Sabana REIT and its unitholders.
 
Analysts have said they agree with Chan when he says in his letter: &ldquo I feel it is time for the requisionists to realise they cannot be chipping away at the proper governance of the REIT and passing numerous ordinary resolutions to effect the change to an internal model.&rdquo

 

 
MrBear12
    13-Apr-2024 17:05  
Contact    Quote!
Don' t just talk. Take time to Listen
Look, I found this REITS Symposium on investingnote
and there are discounts for early birds 1 or 2 pax.

HURRY! 
While places last.
The best place to learn about REITs.
You will learn about the pitfalls of investing in REITS and why Sabana has ended up like this.


What are you waiting for?

SIGN UP Below
REITs Symposium (reitsymposium.com)
See you there before the EGM for Sabana!
 
 
 
MrBear12
    13-Apr-2024 14:23  
Contact    Quote!
人 们 性 生 活 减 少 的 真 正 原 因  - BBC 英 伦 网

This ship is enough to fit the garbage?

Jandec      ( Date: 13-Apr-2024 01:41) Posted:

Who is trying to show off?  Examine yourself, what facts have you presented that are accurate?  Haven' t you presented nothing but nonsense, fit for the garbage bin?   
Is there a rule a non-shareholder cannot post?    Did you even think of this before you start writing? 

aragosta      ( Date: 13-Apr-2024 00:53) Posted:

--- Post Removed by User ---


 
 
Joelton
    13-Apr-2024 13:36  
Contact    Quote!
Sabana REIT&rsquo s unitholder explains why Trust Deed changes need EGM
 
In another shot across the bow of Sabana Industrial REIT&rsquo s contentious internalisation journey, unitholder Chan Wai Kheong, better known as Charlie Chan, has written to Sabana REIT&rsquo s manager in support of HSBC Institutional Trust&rsquo s (the Trustee).
 
For those that were present at the REIT&rsquo s March 8 EGM, the Trustee bore the brunt of unitholders&rsquo somewhat contentious questions and comments. The EGM was requisitioned mainly by Quarz Capital Asia. On March 25, Quarz requisitioned a third EGM.  
 
In his letter, which was co-signed and supported by three more unitholders, Chan pointed out that the Trust Deed and its provisions should reign supreme and amended only with a supermajority. He likens the Trust Deed to a country&rsquo s constitution. The government can change with 51% but the constitution can only be amended by a two-thirds majority in parliament.
 
&ldquo I look to the Trust Deed to set out the structure of our investment vehicle and to regulate who can make investments for the REIT and what the REIT can invest in. The structure and setup of the external manager are all clearly spelt out,&rdquo Chan writes in his letter. " The Sabana Trustee is seeking to act properly in accordance with good corporate governance in wanting to put forward trust deed amendments for unitholders to consider and approve but a few unitholders are trying to prevent the democratic process from running its course," he says, adding that the Trustee is seeking guidance from the Court and the Court process should be respected. 
 
Chan reminds us that back in July last year, the Trustee had already warned unitholders that it would have to hold two or more EGMs to approve specific and necessary amendments to the Trust Deed by way of extraordinary resolution.
 
On Apr 9, the Trustee spelt out these amendments in Appendix C to its announcement to unitholders.   These include the treatment of the New Internalised Manager as an Authorised Investment of the REIT restriction of holding 20% or more of the internalised REIT disclosure of interest Lending, Borrowing and Raising Money for the Manager and establishment of, acquisition of and/or investments into subsidiaries of the Manager.
 
The amendments to the Trust Deed are key changes. The treatment of the New Internalised Manager as an authorised investment of the REIT is one of the main changes and key to internalisation, or else Quarz&rsquo s raison d&rsquo ê tre for internalisation falls flat. The Trust Deed does not authorise Sabana REIT to hold unlisted shares in a company providing internal REIT management functions and to invest in its own manager. If this is not amended, there is a risk that Sabana REIT is operating in breach of its Trust Deed which could result in action taken by either unitholders or other stakeholders, the Trustee cautions.
 
