|
Latest Posts By gregtan123
- Supreme
|
|
| 13-Aug-2021 00:53 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
i went to verify this. not true. do note las result was in RMB. Now is in SGD. Unless I miss something, can u enligthen me how u come to this conclusion? No hate ah, I want to learn.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 05-Aug-2021 22:36 |
YZJ Shipbldg SGD
/
The Only Shipbuilding Blue Chip in SGX!
|
||||
|
|
Revenue drop, hope boat return to 1.35 for more to board?
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 04-Aug-2021 11:39 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
I predict 100% to 150%
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 03-Aug-2021 13:08 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
Actually I am NOT worried at all. I dont think I am Stuck too. Of course like most others I want it to fly asap like tomorrow so I can feel SHIOK n rub it in the face of others or boast or just feel good. BUT a the end of the day, if u have conviction, the current price doesnt matter. In fact, if  I dont have too much of this currently, I would add. What I think most Longs cannott stand is people spreading FUD n 害 others to lose $$$. HODL with Greg n Co, u confirm make money. Max CNY next year will be min 8 cents. Delayed Gratification sometimes is the best!
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 03-Aug-2021 12:23 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
Can you Enlighten me how the Management is Selfish? For those who bought low n even those who bought 4 cents n believe, I think it has been good.  Note Yaccob and the other Malay dude bought at 1.7 cents. Peter Re-Buy in at 4.1 cents, Alacrity (Indonesians) Re-Buy in 4.2 cents.  Good News Lined Up. Results, Exit Watchlist, Prawn Farm Tech, Tech Up Blockchain.  Can share with me how Management is Selfish?
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 03-Aug-2021 12:07 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
I will be worried if SGX is Competent n Capable. SGX approve very Quickly ASPEN Upgrade to Mainboard, looked what happened? SGX also approve FJ Benjamin out of watchlist, look what happened? SGX also allowed Xia Junwei of Medtecs along with DBS Broker Vivi to get away Scot Free.  Is SGX or MAS really trustable? I would be worried if they approve fast, SGX is possibly the WORST regulator on this planet. High Salary, but Lunts in behaviour. 
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 02-Aug-2021 08:32 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
BREAKING FROM THEIR FB: OCEANUS is the Next Tesla!   Food security is a challenge to a small city-state, Singapore. We have limited resources where 90% of food is imported from an increasingly disrupted world.
Our land is scare and large advancements in farming technology is needed to combat this growing problem.
To address this difficulty, Oceanus will be digitalising its entire value chain. The Tech Up phase will focus on developing deep tech solutions aimed towards the development of a sustainable food production and distribution framework. With well established capabilities, we are well-positioned to advance our vision to securing Singapore' s food security and future-proofing our business.
#oceanusgroup #oceanusfoodtechhub #foodsecurity #sustainablefarming
https://www.facebook.com/OceanusGroupLimited/ |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 26-Jul-2021 19:21 |
Sanli Env
/
Sanli forum after it ipo
|
||||
|
|
QUADDRUPLE HUAT. No 30 cents, No sell! 1. Profit Increase 25%: Totally Unexpected Esp During Pandemic (though Revenue Drop) 2. Dividend Increase Despite Pandemic  But Key is Forward Looking Statement 3.  As the Singapore government works on developing a broader set of reopening plans1 , the Group is hopeful that the COVID-19 situation will improve with the overall global economy and industries normalising. As a result of the above, the Group is cautiously OPTIMISTIC for the year ending 31 March 2022. 4.  Sanli Environmental (Myanmar) Company Limited (&ldquo Sanli Myanmar&rdquo ) is a 60%-owned subsidiary of the Group which provides engineering, construction and related services in Myanmar. With regard to the military takeover in Myanmar and its impact on the operations in Myanmar, the Group would like to update shareholders that projects have resumed and staffs have returned to the office in the beginning of July 2021.  HUAT KA SIAO SIAO |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 23-Jul-2021 14:11 |
Sanli Env
/
Sanli forum after it ipo
|
||||
|
|
I wanted to buy but having thought it through: First, I think these few days if u buy, you are giving free money to the Ex Director who is selling out. Second, Weekend is Result. How about Wait see Results how? Also once Results Announce, only can insiders i,e Share Buyback + Temasek via Helconia Mop Up Shares cause of Black Out. Don' t feed the Pek dude these few days. BB also wait till next week.  | ||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 20:10 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
Thanks bro, we will huat together.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 19:19 |
Abundance Intl
/
Abundance int
|
||||
|
|
Yes 4.9-3.3 = 1.6 x 1,000,000 = list 16,000 SGD. 
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 18:50 |
Medtecs Intl
/
The next journey
|
||||
|
|
Emails: regco@sgx.com asksgx@sgx.com boonchyeloh@gmail.com Ravi_MENON@mas.gov.sg, admin@sias.org.sg lawrence_wong@mof.gov.sg btocs@sph.com.sg
 
Regulatory: Listed Company [Is SGX sleeping on the job?]
 
