| Latest Forum Topics / Roxy-Pacific |
|
|
YOMA
|
|||||
|
Observers
Elite |
18-Feb-2022 17:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Will regret or not? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
MakeChanges
Elite |
18-Feb-2022 07:52
Yells: "No price is too low for a bear or too high for a bull" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
SUSPENDED ! | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
20-Jan-2022 11:26
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Roxy-Pacific offer ' not fair but reasonable' , says independent financial adviser shareholders advised to accept deal
 
THE buyout offer for property group Roxy-Pacific Holdings is " not fair but reasonable" , the independent financial adviser (IFA) in the deal said in a letter dated Wednesday (Jan 19).
 
On the advice of the IFA, the independent directors recommended that shareholders accept the offer of S$0.485 in cash for each share, which values the company at S$630.5 million.
 
Roxy-Pacific chairman and chief executive Teo Hong Lim launched the privatisation bid in September 2021 with 10 others through bid vehicle TKL & Family, citing a " challenging macro and operating environment" and other factors.
 
In gauging the fairness of the offer, IFA ZICO Capital noted the price-to-revalued net asset value (P/RNAV) of 0.64 time implied by the offer price was below the average and median ratios of precedent privatisation transactions since 2019.
 
Precedent deals that were taken into account by the IFA included United Engineers, Breadtalk Group, Perennial Real Estate Holdings, Fragrance Group and Singhaiyi Group.
 
Still, the IFA considered that the implied P/RNAV was higher than the average but below the median P/RNAV of the precedent real estate privatisation transactions.
 
Meanwhile, the implied P/RNAV was higher than the average and median P/NAV of selected comparable listed companies, which were considered after discussion with the management, said the IFA - such as Ho Bee Land, Oxley Holdings, Chip Eng Seng and Hiap Hoe.
 
In determining the reasonableness of the offer, the IFA also noted that Roxy-Pacific had not declared dividends in FY2020 and in H1 2021, among other factors.
 
Given that the offeror already has irrevocable undertakings for about 77 per cent of the shares - from shareholders Kian Lam Investment and Sen Lee Development, as well as from most of the members of the consortium that is making the offer - the IFA added that " it is highly unlikely that there will be any competing offer from a third party" for the company.
 
" Having considered carefully the information available to us as at the latest practicable date, and based on our analyses, we are of the opinion that the financial terms of the offer are, on balance, not fair but reasonable," the IFA wrote in the letter released to shareholders.
 
The independent directors said in the resulting circular that they agree with the IFA' s assessment of the offer, as well as its advice and recommendation.
 
But shareholders were told that the IFA' s advice to the independent directors on the offer should not be relied upon by any shareholder as the sole basis for whether to accept or reject the offer.
 
The voluntary conditional general offer for Roxy-Pacific is set to close on Feb 3 at 5.30 pm, or any later date that the offeror may announce.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
20-Jan-2022 09:32
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
From BT -  Roxy-Pacific:  Roxy-Pacific: E8Z 0%  Shareholders of the mainboard-listed property group have been  advised to accept the buyout offer of S$0.485 in cash per share  by an independent financial adviser (IFA). This values the company at S$630.5 million, which was noted to be " not fair but reasonable" by the IFA as the price-to-revalued net asset value of 0.64 time was below the average and median ratios of precedent privatisation transactions. The counter closed flat on Wednesday at S$0.48, before the latest announcement. Does this mean that the takeover price is UNFAIR? If we do not wish to accept, do we just ignore the offer letter? Throw into dustbin etc? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
05-Jan-2022 21:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
They have issues the offer document. We can ignore if we do not want to accept right? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
15-Dec-2021 15:50
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Good point. I am just highly suspicious of anyone attempting a takover and buy-out during this COVID pandemic at depressedd valuations.  Just smacks of being opportunistic.  I will surely reject.   
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
15-Dec-2021 12:15
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Trading Halt - probably related to the take-over attempt. I am not going to agree at this 48cent low price anyway. They need to go higher. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
03-Dec-2021 09:21
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Roxy-Pacific to launch Mori at an estimated average price of S$1,900 psf
There will be 2 residential blocks of 5 and 8 storeys each, and its 137 units will have 1 to 4-bedroom apartments
 
MAINBOARD-LISTED Roxy-Pacific Holdings will be launching its freehold condominium Mori on Dec 4, with an expected average price of S$1,900 per square foot (psf).
 
Inspired by the Japanese wabi-sabi concept of finding beauty in simplicity, Mori comprises 2 residential blocks of 5 and 8 storeys each, an outdoor onsen, several pools and lounges, and an open-air gymnasium. Its 137 units include 1 to 4-bedroom apartments, ranging from 484 square feet (sq ft) to 1,259 sq ft.
 
According to Teo Hong Lim, executive chairman of Roxy-Pacific, prices will start from S$1,680 psf. " However, we are in the midst of adjusting the price list as we intend to achieve an average psf price in the range of S$1,900," Teo said.
 
The condominium sits on 37,131 square feet (sq ft) of land along Jalan Molek and Guillemard Road in District 14. It is 500 metres away from Dakota MRT station and 1 kilometre away from Aljunied MRT station.
 
Teo said the land was bought in November last year for S$93 million as he felt that the market was stirring.
 
He said that at the start of 2020 when Covid-19 cases grew in Singapore, he was concerned about how the market would turn out and " tightened Mori' s belt" in response. However, during the second half of the year he saw that Roxy-Pacific' s existing project, View at Kismis, was experiencing " continued sales momentum" .
 
Teo added that it typically takes 1 year from the initial acquisition date to launch a project. " So we can' t wait until our projects are substantially sold before we start going to the market to replenish our land bank. Ideally we want to start looking before other developers start moving, we always need that first-mover advantage," he said.
 
According to Teo, he snapped up the property which would be developed into Mori because of its attractive price, location and size.
 
Mori is due to achieve its Temporary Occupation Permit in 2024, he said.
 
While demand is growing, Teo added that the stock of unsold apartments in the " mass market" , which he defines as projects priced between S$1,000 and S$1,999, is also diminishing quickly.
 
In February this year, Roxy-Pacific bought a 14,300 sq ft site at Institution Hill for S$56.6 million as part of a joint venture with Macly Group and LWH Holdings. The property is currently in its conceptualisation stage, to be developed into a boutique project comprising about 70 units. It is likely to launch in mid-2022, Teo said.
 
However, given increasing construction and labour costs, Teo added that developers might need to raise their breakeven price.
 
He said: " We hope to still be able to give good value to buyers. Because launch price is not purely based on breakeven, it is also based on what the buyers can accept."
 
" I think we are rather cautious right now. If you buy a plot of land at a price that is too expensive and still add the construction costs, when the market starts to come down, the buyers might not accept your product."
 
On whether market sentiments would ease any time soon, Teo noted that the market is " very difficult to predict" .
 
He said: " The current market seems to be quite flushed with liquidity, it is doing very well. Volume is good, prices are inching up. The last few land sales by bigger developers have been quite active, so I think the market should be stable for the next 1 or 2 years."
 
" Of course everything is always changing," Teo added.
 
He said that Roxy-Pacific continues to be on the lookout for " attractive and unique" sites.
 
In the meantime, Roxy-Pacific is also looking at privatisation. The company announced in September that it has received a pre-conditional voluntary general offer from TKL & Family for all the issued ordinary shares in the company. The offeror is a consortium formed by 11 individuals, including Teo and his family members.
 
According to Teo, the decision was made after considering that Roxy-Pacific' s management team " might need some flexibility" in response to the challenges brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic. " It' s also an opportunity for shareholders to exit their investment," he added.
 
The family currently owns about 76 per cent of Roxy-Pacific. Should the privatisation go through, Teo will own a proposed 32.5 per cent.
 
Roxy-Pacific' s offer price is S$0.485 per share, which represents a 19.8 per cent premium over the stock' s closing price on Sept 14, 2021 - the last full trading day of the company prior to the announcement.
 
On when the privatisation will conclude, Teo said that the company is currently waiting for approval from the New Zealand government, which is required because Roxy-Pacific has two properties in the island country.
 
" Then after that, we will send out an offer document officially. We hope that shareholders will look at it favourably and that we can receive a 90 per cent acceptance rate."
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
24-Sep-2021 07:26
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
So 48.5cents offer is too cheap?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
PhillipTan
Supreme |
24-Sep-2021 02:58
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Roxy-Pacific' s privatisation offer catches the eye of SAC CapitalProperty developer Roxy-Pacific Holdings has been on the radar of SAC Capital, following an offer it received on Sep 20 to delist.The pre-conditional voluntary general offer was made by TKL & Family for all the issued ordinary shares in the company. The offeror is also the bid vehicle for a consortium formed by 11 individuals including Teo Hong Lim, chairman and CEO of Roxy-Pacific. The offer price of 48.5 cents is a 33.4% discount to the company' s net asset value of 72.87 cents/share as at Jun 30. This takes into account the fair value Grand Mercure Roxy Hotel, Noku Kyoto, Noku Osaka, hotel under development in Phuket, Noku Maldives and the head office premise, which were valued at $679.6 million as at June 30.  For comparison, the net book value of the properties stood at $216.2 million then. At present, the undertaking parties hold 76.4% of the total number of issued shares. SAC Capital analyst Tracy Lim believes that Roxy-Pacific is emerging from the trough following a 19.6% y-o-y increase in its revenue to $141.2 million in 1HFY21. This is thanks to a 27.4% y-o-y jump in its property development segment. " We believe that with residential prices holding up, along with Roxy-Pacific' s unbooked contracted sales, toplines will be firm for the group," Lim writes in a non-rated report on Sep 22. As at Jun 30, the group' s total attributable pre-sale revenue came in at S$564.4 million based on units sold from ongoing development projects. The group also has two properties under development that is estimated to have a development value of $224.1 million. However, high construction costs and delays continue to pose headwinds and squeeze property developers' margins, notes Lim. " The manpower supply crunch may have slowly been easing but we see that the backlogs and delays are still ahead of the rate of manpower intake. The recent uptick in cases in foreign workers' dormitories also pose as a risk," she adds. Still, property development activities have helped offset the 29.2% drop in revenue in the hotel ownership segment. Lim reckons the segment will remain weak even as Singapore looks to open vaccinated travel lanes with more countries.  The analyst notes that Singapore-listed property developers are trading at a significant discount to their adjusted net asset values, with discount rates ranging from 15.0% to 73.6%. The companies with the largest discounted adjusted net asset value include Hong Fok Corp (73.6%) and Chip Eng Seng (59.0%). Lim also sees Bukit Sembawang Estates as an attractive company, despite the 22.4% year-to-date increase in its share price. The company had net cash of $391.1 million in its FY ended 31 March - which Lim says - places them in a strong position to replenish land bank. " They are also able to tap on unutilised bank facilities," she says adding that the company also has a pipeline of residential launches. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
21-Sep-2021 12:36
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Only have 100 lots, not a big deal.  One of 60 counters I hold, and not a sizeable proportion in this either. But, I do not like predatory opportunistic take-overs.  Many retail investors suffer because of them.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
PhillipTan
Supreme |
21-Sep-2021 12:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
That too, if it suits your mood lol Personally, if I had a lot of spare cash and not knowing what to do with it, I would just throw what I have inside here  Approximately 2.9+% returns in such a short time I only regret the fact that my pockets are not that deep Limited choices for me That is how the rich gets richer, a whole world of opportunities waiting for them lol And if a lot of people think like me and you, your 95% will make their goals very easily acheivable  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
21-Sep-2021 12:14
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Or may sell them 95% and keep 5% to see if they break the 90% threshold for mandatory take-over.  Not making losses, but I personally dislike predatory opportunistic take-over offers.  Not very classy.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
PhillipTan
Supreme |
21-Sep-2021 12:12
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Typo, should be guaranteed profit of  $0.01-$0.015  Close to 3% returns after commission charges  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
PhillipTan
Supreme |
21-Sep-2021 12:07
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
They can also choose to ignore you instead of offering a huge buyout for 100% control With control fully in their hands, they can choose to give themselves high director fees so as to minimise company' s profits, instead of paying out dividends from profits So you may end up with nothing and your capital stuck for perpetuity Are you prepared for that too? Instead of doing that, especially if you are losing capital from selling at $0.485, there is another option Since $0.485 is fixed and market is trading at $0.47-$0.475, why not buy now for the guaranteed profit of $0.10-$0.15 You may even get a breakeven or profit too after selling everything at $0.485 Actually I am surprised market is trading below $0.485, was expecting to see a stagnant $0.485  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
21-Sep-2021 08:09
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
We can just ignore right - no need to accept is enough. This is not a Scheme of Arrangement when voting to block is crucial.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
20-Sep-2021 18:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Anyway, I will not be accepting the offer. The price, while sweet, is not that attractive to make me want to accept.  They can keep me as a shareholder in its books, even if it is delisted. They can privately offer me a huge amount to take 100% control, after the delisting. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
20-Sep-2021 17:07
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The SGX Cicus Maximus is notorious for Lowball Offers from Company Insiders !!!!  The offer price represents a premium of 19.8 per cent over the stock' s closing price on Sept 14, the last full trading day for the company prior to the announcement. It also represents a premium of 37 per cent over the 12-month volume-weighted average price up to and including the last trading date. The price, however, is below Roxy-Pacific' s adjusted net asset value (ANAV) per share of 72.87 cents as at June 30. The ANAV accounts for a revaluation surplus of S$463.4 million for some of the company' s hotel properties. TKL & Family is the bid vehicle of a consortium formed by 11 individuals, including the chairman and chief executive of Roxy-Pacific, Teo Hong Lim. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/stocks/hot-stock-roxy-pacific-up-as-much-as-173-on-pre-conditional-privatisation-offer   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
nqing87
Supreme |
20-Sep-2021 10:57
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If I were rich, I would give a low ball offer for all the property developer counters way below their NAV but at a slight premium in last traded price, just like what they have been doing for past few years.. seems like roxy is the next victim of low ball offer.. always wondering why our local investors don't give a higher valuation to our property counters | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
20-Sep-2021 10:22
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Roxy-Pacific' s chairman Teo offers 48.5 cents to privatise company
 
A group of investors led by Teo Hong Lim, chairman and CEO of Roxy-Pacific Holdings, is offering to buy out other shareholders at 48.5 cents.
 
The consortium of 11 investors already control or has secured in between them 76.44% of the shares. 
 
They intend to privatise the company, which is valued at $623.4 million based on the 48.5 cents offer price.
 
The offer price, at 19.8% premium over the last traded price on Sept 14, is final and will not be revised.
 
As at June 30, the company&rsquo s net asset value was 37.33 cents per share, up from 36.97 cents as at Dec 30 2020.
 
The offer is an &ldquo attractive opportunity&rdquo for other shareholders to exit, given how illiquid Roxy Pacific shares are, as well as the &ldquo challenging macro and operating environment&rdquo faced by the company amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. 
 
The offeror also cited &ldquo prolonged challenges&rdquo in the construction of development projects due to supply chain woes, labour crunch and higher material costs. 
 
&ldquo The company may also face increasing risks of delays in project completion and potential penalties from late delivery exacerbated by the increasing risk of default by construction contractors,&rdquo the offeror adds.
 
The pandemic continues to &ldquo hinder&rdquo Roxy-Pacific&rsquo s hotel business. 
 
&ldquo Continued weakness is expected in the hospitality industry as business travel and retail tourism remain lacklustre due to the surge in COVID-19 cases accelerated by the Delta variant.&rdquo
 
By privatising the company, the offeror will have more flexibility to &ldquo manage the business of the company and optimise the use of the company&rsquo s management and resources during this time of economic uncertainty.&rdquo
 
For 1HFY2021 ended June 30, the company reported earnings of $5.87 million, up 110% y-o-y. Revenue in the same period was up 20% y-o-y to $$141.2 million.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

