Latest Forum Topics /
YZJ Maritime
Last:0.615
+0.005
|
|
|
Will Parkson give out high dividend again ??
|
|||||
|
hokpin
Supreme |
14-Apr-2026 15:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
saw the actions!
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
HVRRVH
Elite |
14-Apr-2026 13:07
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Waitig for AGM date and circular. Would send them AGM question in advance. Disappointing performance post spin as summarised by old Ren' s remark, i.e., the stock should trade at least $0.90 even in current stage. This may not be entirely the ' Fault' of the company but the nature of SGX market, among other things. To be fair, overall SGX market has been performing well for quite some time already and this make it more disappointing to see YZJM' s current share price at $0.64. However, with the latest analysts coverage and old Ren' s interviews with the media, perception of YZJM could be better by the market going forward especially if FY2026 results truly show the market that YZJM' s business model can make a lot of money. As of now, nothing to be excited about until the share price is trading at least at $0.72.  | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
hokpin
Supreme |
14-Apr-2026 10:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Time to accumulate! | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Winnertakeall
Elite |
14-Apr-2026 10:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Sgvale
Supreme |
13-Apr-2026 13:08
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Near IPO price. Re-rating and SBB will drive it higher. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Winnertakeall
Elite |
13-Apr-2026 09:33
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
PhillipCapital sets its target price at 1.0x P/B (S$0.69) while DBS argues that as Return on Equity expands past 8%, the stock deserves a re-rating to 1.4x P/B (S$0.88). To the analysts, YZJ Maritime offers a combination of downside protection and high-growth optionality.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
11-Apr-2026 13:39
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yangzijiang Maritime&rsquo s &lsquo unique&rsquo business model captures shipping value chain
 
Seasoned investors in the Singapore stock market would be familiar with the Yangzijiang (YZJ) name. From one counter, the YZJ brand now has three entities listed on the Singapore Exchange: Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, Yangzijiang Financial and Yangzijiang Maritime Development.
 
The most recently listed entity, YZJ Maritime, was spun off from YZJ Financial and listed on the Mainboard in November 2025. YZJ Financial was spun off from YZJ Shipbuilding and listed in April 2022.
 
Despite being less than six months old on the exchange, YZJ Maritime is attracting more analyst attention. In his April 6 initiation report, PhillipCapital&rsquo s Glenn Thum rates the counter a &ldquo buy&rdquo at a target price of 69 cents. Similarly, Ho Pei Hwa from DBS initiated a &ldquo buy&rdquo rating on April 8 with an even higher target price of 88 cents.
 
YZJ Maritime operates across three segments: maritime business (investments, financing and services), cash management and other non-maritime investments. In FY2025 ended Dec 31, 2025, the company reported net profit attributable to shareholders of US$129.7 million ($165.6 million) and total income of US$142.4 million. It held approximately US$1.6 billion in net assets, with no borrowings and US$400 million in cash, which represented 27% of its market capitalisation.
 
Unique business model
Delving into YZJ Maritime&rsquo s business, Thum notes that the company is a &ldquo one-stop&rdquo platform for maritime financial solutions, acting as a &ldquo strategic hub&rdquo that connects all participants in the maritime ecosystem &mdash shipyards, shipowners, charterers and capital markets &mdash to create and capture value at every stage. Ho shares similar views, describing the firm as an &ldquo integrated&rdquo maritime investment platform, backed by the YZJ ecosystem and veteran Chinese shipbuilder Ren Yuanlin&rsquo s stewardship.
 
From Thum&rsquo s perspective, YZJ Maritime &ldquo captures value&rdquo at every stage of the vessel lifecycle (Figure 1). This includes newbuilding procurement margins of up to 20% below first-tier shipyard prices, charter income from operations, interest on finance leases and capital gains on vessel sale. As at end-2025, the firm has a portfolio of more than 80 vessels with up to 50 newbuilds in the pipeline.
 
With YZJ Maritime not owning or operating shipyards, both Thum and Ho describe the business as &ldquo asset light&rdquo , with the firm leveraging strategic partnerships to optimise construction costs, maintain flexibility, and scale while managing balance-sheet risk.
 
The way Thum sees it, the advantages of the model include: diversified income streams which reduces dependence on any single revenue source asset-backed nature of financing which protects against downside risks a proprietary deal pipeline that standalone shipowners or pure financiers cannot replicate and targeted unleveraged project internal rate of returns of 10%&ndash 15%, with the potential to reach 20%&ndash 30% through leverage.
 
From Ho&rsquo s perspective, YZJ Maritime provides stable income and resilience across cycles as shipping and shipbuilding tend to be counter-cyclical due to lag effects. She is confident in the business&rsquo s growth optionality from newbuilds and defensive nature, with predictable income from charters and finance leases supporting a defensive yet high-growth profile of 15%&ndash 20% CAGR with an attractive dividend yield of 3%&ndash 4% within the shipping sector.
 
Strengthening shipping cycle
With data showing vessel prices at 15-year highs, indicating an upswing in the shipping cycle, this is another factor fueling Thum&rsquo s confidence in YZJ Maritime. Pointing out that FY2025 revenue mix changed significantly with cash management decreasing 56% to US$33.5 million and the maritime business segment increasing by 61% to US$69.9 million, Thum believes the pivot to the maritime business provides the company with &ldquo significant runway&rdquo .
 
Meanwhile, Ho believes the firm is uniquely positioned to capitalise on the shipbuilding upcycle, citing the proprietary deal pipeline, the company&rsquo s ability to underwrite complex, asset-backed maritime transactions, and its diversified investment approach as underlying factors for her positive outlook.
 
On the back of a strengthening shipping cycle, YZJ Maritime&rsquo s strong balance sheet and business model unlikely to be replicated, Thum believes the company&rsquo s shares are worth a &ldquo buy&rdquo . Based on the one-time FY2026 estimated P/B, he values the company at 69 cents per share.
 
