Back

Latest Forum Topics / Spackman

Post Reply

Spackman entertainment Post Reply Rate topic
Alvin2042 Master	19-Nov-2017 14:38        Alvin2042 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	If war break out, any price also achievable. 8cts, 6cts etc as all the busibess in Korea. Alvin2042      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 14:36) Posted: Kim jong en Tommy12356      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 12:38) Posted: Who is fat ki
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Alvin2042 Master	19-Nov-2017 14:36        Alvin2042 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Kim jong en Tommy12356      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 12:38) Posted: Who is fat kim Alvin2042      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 11:58) Posted: Maybe he is a good friend of fat Kim
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Tommy12356 Master	19-Nov-2017 12:38        Tommy12356 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Who is fat kim Alvin2042      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 11:58) Posted: Maybe he is a good friend of fat Kim. Tommy12356      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 10:15) Posted: Har
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Alvin2042 Master	19-Nov-2017 11:58        Alvin2042 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Maybe he is a good friend of fat Kim. Tommy12356      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 10:15) Posted: Hard WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 01:07) Posted: i think possible at 0.095
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Tommy12356 Master	19-Nov-2017 10:15        Tommy12356 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Hard WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 19-Nov-2017 01:07) Posted: i think possible at 0.095  guards80      ( Date: 18-Nov-2017 20:18) Posted: Come short it below 10
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
WSJ.Shares Veteran	19-Nov-2017 01:07        WSJ.Shares About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	i think possible at 0.095  guards80      ( Date: 18-Nov-2017 20:18) Posted: Come short it below 100 WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 18-Nov-2017 19:38) Posted: reverse play coming soon
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
papayaface Supreme	18-Nov-2017 23:33        papayaface About Contact  Quote this Post!   Yells: "This is the best time to enter....when everythings uncertain"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	From 11.3 to 10 is 10%. Still got a lot of meat. Dont spare this crap. Its on a downtrend. Good luck Tommy12356      ( Date: 18-Nov-2017 20:36) Posted: Strong support at 10c no more meat to short papayaface      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 12:08) Posted: Hi Marc. Of course it is a dead cat bounce. This happen many times before and unwitting retailers knea burn many times.  Just watch the volume, for this crapy stock, as long as the daily volume is below 100 million,  dont fall into the syndicate' s trap and it would be better to join the shortists because they make more $$$. Hiak hiak hiak. If you don' t believe me, just watch it. I already shorted at  115.   Good luck
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SgYuan Supreme	18-Nov-2017 23:14        SgYuan About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	EW 119-w1 111-w2 116-w3?-w4?-w5?-abc w4 W1 8 W2 5 W3 12, tgt 104 W4 4, tgt 109 W5 8, tgt 101 SgYuan      ( Date: 13-Nov-2017 14:26) Posted: A dntrend EW is brewing. Watch out. EW 119-w114? SgYuan      ( Date: 11-Nov-2017 20:54) Posted: It is option2. EW end at abc near w4 117. Wait for new formation
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Tommy12356 Master	18-Nov-2017 20:36        Tommy12356 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Strong support at 10c no more meat to short papayaface      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 12:08) Posted: Hi Marc. Of course it is a dead cat bounce. This happen many times before and unwitting retailers knea burn many times.  Just watch the volume, for this crapy stock, as long as the daily volume is below 100 million,  dont fall into the syndicate' s trap and it would be better to join the shortists because they make more $$$. Hiak hiak hiak. If you don' t believe me, just watch it. I already shorted at  115.   Good luck          MarcLim      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 09:49) Posted: Good volume in the morning. Dead cat bounce or Uptrending? 🤔 All waiting for jeep at 10c! Can consider 11c look great from graph, always bounce up from there.😅
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
guards80 Supreme	18-Nov-2017 20:18        guards80 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Come short it below 100 WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 18-Nov-2017 19:38) Posted: reverse play coming soon
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
WSJ.Shares Veteran	18-Nov-2017 19:38        WSJ.Shares About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	reverse play coming soon
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lighter87 Master	18-Nov-2017 14:11        lighter87 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	crappy counter. Every movie is a gamble, what is the ratio of movie bomb vs success? maybe we can see earnings if the next consecutive few movies are all hits.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
zhencheng Member	18-Nov-2017 12:38        zhencheng About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	http://m.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2120452/china-wins-its-war-against-south-koreas-us-thaad-missile?amp=1 Good news for south Korea economy
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
papayaface Supreme	17-Nov-2017 12:08        papayaface About Contact  Quote this Post!   Yells: "This is the best time to enter....when everythings uncertain"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Hi Marc. Of course it is a dead cat bounce. This happen many times before and unwitting retailers knea burn many times.  Just watch the volume, for this crapy stock, as long as the daily volume is below 100 million,  dont fall into the syndicate' s trap and it would be better to join the shortists because they make more $$$. Hiak hiak hiak. If you don' t believe me, just watch it. I already shorted at  115.   Good luck          MarcLim      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 09:49) Posted: Good volume in the morning. Dead cat bounce or Uptrending? 🤔 All waiting for jeep at 10c! Can consider 11c look great from graph, always bounce up from there.😅 WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 08:43) Posted: Good choice lah, i actually warn people not buy-in too early lor... estimate below 0.1 or lower lor... they seems like very pro like that never listen want (hao lian) say people know nothing, buy high loss high.... hahaha... remeber this Kelvintan84 & Papayaface.... hahaha... joker in action.... now this Spackman still in Negative i think lower than my estimate price liao... 😂
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
GuavaXF30 Elite	17-Nov-2017 12:01        GuavaXF30 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Hi sbscap. I am of course no clairvoyant and won' t be able to say for sure how their future earnings will pan out. But one would hope that the management is out to make money out of the movies they are making. So, if they had incur, say, $X in production cost, their net contribution from the release of the movie have to be above that. The difference would be the actual net profit but due to calendarisation, the total gross is recognised as profit in that period. The cost having being already booked in previously. Which means, the losses you see in this recent quarter are investment losses which will be returned when the movies are actually released. Why am I so bullish ? I look at it simply. 1) 2 major movies being produced, with one probably completed and awaiting release at the " golden" period for Chinese market. 2) The Korean/Sino issue now getting resolved. The two US and Chinese Presidents now starting a bromance that can only help S.Korea relations. 3) The management' s investments in other movies and TV drama makers are  spreading future sources of revenue and profit. These are my views on Spackman. Charts and graphs are all good. But they are just lines drawings. You can see how data can be used to mislead. Very notable is how recentlly one of our ministers used them to say that our MRT has good overall track record compared to the past. And then...... sbscap      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 08:10) Posted: My apology if I' m being too hard on Spacky. I' m not a perma-bear on any stock. GuavaXF30 correctly mentioned the " calendarisation" or timing issue in earnings recognition, whereby the expenses of a film are recognized but the revenue or potential revenue comes after. Perhaps GuavaXF30 or someone can comment on how future earnings will pan out. The correct way is to do a DCF with assumptions such as the number of hits/misses per year and the cashflow for acquisitions. My guess is a best case of 1.5 hits per year - assuming Spacky makes 2 movies per year (so 1 hit and one an above average hit) and the acquisitions have a net zero effect to earnings (gains and losses cancel out). Can someone correct me if I' m wrong.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
kelvintan84 Veteran	17-Nov-2017 11:03        kelvintan84 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I'm not very good with charts, but I noticed usually 2-3 mths after the second morning star spackman will stage a rise. The last morning star was in Oct.. That is if from now to Dec there is no bearish engulfing.. Then again, I don't really invest based on chart. I rely quite abit of PE and PEG. (noticed I said invest and not trade....) MarcLim      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 09:49) Posted: Good volume in the morning. Dead cat bounce or Uptrending? 🤔 All waiting for jeep at 10c! Can consider 11c look great from graph, always bounce up from there.😅 WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 08:43) Posted: Good choice lah, i actually warn people not buy-in too early lor... estimate below 0.1 or lower lor... they seems like very pro like that never listen want (hao lian) say people know nothing, buy high loss high.... hahaha... remeber this Kelvintan84 & Papayaface.... hahaha... joker in action.... now this Spackman still in Negative i think lower than my estimate price liao... 😂
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
kelvintan84 Veteran	17-Nov-2017 10:51        kelvintan84 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Lol Wsj, either your English isn't up to mark or you didn't have luxury to develop cognitively. I did not say you know nothing, I said you plucked the figures from thin air. Even after I clarified to ask for your rational, your weak reasoning is "we" feel the value is as such. I am vested yesterday at 0.113-0.114 and I'm not afraid to post real time of my trade. I am in the money and intend to ride it up with trailing stop lost of 3 - 4pips. You can continue to wait for it at 0.095, and while at it, continue your childish behaviour in calling names. Oh, and your understanding of English has also failed you in your bid to understand Papayaface. He actually supported your views that spackman should be below 0.1. And he gave solid reasoning (NTA). Most of us here have different views as we value stocks differently (PE, NTA, EW etc) even so we don't call each other names. The joke is really on you. kelvintan84      ( Date: 21-Oct-2017 00:11) Posted: Hi papayaface, don't worry, I'm not worked out. If the argument is on NTA then there's some truth. But I must say this company is assets light, and therefore it will definitely trade above NTA/ share. Furthermore not all companies should be valued based purely on their NTA. Their PE is low, in fact much lower than peers. Surely this is important? Well, at least you put forth your ideas and argument, unlike someone, who continues to contribute next to nothing. And resort to name callings.. I am not vested. But I am interested in Korean exposure without the "Korean discount" papayaface      ( Date: 20-Oct-2017 22:44) Posted: Kelvin please dont get so overworked by the negative comments. There is a lot of truth in them. For 1, do you know the NTA of the stock? Is it really worth 11 over cts? Falling below 10 cents is a reasonable level i must say. Good luck
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
MarcLim Veteran	17-Nov-2017 09:49        MarcLim About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Good volume in the morning. Dead cat bounce or Uptrending? 🤔 All waiting for jeep at 10c! Can consider 11c look great from graph, always bounce up from there.😅 WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 08:43) Posted: Good choice lah, i actually warn people not buy-in too early lor... estimate below 0.1 or lower lor... they seems like very pro like that never listen want (hao lian) say people know nothing, buy high loss high.... hahaha... remeber this Kelvintan84 & Papayaface.... hahaha... joker in action.... now this Spackman still in Negative i think lower than my estimate price liao... 😂 guards80      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 06:05) Posted: No more bro. Last year already give up this when was 19×.. was invest at 183. Thrn keep drop until i stop loss at 17
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
WSJ.Shares Veteran	17-Nov-2017 08:43        WSJ.Shares About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Good choice lah, i actually warn people not buy-in too early lor... estimate below 0.1 or lower lor... they seems like very pro like that never listen want (hao lian) say people know nothing, buy high loss high.... hahaha... remeber this Kelvintan84 & Papayaface.... hahaha... joker in action.... now this Spackman still in Negative i think lower than my estimate price liao... 😂 guards80      ( Date: 17-Nov-2017 06:05) Posted: No more bro. Last year already give up this when was 19×.. was invest at 183. Thrn keep drop until i stop loss at 173 WSJ.Shares      ( Date: 16-Nov-2017 18:54) Posted: bro, u invest in this
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sbscap Master	17-Nov-2017 08:10        sbscap About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	My apology if I' m being too hard on Spacky. I' m not a perma-bear on any stock. GuavaXF30 correctly mentioned the " calendarisation" or timing issue in earnings recognition, whereby the expenses of a film are recognized but the revenue or potential revenue comes after. Perhaps GuavaXF30 or someone can comment on how future earnings will pan out. The correct way is to do a DCF with assumptions such as the number of hits/misses per year and the cashflow for acquisitions. My guess is a best case of 1.5 hits per year - assuming Spacky makes 2 movies per year (so 1 hit and one an above average hit) and the acquisitions have a net zero effect to earnings (gains and losses cancel out). Can someone correct me if I' m wrong.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   5241-5260 of 14049   Older>   Last