To the Relevant Authorities and Media,
 
Singapore along with SGX/MAS prides itself in being a 1st World Financial Hub with Efficiency and Fairness at the Bedrock of whatever we do. Yet, it has come to the attention of minority investors in companies listed on SGX that SGX is being very inefficient and handling matters in a rather opaque manner.
 
1. Oceanus Exit Watchlist Application
 
It is exactly 100 Days since Oceanus made the Watchlist Application on 13th April. Yet there has been ZERO sound from SGX whether Approval or Rejection. There&rsquo s also no Timeline or Explanation given. We are not sure what&rsquo s the hold up because the criteria is very clear and whether a Company meets it or not, is also very clear.
 
I quote a fellow minority investor: "   It is very disappointing to have SGX take such a long time to review the watchlist application, when the criteria they have set is clear on their website.  As far as Oceanus and its auditors can confirm, they have met those said criteria (see:  http://rulebook.sgx.com/rulebook/1314...  & Practice Note 3.1:  http://rulebook.sgx.com/rulebook/practice-note-132-watch-list...).  Also, there are currently no other exit application submitted for review, so there is no excuse for an administration overload.
 
What this points to is inability by SGX to make important decisions.  It is likely SGX is cautious to make the announcement, taking a " wait and see" approach till after Oceanus' s H1 2021 results.  But let' s be clear.  While I expect a great H1 2021 earnings, those results are  not  part of the exit criteria that SGX has set.  Read the above sources again.&rdquo
 
It is very clear: Does Oceanus meet the Exit Criteria? SGX has to decide, it has been 100 days. Are we supposed to wait another 10,000 Days because SGX is too inefficient?
 
Doesn&rsquo t MAS also regulate the Regulator (SGX)? Isn&rsquo t the Ministry of Finance looking  into the way SGX functions?
 
2.  Medtecs Mainboard Application
 
I  didn&rsquo t follow this but I am sure as well it&rsquo s  been more than 100 Days.
 
3. Quick  Approval of  &ldquo Shady&rdquo Companies ASPEN and FJ Benjamin
Yet, SGX has  chosen to Give Approval to  &ldquo shady&rdquo companies like Aspen Group (their upgrade to Mainboard was approved very quickly, using that news certain people pumped the share before releasing fake news to crash the shares). The same exit watchlist by FJ Benjamin  was approved  quickly.
 
May we as minority shareholders and retail  participants of the market know why the DOUBLE Standards? For credible Singapore-led company like Oceanus, there is a 100-Day Delay whilst  &ldquo shady&rdquo Malaysian companies like Aspen gets their approval quickly. Surely, there must be an objective standard or timeframe?
Failing which, would Minority Investors issuing a Letter of Demand to SGX push SGX along to make their decisions?
 
It is frustrating that SGX  wields ALL the power but is not transparent or efficient in their job.
 
I have included all the relevant ministries, parties that can help  Singapore  achieve it&rsquo s 1st World Financial Hub Status. SGX needs to start being more  transparent and efficient.
 
Greg
Shareholder of the above listed companies, market participant
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 18:48 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
ALL PLEASE HELP, copy the emails and my email message then pressure SGX the jokers
Emails: regco@sgx.com asksgx@sgx.com boonchyeloh@gmail.com Ravi_MENON@mas.gov.sg, admin@sias.org.sg lawrence_wong@mof.gov.sg btocs@sph.com.sg  
Regulatory: Listed Company [Is SGX sleeping on the job?]
 
To the Relevant Authorities and Media,
 
Singapore along with SGX/MAS prides itself in being a 1st World Financial Hub with Efficiency and Fairness at the Bedrock of whatever we do. Yet, it has come to the attention of minority investors in companies listed on SGX that SGX is being very inefficient and handling matters in a rather opaque manner.
 
1. Oceanus Exit Watchlist Application
 
It is exactly 100 Days since Oceanus made the Watchlist Application on 13th April. Yet there has been ZERO sound from SGX whether Approval or Rejection. There&rsquo s also no Timeline or Explanation given. We are not sure what&rsquo s the hold up because the criteria is very clear and whether a Company meets it or not, is also very clear.
 
I quote a fellow minority investor: "   It is very disappointing to have SGX take such a long time to review the watchlist application, when the criteria they have set is clear on their website.  As far as Oceanus and its auditors can confirm, they have met those said criteria (see:  http://rulebook.sgx.com/rulebook/1314...  & Practice Note 3.1:  http://rulebook.sgx.com/rulebook/practice-note-132-watch-list...).  Also, there are currently no other exit application submitted for review, so there is no excuse for an administration overload.
 
What this points to is inability by SGX to make important decisions.  It is likely SGX is cautious to make the announcement, taking a " wait and see" approach till after Oceanus' s H1 2021 results.  But let' s be clear.  While I expect a great H1 2021 earnings, those results are  not  part of the exit criteria that SGX has set.  Read the above sources again.&rdquo
 
It is very clear: Does Oceanus meet the Exit Criteria? SGX has to decide, it has been 100 days. Are we supposed to wait another 10,000 Days because SGX is too inefficient?
 
Doesn&rsquo t MAS also regulate the Regulator (SGX)? Isn&rsquo t the Ministry of Finance looking  into the way SGX functions?
 
2.  Medtecs Mainboard Application
 
I  didn&rsquo t follow this but I am sure as well it&rsquo s  been more than 100 Days.
 
3. Quick  Approval of  &ldquo Shady&rdquo Companies ASPEN and FJ Benjamin
Yet, SGX has  chosen to Give Approval to  &ldquo shady&rdquo companies like Aspen Group (their upgrade to Mainboard was approved very quickly, using that news certain people pumped the share before releasing fake news to crash the shares). The same exit watchlist by FJ Benjamin  was approved  quickly.
 
May we as minority shareholders and retail  participants of the market know why the DOUBLE Standards? For credible Singapore-led company like Oceanus, there is a 100-Day Delay whilst  &ldquo shady&rdquo Malaysian companies like Aspen gets their approval quickly. Surely, there must be an objective standard or timeframe?
Failing which, would Minority Investors issuing a Letter of Demand to SGX push SGX along to make their decisions?
 
It is frustrating that SGX  wields ALL the power but is not transparent or efficient in their job.
 
I have included all the relevant ministries, parties that can help  Singapore  achieve it&rsquo s 1st World Financial Hub Status. SGX needs to start being more  transparent and efficient.
 
Greg
Shareholder of the above listed companies, market participant
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 17:55 |
GRC
/
OKH resume trading
|
||||
|
|
After Abundance, tomorrow this HUAT? NAV 6.5 cents hor. | ||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 17:35 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus major business model restructure
|
||||
|
|
[SGX and MAS] I am sure  $Oceanus^(579.SI)  and  $Medtecs Intl(546.SI)  shareholders are wondering why SGX takes so long to approve Oceanus Exit Watchlist and Medtecs Mainboard Upgrade. Yet for scams like  $Aspen(1F3.SI)  they approve Upgrade to Mainboard so fast, or  $FJ Benjamin^(F10.SI)  exit watchlist via downgrade to Catalist. Is there something wrong with SGX and MAS? Also, seems like we got no recourse? Are these regulators sleeping? |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 15:30 |
YZJ Shipbldg SGD
/
The Only Shipbuilding Blue Chip in SGX!
|
||||
|
|
cannot even break 1.38 with good news + analyst help. YZJ come on la. | ||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 15:28 |
Sanli Env
/
Sanli forum after it ipo
|
||||
|
|
Wa Lau 17.1 i want to buy. I see forummers shortist scare me. now miss boat??? this share how to play?? | ||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 15:25 |
GRC
/
OKH resume trading
|
||||
|
|
bro buy 2.1 first? test the market, let BB algos work
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 14:29 |
Sanli Env
/
Sanli forum after it ipo
|
||||
|
|
Lucky Never anyhow buy.  | ||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 22-Jul-2021 13:50 |
Sanli Env
/
Sanli forum after it ipo
|
||||
|
|
He is NOT a Director LOL. Don' t you know before results got Black out period, cannot trade for directors n insiders. Will go jail. Bro we know u short, cannot spread false rumours. I am going to enter LONG soon, FYI. 
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| First < Newer   21-40 of 5573 Older> Last |



