Back

Latest Forum Topics / YuuZoo Networks

Post Reply

Oceanus major business model restructure Post Reply Rate topic
halleluyah Supreme	30-May-2016 11:05        halleluyah About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	....
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Tradingtowin Veteran	30-May-2016 09:19        Tradingtowin About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	There is no point agruing a counter will go Up or Down when TA & FA can' t apply anymore, leave it or use your instinct to decide that' s it ! 😆 lol   Demostation      ( Date: 30-May-2016 08:58) Posted: Stop arguing and talk as though we are the big time businessmen who know everything about business, about ecommerce.  We are just some semi-jobless share investors. If we are that smart, we would be extablished even if not rich and won' t be here reading SJ forum, wasting much of our precious time and tat of most others who come here to look for news.  Sorry no offence to anyone, lol.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
halleluyah Supreme	30-May-2016 09:11        halleluyah About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	alipapa gt deal wth ah zoo....gd reputation...will get some to hold....
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Demostation Supreme	30-May-2016 08:58        Demostation About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Stop arguing and talk as though we are the big time businessmen who know everything about business, about ecommerce.  We are just some semi-jobless share investors. If we are that smart, we would be extablished even if not rich and won' t be here reading SJ forum, wasting much of our precious time and tat of most others who come here to look for news.  Sorry no offence to anyone, lol.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
ken777 Veteran	30-May-2016 08:10        ken777 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Are you heavily vested or some internal spokesman for Yuuzoo ? Anyway from your post , you are 110% positive and hopefully you are right. In terms of user base and user growth can it be compare with snapchat to demand a fair share px or what is the fair share px do you think Yuuzoo deserve currently , a year later or half a decade later? It burn cash to inject for exponatial growth for the business if that is what you are implying. Just my 2cent jm2110      ( Date: 30-May-2016 06:58) Posted:   So you are suggesting TZ has quietly divested? Sorry I just have no idea here because if that is your insinuation you are barking up the wrong tree.   TZ was and in the company' s largest shareholder for around 180m shares. The change in status for those shares is presumably because the shares were subject to the GEM stock lending contract in these new accounts when they weren' t before. To top this off the stock lending only occurs in the 15 business days between the tap of the GEM line and the issuance of shares so not a concern and finally both the chairman and CEO stated at the AGM the don' t anticipate tapping the line again unless it was for the likes of an acquisition - certainly not to fund the day-to-day funding of the business as hey expect to go cash flow positive before the current funds are drained. So how about you stop being cryptic and just state your accusation directly so that we can call the company, seek clarification and shoot your claim down? sheerluck      ( Date: 29-May-2016 22:07) Posted: From their 2014 Annual Report, Mobile Futurework has direct interest in 165 mil shares. From their 2015 Annual Report, Mobile Futurework has deemed interest and no direct interest in the 172mil shares. They distract you with " big" news but under your nose, things are happening. You think the above means nothing.  Think again. In a contract, the fine print is where all the disclaimers are and I bet most never bother to read them. So while details are important and attention to details are the more important.  Are you detail enough? DYDD.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	30-May-2016 07:11        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Feel like they pledge their shares....the biggest shareholder is retail investors...over 70%....seems no funds or bbs keen to takeover 50%....
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
jm2110 Member	30-May-2016 06:58        jm2110 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	So you are suggesting TZ has quietly divested? Sorry I just have no idea here because if that is your insinuation you are barking up the wrong tree.   TZ was and in the company' s largest shareholder for around 180m shares. The change in status for those shares is presumably because the shares were subject to the GEM stock lending contract in these new accounts when they weren' t before. To top this off the stock lending only occurs in the 15 business days between the tap of the GEM line and the issuance of shares so not a concern and finally both the chairman and CEO stated at the AGM the don' t anticipate tapping the line again unless it was for the likes of an acquisition - certainly not to fund the day-to-day funding of the business as hey expect to go cash flow positive before the current funds are drained. So how about you stop being cryptic and just state your accusation directly so that we can call the company, seek clarification and shoot your claim down? sheerluck      ( Date: 29-May-2016 22:07) Posted: From their 2014 Annual Report, Mobile Futurework has direct interest in 165 mil shares. From their 2015 Annual Report, Mobile Futurework has deemed interest and no direct interest in the 172mil shares. They distract you with " big" news but under your nose, things are happening. You think the above means nothing.  Think again. In a contract, the fine print is where all the disclaimers are and I bet most never bother to read them. So while details are important and attention to details are the more important.  Are you detail enough? DYDD.   sheerluck      ( Date: 27-May-2016 15:29) Posted: There is nothing good about this news if you think further ahead. Cash balance from Q1 report is about $2.2mil.  Loan from GEM adds about $3mil giving a total of $5.2mil.  $400k/mth is about $4.8mil for a year. Now their operation is no generating cash.  All profit ar non-cash.  Their operation are draining cash ie that $400k/month.  So what happens about oenw year from now?  Left with about $400k.  What to do?  So: A) Operation needs to generate positive cash-flow or B) More drawn down from GEM paid by issuing more shares and CEO lend more shares to GEM fund to ____ again. Which one is more likely? Mgmt said they are looking for some silly fools to buy 1% stakes in their ventures which the auditor dare not endorse.  Let see the outcome from this battle of creditability. DYDD
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	29-May-2016 22:07        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	From their 2014 Annual Report, Mobile Futurework has direct interest in 165 mil shares. From their 2015 Annual Report, Mobile Futurework has deemed interest and no direct interest in the 172mil shares. They distract you with " big" news but under your nose, things are happening. You think the above means nothing.  Think again. In a contract, the fine print is where all the disclaimers are and I bet most never bother to read them. So while details are important and attention to details are the more important.  Are you detail enough? DYDD.   sheerluck      ( Date: 27-May-2016 15:29) Posted: There is nothing good about this news if you think further ahead. Cash balance from Q1 report is about $2.2mil.  Loan from GEM adds about $3mil giving a total of $5.2mil.  $400k/mth is about $4.8mil for a year. Now their operation is no generating cash.  All profit ar non-cash.  Their operation are draining cash ie that $400k/month.  So what happens about oenw year from now?  Left with about $400k.  What to do?  So: A) Operation needs to generate positive cash-flow or B) More drawn down from GEM paid by issuing more shares and CEO lend more shares to GEM fund to ____ again. Which one is more likely? Mgmt said they are looking for some silly fools to buy 1% stakes in their ventures which the auditor dare not endorse.  Let see the outcome from this battle of creditability. DYDD zv_francesca      ( Date: 27-May-2016 13:14) Posted: so is bad news?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
jm2110 Member	29-May-2016 20:37        jm2110 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	If you hold stock via some online dealing platforms (i.e. saxo) they pool their holdings within nominee accounts edwinjup      ( Date: 28-May-2016 14:34) Posted: High percentage of shares held under nominees...why? Is it safe?..... edwinjup      ( Date: 28-May-2016 13:54) Posted: Based on latest annual report....72.20% shares held by public.....so ceo pls buy more...at least over 50% ...dont just talk...buy buy buy
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	28-May-2016 14:34        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	High percentage of shares held under nominees...why? Is it safe?..... edwinjup      ( Date: 28-May-2016 13:54) Posted: Based on latest annual report....72.20% shares held by public.....so ceo pls buy more...at least over 50% ...dont just talk...buy buy buy
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	28-May-2016 13:54        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Based on latest annual report....72.20% shares held by public.....so ceo pls buy more...at least over 50% ...dont just talk...buy buy buy
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	28-May-2016 12:35        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I am sure when blumont was @$2, people feels invincible as well. Now many probably feels they better be invisible. hotokee      ( Date: 28-May-2016 10:55) Posted: Despite your misgivings, Alibab surged yesterday in Nasdaq: Stock price:  BABA  (NYSE)  US$80.99  +2.65 (+3.38%) 27 May, 7:56 PM GMT-4 sheerluck      ( Date: 27-May-2016 16:32) Posted: Alibaba was probed by SEC for accounting practise. Yuuzoo was given disclaimer of opinion by the auditor themselves appointed for their questionable revenues and receiveables. If Yuuzoo is the next Alibaba, I can see which bit it is becoming to. Should SGX also be probing into Yuuzoo revenue model to ensure transparency?  SGX cannot risk listing fees from Yuuzoo?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	28-May-2016 12:32        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Ok give you some cules. Spot the similarity between uber and snapchat and the differences between them and yuuzoo. To make it even more obvious, use ceo regrets on using rto route for listing. Very obvious liao right. jm2110      ( Date: 28-May-2016 11:29) Posted:     You do understand that for cash burn to go from $750k and month to $400k a month it has to actually involve cash right? This has nothing to do with the value of the JV on their books - the drop in cash burn at the same time as they are expanding shows that true cash is coming into the business and because of the nature of the business it exponentially grows as the user base and new streams such as Alisports and Etisalat business comes online.  When a new auditor is shortly appointed and they approve the valuation are you then happy or are they in on it as well because that is happening shortly?  Talking of no profits Snapchat raised nearly $1.3bn this week at at $20bn valuation and they are still cash flow negative........everyone thought snapchat was mad to turn down facebooks offer of $3bn a few years ago and now worth $20bn and still haven' t made a cent profit.....it seems perhaps the CEO is right and Sinagpore investors really just dont understand this sector.   It will only go on for so long and as the company goes cash flow positive that they can ignore a dual listing on the Nasdaq Good luck. sheerluck      ( Date: 28-May-2016 10:25) Posted: Bro, the mgmt said lots of things will come.  When no one is checking everything is made to looked beautiful for 364 days.  Come year-end audit, when the make-up was removed, just within 1 day it revealed its ugly face.  You have to decide how much credit you want to give the mgmt for whatever they said. Give you a clue on how " good" the mgmt is.  Go check up their reason for the delay in AGM and annual report and see if you can piece the rest of the info together yourself. Ofc after that is your choice. Someone has now stopped the company contiuning weaving wonderful stories which is consider very fortunate to those in the investing community.  We do not need another ABL type saga with company hype up their business.  When the valuation goes crazy with unsustainable fundamental, the collapse will be spectcular as well.  So thanks to MS LLC for chooisng to do the right thing. DYDD.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
jm2110 Member	28-May-2016 11:29        jm2110 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	You do understand that for cash burn to go from $750k and month to $400k a month it has to actually involve cash right? This has nothing to do with the value of the JV on their books - the drop in cash burn at the same time as they are expanding shows that true cash is coming into the business and because of the nature of the business it exponentially grows as the user base and new streams such as Alisports and Etisalat business comes online.  When a new auditor is shortly appointed and they approve the valuation are you then happy or are they in on it as well because that is happening shortly?  Talking of no profits Snapchat raised nearly $1.3bn this week at at $20bn valuation and they are still cash flow negative........everyone thought snapchat was mad to turn down facebooks offer of $3bn a few years ago and now worth $20bn and still haven' t made a cent profit.....it seems perhaps the CEO is right and Sinagpore investors really just dont understand this sector.   It will only go on for so long and as the company goes cash flow positive that they can ignore a dual listing on the Nasdaq Good luck. sheerluck      ( Date: 28-May-2016 10:25) Posted: Bro, the mgmt said lots of things will come.  When no one is checking everything is made to looked beautiful for 364 days.  Come year-end audit, when the make-up was removed, just within 1 day it revealed its ugly face.  You have to decide how much credit you want to give the mgmt for whatever they said. Give you a clue on how " good" the mgmt is.  Go check up their reason for the delay in AGM and annual report and see if you can piece the rest of the info together yourself. Ofc after that is your choice. Someone has now stopped the company contiuning weaving wonderful stories which is consider very fortunate to those in the investing community.  We do not need another ABL type saga with company hype up their business.  When the valuation goes crazy with unsustainable fundamental, the collapse will be spectcular as well.  So thanks to MS LLC for chooisng to do the right thing. DYDD. jm2110      ( Date: 28-May-2016 09:45) Posted: Yes but in the last financial accounts they were spending $750k a month, now $400k and hence they said that before current cash runs out they will be cash positive.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
hotokee Master	28-May-2016 10:55        hotokee About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Despite your misgivings, Alibab surged yesterday in Nasdaq: Stock price:  BABA  (NYSE)  US$80.99  +2.65 (+3.38%) 27 May, 7:56 PM GMT-4 sheerluck      ( Date: 27-May-2016 16:32) Posted: Alibaba was probed by SEC for accounting practise. Yuuzoo was given disclaimer of opinion by the auditor themselves appointed for their questionable revenues and receiveables. If Yuuzoo is the next Alibaba, I can see which bit it is becoming to. Should SGX also be probing into Yuuzoo revenue model to ensure transparency?  SGX cannot risk listing fees from Yuuzoo?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	28-May-2016 10:25        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Bro, the mgmt said lots of things will come.  When no one is checking everything is made to looked beautiful for 364 days.  Come year-end audit, when the make-up was removed, just within 1 day it revealed its ugly face.  You have to decide how much credit you want to give the mgmt for whatever they said. Give you a clue on how " good" the mgmt is.  Go check up their reason for the delay in AGM and annual report and see if you can piece the rest of the info together yourself. Ofc after that is your choice. Someone has now stopped the company contiuning weaving wonderful stories which is consider very fortunate to those in the investing community.  We do not need another ABL type saga with company hype up their business.  When the valuation goes crazy with unsustainable fundamental, the collapse will be spectcular as well.  So thanks to MS LLC for chooisng to do the right thing. DYDD. jm2110      ( Date: 28-May-2016 09:45) Posted: Yes but in the last financial accounts they were spending $750k a month, now $400k and hence they said that before current cash runs out they will be cash positive. sheerluck      ( Date: 27-May-2016 15:29) Posted: There is nothing good about this news if you think further ahead. Cash balance from Q1 report is about $2.2mil.  Loan from GEM adds about $3mil giving a total of $5.2mil.  $400k/mth is about $4.8mil for a year. Now their operation is no generating cash.  All profit ar non-cash.  Their operation are draining cash ie that $400k/month.  So what happens about oenw year from now?  Left with about $400k.  What to do?  So: A) Operation needs to generate positive cash-flow or B) More drawn down from GEM paid by issuing more shares and CEO lend more shares to GEM fund to ____ again. Which one is more likely? Mgmt said they are looking for some silly fools to buy 1% stakes in their ventures which the auditor dare not endorse.  Let see the outcome from this battle of creditability. DYDD
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
jm2110 Member	28-May-2016 09:45        jm2110 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yes but in the last financial accounts they were spending $750k a month, now $400k and hence they said that before current cash runs out they will be cash positive. sheerluck      ( Date: 27-May-2016 15:29) Posted: There is nothing good about this news if you think further ahead. Cash balance from Q1 report is about $2.2mil.  Loan from GEM adds about $3mil giving a total of $5.2mil.  $400k/mth is about $4.8mil for a year. Now their operation is no generating cash.  All profit ar non-cash.  Their operation are draining cash ie that $400k/month.  So what happens about oenw year from now?  Left with about $400k.  What to do?  So: A) Operation needs to generate positive cash-flow or B) More drawn down from GEM paid by issuing more shares and CEO lend more shares to GEM fund to ____ again. Which one is more likely? Mgmt said they are looking for some silly fools to buy 1% stakes in their ventures which the auditor dare not endorse.  Let see the outcome from this battle of creditability. DYDD zv_francesca      ( Date: 27-May-2016 13:14) Posted: so is bad news?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
moron101 Supreme	27-May-2016 20:04        moron101 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Move above 20c soon? Alibaba will take it private?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Laoliu Veteran	27-May-2016 17:07        Laoliu About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Awaiting rebound to come.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Battle123 Elite	27-May-2016 17:00        Battle123 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Thought that someone said dun exaggerate their accounts ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   5441-5460 of 11242   Older>   Last