Back

Latest Forum Topics / YuuZoo Networks

Post Reply

Yuuzoo Next Alibaba Fast -Grow E-commerce Post Reply Rate topic
danger Supreme	13-May-2016 16:35        danger About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	ALL GOT BUTCHERED IN YUUZOO
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	13-May-2016 16:24        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Siao liao.  Jason chasing this one also?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
andysim83 Elite	13-May-2016 16:24        andysim83 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	down the drain once more...flush down again...this stock realli cant stay abv 0.2
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	13-May-2016 15:44        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Bro, quickly set up a audit firm now.  Yuuzoo is looking for auditor like you who can appreciate them better.  Damn MS LLC.  Our bro here better than you.  You cause people lose money. He can help them to make.   jm2110      ( Date: 13-May-2016 15:34) Posted: I do know for a fact the model is consistent with he accounting practices used by all the major US technology company' s. jm2110      ( Date: 13-May-2016 15:32) Posted: Knowing how these things work I imagine you will find the big 4 name did the model for valuation on the basis they were going to win the audit contract and when they lost it because someone came in cheaper YZ was prevented on saying the model came from them.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
jm2110 Member	13-May-2016 15:34        jm2110 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I do know for a fact the model is consistent with he accounting practices used by all the major US technology company' s. jm2110      ( Date: 13-May-2016 15:32) Posted: Knowing how these things work I imagine you will find the big 4 name did the model for valuation on the basis they were going to win the audit contract and when they lost it because someone came in cheaper YZ was prevented on saying the model came from them.     sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 13:56) Posted: Bro, now I think about it I am even not convinced.  Yuuzoo is willing to release the name of a less than 2 year company but still refuses to release the names of the two big four.  Everybody knows the release of their name will add weight and creditibility to their claims includign Yuuzoo themselves.  Yuuzoo refusal to discolse their name seriously got me wondering if release their names is a risk to their already questioned creditibility. Yes, people says big four vs one, who has more credit but also ask why one going against the big four.  Did they see something that they know cannot be justify?  Why do they choose to appear to look like that dont know what they are doing?  So silly?  I think if things gets more transparent, MS will not be the one looking silly. I dont think the problem is with the auditors.  The problem must be something else.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
fighting Master	13-May-2016 15:33        fighting About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Haiz.... I bought 0.178 can't wait anymore. Everyone just talk talk only never short. fighting      ( Date: 13-May-2016 11:47) Posted: Let go this morning with some kopi money. Now trying to buy back @175. Talk talk talk no action no point la.... if u think this counter cannot make it then short it for me pls. fighting      ( Date: 12-May-2016 14:38) Posted: Bought back @0.178. Panic this morning sold at 0.195.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
jm2110 Member	13-May-2016 15:32        jm2110 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Knowing how these things work I imagine you will find the big 4 name did the model for valuation on the basis they were going to win the audit contract and when they lost it because someone came in cheaper YZ was prevented on saying the model came from them.     sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 13:56) Posted: Bro, now I think about it I am even not convinced.  Yuuzoo is willing to release the name of a less than 2 year company but still refuses to release the names of the two big four.  Everybody knows the release of their name will add weight and creditibility to their claims includign Yuuzoo themselves.  Yuuzoo refusal to discolse their name seriously got me wondering if release their names is a risk to their already questioned creditibility. Yes, people says big four vs one, who has more credit but also ask why one going against the big four.  Did they see something that they know cannot be justify?  Why do they choose to appear to look like that dont know what they are doing?  So silly?  I think if things gets more transparent, MS will not be the one looking silly. I dont think the problem is with the auditors.  The problem must be something else. sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:54) Posted: Very tempting but very risky.  But I think your 1-2 weeks fitted in nicely.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
golden_SGX Master	13-May-2016 15:01        golden_SGX About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Anyway, the auditors problems is only a small matter to most ... most important to all is the recent ALIBABA AND YUUZOO SIGN AGREEMENT next to it real cash will come in soon. also, CEO appearance on CNBC Managing Asia tonite Friday 17:30. hope there will be some good announcement tonite.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	13-May-2016 13:56        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Bro, now I think about it I am even not convinced.  Yuuzoo is willing to release the name of a less than 2 year company but still refuses to release the names of the two big four.  Everybody knows the release of their name will add weight and creditibility to their claims includign Yuuzoo themselves.  Yuuzoo refusal to discolse their name seriously got me wondering if release their names is a risk to their already questioned creditibility. Yes, people says big four vs one, who has more credit but also ask why one going against the big four.  Did they see something that they know cannot be justify?  Why do they choose to appear to look like that dont know what they are doing?  So silly?  I think if things gets more transparent, MS will not be the one looking silly. I dont think the problem is with the auditors.  The problem must be something else. sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:54) Posted: Very tempting but very risky.  But I think your 1-2 weeks fitted in nicely. TanSiBeiKu      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:52) Posted: Mai Gong Bo Jio. Start to nimble small small if price stay flat for the next 1 to 2 weeks. Upon the announcement of the sales of franchisee companies shares, just sell on opening. Easily gain 10% profit.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	13-May-2016 13:44        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yuuzoo also said its share worth $1 but end of the day market decides. Whether independent or not market decides. Yuuzoo can say all it wants but action speaks louder. golden_SGX      ( Date: 13-May-2016 11:52) Posted: According to the announcement release its counted as an independent valuation .... YuuZoo  commissioned, at  the  suggestion  of  the  auditors, CharFi  to  conduct a 2nd independent Valuation, without any reference to the 1st Valuation done by the big-4 accounting firm. Again, the 2nd Valuation came up with a value within the same range as the 1st Valuation and the Validation.  sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:51) Posted: I know the big four but my point being pls reveal them.  Already reveal their 2nd valuer as CharFi (which is a newly register coy in July 2014 by the way and is consider reputatable with less than 2 years of operating history?  This coy doesn' t even have a website!). By the way, the 2nd valuation by CharFi doesn' t count as independent as they have already seen the price range during the validation pocess.  If they came out with valuation that is markedly diff, then they are shooting themselves in the foot becos they invalid the validation they did earlier.    Yuuzoo pls read this.  There are too many shortcomings in your defences.  Please defend properly! Is like keep telling people they have a million dollar note but when asked to show, keep showing $1, $5, $50 note only.  How to convince people?  Why the two big four want to hide in the shadow when working with Yuuzoo.  Just be open about it. You should demand this from Yuuzoo mgmt as well becos if you are heavily invested, this alone might reverse the situation.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
golden_SGX Master	13-May-2016 11:52        golden_SGX About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	According to the announcement release its counted as an independent valuation .... YuuZoo  commissioned, at  the  suggestion  of  the  auditors, CharFi  to  conduct a 2nd independent Valuation, without any reference to the 1st Valuation done by the big-4 accounting firm. Again, the 2nd Valuation came up with a value within the same range as the 1st Valuation and the Validation.  sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:51) Posted: I know the big four but my point being pls reveal them.  Already reveal their 2nd valuer as CharFi (which is a newly register coy in July 2014 by the way and is consider reputatable with less than 2 years of operating history?  This coy doesn' t even have a website!). By the way, the 2nd valuation by CharFi doesn' t count as independent as they have already seen the price range during the validation pocess.  If they came out with valuation that is markedly diff, then they are shooting themselves in the foot becos they invalid the validation they did earlier.    Yuuzoo pls read this.  There are too many shortcomings in your defences.  Please defend properly! Is like keep telling people they have a million dollar note but when asked to show, keep showing $1, $5, $50 note only.  How to convince people?  Why the two big four want to hide in the shadow when working with Yuuzoo.  Just be open about it. You should demand this from Yuuzoo mgmt as well becos if you are heavily invested, this alone might reverse the situation. golden_SGX      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:38) Posted: the Big Four accounting firms are already posted below & I append it again: 1. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) 2. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 3. Ernst & Young (E& Y) 4. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG) http://www.accountingverse.com/articles/big-4-accounting-firms.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Four_accounting_firms and CharFi Valuation Services, LLC, a recognised New York-based investment bank who conduct a 2nd independent Valuation. So 5 against 1, who is more credible? Moore Stephens LLC is on the wrong side ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
fighting Master	13-May-2016 11:47        fighting About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Let go this morning with some kopi money. Now trying to buy back @175. Talk talk talk no action no point la.... if u think this counter cannot make it then short it for me pls. fighting      ( Date: 12-May-2016 14:38) Posted: Bought back @0.178. Panic this morning sold at 0.195.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	13-May-2016 11:39        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Selling 1% to create "real value" for the share that hold......the ceo really A1.... maybe sgx should ask him to be ceo....maybe should ask for high price....then send yuuzoo to wonderland...bigger then alibaba...aligrandpa sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:03) Posted: Woah I am impressed!  Not by Yuuzoo but by TanSiBeiKu! There is a dilemma here.  Sell too little, low confident.  Sell too much is giving up higher stake.  There needs to be a balance.  But yes 1% is seems too low to prove anything. Another good point.  Please be from someone reputation and reliable.  For example Jack Ma, Warren Buffett,etc is the minimum. Lastly, please disclose the name of that one big four.  Why are they so ashamed to be associated with Yuuzoo?  Just this one alone, market will easily value your coy at twice the current value. TanSiBeiKu      ( Date: 13-May-2016 09:43) Posted: " The Group is in the process of finalising an agreement with a number of independent 3rd party investors to sell approximately 1% of its share in the franchisee companies that are held as assets available for sale. Negotiations for these sales are in an advance stage and, subject to the execution of long-form agreements, will complete in mid-2016.  The terms of the in-principle agreements negotiated to date set a price point equal to the Group' s carrying value of the shares and is not expected to yield a profit or a loss to the group. This series of sales will provide level 2 supporting evidence in determining the appropriate value at which to hold these assets on the balance sheet" My personal opinion on the above: 1. The Management should consider a higher % of sale instead of just 1% to give a stronger confidence to the market.  2. The independent 3rd party investors preferably to be someone " known" to Singaporean and have a strong track record in similar industry.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
golden_SGX Master	13-May-2016 11:28        golden_SGX About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	many critics were also shouting its only a dream then ... where is Alibaba ? after Yuuzoo sign agreement with Alibaba, many critics went to dreamland in disbelief ! Demostation      ( Date: 13-May-2016 11:06) Posted: Selling off the " paper" assets should be a good thing as the assets will become cash, and it will shut the mouths of critics who always ask where is the money, hahaha.    If they concluded the sale, Yuuzoo might spike above 30 cents, lol.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Demostation Supreme	13-May-2016 11:06        Demostation About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Selling off the " paper" assets should be a good thing as the assets will become cash, and it will shut the mouths of critics who always ask where is the money, hahaha.    If they concluded the sale, Yuuzoo might spike above 30 cents, lol.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	13-May-2016 10:54        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Very tempting but very risky.  But I think your 1-2 weeks fitted in nicely. TanSiBeiKu      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:52) Posted: Mai Gong Bo Jio. Start to nimble small small if price stay flat for the next 1 to 2 weeks. Upon the announcement of the sales of franchisee companies shares, just sell on opening. Easily gain 10% profit.   sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:03) Posted: Woah I am impressed!  Not by Yuuzoo but by TanSiBeiKu! There is a dilemma here.  Sell too little, low confident.  Sell too much is giving up higher stake.  There needs to be a balance.  But yes 1% is seems too low to prove anything. Another good point.  Please be from someone reputation and reliable.  For example Jack Ma, Warren Buffett,etc is the minimum. Lastly, please disclose the name of that one big four.  Why are they so ashamed to be associated with Yuuzoo?  Just this one alone, market will easily value your coy at twice the current value.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
TanSiBeiKu Senior	13-May-2016 10:52        TanSiBeiKu About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Mai Gong Bo Jio. Start to nimble small small if price stay flat for the next 1 to 2 weeks. Upon the announcement of the sales of franchisee companies shares, just sell on opening. Easily gain 10% profit.   sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:03) Posted: Woah I am impressed!  Not by Yuuzoo but by TanSiBeiKu! There is a dilemma here.  Sell too little, low confident.  Sell too much is giving up higher stake.  There needs to be a balance.  But yes 1% is seems too low to prove anything. Another good point.  Please be from someone reputation and reliable.  For example Jack Ma, Warren Buffett,etc is the minimum. Lastly, please disclose the name of that one big four.  Why are they so ashamed to be associated with Yuuzoo?  Just this one alone, market will easily value your coy at twice the current value. TanSiBeiKu      ( Date: 13-May-2016 09:43) Posted: " The Group is in the process of finalising an agreement with a number of independent 3rd party investors to sell approximately 1% of its share in the franchisee companies that are held as assets available for sale. Negotiations for these sales are in an advance stage and, subject to the execution of long-form agreements, will complete in mid-2016.  The terms of the in-principle agreements negotiated to date set a price point equal to the Group' s carrying value of the shares and is not expected to yield a profit or a loss to the group. This series of sales will provide level 2 supporting evidence in determining the appropriate value at which to hold these assets on the balance sheet" My personal opinion on the above: 1. The Management should consider a higher % of sale instead of just 1% to give a stronger confidence to the market.  2. The independent 3rd party investors preferably to be someone " known" to Singaporean and have a strong track record in similar industry.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	13-May-2016 10:51        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I know the big four but my point being pls reveal them.  Already reveal their 2nd valuer as CharFi (which is a newly register coy in July 2014 by the way and is consider reputatable with less than 2 years of operating history?  This coy doesn' t even have a website!). By the way, the 2nd valuation by CharFi doesn' t count as independent as they have already seen the price range during the validation pocess.  If they came out with valuation that is markedly diff, then they are shooting themselves in the foot becos they invalid the validation they did earlier.    Yuuzoo pls read this.  There are too many shortcomings in your defences.  Please defend properly! Is like keep telling people they have a million dollar note but when asked to show, keep showing $1, $5, $50 note only.  How to convince people?  Why the two big four want to hide in the shadow when working with Yuuzoo.  Just be open about it. You should demand this from Yuuzoo mgmt as well becos if you are heavily invested, this alone might reverse the situation. golden_SGX      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:38) Posted: the Big Four accounting firms are already posted below & I append it again: 1. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) 2. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 3. Ernst & Young (E& Y) 4. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG) http://www.accountingverse.com/articles/big-4-accounting-firms.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Four_accounting_firms and CharFi Valuation Services, LLC, a recognised New York-based investment bank who conduct a 2nd independent Valuation. So 5 against 1, who is more credible? Moore Stephens LLC is on the wrong side ? sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:36) Posted: That' s true, bro.  So Yuuzoo should just disclose the names of the two big fours to silent skeptic on this point.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Demostation Supreme	13-May-2016 10:50        Demostation About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Actually it is good that you brought out the names of the 4 big auditors who supported the business " financial" model of Yuuzoo. For sure 4 are better than 1. The problem could be that the odd one is more mainstream on the general accounting type,  than the other four who are mainstream on ecommerce accounting types. The odd one could have support shorting while the other four could be also shorting, Then where do shareholders stand? Die lah, hahaha. Sorry, just talking cock and sing song in SJ, very enjoy, lol..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
golden_SGX Master	13-May-2016 10:38        golden_SGX About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	the Big Four accounting firms are already posted below & I append it again: 1. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) 2. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 3. Ernst & Young (E& Y) 4. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG) http://www.accountingverse.com/articles/big-4-accounting-firms.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Four_accounting_firms and CharFi Valuation Services, LLC, a recognised New York-based investment bank who conduct a 2nd independent Valuation. So 5 against 1, who is more credible? Moore Stephens LLC is on the wrong side ? sheerluck      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:36) Posted: That' s true, bro.  So Yuuzoo should just disclose the names of the two big fours to silent skeptic on this point. golden_SGX      ( Date: 13-May-2016 10:20) Posted: you see this, even if Yuuzoo were to continues with a 3rd, 4th or even up to 10th valuations .... there will always be a single or a few who will still oppose to it, thats normal. considering the Big-4 already has done the 1st valuation. one is the largest accounting firm in the world in terms of revenue while one is the largest among the Big 4. The Big-4 has also offices here in Singapore, possible Yuuzoo will just appoint one of the Big-4 to be the new auditor?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   4121-4140 of 7931   Older>   Last