| Latest Forum Topics / Nam Cheong |
|
|
YZJFH - potentially rewarding
|
|||||
|
shadow
Veteran |
21-Mar-2017 17:31
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
How many here thinks NC cannot survive this round ? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
shadow
Veteran |
21-Mar-2017 17:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://www.fool.sg/2017/03/21/what-investors-should-know-about-nam-cheong-ltds-going-concern-uncertainty/ Investors are panicking over offshore support vessels builder and owner Nam Cheong Ltd (SGX: N4E), judging from how the company&rsquo s stock price has changed since last Friday. As of the time of writing (1:50 pm), Nam Cheong&rsquo s shares are exchanging hands at S$0.027 each, some 45% lower than last Friday&rsquo s close. Short-term price movements can at times occur for no rhyme or reason. But in Nam Cheong&rsquo s case, I think it&rsquo s clear why. Last Friday night, the company revealed that its auditors, BDO LLP, had highlighted that &ldquo a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on [Nam Cheong&rsquo s] ability to continue as a going concern.&rdquo BDO came to its view due to a few reasons: 1) Nam Cheong&rsquo s revenue had fallen by 82% in 2016 and recorded a loss of RM 42.8 million due to some of its customers requesting a pushback on the delivery dates for their vessels. Furthermore, &ldquo the current downturn in the oil and gas industry may continue to add pressure to [Nam Cheong&rsquo s] financial performance and its operating cash flows.&rdquo 2) As of 31 December 2016, Nam Cheong&rsquo s balance sheet has debt of RM 948.7 million that are due &ndash or payable on demand &ndash sometime before or by 31 December 2017. Of the RM 948.7 million sum, RM 278.6 million has to be repaid on 28 August 2017 based on the current terms of the debt. As of 31 December 2016, Nam Cheong&rsquo s cash and equivalents amount to only RM 162.6 million. 3) Nam Cheong is (a) working with its bankers to restructure its debt, (b) looking for buyers and charterers for its fleet of vessels, and (c) improving its cost controls and cash flow positions. The company also has &ldquo sufficient&rdquo funds that its bankers has promised to lend to meet general working capital needs when necessary (provided that &ldquo certain conditions&rdquo are fulfilled). But, there&rsquo s no guarantee that the debt-restructuring will be successful, or that Nam Cheong&rsquo s bankers and creditors will continue supporting the company. To sum up the situation with Nam Cheong in plain English: 1) The company&rsquo s revenue and bottom-line have both declined substantially in 2016 and there is a high probability that its business performance will continue to suffer in the current year. (I think it&rsquo s worth noting too that Nam Cheong&rsquo s operating cash flow in 2016 was a negative RM 291 million although this is an improvement from 2015&rsquo s negative RM 548 million, it still highlights the company&rsquo s huge struggle to produce cash from its business.) 2) It currently does not have sufficient cash on hand to pay its loans and borrowings that are coming due before or by the end of 2017. (And as mentioned earlier, the company has not managed to show signs that it is currently able to generate cash.) 3) It&rsquo s hard to say as well whether Nam Cheong&rsquo s bankers and creditors will be willing to alter existing borrowing terms to help the company tide through its current predicament and/or lend more money to it. There&rsquo s a lesson in here for investors. Nam Cheong is a solvent company &ndash as of 31 December 2016, it has total shareholders&rsquo equity (total assets minus total liabilities and non-controlling interests) of RM 1.37 billion. But, the company is still confronting a serious risk of failing due to liquidity problems. When assessing a company&rsquo s ability to survive, it also pays to look at its ability to meet short-term financial obligations. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
ahhuat08
Elite |
21-Mar-2017 17:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Muhahahahahuaaa, CEO knows the news from sgx company' s annoucement, who u kiddg?  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ahhuat08
Elite |
21-Mar-2017 17:18
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/_eFORM1V2_LSK_Final.ashx?App=Announcement& FileID=444037 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sh0rthere
Senior |
21-Mar-2017 17:18
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If sgx is a tiger. There won't be so many sino chips scams and blumont case. Think again.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
ahhuat08
Elite |
21-Mar-2017 17:16
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
CEO selling again at 4 cts apiece for 294,000. Really the comapany is in so bad shape huh?   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
arkan1111
Veteran |
21-Mar-2017 16:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I think difficult to go up better than going to die (ai si la), at least still living
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sheerluck
Supreme |
21-Mar-2017 16:19
Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Must be right.   Purposely breach the law meh?   CEO stupid?   Or he think our SGX is paper tiger only.   Cannot be.   Must be he only knows these things through their company announcement.   I insist that is the case.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
alexchew
Master |
21-Mar-2017 16:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
CEO do not read the draft report before signing? No AC meeting before that to discuss? I think there is a good 1.5 months lag between announcement and knowing the fact by the ceo..
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
mepkoh
Elite |
21-Mar-2017 16:02
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
ceo is the one..preparing the accounts... he is the one.. borrowingfrom  n paying the lenders.. he is the first one to know...
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sh0rthere
Senior |
21-Mar-2017 15:59
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
LOL. Ceo only knows the news from the announcement. Are you that naive? LOL
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sheerluck
Supreme |
21-Mar-2017 15:32
Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hard to say.   Maybe the CEO only gets to know the results from the company announcement as well.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Morello
Veteran |
21-Mar-2017 15:25
Yells: "In it for the long haul" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
i also thot is insider trading
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sheerluck
Supreme |
21-Mar-2017 15:04
Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The CEO dumped his shares just before the bad Q4 results and also just before the auditor EOM.   Like that SGX and MAS can accept?   No considered as insider trading?   I believe is already crossing the legal line, is it not? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
21-Mar-2017 13:31
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Other CFD brokering houses maybe can...L&T CIMB Maybank or CMC etc...should open two more in case got this type of "pow chiak" opportunity by auditor's opinion...
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
laksaman57
Supreme |
21-Mar-2017 13:09
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://www.fool.sg/2017/03/20/these-oil-gas-companies-are-at-risk-of-becoming-the-next-ezra-holdings-limited/ |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
laksaman57
Supreme |
21-Mar-2017 12:58
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Banks have lesson learnt from Ezra episode and will be very critical of further extending financial lifeline to any O&G coy in distress. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sheerluck
Supreme |
21-Mar-2017 12:39
Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
That is a big " what if" .   The other " what if" is what if they did not manage to sell and creditors don' t want to support anymore?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
NextEvolution
Elite |
21-Mar-2017 12:34
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
They have another asset in SG. A 10000 sqft opulent office at Suntec City which was bought during the bloom time few years back. But likely this property is 1st charge to the bank before any balance money to retrieve if disposed off | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
tankookoo
Master |
21-Mar-2017 12:28
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
going conern issue...but what if they sell off   all their assets, worth more than current price ? any balance left after paying creditors ? shareholders can get more money back than the current price? hmm...  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

