Latest Forum Topics /
Metech Intl
Last:0.053
![]() |
![]() |
<No Title>
|
|||
fighting
Master |
27-Sep-2021 10:04
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Big trap
|
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
AttasBoss
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 09:59
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
bought 50k shares 0.29 sold 0.305, quaick profit for kopi o later.  | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|||
Stocksguru
Master |
27-Sep-2021 09:52
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
wow anyone brought at 0.3+? | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
sklong138
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 09:16
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just hoot kao kao. No need to think. Huat!!! | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
sklong138
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 09:15
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Easily go up around 0.4 to 0.5 | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|||
easywin
Supreme |
27-Sep-2021 09:14
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Beng Kuang up fast but now.. | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
Joelton
Supreme |
27-Sep-2021 09:11
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Metech Enters Into Joint Venture to Manufacture and Distribute Lab-Grown Diamonds
&bull A lab-grown diamond is a diamond: chemically, physically and optically identical to a mined diamond
 
&bull Strong market prospects in lab-grown diamonds that are driven by environmental, sustainability and ethical concerns of mined diamonds
 
&bull New business venture is aligned with Metech&rsquo s environmental and sustainability business model and creates new growth drivers for the Group
 
Singapore, 26 September 2021 &ndash SGX-listed Metech International Limited (&ldquo Metech&rdquo or the &ldquo Company&rdquo , and together with its subsidiaries, the &ldquo Group&rdquo ), is pleased to announce that its whollyowned subsidiary, Asian Green Tech Pte. Ltd (" AGT" ), has entered into a joint venture agreement (" JVA" ) with X Diamond Capital Pte. Ltd. (" XDC" ) on 24 September 2021 to establish a joint venture,
pursuant to which AGT and XDC (collectively, the &ldquo Parties&rdquo ) will incorporate a joint venture company (" JV Company" ) in Singapore to carry out the business of manufacturing and distribution of lab-grown diamonds (the " Joint Venture" ).
 
Under the JVA, AGT shall operate and manage the JV Company while XDC shall provide technical support to the JV Company.
 
The Rising Popularity and Applications of Lab-Grown Diamonds
 
A lab-grown diamond is a diamond: chemically, physically and optically identical to a mined diamond.
 
While diamonds are more widely known to be used in jewellery, diamonds are also commonly used for industrial applications as they are extremely effective at polishing, cutting, and drilling. 
 
Furthermore, lab diamonds have the edge on mined diamonds with regards to their purity and hardness, with lab-grown diamonds found to be ten times more durable than natural diamonds. The US Department of Energy reports that diamond-based components reduce energy losses by up to 90%(1).
 
According to figures published by Diamond Foundry, the total environmental footprint of mined diamonds is much higher than lab diamonds.
 
In May 2021, the world&rsquo s largest jewellery, Pandora, says it will no longer sell mined diamonds and will switch to exclusively laboratory-made diamonds due to concerns about the environment and working practices in the mining industry.
 
Lab-grown diamond production has ballooned in recent years, with 6-7 million carats produced in 2020 alone, though still a tiny industry compared to diamond mining, which peaked at 152 million carats in 2017 and currently stands around 111 million carats. But lab-grown diamonds are increasingly pitched as the sustainable choice to price- and planet-conscious young consumers. In addition to Pandora, De Beers, Vrai and Kimaï have begun selling lab-grown diamonds as well as or in place of mined ones.
 
  According to Statista, the market size of lab-grown diamonds is forecasted to increase its value to approximately US$29.2 billion by 2025 and grow to nearly 19.2 million carats by 2030
The Joint Venture is aligned with the Group' s strategy to expand further into the environmental and sustainability business.
 
As lab-grown diamonds are created without the need for mining, they are a more sustainable production of diamonds and there are also opportunities to integrate renewable energy in such manufacturing activities, hence it is aligned with the Group' s environmental and sustainability business model.
 
