| Latest Forum Topics / Best World |
|
|
MCT
|
|||||
|
Leehonghng
Member |
12-May-2019 18:02
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
They are not able to answer a few simple queries as requested by SGX! You think what type of company they are???
The peoples behind the door are able to address the matters to both SGX, BR and VV, this will lead to have more issues from all parties concerned. The counter will be continue being suspended and will drop to as low as 10 to 20 cents.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Sin_Cos_Tan
Veteran |
12-May-2019 17:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
![]()   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
investshare
Supreme |
12-May-2019 17:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Or disown the sister?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
12-May-2019 16:54
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
U already stated what it is below.  Only if people pay more attention .....
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
laksaman57
Supreme |
12-May-2019 16:46
|
||||
|
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
Hmmmm....maybe got insider feeding Bonitas/VV with BW rebuttals | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
12-May-2019 16:46
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
They need four days to do some magic, perhaps do the first DNA transfusion ever to turn the bil into someone else .....
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockpicker
Master |
12-May-2019 16:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Google GAAR China,  please
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
pool100
Veteran |
12-May-2019 16:36
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Previous day' s naked shorts are not covered the following day. they' re covered off-market by SGX buy-ins. Also, any strong opening prices are further opportunities to add short positions. Once more shorts have been loaded, Bonitas and VV will send in a rebuttal to BW' s rebuttals and send the prices tanking again. This is a typical short selling cycle and BW can' t blame anyone but themselves. After all, if they have nothing to hide, they won' t need 4 days to answer a few straight-forward questions. They must have something to hide and are scrambling to fabricate something now. My long term view of BW is that it will go back to 20 cents.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Superkilat
Elite |
12-May-2019 13:54
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
What is GAAR? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockpicker
Master |
12-May-2019 13:47
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
So by crooks or hooks,  BWL has to declare ChangSha Best as an indepedent import agent.. this is just a deduction.. better for you to find more information about this GAAR before making any investment decision
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockpicker
Master |
12-May-2019 13:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
In this case,  Changsha Best buying goods directly from BWL Singapore  as an import agent and pay the money for such good to BWL Singapore,  it is not under the GAAR rules..
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockpicker
Master |
12-May-2019 13:36
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I have a feeling that BWL is using Changsha Best for tax avoidance purposes.  this is because China has in 2008 introduced a new rule call General anit-tax avoidance rules (GAAR) to handle foriegn companies that transfer large sum of money from subsidiary companies not for commercial reasons but for tax avoidance.  | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Operator81
Senior |
12-May-2019 12:32
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Where is the $150 million? Are the syndicates selling out or buying in? Still in denial mode like Beng?  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
bayduck
Member |
12-May-2019 11:52
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Agree with you. I think it is a straightforward question to answer if they have nothing to hide. If I were to Guess, they will reply that legal rep is BIL, but that BIL is not deemed as associate pursuant to the rules, and as such, Changsha is deemed independent based on their interpretation of the letter of law. Then they will go and put up some story justifying that there is no conflict of interest in the arrangement (e.g. the sales are conducted at arms length etc), which is the bread and butter reason most companies give. anyway, I don&rsquo t know why the bulls keep harping on the $150M war chest or sth. If Bonitas allegations are true, then it follows that the cash balance is inflated too, so probably have to give a haircut to the balance.  To me, the best way to restore confidence is for management to buy back shares using their own money. According to bonitas, d& d took home around $100M in salary and dividends over the past 8 years. If they can spend $80M to increase their stake in the business, and put money where their mouth is, that will be great for investor confidence.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
12-May-2019 10:37
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Not bil what is there to explain?  More likely fact is they are pushed into a corner they probably never expected.  The more likely scenario is whatever they try to explain the short seller wld probably have sometime to hit them on short n swift.  Let' s see how things develop tmr morning.  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Shifu8888
Supreme |
12-May-2019 10:21
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If BIL- need to explain why not disclose
If not BIL- need to explain the independence Got it? This is not a straight-forward question. Two short-sellers. Anyway, they have $150m to mount a massive defence and buy back. But I prefer to see the two ladies using own money to buy up.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
runaway
Senior |
12-May-2019 09:12
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
是 不 是 妹 夫 这 种 事 不 能 瞒 天 过 海 。 其 实 答 案 很 简 单 , 是 或 不 是 。 有 这 么 难 回 答 meh? 回 答 是 或 不 是 都 要 负 责 任 。   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kerier
Veteran |
11-May-2019 20:30
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Of course they have the rights and BW has to prove it. You think a simple statement saying they aren' t the same person will suffice?  | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Superkilat
Elite |
11-May-2019 20:15
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
That us extractly the point. Does the board has the id of changsa best legal person? Do they have righrs to ask for Huan BIL id and marriage cert? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kerier
Veteran |
11-May-2019 20:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If both names are the same but different persons then prove it with their NRICs, marriage certificate etc.    |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||


