Back

Latest Forum Topics / Riverstone    Last:0.885 --

Post Reply

RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED Post Reply Rate topic
look@bright Elite	24-Jan-2021 13:18        look@bright About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Putrajaya mulls total economic shutdown after Feb 4 if Covid numbers don' t improve, Eurocham Malaysia tells its members https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2021/01/24/putrajaya-mulls-total-economic-shutdown-after-feb-4-if-covid-numbers-dont-i/1943475
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
stanip Veteran	23-Jan-2021 12:12        stanip About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	this is the website: https://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736(20)32318-7/fulltext#sec1 stanip      ( Date: 23-Jan-2021 12:08) Posted: For those who are interesting in estimating when the vaccine line will cross the covid infection line (i.e. Herb immunity equilibrium point), this is an intersting article I came across.  Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination - The Lancet   The mathematical model seems to be pointing to 2 years after start of vaccination.  Other interpretation or observations?  " Calculations of the proportion of the population that will need to be immunised year by year with a COVID-19 vaccine of defined properties can be derived from transmission models of SARS-CoV-2 (appendix). The simple equation for coverage pcbecomes a more complicated expression that involves the rate at which people are immunised, &epsilon , the magnitude of R0, and the average duration of protection provided by the vaccine (figure). The surface plotted in the figure shows the percentage of the population in year 1 that must be vaccinated and a similar plot of the percentage that must be vaccinated once the system equilibrates after a few years. A rough idea of this time is given by numerical evaluations of the model and gives equilibration by the end of year 2 (appendix). The percentage of the population that must be vaccinated in year 1 is much larger than the percentage that must be vaccinated once the system has stabilised after a few years, since most of the population will be susceptible as mass immunisation starts, but after a few years, hopefully, a high proportion will be immunised such that effective herd immunity is created. What is clear from our estimates based on the assumptions that efficacy is satisfactory (> 80%) but duration of protection is short (1&ndash 2 years), is that a large proportion of the total population would need to be vaccinated if there is to be any chance of getting herd immunity to block the continued transmission of SARS-CoV-2."
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
stanip Veteran	23-Jan-2021 12:08        stanip About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	For those who are interesting in estimating when the vaccine line will cross the covid infection line (i.e. Herb immunity equilibrium point), this is an intersting article I came across.  Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination - The Lancet   The mathematical model seems to be pointing to 2 years after start of vaccination.  Other interpretation or observations?  " Calculations of the proportion of the population that will need to be immunised year by year with a COVID-19 vaccine of defined properties can be derived from transmission models of SARS-CoV-2 (appendix). The simple equation for coverage pcbecomes a more complicated expression that involves the rate at which people are immunised, &epsilon , the magnitude of R0, and the average duration of protection provided by the vaccine (figure). The surface plotted in the figure shows the percentage of the population in year 1 that must be vaccinated and a similar plot of the percentage that must be vaccinated once the system equilibrates after a few years. A rough idea of this time is given by numerical evaluations of the model and gives equilibration by the end of year 2 (appendix). The percentage of the population that must be vaccinated in year 1 is much larger than the percentage that must be vaccinated once the system has stabilised after a few years, since most of the population will be susceptible as mass immunisation starts, but after a few years, hopefully, a high proportion will be immunised such that effective herd immunity is created. What is clear from our estimates based on the assumptions that efficacy is satisfactory (> 80%) but duration of protection is short (1&ndash 2 years), is that a large proportion of the total population would need to be vaccinated if there is to be any chance of getting herd immunity to block the continued transmission of SARS-CoV-2."
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
look@bright Elite	23-Jan-2021 11:16        look@bright About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Dr. Fauci says new data shows Covid vaccines appear to be less effective against some new strains
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lhc1964 Senior	22-Jan-2021 23:18        lhc1964 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Very well said ! SGPhantom      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 20:10) Posted: 108? That' s fantastic! Well, whether averaging down or up doesn' t really matter actually. Whichever works for you, stick with it. I prefer averaging up as I' m usually clueless where the bottom is, and also (most importantly) I do not have endless ammo to keep chasing a stock that is falling. ** Imagine me buying from (pre split) 490 to 470 to 450 to 425 to (post split) 190 175 150 125 108..... I think my bullets finished halfway, at best : ) Not to mention opportunity costs. So I' d rather wait patiently, and start buying when it has upward momentum at 120s, 130s, 150s, and hopefully more buying opportunites ahead, which means it is climbing up. It has always worked for me. But like I said, to each his / her own. Whatever works for you best, stick with it, and don' t let anyone tell you that his / her way is the best and only way to invest / trade. Cheerios!!   lhc1964      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 16:51) Posted: Yes i got some at 1.08 . I prefer average down
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SGPhantom Master	22-Jan-2021 20:10        SGPhantom About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	108? That' s fantastic! Well, whether averaging down or up doesn' t really matter actually. Whichever works for you, stick with it. I prefer averaging up as I' m usually clueless where the bottom is, and also (most importantly) I do not have endless ammo to keep chasing a stock that is falling. ** Imagine me buying from (pre split) 490 to 470 to 450 to 425 to (post split) 190 175 150 125 108..... I think my bullets finished halfway, at best : ) Not to mention opportunity costs. So I' d rather wait patiently, and start buying when it has upward momentum at 120s, 130s, 150s, and hopefully more buying opportunites ahead, which means it is climbing up. It has always worked for me. But like I said, to each his / her own. Whatever works for you best, stick with it, and don' t let anyone tell you that his / her way is the best and only way to invest / trade. Cheerios!!   lhc1964      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 16:51) Posted: Yes i got some at 1.08 . I prefer average down . SGPhantom      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 16:17) Posted: Unfortunately no. At that time I was not sure if 110s was an authentic up from 100s, or just a (tech) rebound. I only went in at 120s and 130s when I am pretty certain, and now a bit at 150s coz I' m not sure if 150 will hold yet. Hope you got yours at 110s.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lhc1964 Senior	22-Jan-2021 16:51        lhc1964 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yes i got some at 1.08 . I prefer average down . SGPhantom      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 16:17) Posted: Unfortunately no. At that time I was not sure if 110s was an authentic up from 100s, or just a (tech) rebound. I only went in at 120s and 130s when I am pretty certain, and now a bit at 150s coz I' m not sure if 150 will hold yet. Hope you got yours at 110s.   lhc1964      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 16:08) Posted: Did you buy some at around 1.10
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SGPhantom Master	22-Jan-2021 16:17        SGPhantom About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Unfortunately no. At that time I was not sure if 110s was an authentic up from 100s, or just a (tech) rebound. I only went in at 120s and 130s when I am pretty certain, and now a bit at 150s coz I' m not sure if 150 will hold yet. Hope you got yours at 110s.   lhc1964      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 16:08) Posted: Did you buy some at around 1.10 ? SGPhantom      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 13:03) Posted: Yes, bought at 151 and 153, just a bit. Waiting for it to go up more, to be certain, before adding more. These few days still see below 150, luckily absorbed well.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lhc1964 Senior	22-Jan-2021 16:08        lhc1964 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Did you buy some at around 1.10 ? SGPhantom      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 13:03) Posted: Yes, bought at 151 and 153, just a bit. Waiting for it to go up more, to be certain, before adding more. These few days still see below 150, luckily absorbed well.   zandlery      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 12:47) Posted: indeed it seen like consolidation which very likely it will hold at current price range. Did you add more? unless another news that will impact the industry comes out, most likely glove stocks will be good for the year. Vaccine news effect already ease, what else? Messiah come down from heaven and give miracle
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lhc1964 Senior	22-Jan-2021 16:05        lhc1964 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Correct , junk or not as long as we make monies , be it super junk . zandlery      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 12:34) Posted: Can you be anymore obvious you are shorting? haha Everytime it go positive you say " junk" ... This junk so far I believe make good profit for some of us...haha HERBERTALCA      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 11:33) Posted: Junk stock. Avoid.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
HERBERTALCA Member	22-Jan-2021 15:45        HERBERTALCA About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Still a junk stock with a good fundamental.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SGPhantom Master	22-Jan-2021 14:59        SGPhantom About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	That' s fine. Give more time for MA100 to catch up. zandlery      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 14:46) Posted: I anticipate the consolidating will last till Feb around result season. Now the trend fall on tech and other pandemic defensive stocks.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
zandlery Supreme	22-Jan-2021 14:46        zandlery About Contact  Quote this Post!   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I anticipate the consolidating will last till Feb around result season. Now the trend fall on tech and other pandemic defensive stocks.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SGPhantom Master	22-Jan-2021 13:03        SGPhantom About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yes, bought at 151 and 153, just a bit. Waiting for it to go up more, to be certain, before adding more. These few days still see below 150, luckily absorbed well.   zandlery      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 12:47) Posted: indeed it seen like consolidation which very likely it will hold at current price range. Did you add more? unless another news that will impact the industry comes out, most likely glove stocks will be good for the year. Vaccine news effect already ease, what else? Messiah come down from heaven and give miracle? SGPhantom      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 11:35) Posted: If it can end green today, it will mark 3 consecutive weeks of net gain, although this week is more like consolidation. Still, better than ending the week in net red. Hopefully can hold.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
zandlery Supreme	22-Jan-2021 12:47        zandlery About Contact  Quote this Post!   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	indeed it seen like consolidation which very likely it will hold at current price range. Did you add more? unless another news that will impact the industry comes out, most likely glove stocks will be good for the year. Vaccine news effect already ease, what else? Messiah come down from heaven and give miracle? SGPhantom      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 11:35) Posted: If it can end green today, it will mark 3 consecutive weeks of net gain, although this week is more like consolidation. Still, better than ending the week in net red. Hopefully can hold.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
zandlery Supreme	22-Jan-2021 12:34        zandlery About Contact  Quote this Post!   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Can you be anymore obvious you are shorting? haha Everytime it go positive you say " junk" ... This junk so far I believe make good profit for some of us...haha HERBERTALCA      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 11:33) Posted: Junk stock. Avoid.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bullmarket88 Member	22-Jan-2021 12:09        bullmarket88 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Bro, Quickly cover back. Avoid losing more. It will back to $2 soon. Result out on 25 Feb HERBERTALCA      ( Date: 22-Jan-2021 11:33) Posted: Junk stock. Avoid.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SGPhantom Master	22-Jan-2021 11:35        SGPhantom About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	If it can end green today, it will mark 3 consecutive weeks of net gain, although this week is more like consolidation. Still, better than ending the week in net red. Hopefully can hold.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
HERBERTALCA Member	22-Jan-2021 11:33        HERBERTALCA About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 4  Alert Admin	Junk stock. Avoid.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
lhc1964 Senior	22-Jan-2021 11:04        lhc1964 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Looks like accumulations are still on going .
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   4641-4660 of 10564   Older>   Last