Ms. Samantha Hua, Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of Metech, said: &ldquo With better technology and declining production costs, lab-grown diamonds will be a sustainable solution to the declining supply of mined diamonds.
 
In addition, the millennial generation are also more conscious about the environmental, sustainability and ethical impact of mined diamonds.
 
With our joint venture, we have the capabilities to create our own quality diamonds in Singapore and establish new channels to make it accessible to a wider consumer base.
 
I believe that we are in the early stages of this emerging consumer trend and we are excited about the opportunities ahead.&rdquo
|
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
sklong138
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 09:11
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Load more. Huat!!! | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|||
sklong138
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 09:09
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Diamond is forever. Huat!!! | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
spursfan
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 09:08
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
this stock total shares only 100mil.  free float 50mil.  recently two investors bought to become ssh. | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
sklong138
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 09:04
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Powerful. Chiong Arh | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
sklong138
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 08:56
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hoot. Kao kao. Huat. Arh | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|||
spursfan
Elite |
27-Sep-2021 08:35
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
PRESS RELEASE Metech Enters Into Joint Venture to Manufacture and Distribute Lab-Grown Diamonds - A lab-grown diamond is a diamond: chemically, physically and optically identical to a mined diamond - Strong market prospects in lab-grown diamonds that are driven by environmental, sustainability and ethical concerns of mined diamonds - New business venture is aligned with Metech&rsquo s environmental and sustainability business model and creates new growth drivers for the Group  Singapore, 26 September 2021 &ndash SGX-listed Metech International Limited (&ldquo Metech&rdquo or the &ldquo Company&rdquo , and together with its subsidiaries, the &ldquo Group&rdquo ), is pleased to announce that its whollyowned subsidiary, Asian Green Tech Pte. Ltd (" AGT" ), has entered into a joint venture agreement (" JVA" ) with X Diamond Capital Pte. Ltd. (" XDC" ) on 24 September 2021 to establish a joint venture, pursuant to which AGT and XDC (collectively, the &ldquo Parties&rdquo ) will incorporate a joint venture company (" JV Company" ) in Singapore to carry out the business of manufacturing and distribution of lab-grown diamonds (the " Joint Venture" ). Under the JVA, AGT shall operate and manage the JV Company while XDC shall provide technical support to the JV Company. https://links.sgx.com/1.0.0/corporate-announcements/JQRUXFCRFWO1LL48/684620_Metech-Ann-Press_%20Release.pdf |
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
peterwong321
Veteran |
25-Sep-2021 19:26
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It will stay within 30 to 40 cents, my uncle still holding to $1.10 share price but need to find money to pay the shares he brought only | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
Joelton
Supreme |
25-Sep-2021 10:25
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Metech enters joint venture with X Diamond Capital to make lab-grown diamonds
METECH International' s wholly-owned subsidiary, Asian Green Tech (AGT), has entered into a joint venture (JV) with X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (XDC) to manufacture and distribute lab-grown diamonds.
 
In a bourse filing on Thursday, the Catalist-listed company said that the JV company will be incorporated as Asian Eco Technology and will initially have an issued and paid-up capital of S$500,000 divided into 500,000 ordinary shares.
 
AGT will own 51 per cent of the share capital, while XDC will own the remainder.
 
AGT' s stake will be funded through internal resources, bank borrowings and potentially equity fund raising as well. Metech said that the JV is not expected to have any material impact on the earnings per share or net tangible assets per share of the group for the financial year ending June 30, 2022.
 
XDC is an exempt private company that is involved in the wholesale of jewellery made from precious metals and stones, as well as the manufacture of piezo-electric devices. The company is owned by Deng Yiming, Xu Kang and Yang Hanyu, each of whom hold 40 per cent, 35 per cent and 25 per cent of XDC' s shares respectively.
 
