Latest Forum Topics /
Seatrium Ltd
Last:2.02
-0.01
|
|
|
Alliance Mineral the next Blue Chip - TP 1.50
|
|||||
|
jlim70
Member |
23-Dec-2025 22:10
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
[SINGAPORE] Seatrium said it is &ldquo closely monitoring&rdquo the Trump administration stop-work order issued to the end-customer of a U$475 million wind vessel job, noting that it can be redeployed beyond the US market. Seatrium was responding to The Business Times&rsquo queries on Tuesday (Dec 23) after news broke that morning that Empire Offshore Wind had received a US government order to stop construction on the Empire Wind 1 project due to &ldquo national security concerns&rdquo . Four other wind projects also received similar orders from the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, including the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, the country&rsquo s largest such project. This is the second such order affecting Empire Wind 1 this year the first was in April.  
In October, the Singapore offshore marine company received from Maersk affiliate Phoenix II a termination notice for the wind turbine installation vessel meant for the Empire Wind 1 project, which was scheduled for completion in the early part of 2025. On Monday, Seatrium said the two parties have reached an agreement with the Maersk affiliate to pay the balance of the contract price &ndash valued at US$360 million. Upon delivery of the vessel by Feb 28, 2026, Seatrium will receive upfront payment of about US$110 million. The remaining US$250 million will come from an interest-bearing loan of up to 10 years granted by Seatrium and this will be funded by cash generated from the vessel.  
Seatrium will also have first priority rights over the asset and the buyer&rsquo s bank accounts. According to Citi analyst Luis Hilado, the latest development should not derail the settlement. &ldquo Management noted that the vessel utility is not limited to the US offshore market and as such can be redeployed to European markets.&rdquo He added: &ldquo As such, despite the  recent suspension of the Empire Wind project anew, there are offsets to the project and commercial launch risks embedded in the new contract.&rdquo  
He added that any share price weakness from the news of the suspension itself would be an opportunity to accumulate the shares instead. Shares of Seatrium were flat at S$2.13 on Tuesday as at the midday trading break, having climbed 2.9 per cent the previous day on news of the Maersk resolution. Empire Offshore Wind on Tuesday said it was engaging the relevant authorities to &ldquo better understand this matter&rdquo . Its Empire Wind 1 project, which is &ldquo more than 60 per cent complete&rdquo , has been set to connect to New York&rsquo s grid and provide enough power to electrify 500,000 homes. Norwegian state oil company Equinor, which is developing the Empire Wind 1 project, said: &ldquo In total, dozens of vessels, around 1,000 people, and more than a hundred companies in the US and globally have been working in coordination on the Empire Wind project.&rdquo It added: &ldquo The stop-work order threatens the progress of these activities and, without a swift solution, there may be significant impact to the project.&rdquo  
 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
eugesun
Elite |
23-Dec-2025 15:47
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
easy squeez now if SBB come in...
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
23-Dec-2025 12:03
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Seatrium, Maersk resolve contract dispute with giant line to pay US$360 million upon vessel delivery
Part of the amount will be paid using an interest-bearing credit arrangement
 
[SINGAPORE] Offshore, marine and energy specialist Seatrium has reached an agreement with buyer Maersk Offshore Wind&rsquo s affiliate Phoenix II to pay the balance of the contract price &ndash valued at US$360 million &ndash upon delivery of a vessel.
 
This deal comes after the group started its own arbitration proceedings against the buyer in November, against a &ldquo wrongfully terminated&rdquo US$475 million contract in 2022. 
 
Seatrium said in a statement on Monday (Dec 22) that the wind turbine installation vessel involved in the contract will be delivered by Feb 28, 2026.
 
Both parties agreed for the Maersk affiliate to pay part of the contract price &ndash US$250 million &ndash using an interest-bearing credit arrangement. This was extended to the buyer by the company&rsquo s wholly owned subsidiary, Seatrium (SG). 
 
The credit arrangement is for up to 10 years and repayable through cash generated by the vessel. 
 
Seatrium said its subsidiary will have a mortgage over the vessel, as well as first priority rights over the vessel and the Maersk affiliate&rsquo s bank accounts. 
 
Earlier in October, the group received a termination notice for its contract with the Maersk affiliate for the construction of the wind turbine installation vessel at a US offshore wind farm. This project was scheduled to be completed in the early part of 2025. 
 
Both parties will withdraw and discontinue all legal proceedings following Monday&rsquo s announcement, with the contract in full force and effect. 
 
Seatrium does not expect the latest development to affect its net tangible assets and earnings per share for the current financial year ending Dec 31. It will make further announcements as and when there are material developments.
 
Citi analyst Luis Hilado noted that although he and other analysts had not expected Seatrium to lose money through the arbitration, the market still views the resolution &ldquo positively&rdquo due to the removal of the legal overhang.
 
&ldquo We believe this will supersede concerns of being exposed to the operational performance of the vessel,&rdquo said Hilado in a note on Monday. &ldquo Combined with the revival of its order win momentum, the stage is set for a better 2026 financial year.&rdquo
 
Any potential negative perception of Seatrium will also be addressed thanks to the resolution, he added, setting a target price of S$2.65.
 
Hilado also said that although the new payment terms technically discounted the contract&rsquo s value, the interest charged will likely balance out any hit to 2025 earnings. 
 
Not only that, the deal structure is likely to increase finance income from 2026, but he added that he was waiting to see if Seatrium had the right to sell the vessel to a third party.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
FATABA
Supreme |
23-Dec-2025 09:51
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I guess the market think otherwise. Back below 2.10. Somehow Seatrium wld be affected in this market. Recent so call settlement is a step back for Seatrium w a cut in price etc.  Time will tell ...dyodd
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
newbie19
Supreme |
23-Dec-2025 09:14
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The pause will affect Danish energy firm Orsted?s Revolution Wind and Sunrise Wind projects, Avangrid and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners? Vineyard Wind 1 project, Dominion Energy?s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, and Equinor?s Empire Wind 1 project, according to the statement.
Shares in Orsted traded down more than 12 per cent, with Dominion and Equinor also trading lower.
Seatrium not affected.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
FATABA
Supreme |
23-Dec-2025 08:53
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
  US freezes five big offshore wind projects, shares dive/Orsted one of them.If not wrong ...Seatrium is involved in one of this or more ?  Kep OM was also in this or completed. Let see any update coming up . DYODD |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Alignment
Elite |
23-Dec-2025 04:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The situation on the Maersk contract has not reverted to the pre-dispute announcement positon, because a) Seatrium made concessions to get to the resolution, and b) the dispute raises questions as to whether there are other hidden landmines. This needs to be weighed against the upside from the new contracts. What the balance is, everyone needs to make their own minds up. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
n3wbie
Elite |
23-Dec-2025 01:51
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Stock went from $2.40+ to $2.05 since Oct after the Maersk announcement back in Oct so theoretically, the stock should revert to those levels and higher since they won two other new contracts over the last 2 months which clearly have not been priced in the stock. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joyoftheworld
Master |
22-Dec-2025 22:02
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Simple. Just double the CEO' s annual pay from $4mil to $8mil and we will see $4 in no time at time. But have to wait til next AGM to approve that.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
GreenSprout
Member |
22-Dec-2025 20:05
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Holding to this is no fun ... what does it take to rocket... | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
eugesun
Elite |
22-Dec-2025 15:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
slow and steady...climbing..huat ahhh
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Workaholic
Member |
22-Dec-2025 12:01
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Absolutely! See the price climbed by almost 4%. No point speculating the impact.... just look at the share price fly. This is just the start only. More to come. Happy Holidays.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
LoudShout
Master |
22-Dec-2025 11:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
more like crawling a horizontal slippery, slimly ground.. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
haizzz
Senior |
22-Dec-2025 10:40
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
when Maersk sued, the share dived from top of building. Now case resolved, use staircase to climb up??? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joyoftheworld
Master |
22-Dec-2025 09:53
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
各 退 一 步 。
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joyoftheworld
Master |
22-Dec-2025 09:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Wrong. Maersk' s subsidiary got what they want. A US$20mil discount and vendor financing for US$250mil.  The original purhase price is $475mil. Maerslk paid 20% at the start. The remaining 80% of US$380mil is payable at delivery. Sinktrium gave a $20mil discount, so $360mil paybale. It seems that Maersk (the parent co.) is willing to let the subsidiary go bankrupt instead of topping up cash. In essence, the subsidiary don' t have enough money to pay up the full amount. Therefore, Sinkttrium have to give them $250mil of financing payable over 10 long years at likely low interest. The plus for Sinktrium is they receive US$110mil (likely all the cash Maersk' s subsidiary has right now) and don' t have to make immediate loss provision.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
LoudShout
Master |
22-Dec-2025 09:45
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
One legacy nonsense at least removed in the near term.  Another is the Operations Car Wash aribtration by Keppel.    Seatrium removing these landmines.  Hopefully, these will be the last of the nonsense/ |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
CheongArgh
Master |
22-Dec-2025 09:44
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Coupled with good news, this one will go beyond 2.60  this time !  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
CheongArgh
Master |
22-Dec-2025 09:41
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Santa claus rally started ?  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Caesar
Master |
22-Dec-2025 09:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Nice Christmas present. Thanks!
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