Additionally, if Clause 16.4 of the Trust Deed is not amended, the New Internalised Manager would not be permitted to invest trust monies into securities of, or lend trust monies to, itself or its subsidiaries such as the Property Manager.
 
&ldquo The Trust Deed should give Sabana Industrial REIT the flexibility, if it chooses to replicate the Existing Property Management Structure, to permit the New Internalised Manager to hold and provide funding from Sabana Industrial REIT to a property manager subsidiary,&rdquo the Trustee says.
 
Moreover, upon internalisation, unitholders will be regarded as having an interest in the shares of the New Internalised Manager in proportion to their respective unitholding in Sabana REIT.
 
&ldquo Accordingly, a unitholder will have to meet and maintain certain qualifications prescribed by the MAS if it acquires, holds or controls 20% or more of the units of Sabana REIT, such as being a fit and proper person,&rdquo the Trustee says. If this Trust Deed amendment is not adopted, the New Internalised Manager will not have the ability to " clawback" units that were acquired above the permitted limit without MAS approval so as to resolve the relevant breaches of the Regulatory Requirements under the Securities & Futures Act and its capital markets services licence. 
 
Coincidentally, Volare, who has voted with Quarz in the Quarz requisitioned EGMs, raised its stake to 17.01% as announced on SGXnet on Apr 9.
 
Also on Apr 9, the Trustee had stated that piecemeal proposals to avoid an EGM, which will allow all Unitholders to properly consider the internalisation including Trust Deed amendments, do not serve the interests of Sabana REIT and its unitholders.
 
Analysts have said they agree with Chan when he says in his letter: &ldquo I feel it is time for the requisionists to realise they cannot be chipping away at the proper governance of the REIT and passing numerous ordinary resolutions to effect the change to an internal model.&rdquo
 
 
MrBear12
    13-Apr-2024 12:53  
Contact    Quote!
 
 
MrBear12
    13-Apr-2024 09:05  
Contact    Quote!
peace
 

 
MrBear12
    13-Apr-2024 08:56  
Contact    Quote!
Bear advice: Trust no one, no manager, no sponsor, no shareholder, no forumner, not even yourself.

Jandec      ( Date: 12-Apr-2024 23:43) Posted:

Same character, different person.    The Bear bear I know is an anti-Christ.  You are not him, so I am mistaken. 

MrBear12      ( Date: 12-Apr-2024 23:38) Posted:

He made all things, including bears, bulls and human kind.
In His hands are time, space and life.
How blessed to know Him!


 
 
Jandec
    13-Apr-2024 01:41  
Contact    Quote!
Who is trying to show off?  Examine yourself, what facts have you presented that are accurate?  Haven' t you presented nothing but nonsense, fit for the garbage bin?   
Is there a rule a non-shareholder cannot post?    Did you even think of this before you start writing? 

aragosta      ( Date: 13-Apr-2024 00:53) Posted:

--- Post Removed by User ---

 
 
Jandec
    13-Apr-2024 00:26  
Contact    Quote!
I am neither for, nor against internalisation.  I only look at the facts.   
As I see it, it' s not going to happen, ie if you need 75% shareholder approval, ESR will block it.    Even if it' s put thru, will it come at a cost that will hurt the shareholders?  So there are two hurdles, first get that 75%.  Second, avoid having to pay the external manager off - or try to low ball (hoping seller will be a goondo....just hope lor).
 
 
Jandec
    13-Apr-2024 00:18  
Contact    Quote!
You presented: 
1.  Internalisation is already decided...is it?    Have you read what the Trustee posted?  You need to change the Trust Deed, is it already done?    Not a fact.  This is a nonsensical statement. 
2.    Purpose of a Trust deed is to protect the minorities....are you serious?    The Trust Deed is the constitution of the Reit - to protect all members..... 

Do I need to continue?   
 
 
Jandec
    13-Apr-2024 00:12  
Contact    Quote!
I said very clearly I only respect facts presented, and I don' t think highly of myself, I wonder why you said I do?  Did you present facts or garbage?    Do you even understand what is going on?
 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .