| Latest Forum Topics / Others |
|
|
HYFLUX Petition
|
|||||
|
kerier
Veteran |
24-Feb-2019 10:16
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
6% not high? we only get over 1% for FDs and SSB is 2%. water is strategic resource no doubt... but is tuaspring critical to our survival? NO
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
simplesimon
Member |
24-Feb-2019 10:08
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It is not greed but did not know the risk as water is a strategic resource! And the media had praise olivia Lum to sky high! 6% is not extremely high like ah long' s 10%!  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
kerier
Veteran |
24-Feb-2019 10:03
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
not just hyflux bonds. many of the o& g companies also...bonds issued by banks so they had to sell them. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
24-Feb-2019 09:47
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It' s not only the banks. I saw even Singpost outlets have glass cubicles with " salesmen/salesgirls" inside who' ll come out and scout the queues for uncles and aunties. They' ll start by asking whether they' re Singaporeans and try to get them to sit down and sell them some investments or whatever.    ![]()
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
des_khor
Supreme |
24-Feb-2019 09:44
Yells: "Tell me who is God or Market Fortune Teller in this forum ??" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Even now also Super Low .
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
lukewong82
Master |
24-Feb-2019 07:22
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
At that time,fixed deposit  interest rate was super low as QE was implemented during those days. So 6% compared to fixed deposit of less than 1% is really very enticing.. So i think Greed overcame those investors... Asking tax payers to bail them out is not fair to those  investors who were prudent and did NOT succumb to greed and did not buy into hyflux.  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
24-Feb-2019 07:19
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I wldn' t want to over speculate if the customer had been taken in by the bait of high yield although I tend to be more biased towards the customer being pressurised, to some extent at least.  What I' d like to say is, in the banking relationship of my grandfather' s time, this wld probably never have happened, ie, the traditional relationship between a depositor n his bk was one of solely taking in deposit n serving as custodian of that deposit n striving to offer the best rate for it.  Qn is how far shd a bk go, or be permitted to go, to pry into depositors' accounts n exploit the (privileged?) information available to it to push products to unsuspecting customers to fatten it' s profits?  It might be timely for MAS to review bks' relationships with customers n, if deemed appropriate, return bks to their more traditional relationship with depositors.  Selling of financial instruments n products shd remain the domain of licenced financial advisors n wealth managers n shd ideally be initiated by the customer.  | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Wind22i
Supreme |
24-Feb-2019 06:56
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I think many madams who bought knew the risk involve .. but when they dangle the carrot at 6% perpetuals - one type of investor will know its too good to be true and avoid it but another type like the madam may have been motivated by greed and go all in...the 6% is the carot / bait sounds too good to be true | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
24-Feb-2019 06:53
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hmmmmm!!!!  History seems to be repeating  .... yet again?  A great brand name in the financial industry being allegedly mired once more in apparently controversial high-pressure selling of products that the buyer seemed inadequately equipped to take the plunge in?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
24-Feb-2019 06:10
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The term must have one million dollar to throw don't know she has ? ...the PR boh tai chi if she has.....
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
23-Feb-2019 20:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Er.... is Madam Loo an accredited investor?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
23-Feb-2019 20:32
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Retail investor offers counter proposal FEB 22, 2019, 5:00 AM SGT Madam Loo Leong Hun was 55 years old when she was given a list of corporate bonds in June 2012 by a DBS relationship manager to invest in as she had savings in her POSB account. " Hyflux preference shares was on the list, and it was strongly recommended as it was a strategic and national asset. The money was to facilitate expansion and build desalination plants. I thought I had invested in a good company... which was our nation' s pride," Madam Loo, now 62, told the High Court yesterday. One of some 34,000 registered holders of Hyflux perpetual securities and preference shares, Madam Loo was allowed yesterday by Justice Aedit Abdullah to voice her concerns, which he said are " shared by many of you" . But Justice Aedit added that he " may not be able to meet all of Madam Loo' s concerns (yesterday) afternoon" as court proceedings were geared towards whether a scheme meeting should be called. On the proposed plan, Madam Loo said that many individual investors, including herself, will be " ruthlessly eliminated from the balance sheet with very little money or equity returned to them" . Madam Loo proposed " a minimum or waived coupon" payment on her securities but for her initial investment or principal to be kept on Hyflux' s books, The Straits Times understands. She cited the case of another elderly investor who had invested in 2,500 preference shares. " She is 86, lives alone in a one-room flat and... has mobility problems. She used Hyflux dividends to pay off some of her daily expenses. Now, she has no more earning power," she said. Asking for her proposal to be accepted, she said it is " a glimmer of hope" to recover her savings. https://www.straitstimes.com/business/retail-investor-offers-counter-proposal |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
kerier
Veteran |
23-Feb-2019 17:40
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You want to take contract from PUB then you expect them to help when you fail? Will your boss help you if you are incompetent? 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
23-Feb-2019 17:15
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Those who suffer losses can also consider their rights against the Board of Hyflux.  If you think there is a case, you have your rights to pursue action. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
23-Feb-2019 17:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hyflux grabbed the Hyflux Water Trust at cheap price from minorities, without their consent. It was forced acquisition.  Many trust holders were against the buyout. This is karma.  Now the company is being grabbed away by foreigners at bargain price. Olivia is getting retribution. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Nainai
Member |
23-Feb-2019 17:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Use our tax payer money to help them?? Did they share the dividend when they received it? take money time why not have petition to ask them share? Now lose money kpkb ask tax payer bail out. Life where got so easy one
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
angmohlin
Veteran |
23-Feb-2019 16:21
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi all,  Whether you are victim or not, please go and sign the petition to help poor papa & mama. One day you may need help from others. Thanks. https://www.change.org/p/singapore-government-appeal-to-government-to-take-back-tuaspring-to-save-citizens-retirement-fund?fbclid=IwAR2_Bvmy-SeELZWTbI73kG6GjARe7_DT_USvPS2CsuSrfC_ZQJlWSwPkmkE |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
23-Feb-2019 15:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Was that the reason for the govt to take over the rail n bus assets?  Did they do it at leylong prices?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
investshare
Supreme |
23-Feb-2019 15:31
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I am 101% sure that there is a clause that PUB can takeover the water plant at $1 if the operator not performing.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
mrscoop
Member |
23-Feb-2019 15:30
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If want to say strategic national resource, why not just let hyflux liquidate then govt can acquire TS at a much cheaper price? save hyflux or dont save hyflux also can protect national assets but if dont save can get the assets much cheaper | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||


