Back

Latest Forum Topics / Alita Resources    Last:0.078 --

Post Reply

alliance mineral resources move up Post Reply Rate topic
KopRed75 Veteran	06-Apr-2017 14:17        KopRed75 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Distribution at 0.395 is too low a price. risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 14:15) Posted: I dont think so... most shares already hold up by rich investors just waiting for next leg up johnncheng81      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 14:13) Posted: That will be the best scenario...haha...somethings worse things happen when distribution occur
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	06-Apr-2017 14:15        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I dont think so... most shares already hold up by rich investors just waiting for next leg up johnncheng81      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 14:13) Posted: That will be the best scenario...haha...somethings worse things happen when distribution occurs ben_kieran      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 14:09) Posted: meaning they taking profit at 0.395?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
johnncheng81 Veteran	06-Apr-2017 14:13        johnncheng81 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	That will be the best scenario...haha...somethings worse things happen when distribution occurs ben_kieran      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 14:09) Posted: meaning they taking profit at 0.395? johnncheng81      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:55) Posted: Means BBs are slowly selling their shares to retailers at 395..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	06-Apr-2017 14:10        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Lol its my own view... why u so worried... also do i need to get permission from u to publish my own view? I am just stating the fact ... anyone that has common sense will ask why.... as they are sharing the interest altogether..... there are people that spent hundred of millions to get the mine going but tawana just spent 20m.... Relax why u sound so stress lol RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 14:04) Posted: Prove it. I have not come across anything in the " Investor Manual" that says: " The price gap between two firms cannot exceed ' X' amount" . You made the conjecture screaming about price gap so prove it. risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:58) Posted: Sorry basically...cos i buy alliance i research ma... u think i so free meh lol...but price gap shouldnt be in a huge way ...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
ben_kieran Member	06-Apr-2017 14:09        ben_kieran About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	meaning they taking profit at 0.395? johnncheng81      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:55) Posted: Means BBs are slowly selling their shares to retailers at 395... ben_kieran      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:30) Posted: Hi John meaning what exactly? sorry noob here.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	06-Apr-2017 14:04        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Prove it. I have not come across anything in the " Investor Manual" that says: " The price gap between two firms cannot exceed ' X' amount" . You made the conjecture screaming about price gap so prove it. risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:58) Posted: Sorry basically...cos i buy alliance i research ma... u think i so free meh lol...but price gap shouldnt be in a huge way .... RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:53) Posted: Okay...to test your hypothesis can you highlight other examples of the share price differential between a mineral rights owner and the contractor exploring that property with potential to get a 50% share...if you can highlight the differential in like cases closely parralel then your concern may be warranted...but if the differential is just as much then just blowing in the wind...so can you provide other examples?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	06-Apr-2017 14:02        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yes that is true.... possible take over target.... lithiumpower      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:59) Posted: Similar to Galaxy taking control of the Mt Cattlin lithium project with 100% takeover of General Mining Corp.. Atom99      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:44) Posted: In my opinion,AMAL is a potential M&A target.If you follow the mining news,especially on Lithium mines,in Australia
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lithiumpower Member	06-Apr-2017 13:59        lithiumpower About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Similar to Galaxy taking control of the Mt Cattlin lithium project with 100% takeover of General Mining Corp.. Atom99      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:44) Posted: In my opinion,AMAL is a potential M&A target.If you follow the mining news,especially on Lithium mines,in Australia. hobert      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:39) Posted: the fundamentals and prospect of AM has not changed...so there' s no reason for panic selling. Stocks price move up and down every day...if everyday keep chionging up for no reason...i will scare.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	06-Apr-2017 13:58        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Sorry basically...cos i buy alliance i research ma... u think i so free meh lol...but price gap shouldnt be in a huge way .... RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:53) Posted: Okay...to test your hypothesis can you highlight other examples of the share price differential between a mineral rights owner and the contractor exploring that property with potential to get a 50% share...if you can highlight the differential in like cases closely parralel then your concern may be warranted...but if the differential is just as much then just blowing in the wind...so can you provide other examples?  risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:44) Posted: I only say what i see... i been monitoring... alliance n tawana in the 10c... tawana use to be higher... but alliance over took.. i got raise the issue before dont believe go read... but alliance keep chionging. ..lol but maybe becos tawana is spending the money but the gap different is too big lol... I only comment what i found out.... FYI onl
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
johnncheng81 Veteran	06-Apr-2017 13:55        johnncheng81 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Means BBs are slowly selling their shares to retailers at 395... ben_kieran      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:30) Posted: Hi John meaning what exactly? sorry noob here. johnncheng81      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:28) Posted: Bbs seem to be distibutin at 395. Bewar
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	06-Apr-2017 13:53        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Okay...to test your hypothesis can you highlight other examples of the share price differential between a mineral rights owner and the contractor exploring that property with potential to get a 50% share...if you can highlight the differential in like cases closely parralel then your concern may be warranted...but if the differential is just as much then just blowing in the wind...so can you provide other examples?  risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:44) Posted: I only say what i see... i been monitoring... alliance n tawana in the 10c... tawana use to be higher... but alliance over took.. i got raise the issue before dont believe go read... but alliance keep chionging. ..lol but maybe becos tawana is spending the money but the gap different is too big lol... I only comment what i found out.... FYI only RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:38) Posted: Love ya Bro...drumming business for yourself...one second long then short then long then short....like a light switch...promote one second to drive up price, then create fear to drive down...u must be making a fortune....congrats on your skill...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lithiumpower Member	06-Apr-2017 13:48        lithiumpower About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Tawana has to cough out the money in order to earn 50% rights in whatever minerals to be explored in Bald Hill... Still Bald Hill Mine is 100% fully owned by AMAL and there is no need for AMAL to earn the 50% rights to the minerals to be mined at Bald Hill!  risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:44) Posted: I only say what i see... i been monitoring... alliance n tawana in the 10c... tawana use to be higher... but alliance over took.. i got raise the issue before dont believe go read... but alliance keep chionging. ..lol but maybe becos tawana is spending the money but the gap different is too big lol... I only comment what i found out.... FYI only RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:38) Posted: Love ya Bro...drumming business for yourself...one second long then short then long then short....like a light switch...promote one second to drive up price, then create fear to drive down...u must be making a fortune....congrats on your skill...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
timothylim890 Veteran	06-Apr-2017 13:47        timothylim890 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Useful points raised. Thanks. RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:19) Posted: I understand where you coming from, but this is not a case of comparing apples to apples. Some points that can distort the values: (1) Correct me if wrong, but I believe AMA have the formal rights to Bald Hill mine. Tawana is currently entitled to zero. Under the agreement they get a 50% interest in the lithium from the project only when they have actually spent $7.5 million on exploration, evaluation and feasibility. They have till Dec 31 2017 to do this. So even if they discover great deposits of lithium, if they only spend $5 million (for example) as fail to raise sufficient funding then Tawana gets nothing but AMA still got its share. If deposits there and Tawana fail to live up to their side then AWA simply goes to another contractor who I am sure would jump at chance if proven deposits. So compared to AMA, Tawana still got lot more at risk. (2) To get 50% interest in all the minerals Tawana needs to spend $12.5 million on upgrade and convert. Till they do that capital expenditure they only (if spend the $7.5 million on exploration, evaluation and feasibility) entitled to lithium BUT not the other minerals. Tawana still must come up with all the funding etc before they can see more of the prize. And they must do this upfront versus AMA who are not. So Tawana got more at risk than AMA. If it comes out as true lithium deposits abound with nice lots ot tantalum as bonus but Tawana fails to spend enough etc then AMA left with the deposits to bank whilst Tawana left with nothing but money spent on what it did. So Tawana will need to pour in cash upfront before they even entitled to things whereas AMA sitting on the money and still hold the rights. Tawana more risky then AMA at this point. (3) Pricing is in different markets. AMA got the monopoly in Singapore. If SG investor  (talking this the uncle/auntie retail investor who onlly got shallow pockets and do not want FX risk investing in Aus firm, not the deep pocket Peter Lims who can invest in Australia)  wants some lithium action can only grab AMA. In comparison for Aus investor you got competitors. Do I drop my hard earned cash into a proven lithium producer like Galaxy? Or an entity that as yet does not actually have the 50% rights? And with Australia there are so many resource firms whereas Singapore not really got many. So in context of Australia far more competitors competing for investors with money looking to invest into resources but in Singapore who do you have to select from? In Australia may be a number of firms selling their great resource and mineral find to investors whilst in Singapore it only AMA. Tawana is a small fish in a big pond but AMA a big fish in a small pond. (4) Tawana got several projects on the go at moment. AMA only focused on Bald Hill. So Tawana is likely burning through more money and they do not actually have the rights to anything (as they still exploring) but AMA at least got something and they not burning cash or needing to raise finance on other projects. So Tawana potentially put more at risk (with higher chance of reward if all pay off) than AMA as they need to put out the cash. Those just a few point that could help to explain the difference. And it should not be forgotten the share price of Tawana has risen from about 3c mid last year to 24c now. That is about a 700 - 800% rise, and they do not even have the rights to the 50% interest. AMA also risen from 6c to 40c so about the same rise. So rather than compare in absolute terms 24c versus 40c (ignore FX difference which actually reduces AMA share price to about 37c) perhaps compare on the percentage increase. lithiumpower      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:05) Posted: Tawana did not buy 50% stake into AMAL.   Tawana has to invest A$20M to earn 50% rights in all the minerals to be mined..just a Farm-In JV, that' s all! Bald Hill asset still belongs to AMAL!
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Atom99 Master	06-Apr-2017 13:44        Atom99 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental   Mood: Yells: "Once you hv eliminated the impossible,whatever remains TRUTH"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	In my opinion,AMAL is a potential M&A target.If you follow the mining news,especially on Lithium mines,in Australia. hobert      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:39) Posted: the fundamentals and prospect of AM has not changed...so there' s no reason for panic selling. Stocks price move up and down every day...if everyday keep chionging up for no reason...i will scare.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	06-Apr-2017 13:44        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I only say what i see... i been monitoring... alliance n tawana in the 10c... tawana use to be higher... but alliance over took.. i got raise the issue before dont believe go read... but alliance keep chionging. ..lol but maybe becos tawana is spending the money but the gap different is too big lol... I only comment what i found out.... FYI only RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:38) Posted: Love ya Bro...drumming business for yourself...one second long then short then long then short....like a light switch...promote one second to drive up price, then create fear to drive down...u must be making a fortune....congrats on your skill... risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 12:49) Posted: just saw Tawana got trash now on the way to 0.20.... something is not right here
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	06-Apr-2017 13:42        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Heck, you a qualified miner as well...so you know precisely how much effort to spend 7.5 million right? Wow...you so skilled knowing the cost of these things...my hat off to you....if dig so ' X' number of holes it cost 7.5 mill....wish I knew the secret formula... risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:38) Posted: Based from the tawana alliance announcment they dig so much hole liao and sent for analysis and even sent 60kg bag of resources to buyers to grade.... spending 7.5m is not a problem... go read tawana plan... if tawana fail... Alliance will drop like fly... lol alliance depend on tawana funds n expertise.... Not that i say aussie is rascist but the local angmo can get things done easier there RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:33) Posted: Wrong.....read agreement...need to spend $7.5 million by Dec 31 2017 on exploration, etc first...then get 50% rights to lithium ONLY. Have they spent $7.5 million yet?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lithiumpower Member	06-Apr-2017 13:42        lithiumpower About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Haha...looks like Tawana is owning Bald Hill Mine and not the other way round.. It is interesting to know that now AMAL just earns the right to explore and mine lithium at the Bald Hill Mine it owns since IPO.   risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:38) Posted: Based from the tawana alliance announcment they dig so much hole liao and sent for analysis and even sent 60kg bag of resources to buyers to grade.... spending 7.5m is not a problem... go read tawana plan... if tawana fail... Alliance will drop like fly... lol alliance depend on tawana funds n expertise.... Not that i say aussie is rascist but the local angmo can get things done easier there RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:33) Posted: Wrong.....read agreement...need to spend $7.5 million by Dec 31 2017 on exploration, etc first...then get 50% rights to lithium ONLY. Have they spent $7.5 million yet?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
hobert Member	06-Apr-2017 13:39        hobert About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Yells: "As long no loss is win..."
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	the fundamentals and prospect of AM has not changed...so there' s no reason for panic selling. Stocks price move up and down every day...if everyday keep chionging up for no reason...i will scare.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	06-Apr-2017 13:38        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Love ya Bro...drumming business for yourself...one second long then short then long then short....like a light switch...promote one second to drive up price, then create fear to drive down...u must be making a fortune....congrats on your skill... risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 12:49) Posted: just saw Tawana got trash now on the way to 0.20.... something is not right here
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	06-Apr-2017 13:38        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Based from the tawana alliance announcment they dig so much hole liao and sent for analysis and even sent 60kg bag of resources to buyers to grade.... spending 7.5m is not a problem... go read tawana plan... if tawana fail... Alliance will drop like fly... lol alliance depend on tawana funds n expertise.... Not that i say aussie is rascist but the local angmo can get things done easier there RedEye1811      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:33) Posted: Wrong.....read agreement...need to spend $7.5 million by Dec 31 2017 on exploration, etc first...then get 50% rights to lithium ONLY. Have they spent $7.5 million yet? risktaker      ( Date: 06-Apr-2017 13:29) Posted: This means they buy from Alliance liao ma... the Alliances only owns the rights to mine there and now share 50% with tawana...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   7301-7320 of 10377   Older>   Last