Ho believes YZJ Maritime&rsquo s current valuation of 0.9 times of FY2026 forecasted P/B and 11 times of forecasted P/E is &ldquo undemanding&rdquo relative to the growth outlook. She values the counter at 1.4 times the P/B multiple, representing a valuation of 88 cents per share, in line with global peers, which are valued at 17 times forecast P/E.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Winnertakeall
Elite |
11-Apr-2026 12:45
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yangzijiang Maritime unique business
https://www.theedgesingapore.com/capital/investing-ideas/yangzijiang-maritimes-unique-business-model-captures-shipping-value-chain
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
HVRRVH
Elite |
11-Apr-2026 12:16
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yes fair enough, the company did not commit to a rights issue even though the question was asked during EGM. Nonetheless, they ought to be more categorical in tackling the question. After the spin off, we now know instead of short of cash, they have excessive cash because the cash was not deployed. Of course there wasn' t a need for rights issue now with the excessive cash. In fact, the excess cash amounting to SGD$507m if remain undeploy is a waste of capital. I was under the impression during the lead up to the spin off that, after the spin off, YZJM would have no problem finding opportunities to put their money and that' s why they even willing to entertain the question of rights issue. However, it seems that both YZJF and YZJM are facing challenges to put their money into good use now. For YZJF, the only significant news was their $100m anchor fund in local mid and small cap equities investment after failing to be the white knight of Shan Shan. The returns is not expected to be a lot even we assume that the ROI is 10% for their 100m local fund. YZJM has excess fund to such an extend that they are prepare to use it for SBB. Well, if they have good use of the money for bigger returns, perhaps they would not consider SBB so that illustrate the challenges they face in deploying the money. The strtegic positioning of the SBB is also questionble. After the mandate is obtained, they didn' t even bother to buy back any shares from $0.58 to $0.505. Yes, that the price movements since the SBB mandate was obtained and now, the price has move back up to $0.625 and I think we can forget about any SBB. So did the company in fact deploy some of its cash during the time SBB mandate was obtain till now? If not, is this a case of no SBB and no investment of its cash from then till now? If so, it raise the question of competency and optimal managment of cash capital. Is this the reason why they are reluctance to conduct quarterly volunteer business update? Even though old Ren has proven that he is shrew and can make money for shareholders, I think more information need to be disclose on regular basis for shareholders to stay inform. One thing good about old Ren is that he always try to create value for shareholders, latest being floating the idea of secondary HKSE listing. Also, the latest 2 coverage by Phillip and DBS have somehow make the business model clearer to the wider investment community and have boosted the investors' confidence in the company.  | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
volvo125
Master |
10-Apr-2026 23:34
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
1.  The original intent of the coy as highlighted in the Circular was to issue private placement shares to institutions (to satisfy SGX requirement to raise capital), rights issue was never mentioned. During EGM, shareholders highlighted their concerns on the potential up to 20% dilution due to discounted issued private placement price, so the idea of Rights issue was floated up by some other shareholders and some wild suggestions of 1 for 10 .... 1 or 3 ... etc were disscused  and the coy said it will consider. There has been no commitment of doing Right issue. The coy instead went on to issue just a small ~9m shares to raise a token ~$5m capital to satisfy the SGX listing requirement. 2.    Yes, why the hurry to call an early EGM in Mar to solicit an SBB mandate and then not following through with any buy back action thereafter inspite of the acute price drop to as low as 0.51 ....  3.    Yes, they floated up the Pri/Sec listing or better still, Dual listing balloon .... so now we are asking is this balloon still up in the sky ? We are only asking for the " balloon" only, NOT Definitive Decision. 4.    Yes, should press YMD, and YFH too, to continue to practice the 1Q and 3Q voluntary updates. VT was religious in providing 1Q and 3Q updates until his departure. YZJSB does that, all the big 3 SG Banks do that, CDL, Genting, Venture, iFast, AEM ..... do that. So why YFH and YMD choose to skip these updates which shareholders would very much like to stay inform ?  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
HVRRVH
Elite |
10-Apr-2026 12:09
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Got it very wrong here with regard to price action, thinking that it may still hover round low $0.50+ so dry powder hasn' t deploy. On hindsight BBs have been accumulating at low before pushing up aggressively from $0.54. Should be trying $0.68 next with supports at current level. Waiting for AGM and will pose a few questions to the management, among others, 1) why give mixed signals- During spin off time say will consider rights issue but no sign of case 2) SBB mandate - Instead of rights issue, hurridedly obtained SBB mandate, which is in contrast with earlier intention of issuing rights shares, one is to increase float one is to reduce float 3) Just like rights issue with regard to SBB - no follow up after talk about it and obtained the mandate 4) New talk of second HKSE listing - Is it still exploring or again, just talk only? 5) How about summary quartely release so that investors can track closely the performance of the company. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
hokpin
Supreme |
10-Apr-2026 12:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I would much more be convinced as buy up because of obviously undervalue now. Dual listing is still far amd only a personal talk now.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Hawkeye
Master |
10-Apr-2026 09:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Some BB decided to buy up. Perhaps preparing to accumulate shares for dual listing in HK.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
hokpin
Supreme |
09-Apr-2026 15:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Today is the top 5th volume of this counter ever since its listing since 19 Nov 25 till date. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Dannkh
Master |
09-Apr-2026 14:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Going to above 70c. Something is brewing?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
SlothSG
Veteran |
09-Apr-2026 14:32
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Swee .... pickup some below $0.60.... Probably institutions pick durians 😂 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kt3152
Supreme |
09-Apr-2026 14:30
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Waiting for it to break 64.... | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
hokpin
Supreme |
09-Apr-2026 14:14
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Noticed that these 2 days volume is very high... | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
hokpin
Supreme |
09-Apr-2026 13:50
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
THx. Bro. 0.88 is good enough!
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
s100125
Elite |
09-Apr-2026 13:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Ren said a more reasonable share price for Yangzijiang Maritime should be about 90 cents | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