Metech said that the joint venture is in line with the group' s strategy to expand into the environmental and sustainability business, as lab-grown diamonds are more sustainable than mined diamonds to produce.
|
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
Joelton
Supreme |
09-Nov-2020 09:18
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Metech International
 
On Nov 3, Metech International substantial shareholder Simon Eng increased his direct interest in the Catalist-listed company from 24.19 per cent to 24.29 per cent with the acquisition of 100,000 shares at 12.00 cents per share.
 
Metech International provides smart solutions to bring value and efficiency to the global supply chain.
 
Leveraging on its expertise in the metal industry, the company has secured worldwide acceptance among major metal traders.
|
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
ysh2006
Supreme |
29-Dec-2019 14:12
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This time think still Mr Eng and company will be reelected again...they combine hold 70% unless they are not allow to vote...small investors cannot overturn result.. | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
Starship
Supreme |
29-Dec-2019 13:58
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
What an ugly stock.    ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Metech: Prompt action by SGX Regco welcome, but responses inadequate Published December 28, 2019Updated on December 28, 2019 at 5.45 pm By Mak Yuen Teen I applaud the swift response of SGX Regco to questions I had raised on Christmas eve regarding (a) the appointment of Mr Chng Hee Kok as independent director at Metech International (b) the independence of the sponsor RHT Capital from Metech and (c) the failure to disclose the reprimand imposed by SGX on Mr Simon Eng at Advanced SCT (now Citicode) in Metech&rsquo s 2019 annual report as required for his re-election at the company&rsquo s October 2019 AGM. What is particularly praiseworthy about the immediate action taken by SGX Regco is directing the company to convene an EGM and re-seek the re-election of Mr Eng, given that the information disclosed was &ldquo inaccurate and incomplete&rdquo . The disclosure lapse ought to have a consequence. This EGM should be convened as soon as possible as Mr Eng was re-elected on &ldquo inaccurate and incomplete&rdquo information and in my view, acting as director and chairman without a proper mandate. Of course, Metech shareholders may not be happy about the additional costs that the company will now have to bear. Given that this is an unnecessary EGM which is the result of a lapse, perhaps Mr Eng and the directors will consider paying for the costs of the EGM from the fees due to them. Under section 176(4) of the Companies Act, if directors fail to convene an EGM in accordance with section 176 and requisitioning shareholders convene it themselves, any reasonable expenses are to be paid out of the fees or remuneration due to the directors. Perhaps something similar should be considered for the listing rules when companies breach rules and have to convene unnecessary EGMs. I am also pleased that SGX Regco is looking further into the various issues raised in my post. Metech&rsquo s responses to SGX Regco&rsquo s queries dated December 27, 2019 on the matters raised are in my view unsatisfactory. In query 2, SGX Regco asked about the NC&rsquo s assessment of Mr Chng&rsquo s ability to commit time and resources given that he serves as a director on 8 other listed boards. The company essentially gave the same explanation as it did in his appointment announcement, except adding that Mr Chng will now write to the other boards to seek their concurrences for him to join Metech (which SGX Regco has directed be done). It is, however, not only the time commitment but the fact that Mr Chng has a prior conviction under the Companies Act and a warning under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Although this was in 2007, it is nevertheless important for the NC, board and the continuing sponsor to have considered this matter and whether other candidates should be considered for appointment. The response shed no light on this at all. SGX Regco should also validate the sponsor&rsquo s responses on this matter and review the process that the sponsor followed, to determine if the sponsor merely accepted the NC&rsquo s assessment or whether it raised any queries. The sponsor should clearly not just rubber stamp whatever the NC or board says. In query 4, SGX Regco asked the sponsor to confirm and provide the basis for their independence from Metech. I had raised the issue that two of Metech&rsquo s independent directors are also directors of a company within the RHT Group. The sponsor confirmed its independence and absence of conflicts of interests from all its sponsored issuers, by citing five factors, and adding that RHT Capital and all subsidiaries under the RHT Group &ldquo are independent of one another with different business models and operate differently&rdquo . It cited existing procedures and controls to mitigate conflicts of interests, twice. What are these existing procedures and controls? The fundamental question remains: Is RHT Capital in a position to provide an objective opinion about the suitability of directors for its sponsored issuers if those directors serve on boards of companies within the RHT Group? Would it be in a position to &ldquo blow the whistle&rdquo to SGX Regco on any breaches of rules if directors on boards of companies within the RHT Group are on boards of its sponsored issuers? Would they be perceived to be able to do so, even if RHT Capital asserts that its objectivity will not be impaired? The independence of a sponsor from the sponsored issuer is arguably just as important, if not more so, than the independence of an external auditor from an audit client. SGX Regco should review its guidelines on independence for sponsors. It may wish to consider the rules for sponsors for GEM in HK, which refers to the &ldquo sponsor group&rdquo and not just the sponsor &ndash and &ldquo sponsor group&rdquo includes fellow subsidiaries, among others. Finally, on query 5, SGX Regco asked the company to explain and elaborate on the &ldquo negative confirmation&rdquo for Mr Simon Eng which was clearly wrong. In a corrigendum to the 2019 annual report issued on December 27, 2019, it turned out that not only was the reprimand he received at Advanced SCT in October 2015 omitted (which I had pointed out), a warning letter he received from the Monetary Authority of Singapore in 2014 for late disclosure of his change in interest at Teledata following a placement by that company was also not disclosed. The company said that the rule was amended in January 2019 and that Mr Eng &ldquo who was clearing the Company&rsquo s Annual Report 2019&rdquo was &ldquo focused on ensuring the facts and figures in the Annual Report were accurate therein and had inadvertently omitted the information required under Appendix 7F&rdquo . It said he will be mindful of regulatory changes when clearing future annual reports. The Annual Report should be cleared by all the directors and should also have been reviewed by the company secretary and the continuing sponsor. Why didn&rsquo t any of them pick up this wrong disclosure? The response suggests that these changes were new and Mr Eng was unaware of the regulatory changes. Metech&rsquo s 2019 annual report for the year ended June 30, 2019 was dated October 1, 2019. In the 2018 Annual Report of Citicode &ndash which was previously called Advanced SCT and which was where Mr Eng received his reprimand from SGX &ndash the reprimand was disclosed on page 146 for exactly the same question. Citicode&rsquo s annual report was dated April 1, 2019. How can lack of familiarity with the recent regulatory changes be the reason for the wrong disclosure if it was disclosed in Citicode&rsquo s annual report dated April 1, 2019 and then omitted in Metech&rsquo s annual report dated six months later? Hopefully, SGX Regco&rsquo s investigation of the matters raised will be swift as will any necessary enforcement action. As I mentioned in my earlier post, investors should pay attention to the integrity, independence, competence and commitment of the board of directors because most corporate actions are approved by the board, and not shareholders. The 5-member board of Metech now includes: Mr Eng, the controlling shareholder, chairman and CEO who had been reprimanded and warned by regulators, and then failed to make proper disclosures Mr Chng who had previously been convicted of an offence under the Companies Act and also received a warning, and now serves on the boards of 9 listed companies and 2 independent directors who have relationships with the continuing sponsor. One of the 2 incumbent independent directors, Mr Chay Yiowmin, who is the lead independent director, was also an independent director of Advanced SCT from September 4, 2013 to May 31, 2015. Mr Eng had previously held the roles of chairman and CEO at Advanced SCT. Although Mr Chay joined that company after the events that led to the reprimand and left before the reprimand was issued by SGX, and was not reprimanded, it is clear that Mr Chay is well acquainted with Mr Eng. Investors should carefully consider all the above factors and assess whether such a board is likely to be effective. |
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
mikethong88
Elite |
28-Dec-2019 15:13
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
very low volume stock. | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
ysh2006
Supreme |
27-Dec-2019 19:29
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The director was scolded by SGX before not charge can he be elected in AGM ? | ||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |