Post Reply
1-20 of 326
normally cloud red line will be strong support. if break that means downtrend liao
guards80 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:28) Posted:
better get supported at $1.100. if hold well end this downtrend. if break then going down liaoz |
|
https://saydigi-tech.com/2020/09/30026.html
get this link from the tw forum.
an online marketing advertisement of Medtecs
yes 1.16 blocked by conversion line... need stay above this
Superfast ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:09) Posted:
116.5.... tough. Lo
114 still ok....
guards80 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:05) Posted:
| as long dont break down the cloud red line should be fine |
|
|
|
116.5.... tough. Lo
114 still ok....
guards80 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:05) Posted:
as long dont break down the cloud red line should be fine.
Superfast ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:03) Posted:
Don't think so...
Maybe tmr.... |
|
|
|
Hv no doubt that u are right that it will go to 120 soon. But not for tdy, tho wish it would.
Think at current sell down price, if can pick and keep for 3 weeks to 3 months, possibility that it may not be just 120 but 130, 140, or even 150.
No choice got to keep for a while for BBs to complete their collections cheaply within these 3 days or within these 3 weeks before they pump and pump. Just opinion.
yamseng ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:57) Posted:
gg to see 120 soon !!
Huat ah |
|
as long dont break down the cloud red line should be fine.
Superfast ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:03) Posted:
Don't think so...
Maybe tmr.....
guards80 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:03) Posted:
| today can close 1.160 above is goo |
|
|
|
Nope, unless you are more qualified than my doctor.
Andynkl ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:00) Posted:
Sorry to say.. I think u r really sick
Siwomp ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:59) Posted:
| Yes, it is about integrity |
|
|
|
Don't think so...
Maybe tmr.....
guards80 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 16:03) Posted:
today can close 1.160 above is good
guards80 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:28) Posted:
better get supported at $1.100. if hold well end this downtrend. if break then going down liaoz |
|
|
|
today can close 1.160 above is good
guards80 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:28) Posted:
better get supported at $1.100. if hold well end this downtrend. if break then going down liaoz |
|
Sorry to say.. I think u r really sick
Siwomp ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:59) Posted:
Yes, it is about integrity.
Superfast ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:57) Posted:
|
|
|
Yes, it is about integrity.
Superfast ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:57) Posted:
Hmmmm important to u?
Siwomp ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:55) Posted:
| So you can only name 3 in the big Bull Camp that did not sell? Well, one of the 3 in your list say he sold 1/3 of his holding and bought back, but never say at what prices but only say his total average buy price now is higher. But hor, if his initial holding were bought in the pennies, of course after selling and buy back now the total average cost is higher lah. What is important and interesting is he/she never say was there profit in the sell and then buy back of that 1/3 holdings |
|
|
|
Hmmmm important to u?
Siwomp ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:55) Posted:
So you can only name 3 in the big Bull Camp that did not sell? Well, one of the 3 in your list say he sold 1/3 of his holding and bought back, but never say at what prices but only say his total average buy price now is higher. But hor, if his initial holding were bought in the pennies, of course after selling and buy back now the total average cost is higher lah. What is important and interesting is he/she never say was there profit in the sell and then buy back of that 1/3 holdings.
gregtan123 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:12) Posted:
Who sold bro, Chiachia/Wolverine/Longtermer? From what I know they didnt sell but even if they did, it is right, only left me not smart lor, get bluffed haha. But i do my own trade and plans, so even if all sell, does not bother me
Also which one quote half? I didnt see it? u mean the 100x revenue not 100xprofit one right, I think not a super longist bro right |
|
|
|
gg to see 120 soon !!
Huat ah
So you can only name 3 in the big Bull Camp that did not sell? Well, one of the 3 in your list say he sold 1/3 of his holding and bought back, but never say at what prices but only say his total average buy price now is higher. But hor, if his initial holding were bought in the pennies, of course after selling and buy back now the total average cost is higher lah. What is important and interesting is he/she never say was there profit in the sell and then buy back of that 1/3 holdings.
gregtan123 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:12) Posted:
Who sold bro, Chiachia/Wolverine/Longtermer? From what I know they didnt sell but even if they did, it is right, only left me not smart lor, get bluffed haha. But i do my own trade and plans, so even if all sell, does not bother me
Also which one quote half? I didnt see it? u mean the 100x revenue not 100xprofit one right, I think not a super longist bro right?
Siwomp ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:08) Posted:
| Your bros already admitted to selling in the previous threads. And no, I have not benefitted from MT. Just here pointing out the inaccuracies like the Bull camp claimed of 100times rev without even doing their due diligences and you, who choose to only translate half of the message from Tw forum to the bulls' advantage. What is your motive |
|
|
|
Rebounded to 1.13 ?
3.1.2.16
calendar week
ec0101 ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:34) Posted:
I am not quite sure what is your point in bringing up the ISO standard here. ISO standard does not stipulate how to derive X week of the month but X week of the year. The 3rd week claim was received by many bros here who sent an email to MT' s Investor Relations to get an idea of an approximate date range of when they would release their 3rd quarter guidance but nevertheless many have gotten confused by the so called " 3rd week" .
Previously I posted about some TW forumers claiming it will be released on 23rd October however as per Master Chia' s email from IR, they specifically mentioned there is no confirmed date and stressed once again it is only 3rd week of October. There are too many ways to interpret this even as quoted from the ISO.
There are several mutually equivalent and compatible descriptions of week 01:
- the week with the year' s first Thursday in it (the formal ISO definition),
- the week with 4 January in it,
- the first week with the majority (four or more) of its days in the starting year, and
- the week starting with the Monday in the period 29 December &ndash 4 January.
Siwomp ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:18) Posted:
| The one who do not bother to do due diligence as long as it is to the bulls' advantage. the 100x rev claim and the 3rd week of Oct claim of 12 to 16.....by ISO standard, this is not the case. How come for someone who seens to know iso standard choose to ignore iso when it is to his/her advantage |
|
|
|
is this is true then a higher low is formed which actually bodes well..
all that stanleytay nonsense about covering the gap is b/s.
but anyway gd luck
easywin ( Date: 29-Sep-2020 15:40) Posted:
| Chart shown $1.11 is bottomed, turning up soon, I Jeep liow |
|
Glove brothers are rebounding now.
Chart shown $1.11 is bottomed, turning up soon, I Jeep liow
true bro greg.... sgx is the worst exchange and still dare pride ourselves as global financial hub.
but yet our stockexchange is actually smaller than thailand' s!
what a joke
