Latest Forum Topics /
OCBC Bank
Last:24.0
-0.53
|
 Post Reply
|
|
ocbc buyers fight back from the shortists
|
|
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 15:03
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
every financial crisis after 1965
https://youtu.be/fVJwneN9w4M?si=fIaDEwdJbmb5DzHJ |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:59
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
the start of my life journey from 1965...
https://youtu.be/zDL5LAuqRQs?si=nWCM1rmi1UND7aM0 |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:55
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
every start of financial crisis till the end
https://youtu.be/4pekqgfJU0s?si=K8QAC2xo8mIZQXwO |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:51
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
the one who follow and the one who leads
https://youtu.be/O8JjnL2-sX4?si=vCwwbmeDyI63IUQs |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:46
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
struggling in every financial crisis at that crucial moment
https://youtu.be/bYokg98l2tI?si=IxAYyhZZOciQ9jF3 |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:43
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
在 以 前 的 大 金 融 危 机 时
https://youtu.be/HltOJDs_xbQ?si=1BbR3QCMNM9Tohlj |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:37
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
在 危 机 时 求 平 安
https://youtu.be/DcZjLPvoOi4?si=ivScA6f6mlRxKuOh 危 机 后 就 求 跑 赢 inflation |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:31
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
当 日 子 过 不 下 去 的 时 候
https://youtu.be/RaC5gC7KZp0?si=vXcg8Oa34X5V0TAk |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:27
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
during every financial crisis I just want to
https://youtu.be/eU6YI9lkfII?si=Pe7uiAlxCCye8Mzs |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:25
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
since 1973 oil crisis 1987 pan electric crisis 1998 Asia financial crisis 2008 great financial crisis and 2020 pandemic crisis
and now the latest coming crisis https://youtu.be/EugpuiJFfKo?si=5Zqe7G22DnGQ2E_B |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:19
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://youtu.be/im70eF8x14U?si=LsnNLTNUjzfW3skq
Here?s a simple timeline of when Hong Kong lifted COVID‑ 19 restrictions and returned to normal life after the pandemic policies: 📍 Late 2022 ? Travel & Entry Restrictions Eased December 14, 2022: Hong Kong ended almost all arrival travel restrictions. That includes dropping the ?0+3? health code regime for people who tested negative ? travellers could move freely once in the city. � Time Out Worldwide December 29, 2022: Most local social‑ distancing and venue restrictions were lifted ? no more vaccine pass requirements for many places and inbound travellers no longer needed PCR tests. � multimedia.scmp.com 📍 Early 2023 ? Mask Mandate Ended March 1, 2023: Hong Kong ended the general mask‑ wearing requirement indoors and outdoors (masking could still be required in specific places like hospitals or elderly homes). � The Standard 📍 Earlier Phases (2022) Before full reopening, Hong Kong gradually relaxed many measures starting in April?May 2022 ? easing social‑ distancing rules, extending restaurant hours, reopening gyms and cinemas, and lifting limits on group gatherings. � news.gov.hk In summary: ✔ ️ Most internal restrictions and social distancing were lifted by late 2022. � ✔ ️ Travel restrictions were largely removed by 14 December 2022. � ✔ ️ The city?s general mask mandate ended on 1 March 2023. � multimedia.scmp.com Time Out Worldwide The Standard If had been monitoring nwd share since HK lifted its COVID restrictions |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:07
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
how new year development 第 三 代 return and fight back
https://youtu.be/uWuNCQRcy7M?si=oJP2CHVBiP0fxlEo |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 14:05
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
will the 4 big HK property tycoons reduce to only 3
https://youtu.be/OMOGaugKpzs?si=-pL5Zr8-MA7jUpft new world development share |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
21-Jan-2026 13:56
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Features / Touchpoints / Gainpoints / Painpoints / Challenges / Solutions 框 架 ， 用 中 文 整 理 一 份 为 什 么 新 加 坡 投 资 者 可 以 考 虑 在 CityDev、 香 港 置 地 、 UOL涨 幅 后 ， 分 散 投 资 美 元 挂 钩 的 香 港 新 世 界 发 展 （ 0017） 的 分 析 。
一 、 Features（ 事 件 特 征 ｜ 这 是 什 么 ） 资 产 类 型 ： 香 港 地 产 开 发 商 股 票 （ 美 元 挂 钩 交 易 ， 受 港 币 联 系 汇 率 影 响 ） 背 景 ： 新 加 坡 地 产 股 近 期 涨 幅 ： CityDev、 香 港 置 地 （ HK Land） 、 UOL 都 出 现 明 显 反 弹 新 世 界 发 展 （ NWD） 近 期 股 价 相 对 滞 后 ， 存 在 短 期 调 整 股 权 结 构 与 家 族 背 景 ： 郑 氏 家 族 控 股 ， 通 过 CTFE / 周 大 福 资 本 对 NWD有 间 接 控 制 股 东 结 构 稳 定 ， 但 财 务 杠 杆 高 ， 短 期 波 动 大 本 质 ： NWD 是 滞 后 反 弹 、 潜 在 高 收 益 、 港 币 /美 元 挂 钩 的 机 会 ， 适 合 用 作 组 合 分 散 风 险 。 二 、 Touchpoints（ 市 场 触 点 ｜ 投 资 者 关 注 ） 多 元 化 需 求 ： SG投 资 者 已 集 中 在 本 地 地 产 股 和 大 盘 股 ， 需 要 跨 区 域 配 置 货 币 优 势 ： 港 币 挂 钩 美 元 → 在 美 元 走 强 时 期 可 提 供 天 然 避 险 估 值 差 异 ： NWD 当 前 股 价 相 对 CityDev、 香 港 置 地 和 UOL更 低 → 有 潜 在 折 价 买 入 机 会 风 险 信 号 ： NWD 财 务 杠 杆 高 、 短 期 债 务 压 力 和 宏 观 调 控 不 确 定 性 三 、 Gain Points（ 正 面 价 值 ｜ 潜 在 收 益 ） 分 散 收 益 来 源 SG地 产 股 已 涨 ， NWD仍 有 价 格 回 升 空 间 投 资 组 合 波 动 率 可 降 低 ， 同 时 提 升 潜 在 年 化 收 益 美 元 挂 钩 带 来 的 汇 率 保 护 对 新 加 坡 投 资 者 而 言 ， 港 币 与 美 元 挂 钩 → 对 SGD提 供 汇 率 缓 冲 估 值 折 价 吸 引 力 NWD 当 前 P/B、 P/E低 于 同 类 香 港 地 产 开 发 商 价 值 投 资 者 可 低 价 买 入 ， 等 待 债 务 和 市 场 修 复 潜 在 催 化 因 素 家 族 重 组 、 资 产 处 置 、 楼 盘 销 售 回 暖 → 股 价 反 弹 催 化 剂 四 、 Pain Points（ 潜 在 风 险 ｜ 投 资 者 担 忧 ） 高 财 务 杠 杆 NWD 资 产 负 债 率 高 → 利 率 上 升 或 市 场 疲 软 会 压 制 股 价 香 港 房 地 产 市 场 波 动 政 策 调 控 、 销 售 不 及 预 期 → 营 收 波 动 大 结 构 复 杂 郑 氏 家 族 控 股 、 跨 公 司 持 股 → 投 资 透 明 度 低 部 分 投 资 者 可 能 担 心 现 金 流 被 关 联 输 血 或 用 于 高 杠 杆 项 目 短 期 波 动 大 近 期 市 场 不 稳 定 → 股 价 可 能 大 幅 波 动 ， 增 加 心 理 成 本 五 、 Challenges（ 挑 战 ｜ 投 资 决 策 难 点 ） 判 断 最 佳 入 场 价 格 NWD 股 价 尚 未 充 分 修 复 ， 需 要 结 合 债 务 情 况 和 市 场 情 绪 判 断 宏 观 环 境 不 确 定 美 元 走 势 、 港 币 利 率 政 策 、 香 港 楼 市 政 策 都 会 影 响 回 报 组 合 配 置 平 衡 SG投 资 者 如 何 在 本 地 地 产 股 高 位 与 海 外 滞 后 股 间 分 配 仓 位 六 、 Solutions（ 解 决 方 案 ｜ 投 资 策 略 ） 分 批 建 仓 NWD 可 分 阶 段 买 入 ， 利 用 短 期 波 动 降 低 平 均 成 本 先 少 量 试 水 ， 观 察 市 场 和 债 务 风 险 设 定 安 全 边 际 投 资 价 格 控 制 在 分 析 师 合 理 估 值 下 限 附 近 （ 如 HK$5?7区 间 ） 关 注 催 化 事 件 家 族 重 组 、 资 产 出 售 、 销 售 回 暖 → 可 作 为 追 加 投 资 信 号 货 币 与 风 险 管 理 港 币 挂 钩 美 元 → 对 冲 部 分 汇 率 风 险 配 合 本 地 涨 幅 较 高 的 地 产 股 → 平 衡 组 合 风 险 长 期 持 有 视 角 价 值 投 资 者 可 利 用 短 期 波 动 积 累 仓 位 聚 焦 稳 定 现 金 流 和 资 产 价 值 回 升 而 非 短 期 市 场 波 动 💡 总 结 一 句 话 对 新 加 坡 投 资 者 而 言 ， NWD 提 供 了 港 币 /美 元 挂 钩 的 分 散 机 会 、 低 估 值 潜 在 收 益 和 催 化 事 件 预 期 ， 适 合 作 为 在 CityDev、 UOL、 HK Land涨 幅 后 的 海 外 分 散 配 置 ， 但 需 注 意 高 杠 杆 和 短 期 波 动 风 险 。 |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
20-Jan-2026 15:01
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Got it ? I?ll cover all three, cleanly and in one flow.
Think of this as a US?EU retaliation playbook and how it differs from the US?China trade war, with real earnings and sector impact. 1️ ⃣ Simulating Nasdaq earnings impact under EU retaliation 🎯 Key assumption EU retaliation would be targeted, legal, and politically surgical (not blunt tariffs like China used in 2018). 📉 Earnings transmission channels Channel How it hits Nasdaq Digital services taxes Direct margin hit to Big Tech Antitrust fines / compliance Higher operating costs Public-sector procurement bans Revenue loss for cloud & defense tech Consumer boycotts (soft) Brand damage, slower EU sales 📊 Earnings impact simulation (12?18 months) Segment EPS impact Mega-cap Tech (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL) -3% to -7% Ad-driven platforms (META, GOOGL) -5% to -10% Semis (NVDA, AMD) -1% to -3% SaaS / Cloud -2% to -5% Nasdaq overall EPS -3% to -6% 🔎 Market reaction: ? Valuation compression > earnings damage ? P/E derating of 1?3 turns, even if revenue impact is modest 2️ ⃣ US?EU trade war vs US?China trade war (critical differences) This is where many investors get it wrong. Dimension US?China US?EU Economic model Rival system Allied capitalist system Trade tools Tariffs, bans Regulation, taxation Speed Sudden, aggressive Slow, legalistic Market shock Violent Grinding FX weapon Yes (RMB) No (EUR not weaponised) Supply chain Replace China Cannot replace EU 🧠 Key insight US?China war = heart attack US?EU war = chronic disease Markets can?t price chronic damage easily, which is why valuation risk is underestimated. 3️ ⃣ Which US sectors the EU would most likely target The EU retaliates where: ✔ It has legal authority ✔ It can claim ?consumer protection? ✔ US firms dominate EU market share 🎯 High-probability targets 🔴 Tier 1 ? Most likely Sector Why Big Tech (Apple, Meta, Google, Amazon) Digital sovereignty Cloud services Data localisation laws Online advertising Competition & privacy 🟠 Tier 2 ? Likely but selective Sector Why AI platforms Ethical / regulatory framing Financial services Transaction taxes Pharmaceuticals Drug pricing controls 🟢 Tier 3 ? Unlikely Sector Why Energy EU already vulnerable Defense NATO dependency Semiconductors EU needs US supply 🔁 Putting it all together (investor takeaway) 📉 What suffers ? Nasdaq multiples ? US Big Tech margins ? Ad-driven platforms 🛡 What holds up ? US domestic industries ? Defense & infrastructure ? Non-EU exposed US mid-caps 🌍 Who benefits indirectly ? Asia ex-US (capital rotation) ? EU domestic champions ? Hard assets (gold, infrastructure) ⚠ ️ Final reality check EU retaliation won?t crash markets But it caps upside, especially for: ?perfectly priced US tech? If you want next, I can: 📊 Build a Nasdaq sector heatmap under EU retaliation 💼 Show where capital would rotate (US → Asia / EM / EU) 🧮 Model Big Tech fair value if EU regulation intensifies Just say which one. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
20-Jan-2026 14:58
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Below is a scenario-based strategic analysis (not a prediction) of if the US imposes tariffs on Denmark / Greenland, and the EU retaliates, focusing on US tech, US stock markets, and US consumers, using your requested framework.
1️ ⃣ Features（ 事 件 特 征 ） What happens US imposes tariffs on Denmark-origin goods (Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark). EU treats this as tariffs on an EU member state → triggers EU collective retaliation. Retaliation is asymmetric: EU targets politically and economically sensitive US sectors. Why this matters Denmark is small, but EU retaliation is large-scale. Greenland adds strategic minerals + Arctic geopolitics, escalating the issue beyond trade. 2️ ⃣ Touchpoints（ 直 接 接 触 点 ） A. EU retaliation targets (historical pattern) EU is likely to hit: US Tech & Digital Services Aerospace Consumer brands Agricultural exports Digital taxes / regulatory pressure B. Market touchpoints US equity markets (Nasdaq, S&P) US corporate earnings Consumer prices USD strength vs EUR 3️ ⃣ Gainpoints（ 谁 受 益 ） 🇪 🇺 European Union Shows unity and sovereignty Strengthens EU?s strategic autonomy narrative Pushes faster de-risking from US tech 🇨 🇳 China (Indirect) EU firms may: Buy Chinese hardware instead of US Use Asian cloud & manufacturing alternatives China gains leverage as non-tariffed supplier 🇺 🇸 US Treasury (Short-term) Tariff revenue Temporary protection for specific domestic industries 4️ ⃣ Painpoints（ 谁 受 伤 ） 🔻 US Tech Companies (Most exposed) Sector Pain Big Tech (Apple, Google, Microsoft, Meta) Digital taxes, antitrust, service restrictions Semiconductors EU retaliation + supply chain friction Cloud & SaaS Government procurement exclusions AI platforms Regulatory tightening 👉 EU doesn?t need tariffs ? regulation hurts more 🔻 US Stock Market Impact Short-term Nasdaq volatility ↑ Tech valuation multiples compress Defensive rotation (utilities, healthcare) Medium-term Earnings downgrades for multinationals Lower buybacks due to cash flow uncertainty Historical pattern Markets initially shrug → reprice when earnings fall 🔻 US Consumers (Slow but painful) Area Impact Electronics Higher prices (EU components + logistics) Autos EU retaliation hits US car exports → job pressure Subscriptions Digital service costs passed on Inflation Sticky services inflation 👉 Tariffs = hidden tax on consumers 5️ ⃣ Challenges（ 结 构 性 问 题 ） ⚠ ️ For the US EU retaliation is legal under WTO Hard to isolate Denmark without triggering EU bloc Tech dominance = easy retaliation target ⚠ ️ For Markets Trade conflict during rate-cut cycle = mixed signals Inflation vs growth tradeoff worsens Policy unpredictability increases risk premium 6️ ⃣ Solutions（ 现 实 应 对 路 径 ） 🇺 🇸 US Policy Options Carve-outs / exemptions for EU Shift from tariffs → investment controls Use NATO / Arctic cooperation to de-escalate Greenland angle 📊 For Investors Reduce EU-revenue-heavy US tech exposure Tilt toward: US domestics Defense Energy Infrastructure Watch USD/EUR for capital flow signals 🛒 For US Consumers Expect price creep, not sudden spikes Most pain shows up in: Services Tech ecosystems Insurance & logistics costs 🔚 Bottom Line（ 一 句 话 总 结 ） Tariffs on Denmark/Greenland won?t hurt Denmark ? they trigger EU retaliation, which disproportionately hurts US tech, compresses US equity valuations, and quietly taxes US consumers. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
20-Jan-2026 14:12
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Below is a structured investment-style breakdown of Li Ka-shing / CK Hutchison investment philosophy, using your example of buying gold around 2001 (~USD 200/oz) and why you chose CK Hutchison to ?see how the tycoon?s office invests in HK & China markets?.
I?ll frame it in Features / Touchpoints / Gainpoints / Painpoints / Challenges / Solutions, and keep it practical for investors, not myth-making. 1️ ⃣ FEATURES ? How Li Ka-shing?s Capital Really Invests 🔹 1. Extreme Cycle Awareness Bought gold in 2001: Tech bubble burst US rate cuts starting USD credibility weakening This was not a gold trade, but a macro regime shift bet 👉 Key feature: He invests when consensus is wrong and liquidity is scarce 🔹 2. Asset > Geography Li Ka-shing does not ?love China? or ?hate China? Capital flows to: Infrastructure Utilities Telecom Cash-flow-stable monopolies 👉 CK Hutchison today: ~80% earnings outside China Europe, UK, Canada, Australia dominate 🔹 3. Optionality First, Narrative Later Gold 2001 = insurance + upside Ports, telecom = downside protected, upside asymmetric Rarely all-in, always optionality preserved 2️ ⃣ TOUCHPOINTS ? How This Shows Up in HK & China Investing 🔹 CK Hutchison (0001.HK) Sells assets at cycle peaks Holds cash when others chase growth Re-enters only when forced sellers dominate 🔹 China / HK Property Li family reduced exposure early Did not fight: Policy tightening Leverage crackdown Demographics 👉 Contrast: Others averaged down Li stood aside 3️ ⃣ GAINPOINTS ? Why This Approach Works Over Decades ✅ 1. Capital Survival First Avoids permanent loss Survives: Asian Financial Crisis GFC China deleveraging US tightening cycles ✅ 2. Buy When Assets Are ?Unloved but Needed? Gold (2001) → money hedge Ports → global trade backbone Telecom → non-discretionary cash flow ✅ 3. Time Is the Leverage Willing to wait 5?10 years Retail investors usually can?t 4️ ⃣ PAINPOINTS ? Why Following Li Ka-shing Is Hard ❌ 1. Looks ?Wrong? for Years Gold buyers in 2001 were mocked CK Hutchison often underperforms in bull markets ❌ 2. Boring on the Surface No hype No exciting narratives Underweights ?national champions? ❌ 3. Cash Drag Holding cash during bubbles feels painful But saves lives later 5️ ⃣ CHALLENGES ? For HK & China Stock Investors Today ⚠ ️ 1. Structural vs Cyclical Confusion Many China stocks are structurally impaired, not cyclically cheap Li avoids: Over-leveraged developers Policy-dependent sectors ⚠ ️ 2. Political Optionality Risk Assets with single-country risk are avoided This is why CK Hutchison globalized early ⚠ ️ 3. Patience Gap Most investors think in quarters Li thinks in macro decades 6️ ⃣ SOLUTIONS ? How You Can Apply ?Li-Style Thinking? Today 🧠 1. Ask the Gold 2001 Question ?What asset today is hated, but protects purchasing power if the system changes?? Examples (conceptual, not advice): Hard assets Regulated monopolies Cash-rich balance sheets 🧠 2. Separate China Exposure from China Risk Revenue from China ≠ political exposure CK Hutchison: minimal dependency despite HK listing 🧠 3. Use CK Hutchison as a Philosophy Proxy, Not a Trade You bought CKH to understand: Capital discipline Asset rotation timing Macro humility That is the right reason ? not short-term alpha. 🔚 Bottom Line (Li Ka-shing Logic in One Sentence) ?I don?t need to be right often. I just need to avoid being wrong when it matters.? If you want, next I can: 🔍 Compare CK Hutchison vs HK developers (who follows Li-style discipline, who doesn?t) 📊 Map 2026 assets Li-style capital would avoid vs accumulate 🧠 Translate this framework into a personal portfolio rulebook Just tell me which one you want. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
19-Jan-2026 11:30
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Here?s a summary of the latest earnings reports (January 2026) for the big private banks in India, focused especially on the Q3 FY26 results that were reported around mid-January 2026 (these are the most recent quarterly figures available right now):
mint The Economic Times HDFC Bank Q3 Results 2026 Highlights: Net profit rises 11% to ₹ 18,654 crore NII up 6.4% YoY HDFC Bank shares in focus as Q3 net profit jumps 11% to Rs 18,654 crore. Should you buy, sell or hold? Yesterday Today 📊 Key Earnings Highlights (Q3 FY26 / Dec 2025 quarter) 🏦 HDFC Bank 2.4 · Bank · Closed Reported strong Q3 results with profit rising year-on-year. Standalone net profit: ~₹ 18,654 crore, up ~11 % YoY. Net interest income (NII) also grew, supporting earnings. Results generally beat market expectations, lifting investor sentiment. � mint +1 Overview: HDFC Bank, India?s largest private lender, showed solid profit growth, stable asset quality, and increased interest income ? an encouraging sign of resilience in its core business. 🏦 ICICI Bank 3.1 · Bank · Closed Q3 net profit declined slightly year-on-year. Profit fell ~3?4 % compared with the same quarter last year. Higher provisions and regulatory compliance costs weighed on earnings. Despite the profit drop, net interest income and asset quality remained steady. � The Economic Times +1 Overview: ICICI Bank?s earnings were mixed ? profitability slightly weaker but underlying business metrics like margins and loan growth remain reasonably solid. 🏦 RBL Bank 2.1 · Bank · Closed Reported lower-than-expected Q3 profit though much higher than a year ago. Profit was impacted by slower-than-expected growth, despite improved net interest income. Focus shifting to safer loan segments like auto and mortgages. � Reuters Overview: Smaller private lender RBL Bank is still stabilizing after its strategic changes and reported weaker results compared with analyst forecasts. 📅 Other Private Banks Kotak Mahindra Bank was scheduled to report Q3 results around mid-January 2026 ? so full details were expected as of Jan 18-19 but not yet widely reported. � Business Today Earnings for other mid-sized private banks (e.g., IDFC First Bank, smaller lenders) generally lag behind the big names but trends point to mixed performance in margins and profits across the sector. 📈 Summary of Sector Trends Largest private banks like HDFC Bank delivered robust profits, benefiting from strong interest income and controlled asset quality. ICICI Bank faced earnings pressure due to higher provisions, but continued to post solid operational metrics. Smaller private lenders saw more volatile results, with some missed estimates. The broader earnings season in January 2026 reflects a mix of resilience in core banking franchises and pressure from credit costs and regulatory changes affecting net profits this quarter. � whalesbook.com If you?d like, I can also break these numbers down into a table or compare them with public sector bank earnings for the same period. ICICI Bank Ltd,Mumbai BKC ICICI Towers HDFC Bank 2.4 · Bank 3.1 · Bank Closed until 9:30 AM Closed until 9:30 AM |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
16-Jan-2026 15:23
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The consensus among 16 analysts tracking Genting Singapore (SGX:G13) is generally positive, with a "Buy" or "Outperform" rating and an average 12-month price target of S$0.88, suggesting an upside of about 20% from recent prices. However, the company is currently navigating a significant investment phase, which is creating a mixed picture of near-term pressures and long-term potential.
Here?s a breakdown of the investment case, the main strategic project, and key risks. 📈 The Bull Case: Key Investment Rationales The positive outlook from many analysts is based on several key factors: · Strong Capital Efficiency Trend: A key financial metric, Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), has shown a promising long-term trend, increasing by 113% over the past five years. This suggests the company is becoming more efficient at generating profits from its capital. · Resilient Operations & Growth: Despite challenges, the core business shows strength. For Q3 2025, the company reported strong results with revenue of S$649.8 million and growth driven by improved VIP volume and non-gaming expansion. Rival Marina Bay Sands also reported robust VIP volume growth recently, indicating healthy industry demand. · Attractive Valuation & Yield: The stock trades near the middle of its 52-week range. Some analysts view this as a good entry point, especially when considering the potential for dividends to return to pre-pandemic levels, which could offer a yield of around 4-5%. · Tourism Market Recovery: Singapore's tourism recovery continues, providing a favorable tailwind for Resorts World Sentosa (RWS). 🏗 ️ The RWS 2.0 Transformation: A Double-Edged Sword The dominant theme for Genting Singapore is its S$4.5 billion RWS 2.0 transformation plan, set for completion by 2030. This is the main cause of both current headwinds and future optimism. · Near-Term Impact (Headwinds): The ongoing major renovations, including phased attraction closures like the S.E.A. Aquarium, are directly impacting current financial performance. As a result, revenue and profit for the first half of 2025 declined year-over-year. · Long-Term Goal (Catalyst): The goal is to completely renew the resort with new hotels, lifestyle precincts, and upgraded attractions to secure its competitiveness and drive future growth once completed. ⚠ ️ Key Risks and Challenges to Consider · Near-Term Earnings Pressure: Financial results are expected to remain volatile as construction continues. One analyst report cautions that Genting Singapore may not mirror the recent strong performance of its rival due to its own strategic pullback in VIP credit and ongoing property disruptions. · Execution and Competitive Risk: The scale of the RWS 2.0 project carries execution risk. Furthermore, competitor Marina Bay Sands is also investing and performing well, potentially capturing market share in the interim. · Macroeconomic Sensitivity: The business is sensitive to regional economic health, affecting tourist spending and VIP gaming volumes. 💎 Final Verdict Investing in Genting Singapore is essentially a bet on the successful execution and payoff of its S$4.5 billion RWS 2.0 transformation. The current "Buy" consensus reflects a belief that the long-term benefits outweigh the near-term financial pains. For a potential investor, the decision hinges on your investment horizon: · If you are looking for short-term gains, the stock faces clear headwinds and volatility. · If you have a long-term horizon (3-5+ years) and believe in the strategic renewal of RWS, the current period of operational disruption may present a strategic entry point, as suggested by the analyst price targets. Would you like a deeper comparison of Genting Singapore's financial metrics (like debt levels and dividend history) against its main competitor to better assess its relative position? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartistkaohz
Elite |
15-Jan-2026 14:54
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Based on available information, a past attempt to privatize Kerry Properties failed. Whether Robert Kuok would try again involves analyzing the company's current market position and ownership structure.
Allgreen Properties (SGX, 2011) vs. Kerry Properties (HKEX, Potential Future) Touchpoints (Key Actors & Factors) · Controlling Shareholder: Kuok Group (via Brookvale Investments) Kuok Group (via Kerry Group Ltd, 60% stake) · Market/Listing: Singapore Exchange (SGX) Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) · Key Motive (Likely): Simplify group structure, gain full control of assets Address significant undervaluation (P/B ratio ~0.29), streamline portfolio · Major Challenge: Compulsory acquisition after achieving high ownership threshold Gaining approval from minority shareholders (26% public float), regulatory compliance Gainpoints (Potential Benefits) · For Kuok Group: Full control over prime assets (e.g., Great World, Tanglin Mall), operational flexibility Full control, retain all future profits from prime portfolio, avoid public market costs · For Company: Freedom from quarterly market pressures, ability to execute long-term plans Shielded from volatile public markets, ability to execute long-term, capital-intensive strategies · For Shareholders (Minority): Exit at a controlled premium (if offered) Opportunity to exit at a premium in an undervalued, illiquid stock Painpoints (Potential Negatives) · For Kuok Group: Upfront cash outlay for shares High cash outlay for remaining ~40%, risk of shareholder rejection · For Company: Loss of public equity fundraising channel Loss of a public listing for future capital raising · For Shareholders (Minority): Loss of future upside in a now-private, growing entity Loss of future upside, especially if offer price is low relative to NAV Challenges & Solutions · Valuation Gap: Challenge: Minority shareholders rejected a past offer (HK$9.50) for being too low vs. Net Asset Value (NAV). Solution: A new offer would need to be significantly higher, closer to or above NAV. · Shareholder Approval: Challenge: Needing approval from a majority of the minority shareholders (26% public float). Solution: A compelling premium and effective communication of long-term privatization rationale. · Funding: Challenge: Funding a deal for the remaining ~40% (market cap ~HKD 30.4B). Solution: Utilizing group cash reserves, dividend streams, or strategic asset sales. 🏢 The Allgreen Privatization (2011) Available records show that Allgreen Properties was listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX) in May 1999 and was delisted in August 2011. The privatization was executed via a compulsory acquisition by Brookvale Investments Pte Ltd, a company within the Kuok Group. This legal mechanism is typically used after an offeror acquires a very high percentage (often 90% or more) of shares, allowing them to force the remaining shareholders to sell. · Strategic Context: Post-privatization, Allgreen has operated as a key private investment vehicle for the Kuok Group's real estate ambitions. It has been active in acquiring prime assets like Seletar Mall and the Johor Bahru City Square mall, and aggressively bidding for land in Singapore. Being private allows for quicker, more strategic decisions without public market scrutiny. 🏙 ️ The Kerry Properties Situation A past attempt to privatize Kerry Properties was rejected by minority shareholders. The current conditions present a mixed picture for a potential new attempt. · Strong Motive - Undervaluation: Kerry Properties appears deeply undervalued. Its Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio is approximately 0.29, meaning the market values the company at less than a third of its net asset value. This is a classic trigger for privatization. · Major Hurdle - Shareholder Dynamics: The Kuok Group already controls 60% of the company through Kerry Group Limited. The remaining 40% is held by institutional investors (13%) and the public (26%). Any privatization would require winning over these independent shareholders, who have proven resistant in the past. · Recent Strategic Moves: The company has been actively managing its portfolio, including selling non-core assets like warehouses. Such moves can streamline the balance sheet and potentially free up cash, which could be a preparatory step for a major transaction. 📈 Other Companies Linked to Robert Kuok The search results do not provide a comprehensive list of other companies Robert Kuok has privatized. The Kuok Group's structure is complex, with both public and private entities. · Public Companies in the Group: The group maintains several other listed vehicles, including Shangri-La Asia (hotels) and Wilmar International (agribusiness), which remain publicly traded. · Privatization Pattern: The Allgreen case shows a pattern of taking a real estate subsidiary private after a relatively short public listing (about 12 years), suggesting a preference for controlling strategic property assets within the private side of the conglomerate. To summarize, while the Kuok Group has a precedent and a clear financial motive for privatizing Kerry Properties, the decisive factor would be structuring an offer acceptable to minority shareholders who have previously resisted. If you are interested, I can provide a deeper analysis of the financial metrics (like NAV) that would make a fair offer price for minority shareholders. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |