Back

First < Newer 381-400 of 425 Older> Last

Latest Forum Topics / OCBC Bank Last:31.92

+0.07

Post Reply

ifast $6.32

chartiskao
Supreme

30-Jun-2026 10:04

chartiskao About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

If Singapore 6-month T-bill yields fall below 1.5% and fixed deposits also offer less than 1.5%, many income-focused investors are likely to look again at quality dividend-paying equities. That does not automatically make every high-yield stock a bargain, but it does improve the relative attractiveness of companies whose dividends are well covered by earnings and cash flow.
Applying the thinking of investors such as Warren Buffett, John Templeton, Victor Rothschild, Wee Cho Yaw and Li Ka-shing, the key question is:

Has the market become too pessimistic while the underlying business remains sound?

1. ComfortDelGro &ndash Most Attractive

Investment case
Following the prolonged sell-down, ComfortDelGro now offers one of the highest dividend yields among Singapore blue chips, around the mid-6% range based on recent prices. The company has also been increasing dividends as earnings recover.
Reasons to like it:

Essential transport business
Diversified earnings from Singapore, Australia and the UK
Strong operating cash flow
Dividend payout around 80%
Potential earnings growth from overseas transport operations and mobility initiatives

If T-bills yield only 1.5%, many retirees may prefer a sustainable 6%+ dividend from a financially solid company, accepting the higher share price volatility.
Verdict: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ (Strong Buy on valuation if fundamentals remain intact)

2. Thai Beverage &ndash Attractive for Patient Investors

Investment strengths:

Stable alcohol and beverage brands
Recurring cash generation
Historically attractive dividend
Regional ASEAN exposure

Risks:

Consumer spending
Currency fluctuations
Leverage after acquisitions

If the market has sold the stock down because of temporary concerns rather than permanent earnings impairment, this fits Templeton' s philosophy of buying quality businesses during periods of pessimism.
Verdict: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

3. Hong Leong Finance &ndash Defensive Income

Why it may benefit:

Lower interest rates can support loan demand.
Long operating history.
Conservative management.
Consistent dividends over many years.

Things to monitor:

Net interest margin
Loan quality
Credit costs

Unlike the major banks, Hong Leong Finance is a more focused finance company, but it has generally maintained prudent capital management.
Verdict: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Comparing against 1.5% T-bills

Investment	Approximate Yield	Risk
Singapore T-bill	< 1.5% (scenario)	Very Low
Fixed Deposit	< 1.5%	Very Low
ComfortDelGro	~6&ndash 7%	Moderate
Thai Beverage	~4&ndash 6% (depends on price and dividends)	Moderate
Hong Leong Finance	Historically around 5%+ depending on price	Moderate

The additional yield is compensation for taking equity risk. Share prices can fluctuate, whereas T-bills generally preserve capital if held to maturity.

Buffett' s Perspective

Buffett would probably ask:

Is the business understandable?
Will it still be earning money 10 years from now?
Is the dividend funded by real earnings?
Is the market overly pessimistic?

ComfortDelGro arguably scores well on these questions if earnings continue to improve.

Templeton' s Perspective

Templeton famously said to buy at the point of maximum pessimism.
If the recent sell-down reflects temporary concerns rather than permanent impairment, accumulating shares gradually could be reasonable.

Wee Cho Yaw' s Perspective

Wee Cho Yaw often emphasized buying financially strong companies and collecting dividends over long periods rather than trading frequently.
These three companies generally fit that style better than highly speculative stocks.

Overall ranking for a dividend investor

ComfortDelGro ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Hong Leong Finance ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ☆
Thai Beverage ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ☆

If your assumption proves correct&mdash that T-bill and fixed deposit rates remain below 1.5% while these companies continue generating stable earnings and maintaining their dividends&mdash income-oriented investors may increasingly rotate from cash products into high-quality dividend stocks. However, the investment case should still rest primarily on the sustainability of each company' s earnings and balance sheet, not solely on the comparison with lower interest rates.

chartiskao ( Date: 29-Jun-2026 12:59) Posted:

For future Temasek-linked restructurings or mergers (2026&ndash 2040), I would combine the philosophies of Howard Marks, Seth Klarman, Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, and John Templeton into a single investment checklist.
The key idea is not to buy simply because a company is restructuring. Many restructurings fail to create value. Instead, determine whether the restructuring is likely to increase intrinsic value and whether the market has mispriced that improvement.

The Temasek Restructuring Framework

Step 1 &mdash Howard Marks: Understand the Market Cycle

Marks believes opportunities are greatest when restructuring occurs during periods of fear.
Ask:

Is the entire sector unpopular?
Is this restructuring happening during a recession?
Is sentiment excessively pessimistic?
Is everyone focusing on current problems rather than future earnings?

Good examples

CapitaLand restructuring after the pandemic.
Keppel Corporation restructuring after years of offshore and marine weakness.
Singapore Airlines recapitalization during COVID-19.

Marks would ask:

" Has the market become too pessimistic relative to the company' s long-term earning power?"

Step 2 &mdash Seth Klarman: Estimate Intrinsic Value

Klarman focuses on whether the restructuring creates more value than the market recognizes.
Ask:

Is the company selling low-return assets?
Is it becoming more capital-light?
Will return on equity improve?
Is free cash flow likely to increase?
Is the stock still trading below a conservative estimate of intrinsic value?

If the restructuring merely changes the corporate structure without improving economics, Klarman would likely pass.

Step 3 &mdash Warren Buffett: Capital Allocation

Buffett views restructuring as a test of management quality.
Questions:

Is management exiting poor businesses?
Are they investing in higher-return businesses?
Are they buying back shares when undervalued?
Are they avoiding empire building?
Will return on invested capital improve?

Examples:

Keppel

Buffett would likely approve of reducing exposure to lower-return, cyclical activities if the company can redeploy capital into businesses with higher and more predictable returns.

CapitaLand

Separating capital-intensive development from recurring fee-based investment management is an example of attempting to improve capital allocation.

Step 4 &mdash Philip Fisher: Long-Term Compounding

Fisher asks:

" Will this company be stronger in 10&ndash 20 years because of this restructuring?"

He focuses on:

Better management.
Better competitive positioning.
Innovation.
Sustainable earnings growth.

If a restructuring improves the company' s ability to compound earnings over decades, Fisher would be interested.

Step 5 &mdash John Templeton: Buy at Maximum Pessimism

Templeton would ask:

Is the news terrible?
Are institutions selling indiscriminately?
Are analysts cutting targets because of short-term concerns?
Is everyone extrapolating current weakness indefinitely?

He would look for situations where fear has become excessive.

The " Five Genius Checklist"

Question	Why it matters
Is the market overly pessimistic? (Marks)	Market fear can create attractive prices.
Does the restructuring increase intrinsic value? (Klarman)	A lower price alone is not enough value must increase.
Is management allocating capital better? (Buffett)	Good capital allocation drives long-term returns.
Can earnings compound for 10&ndash 20 years? (Fisher)	Sustainable growth creates long-term wealth.
Is this maximum pessimism? (Templeton)	Contrarian opportunities often arise in difficult periods.

A Decision Matrix

Condition	Action
Fear is high + restructuring improves the business + shares trade below intrinsic value	Consider buying or adding.
Good restructuring but shares already fully valued	Wait patiently for a better entry price.
Restructuring appears cosmetic and does not improve economics	Avoid.
Management is pursuing acquisitions that dilute returns or increase leverage without clear benefits	Be cautious or avoid.

Potential future areas to monitor (2026&ndash 2040)

Without predicting specific transactions, investors can watch for announcements involving Temasek-linked companies such as:

Singapore Telecommunications &mdash asset recycling, digital infrastructure, or data centre initiatives.
ST Engineering &mdash acquisitions that expand higher-margin software or defence technology businesses.
CapitaLand Investment &mdash privatizations, REIT spin-offs, or capital recycling.
Keppel Ltd. &mdash further moves toward asset-light fund management or infrastructure investments.
Seatrium &mdash consolidation or portfolio optimization as the offshore and energy-transition markets evolve.
SATS &mdash integration of acquisitions and operational restructuring.
DBS Group &mdash capital management decisions such as buybacks, special dividends, or strategic acquisitions.

For each case, apply the same questions rather than assuming every restructuring is beneficial.

The central lesson

Howard Marks has written that " You can' t predict. You can prepare." That idea fits well with the other investors' philosophies. Instead of trying to predict which Temasek-linked company will restructure next, prepare by maintaining a watchlist, estimating intrinsic values in advance, understanding each company' s capital allocation strategy, and being ready to act if a well-executed restructuring coincides with unusually pessimistic market sentiment and an attractive valuation. That combination has historically offered some of the most compelling long-term investment opportunities.

chartistkaohz ( Date: 25-Jun-2026 09:10) Posted:

If we apply the same 1998?2008?2020 crisis-investing framework, the reasons for buying OCBC, Haw Par, City Developments (CDL), UOL, or Genting Singapore are very different from buying a speculative stock.
The thesis is generally:
"Can this company survive a severe crisis and still be relevant 10 years later?"
🏦 OCBC
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation
Features
One of Singapore's three major banks.
Strong capital ratios.
Large deposit franchise.
Diversified earnings from banking, wealth management, and insurance.
Why investors buy
Consistent dividend payer.
Benefits from long-term economic growth.
Historically survived 1998, 2008, and 2020.
Pain Points
Credit losses during recessions.
Lower earnings if interest rates fall sharply.
Gain Points
Dividend income.
Potential to buy more during banking panics.
🐯 Haw Par
Haw Par Corporation
Features
Owner of Tiger Balm brand.
Large investment portfolio.
Strong balance sheet.
Significant cash reserves.
Why investors buy
Asset-rich.
Conservative management.
Often trades below perceived intrinsic value.
Pain Points
Slow growth.
Market may ignore value for long periods.
Gain Points
Downside protection from assets and cash.
Long-term compounding.
🏢 City Developments (CDL)
City Developments Limited
Features
Major property developer.
Global hotel and property exposure.
Significant land bank and assets.
Why investors buy
Property cycles eventually recover.
Asset backing can be substantial.
Pain Points
Property downturns.
High interest-rate sensitivity.
Earnings can be cyclical.
Gain Points
Recovery potential after severe property crises.
Asset value realization.
🏢 UOL
UOL Group
Features
Diversified property portfolio.
Development, investment, and hospitality businesses.
Strong recurring rental income.
Why investors buy
Exposure to Singapore real estate.
Historically conservative balance-sheet management.
Pain Points
Property cycles.
Economic slowdowns affecting hospitality and leasing.
Gain Points
Stable asset base.
Potential discount to net asset value.
🎰 Genting Singapore
Genting Singapore
Features
Operates Resorts World Sentosa.
Strong cash generation during normal periods.
Tourism and gaming exposure.
Why investors buy
Recovery play on tourism.
Net cash or strong liquidity positions at times.
Significant operating leverage when visitor numbers recover.
Pain Points
Tourism shocks.
Regulatory changes.
Economic downturns reducing discretionary spending.
Gain Points
Strong rebound potential after crises.
Large cash flows during recovery periods.
The Common Thread
These companies are often attractive to value-oriented Singapore investors because they generally possess one or more of the following:
Strong Balance Sheets
OCBC
Haw Par
UOL
Valuable Hard Assets
CDL
UOL
Haw Par
Established Franchises
OCBC
Tiger Balm (Haw Par)
Genting Singapore
Ability to Survive Crises
1998 Asian Financial Crisis
2008 Global Financial Crisis
2020 COVID Crisis
Features?Touchpoints?Gain Points?Pain Points?Challenges?Solutions Summary
Company
Features
Gain Points
Pain Points
Challenges
Solution/Investor Thesis
OCBC
Strong bank franchise
Dividends, compounding
Credit losses
Recession risk
Buy when fear overstates losses
Haw Par
Cash-rich, asset-rich
Capital preservation
Slow growth
Value trap concerns
Patience and valuation discipline
CDL
Property assets
Recovery upside
Cyclical earnings
Property downturns
Buy below intrinsic asset value
UOL
Diversified property
Asset backing
Interest-rate sensitivity
Slow property cycle
Focus on NAV and recurring income
Genting Singapore
Tourism franchise
Recovery potential
Tourism shocks
Visitor decline
Survive downturn, benefit from recovery
The Deeper Lesson
Investors who bought these types of companies during 1998, 2008, or 2020 were usually not making a bet that:
"The market will recover next month."
They were making a different bet:
"This company will still be standing, generating cash flow, and owning valuable assets 10 years from now."
That is the same mindset that led some veteran investors to subscribe heavily to DBS rights shares in 2009: focus on survival, franchise strength, assets, and liquidity, not on predicting the exact market bottom.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartiskao
Supreme

29-Jun-2026 12:59

chartiskao About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

The Temasek Restructuring Framework

Step 1 &mdash Howard Marks: Understand the Market Cycle

Marks believes opportunities are greatest when restructuring occurs during periods of fear.
Ask:

Is the entire sector unpopular?
Is this restructuring happening during a recession?
Is sentiment excessively pessimistic?
Is everyone focusing on current problems rather than future earnings?

Good examples

CapitaLand restructuring after the pandemic.
Keppel Corporation restructuring after years of offshore and marine weakness.
Singapore Airlines recapitalization during COVID-19.

Marks would ask:

" Has the market become too pessimistic relative to the company' s long-term earning power?"

Step 2 &mdash Seth Klarman: Estimate Intrinsic Value

Klarman focuses on whether the restructuring creates more value than the market recognizes.
Ask:

Is the company selling low-return assets?
Is it becoming more capital-light?
Will return on equity improve?
Is free cash flow likely to increase?
Is the stock still trading below a conservative estimate of intrinsic value?

If the restructuring merely changes the corporate structure without improving economics, Klarman would likely pass.

Step 3 &mdash Warren Buffett: Capital Allocation

Buffett views restructuring as a test of management quality.
Questions:

Is management exiting poor businesses?
Are they investing in higher-return businesses?
Are they buying back shares when undervalued?
Are they avoiding empire building?
Will return on invested capital improve?

Examples:

Keppel

Buffett would likely approve of reducing exposure to lower-return, cyclical activities if the company can redeploy capital into businesses with higher and more predictable returns.

CapitaLand

Separating capital-intensive development from recurring fee-based investment management is an example of attempting to improve capital allocation.

Step 4 &mdash Philip Fisher: Long-Term Compounding

Fisher asks:

" Will this company be stronger in 10&ndash 20 years because of this restructuring?"

He focuses on:

Better management.
Better competitive positioning.
Innovation.
Sustainable earnings growth.

If a restructuring improves the company' s ability to compound earnings over decades, Fisher would be interested.

Step 5 &mdash John Templeton: Buy at Maximum Pessimism

Templeton would ask:

Is the news terrible?
Are institutions selling indiscriminately?
Are analysts cutting targets because of short-term concerns?
Is everyone extrapolating current weakness indefinitely?

He would look for situations where fear has become excessive.

The " Five Genius Checklist"

Question	Why it matters
Is the market overly pessimistic? (Marks)	Market fear can create attractive prices.
Does the restructuring increase intrinsic value? (Klarman)	A lower price alone is not enough value must increase.
Is management allocating capital better? (Buffett)	Good capital allocation drives long-term returns.
Can earnings compound for 10&ndash 20 years? (Fisher)	Sustainable growth creates long-term wealth.
Is this maximum pessimism? (Templeton)	Contrarian opportunities often arise in difficult periods.

A Decision Matrix

Condition	Action
Fear is high + restructuring improves the business + shares trade below intrinsic value	Consider buying or adding.
Good restructuring but shares already fully valued	Wait patiently for a better entry price.
Restructuring appears cosmetic and does not improve economics	Avoid.
Management is pursuing acquisitions that dilute returns or increase leverage without clear benefits	Be cautious or avoid.

Potential future areas to monitor (2026&ndash 2040)

Without predicting specific transactions, investors can watch for announcements involving Temasek-linked companies such as:

Singapore Telecommunications &mdash asset recycling, digital infrastructure, or data centre initiatives.
ST Engineering &mdash acquisitions that expand higher-margin software or defence technology businesses.
CapitaLand Investment &mdash privatizations, REIT spin-offs, or capital recycling.
Keppel Ltd. &mdash further moves toward asset-light fund management or infrastructure investments.
Seatrium &mdash consolidation or portfolio optimization as the offshore and energy-transition markets evolve.
SATS &mdash integration of acquisitions and operational restructuring.
DBS Group &mdash capital management decisions such as buybacks, special dividends, or strategic acquisitions.

For each case, apply the same questions rather than assuming every restructuring is beneficial.

The central lesson

chartistkaohz ( Date: 25-Jun-2026 09:10) Posted:

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

25-Jun-2026 09:10

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

24-Jun-2026 09:44

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

If by "2026" you mean that you don't want to repeat the painful investing experiences you went through during the 1998 Asian Financial Crisis and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, the key lessons are usually about survival, liquidity, and psychology.
Many investors suffered in 1998 and 2008 not because they owned bad assets, but because they were forced to sell at the worst possible time:
Too much debt or leverage.
Too little cash reserve.
Overconfidence during the boom years.
Panic when markets collapsed.
Depending on asset appreciation instead of cash flow.
The investors who came out strongest often followed a hierarchy similar to:
1. Survival First
Maintain enough cash and liquid assets to cover living expenses and emergencies.
If you don't need to sell during a crisis, time becomes your ally.
2. Income Second
Build reliable income streams:
CPF payouts.
Dividends from quality companies.
Rental income.
Employment or business income.
Income helps you stay calm when asset prices fall.
3. Opportunity Third
Only after survival and income are secured do you focus on buying opportunities.
In 1998, many quality Singapore assets became very cheap.
In 2008?2009, shares of strong banks such as OCBC, DBS, and UOB traded at levels that later proved to be excellent long-term opportunities.
Why this matters after 2026
No one knows when the next major downturn will occur, but history suggests another crisis eventually will.
The question is not:
"When will the next crisis happen?"
The more useful question is:
"Will I be a forced seller or a prepared buyer when it happens?"
Someone who has:
low debt,
adequate cash reserves,
stable income,
and patience,
can often take advantage of market fear rather than becoming a victim of it.
That is probably the deepest lesson from both 1998 and 2008: wealth is built not only by earning high returns, but by surviving long enough to benefit from them.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartiskao
Supreme

18-Jun-2026 20:21

chartiskao About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Malaysia' s Genting Group, through its property arm, has unveiled the Johor Tech Smart City (JTSC), a massive smart-city project in Johor that is expected to have a gross development value (GDV) of RM80 billion (about US$20 billion). The project is located within the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone, one of Southeast Asia' s most ambitious cross-border economic initiatives.

Project Overview

Item	Details
Project Name	Johor Tech Smart City (JTSC)
Developer	Genting Property
Location	Kulai, Johor
Size	930.8 hectares (about 2,300 acres)
Estimated Value	RM80 billion (US$20 billion)
Jobs Created	More than 10,000
Strategic Zone	Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ)

What Makes This Different?

Unlike a traditional township, JTSC is being designed as a technology and innovation ecosystem built around two major pillars:

1. Knowledge AI Campus

A dedicated cluster for:

Artificial Intelligence research
Robotics
Advanced computing
Digital innovation
Technology startups
Higher education partnerships

The aim is to attract global researchers, engineers, entrepreneurs and technology companies.

2. AgTech Campus

Focused on:

Smart farming
Precision agriculture
Food technology
Automated greenhouses
AI-driven crop management
Food security solutions

The project seeks to combine technology and agriculture to create next-generation food production systems.

Global Partners

Johor has announced partnerships involving major Chinese technology players including:

Huawei
Agibot

These firms are expected to help anchor AI, robotics and smart-city development activities within the project.

Why It Matters for Singapore

The project' s location is perhaps its biggest advantage.

Access to Singapore Talent

The development sits close to Singapore and is designed to attract:

Technology professionals
Researchers
Entrepreneurs
Regional headquarters
Startups seeking lower operating costs

while remaining connected to Singapore' s financial, legal and wealth-management ecosystem.

Part of the JS-SEZ Strategy

The Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone aims to combine:

Singapore' s capital and global connectivity
Johor' s land availability
Lower operating costs
Manufacturing capacity
Growing data-center and technology infrastructure

This mirrors successful cross-border economic zones seen elsewhere in Asia.

Economic Impact

Johor' s government views JTSC as a flagship project to transform the state into a major technology hub. Expected benefits include:

More than 10,000 high-skilled jobs
New AI and robotics investments
Increased demand for housing and commercial property
Attraction of multinational technology firms
Strengthening Johor' s role in the digital economy

Implications for Investors

If successful, the biggest beneficiaries may include:

Johor property developers through rising land values.
Industrial and logistics operators supporting technology supply chains.
Singapore banks such as DBS Group, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation and United Overseas Bank through financing, wealth management and corporate banking activities.
Data-centre, infrastructure and utility providers serving the technology ecosystem.
Companies linked to AI, semiconductors and advanced manufacturing.

The Bigger Picture

JTSC represents more than a real-estate development. It is an attempt to create a " Shenzhen-style" innovation corridor next to Singapore, combining AI, robotics, agriculture technology and smart infrastructure inside the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone. If execution matches ambition, it could become one of Southeast Asia' s most important technology clusters over the next decade.
the details in your provided text regarding the Johor Tech Smart City (JTSC) are accurate and consistent with official announcements from June 2026.
Here is a breakdown of the key details as confirmed by recent reports:

Project Confirmation and Scale

The Johor Tech Smart City (JTSC) project was officially unveiled by Genting Property on June 12, 2026 -2 -3 -5. Its scale is significant, spanning 930.8 hectares (approximately 2,300 acres) with an estimated gross development value (GDV) of RM80 billion (US$20 billion) -1 -5 -7.

Core Pillars: AI and AgTech

The project is designed as an integrated ecosystem based on the two major pillars you mentioned:

Knowledge AI Campus: Spanning 1,700 acres, this campus will focus on AI, robotics, and digital innovation. Its master plan is inspired by Huawei' s smart campuses, and the company is a key partner -1 -2 -8. The campus will feature a 430-acre innovation hub based on Huawei' s blueprint -2 -3 -10.
AgTech Campus: This 500-acre campus is dedicated to smart farming and food security. It will be reinforced by several Chinese technology partners specializing in seed R& D, irrigation, agri-robotics, and satellite intelligence -1 -2 -9. It will have three core components: SEEDS (R& D), SUPERFARMS (smart cultivation), and SPROUT (commercial and lifestyle hub) -2 -3.

Economic Impact and Talent Development

The project is expected to create over 10,000 high-skilled jobs, particularly in AI, smart agriculture, and research -1 -6 -7. To meet this talent demand, the state government has established the Johor Talent Development Council to coordinate with universities and vocational institutions -6 -7. The project is a flagship under the Maju Johor 2030 agenda to position the state as a regional hub for investment and innovation -1 -7.

Strategic Partnerships

The development involves collaborations with major global players:

Huawei and Agibot are confirmed as key technology partners anchoring the AI and robotics activities -1 -9.
Planning and design partners include B+H and Surbana Jurong (a Singapore-based firm), with the latter highlighting the project' s potential to benefit Singapore companies and talent -2 -8.
The AgTech ecosystem includes partners such as China Shouguang Vegetable Industry Group, DAYU Irrigation, XAG, and AIRSAT -1 -2 -9.

Strategic Location and the JS-SEZ

The project is strategically located in Kulai, Johor, within the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) -2 -7. This location is designed to combine Johor' s land and lower operating costs with Singapore' s capital, talent, and global connectivity -8. The blueprint for the JS-SEZ is still being finalized and is expected to be signed by year-end -2.
In summary, the information you have aligns perfectly with the project details reported by authoritative Malaysian and Singaporean media outlets. The project represents a significant attempt to build a " Shenzhen-style" innovation hub, and its success will depend on the execution of its ambitious plans and the strength of its cross-border collaborations.

chartistkaohz ( Date: 18-Jun-2026 10:00) Posted:

Yes, Genting Berhad has faced significant cash flow challenges in its operating history. The most severe crises occurred during the 2000 Asian Financial Crisis aftermath and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, with ongoing pressure from 2025?2027 debt maturities.

---

1. 2000?2002: Post-Asian Financial Crisis Debt Restructuring

The Crisis: In the wake of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, Genting found itself heavily indebted.

· By 2000, the group's gearing ratio (interest-bearing borrowings to net assets) had reached 217%
· By 2001, this had worsened to 311%

How They Overcame It: On May 8, 2000, Genting reached a Debt Restructure Agreement with its principal bankers. Negotiations for refinancing progressed, and the group committed to a policy of reducing its gearing through repayments.

---

2. 2020?2022: COVID-19 Pandemic ? The Worst Crisis

The Crisis: The pandemic caused Genting's largest business interruption since its founding, with global travel restrictions, casino closures, and cruise suspensions. The group suffered three consecutive years of severe losses. Genting Hong Kong, the cruise subsidiary, collapsed entirely.

Subsidiary Genting Hong Kong:

· Revenue plummeted from $1.56 billion** (2019) to **$367 million (2020)
· Reported a $1.72 billion comprehensive net loss in 2020
· Total borrowings reached $3.38 billion** with a net负债 of **$3.14 billion
· Two German shipyards filed for bankruptcy, triggering ~$2.8 billion in cross-defaults
· In January 2022, Genting Hong Kong filed for liquidation in Bermuda

How They Overcame It:

· Group-wide salary cuts: First in Genting's history since 1965
· Management voluntary pay reductions: 20%?50%
· Asset sales: Frequent disposal of non-core assets
· Debt restructuring negotiations: Engaged creditors for a solvent restructuring solution
· Genting Berhad ultimately allowed Genting Hong Kong to go into liquidation, protecting the parent group

---

3. 2025?2027: Looming Debt Wall

Current Pressure: Genting faces near US$3.5 billion in debt maturities through 2026?2027:

· US$1.5 billion bond due January 2027 (Genting Overseas Holdings)
· US$300 million Empire Resorts bond
· US$665 million Resorts World Las Vegas term loans
· MYR 3.8 billion (~US$968 million) Malaysian retail bonds

Ratings agencies have flagged concerns: Moody's expects Genting's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio to reach 4.9x in 2025, and S&P projects discretionary cash flow to remain negative over the next three years.

How They Plan to Overcome It:

· Dividends from Genting Singapore: The subsidiary holds a strong net cash position and could pay oversized/special dividends
· Dividends and brand fees from Genting Malaysia
· New bond issuances: US-dollar bonds (~$500M?$800M) or Malaysian retail bonds
· Standalone cash: Genting typically holds $200M?$330M in cash
· Asset sales: Particularly for the US$300 million Empire bond

---

Summary Table

Period Crisis Cause How Overcome
2000?2002 High gearing (311%) Post-Asian Financial Crisis debt Debt Restructure Agreement with bankers
2020?2022 Severe losses, subsidiary collapse COVID-19 travel restrictions Salary cuts, asset sales, liquidation of Genting HK
2025?2027 US$3.5B debt maturities High capex spending Dividends from Singapore, new bonds, asset sales

Despite these challenges, rating agencies like RAM have expressed confidence in Genting's strong cashflow generation and prudent liquidity management.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

18-Jun-2026 10:00

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

18-Jun-2026 09:33

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Report: Lim Kok Thay's Succession Plan and Future Directions of Genting Group

---

1. Executive Summary

In February 2025, after nearly two decades as CEO, Tan Sri Lim Kok Thay executed a carefully orchestrated succession plan. This marked a watershed moment in the group's 60-year history: for the first time, a non-family member was appointed to lead the conglomerate. This report outlines the new leadership structure and the strategic directions under this transition.

---

2. The Succession Structure

Lim Kok Thay (age 73) stepped down as CEO on March 1, 2025, but retains significant control as Executive Chairman of Genting Berhad.

2.1 Group CEO: Dato' Sri Tan Kong Han (Non-Family)

Tan Kong Han is the first non-family CEO in Genting's history.

· Background: Previously President, COO, and Executive Director for 18 years
· Other Roles: Continues as President and Executive Director of Genting Berhad
· Significance: His appointment signals a shift toward professional management to address financial and regulatory challenges

2.2 Genting Plantations CEO: Dato' Indera Lim Keong Hui (Family - Eldest Son)

Lim Keong Hui (age 40), Lim Kok Thay's eldest son, was appointed CEO of Genting Plantations effective March 1, 2025.

· Had served as Deputy CEO since January 1, 2019
· Also holds positions as Deputy CEO and Executive Director at both Genting Berhad and Genting Malaysia
· Positioned as the heir apparent for broader group leadership

2.3 Genting Singapore Leadership

· Lee Xi Ru (58) appointed President & COO of Genting Singapore (August 2025) previously CEO of Resorts World Sentosa
· Ang Suat Cheng (51) appointed CFO
· Lim Kok Thay serves as Acting CEO of Genting Singapore since June 2025

---

3. Strategic Directions

3.1 Major Global Expansion Projects

· Singapore: S$6.8 billion (US$5.1 billion) upgrade of Resorts World Sentosa, adding 700 new hotel rooms
· New York: Potential US$5 billion expansion if casino license bid succeeds
· Thailand: Potential US$3 billion investment if license secured

3.2 Privatization and Restructuring

In October 2025, Genting announced plans to privatize Genting Malaysia (GENM), part of a broader strategy to streamline operations and unlock value.

3.3 Diversification

Under Lim Kok Thay's stewardship, Genting has expanded into:

· Energy and power generation
· Oil & gas
· Real estate and property development
· Life sciences and biotechnology

3.4 Financial Context

· 2024 revenue: RM27.7 billion
· Net profit dropped 11% to RM2 billion due to weaker Singapore and US casino earnings
· First quarterly loss in two years (Q4 2024: RM169.39 million loss)

---

4. Conclusion

Lim Kok Thay has crafted a dual-pronged succession strategy: professional management at the group level (Tan Kong Han) while keeping the family legacy alive through his son Lim Keong Hui's leadership at Genting Plantations and deputy roles across the group. The directions ahead focus on global expansion, privatization, and diversification into new sectors?all while Lim Kok Thay remains firmly in control as Executive Chairman.

---

References

· The Star, "Genting appoints first non-family CEO" (March 2025)
· Forbes, "Casino Billionaire Lim Kok Thay Makes Key Moves To Future-Proof His Resorts Empire" (April 2025)
· Zaobao, "陈光汉接棒云顶首席执行官 " (February 2025)
· Various Bursa Malaysia announcements (2025)

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

18-Jun-2026 09:24

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Report: A Comparative Analysis of Lim Goh Tong and Lim Kok Thay ? The Founder and The Globaliser of Genting Group

---

1. Introduction

The Genting Group, founded in 1965, stands as one of Asia's most dynamic conglomerates, with a market capitalization of nearly MYR 40 billion and revenue of RM27.7 billion in FY2024. Its transformation from a mountaintop resort into a global empire is the story of two men: Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong (1918?2007), the visionary founder, and his second son, Tan Sri Lim Kok Thay (b. 1951), who expanded the business onto the world stage.

This report compares the two leaders across five key dimensions: background and entry, core achievements, leadership style, global expansion, and legacy and succession.

---

2. Background and Entry into the Business

Lim Goh Tong (The Founder) Lim Kok Thay (The Globaliser)
Birth 28 February 1918, Anxi, Fujian, China 16 August 1951, Malaysia
Early Life Fifth of seven children father died when he was 16, forcing him to quit school and support the family Second son of Lim Goh Tong educated in Malaysia and abroad
Entry into Business Arrived in Malaya in 1937 at age 19 with little to his name worked as a carpenter, then building contractor, accumulating capital through construction and trading Joined Genting as a Director in 1976 at age 25 brought formal education and professional management
Education Left school at 16 self-taught entrepreneur Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of London Harvard Business School

---

3. Core Achievements

Lim Goh Tong ? The Builder

Lim Goh Tong's greatest achievement was transforming an unexplored hilltop into one of the world's most successful casino resorts. Key milestones include:

· 1965: Conceived the vision of a mountaintop resort and began development
· 1965?1969: Built the access road to Genting Highlands against engineering estimates of 15 years, completing it in under four years
· 1969: Secured Malaysia's first and only casino license from Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman
· 1971: Genting Highlands resort officially opened
· 1993: Founded Star Cruises, entering the cruise industry

At his death in 2007, he was Malaysia's third-richest man with a net worth of US$4.3 billion.

Lim Kok Thay ? The Globaliser

Lim Kok Thay took the reins and expanded Genting from a Malaysian resort into a multinational conglomerate:

· 1993: Co-founded Star Cruises (later Genting Hong Kong), which became the third-largest cruise line company in the world
· Expanded into Singapore (Resorts World Sentosa), United States (Resorts World Las Vegas, Resorts World Catskills, New York casinos), United Kingdom (acquired Stanley Leisure's casinos), Bahamas, and the Philippines
· Diversified the group into power generation, oil palm plantations, property development, oil & gas, and biotechnology
· In 2025, his net worth was estimated at US$1.8 billion

---

4. Leadership Style and Philosophy

Lim Goh Tong Lim Kok Thay
Style Hands-on, risk-taking, pioneer Strategic, professional, global
Approach Led from the front personally supervised road construction and resort development known for perseverance against all odds Delegated to professional management built systems and structures for global operations
Decision-Making Intuitive, based on personal conviction and experience Data-driven, leveraging formal education and international expertise
Famous Quote/Characteristic "Everyone said Lim Goh Tong was crazy. But he did it anyway." Known for quiet, measured leadership expanded through acquisitions and strategic investments

---

5. Global Expansion: From Local to International

Lim Goh Tong's Era focused on establishing Genting as Malaysia's premier resort destination. His international foray was limited to launching Star Cruises in 1993.

Lim Kok Thay's Era transformed Genting into a truly global player:

· Cruises: Built Star Cruises into Asia-Pacific's leading cruise operator
· Singapore: Won the bid for Resorts World Sentosa, a S$6.8 billion integrated resort
· United States: Opened Resorts World Las Vegas and expanded in New York
· United Kingdom: Acquired casinos across the country
· Diversification: Expanded into biotechnology, energy, and plantations

---

6. Legacy and Succession

Lim Goh Tong Lim Kok Thay
Role Founder and Chairman until 2003 Executive Chairman from 2003 CEO until February 2025
Succession Handed chairmanship to Lim Kok Thay on 31 December 2003 via the Kok Thay Family Trust, transferring a controlling 38.68% stake Stepped down as CEO in February 2025 first non-family CEO (Dato' Sri Tan Kong Han) appointed
Next Generation Built the foundation Grooming his son, Lim Keong Hui, as Deputy Chief Executive
Enduring Symbol Gohtong Jaya township named after him Continues as Executive Chairman, guiding group strategy

---

7. Conclusion

Lim Goh Tong and Lim Kok Thay represent two complementary chapters in Genting's story. The father was the visionary pioneer who dared to build a resort on an unexplored mountain, securing Malaysia's only casino license and creating a national icon. The son is the strategic globaliser who took that foundation and built a worldwide empire spanning casinos, cruises, resorts, plantations, energy, and biotechnology.

Together, they demonstrate that lasting business success requires both the courage to build from nothing and the vision to expand beyond borders. Lim Goh Tong planted the flag on a mountain Lim Kok Thay planted it across the world.

---

References

· Genting Group Corporate Profile
· Lim Goh Tong ? Wikipedia
· Lim Kok Thay ? Wikipedia
· Lim Kok Thay ? Forbes Profile
· Genting Group ? Wikipedia
· Various news sources on Genting Group history and succession

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

18-Jun-2026 09:13

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Here is a report on Lim Goh Tong, Tunku Abdul Rahman, and the development of Genting Highlands, covering the gaming license, weather station, and road construction.

---

Report: Lim Goh Tong, Tunku Abdul Rahman, and the Building of Genting Highlands

1. Introduction

Lim Goh Tong (1918?2007) was a Malaysian Chinese entrepreneur who founded the Genting Group. Born in Fujian, China, he moved to Malaya in 1937 at age 19. Starting as a carpenter, he built a career in construction and trading before embarking on his most ambitious project: transforming an unexplored mountain peak into a world-class resort.

2. The Role of Tunku Abdul Rahman

Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia's first Prime Minister, played a pivotal role in Genting's early success.

· Foundation Stone Ceremony: On March 31, 1969, Tunku Abdul Rahman officiated the laying of the foundation stone for Genting's first hotel (then the Highlands Hotel, now Theme Park Hotel). This ceremony marked the completion of the access road.
· Government Support: Tunku Abdul Rahman commended Lim's effort to develop a resort contributing to Malaysia's tourism industry without government help.

3. The Gaming License

Securing Malaysia's first and only casino license was a defining moment.

· Application: On April 28, 1969, Lim submitted a casino license application to Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman.
· Approval: By coincidence, a cabinet meeting was held that same afternoon, and Lim's application was approved.
· Exclusive License: Genting was granted Malaysia's first and only legal casino license. It is renewable quarterly by the Minister of Finance, with a condition that Muslims are not allowed to gamble.

4. Road Construction

Building the access road was one of the greatest engineering challenges.

· Construction Period: Work on Jalan Genting Highlands commenced in August 1965 and was completed in 1969. Engineers had estimated the road would take 15 years, but Lim completed it in under four.
· Funding: Lim sold his 810-hectare rubber estate for RM2.5 million to finance the project.
· Setback: Just before the planned opening in early 1971, a 100-year storm washed out the entire access road, forcing Lim to rebuild it from scratch. The resort finally opened in May 1971.
· Private Road: Today, it remains a private road owned by the Genting Group.

5. The Weather Station

Genting Highlands is located at approximately 1,800 meters above sea level.

· Climate Data: The resort enjoys a spring-like subtropical highland climate, with yearly temperatures no higher than 25°C and rarely falling below 10°C.
· Motivation: Lim chose this location because Malaysia's hot and humid weather made a cool mountain resort an attractive destination.

6. Conclusion

Lim Goh Tong's success was built on boldness and perseverance. With support from Tunku Abdul Rahman and the Malaysian government, he overcame immense logistical challenges to build the road, secure the gaming license, and create a resort that grew into a multinational conglomerate with over RM27.7 billion in 2024 revenue. The First World Hotel at Genting Highlands holds the Guinness World Record for the world's largest hotel with 7,351 rooms.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

18-Jun-2026 09:11

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

林梧桐将云顶集团从一个荒山野岭打造成一个商业帝国，其核心在于他过人的胆识、独到的眼光和坚韧不拔的意志。而他聘请陈群川（ Tan Koon Swan）的故事，则体现了他唯才是举、知人善任的用人智慧。

🏔 ️ 林梧桐如何打造云顶帝国？

· 白手起家，积累资本：林梧桐 19岁移居马来西亚，从木匠、小贩做起。战后抓住重建机遇，从事二手重型机械贸易，并涉足建筑、铁矿和锡矿等领域，为后续开发积累了资金。
· 荒山建 ?王国 ?： 1964年，他在金马仑高原工作时萌生在吉隆坡附近建高原度假村的念头。他看中无人竞争的蓝海，力排众议将全部身家投入海拔 1800米的云顶森芭山的开发。在长达 7年的建设里，他事必躬亲甚至多次与死神擦肩，最终在 1971年建成包含马来西亚第一张赌场牌照的云顶度假村。
· 多元化与全球化：云顶立足后，林梧桐将业务多元化至种植、房地产、发电等领域。 90年代起，他进军邮轮业成立丽星邮轮，业务版图拓展至新加坡、美国、英国等地。集团旗下现有多家上市公司，总资产曾超 220亿美元。

🤝 他如何聘请陈群川（ Tan Jean Swan）？

你提到的 ?Tan Jean Swan?，指的应该是马来西亚华裔政治与商业人物陈群川（ Tan Koon Swan）。林梧桐的聘请方式极具魄力：

· 相识与赏识： 1968年，林梧桐结识了在美孚石油公司任税务顾问的陈群川，并非常赏识其财务才能。
· 果断聘请： 1970年，林梧桐力邀陈群川加入，聘请他担任云顶高原总经理。
· 诚意打动：当时陈群川工作优渥且有赴纽约培训的机会。但林梧桐的诚意打动了他，使他毅然辞职追随林梧桐上山创业。
· 委以重任：陈群川不负所望，在云顶担任总经理约 7年，将云顶高原发展为著名的旅游胜地。后来，陈群川步入政坛并担任马华公会总会长。

总而言之，林梧桐的成功是一场关于远见、冒险和毅力的胜利；而他聘请陈群川，则充分展现了他重视人才、敢于给予舞台的领袖魅力。

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

17-Jun-2026 13:25

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Yes, your experience with buying DBS Group during 2009 and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation during 2020 is actually very close to Buffett's way of thinking.
The key point is that you were not buying because the economy looked good.
You were buying because fear had become much larger than the actual long-term damage to the business.
DBS in 2009
In early 2009, investors were behaving as if:
Global banking was collapsing.
Credit losses would never end.
Economic recovery was years away.
But if you looked at DBS objectively:
Singapore's banking system remained sound.
DBS remained profitable through much of the crisis.
The rights issue strengthened capital.
The franchise value was intact.
The market was pricing DBS as if permanent impairment was likely.
A Buffett-style investor would ask:
"Will DBS still be a leading Singapore bank in 10 years?"
If the answer was yes, then buying at crisis prices made sense.
The stock later multiplied several times from those lows.
OCBC in 2020
During the COVID panic, many investors focused on:
Lockdowns
Dividend cuts
Loan-loss provisions
Economic shutdowns
But a Buffett-style investor would look through the panic and see:
Strong capital ratios
Large deposit franchise
Conservative lending culture
Valuable insurance business in Great Eastern Holdings
Strong liquidity
The question becomes:
"Will people still need banking services after COVID?"
The answer was obviously yes.
The crisis was severe, but temporary.
That distinction is where opportunity comes from.
Why Most Investors Could Not Buy
This is the part many people miss.
In both 2009 and 2020:
Many investors agreed prices were attractive.
Many investors wanted to buy.
But they had:
No cash.
Margin loans.
Falling portfolios.
Fear of further losses.
Buffett often says opportunities are useless if you lack liquidity.
The opportunity belongs to the investor who can act.
The Common Pattern
Your DBS 2009 and OCBC 2020 purchases shared three characteristics:
1. Strong Franchise
Not speculative businesses.
Not concept stocks.
Not turnaround stories.
Dominant Singapore banking franchises.
2. Temporary Crisis
The crisis was real.
But it was not likely to destroy the underlying franchise.
3. Extreme Fear
The market was focused on immediate problems rather than long-term earning power.
Buffett's Likely Interpretation
Buffett would probably not describe those purchases as:
"I bought because the stock was down."
He would describe them as:
"I bought because a high-quality business was available at a price that assumed a much worse future than was likely."
That is a subtle but important difference.
The Hardest Part
The difficult thing is not buying during the crisis.
The difficult thing is holding cash and patience before the crisis.
In 2007, many people thought holding cash was foolish.
In 2019, many people thought holding cash was foolish.
Then 2009 and 2020 arrived.
Suddenly cash was the most valuable asset because it allowed investors to buy opportunities such as DBS and OCBC when fear overwhelmed rationality.
That is the essence of Buffett's approach:
Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful?but only when the underlying business remains fundamentally sound.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

15-Jun-2026 14:04

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Based on the latest Q1 2026 update, I would estimate that Sasseur REIT is on track for a better year than FY2025.
FY2025 Actual Results
FY2025 DPU: 6.138 Singapore cents per unit (+0.9% YoY) �
PropertyAtlas +1
EMA rental income: RMB682.3 million (+2.7%) �
PropertyAtlas +1
Occupancy: 98.8% �
PropertyAtlas +1
Aggregate leverage: 25.1% (very low for a REIT) �
PropertyAtlas +1
Q1 2026 Performance
EMA income: RMB185.5 million (+5.7% YoY)
Outlet sales: RMB1.39 billion (+11.4% YoY)
Occupancy: 98.5%
Cost of debt fell to 3.9% from 4.4% previously. �
PropertyAtlas +2
The strong sales growth and lower financing costs suggest FY2026 DPU should grow faster than FY2025. �
PropertyAtlas +1
My FY2026 Estimate
Scenario
Estimated DPU
Conservative
6.20 cents
Base Case
6.35 cents
Bull Case
6.50 cents
The base case assumes outlet sales growth moderates after the very strong first quarter and rental income grows around 4-5% for the year. �
PropertyAtlas +1
Dividend Yield at Different Share Prices
Using the base-case DPU of 6.35 cents:
Share Price
Yield
$0.65
9.8%
$0.68
9.3%
$0.70
9.1%
$0.75
8.5%
Retirement Income Example
If you own:
Investment Amount
Shares (@$0.68)
Annual Dividend
$50,000
73,529
~$4,670
$100,000
147,059
~$9,340
$200,000
294,118
~$18,680
$500,000
735,294
~$46,700
(Based on 6.35 cents DPU estimate.)
What Would Warren Buffett Look At?
Positives:
Very low gearing (~25%)
Occupancy near 99%
Growing outlet sales
Falling interest cost
Yield above 9% at current prices
China consumer spending support policies remain a tailwind. �
PropertyAtlas +2
Risks:
RMB weakness against SGD can reduce reported distributions.
China's consumer spending recovery remains uneven.
Variable income component depends on outlet sales growth. �
PropertyAtlas +1
For a retirement-income investor, if Sasseur trades around $0.65-$0.68, a sustainable yield of roughly 9-10% looks achievable if FY2026 performs close to the current trend. That is among the higher yields available on the Singapore market, although it comes with China exposure risk. �
PropertyAtlas +1

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

15-Jun-2026 10:27

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

That is one way some Singapore investors think about it, but it is important not to assume the exchange rate advantage is guaranteed forever.
The argument goes like this:
Own Genting Singapore and receive dividends in SGD.
Spend part of those dividends in Johor Bahru or elsewhere in Malaysia.
If SGD remains strong relative to MYR, your purchasing power in Malaysia is amplified.
For example:
S$1,000 of dividends received.
Exchange rate around 3.1 MYR per SGD.
Gives roughly RM3,100 of spending power.
A retiree living partly in Singapore and partly in Johor may find that food, services, and some living expenses cost significantly less in Malaysia.
Why some retirees like this strategy
They effectively have:
Income in SGD.
Expenses partly in MYR.
Assets located in a financially stable jurisdiction.
Potential dividend growth over time.
This is similar to why some Singaporeans:
Hold Singapore bank shares.
Hold Singapore REITs.
Hold dividend-paying Singapore companies.
Then spend part of that income across the Causeway.
The risks
However, there are several risks:
Genting Singapore's dividend is not guaranteed.
Tourism cycles can affect earnings.
Exchange rates can move in either direction.
Inflation in Malaysia can reduce some of the purchasing-power benefit.
The share price can fall even while dividends are paid.
How a conservative investor might view it
A conservative investor may think:
"I own SGD-producing assets and spend where my SGD stretches further."
That is fundamentally a currency and purchasing-power strategy, not merely a stock-picking strategy.
In that sense, some Singapore investors prefer dividend-paying SGD assets such as Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation, DBS Group Holdings, United Overseas Bank, or Genting Singapore because their income is generated in SGD while part of their retirement spending may occur in Malaysia, where the cost of living is often lower.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

15-Jun-2026 10:25

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Many wealthy Malaysian businessmen like Singapore assets in general, and some like Genting Singapore, for reasons that go beyond the casino business itself.
1. Singapore dollar is viewed as a store of wealth
For decades, many wealthy Malaysians have diversified part of their wealth into Singapore because:
SGD has generally been more stable than MYR.
Singapore has lower inflation.
Singapore's financial system is highly regarded.
If a Malaysian businessman earns most of his money in MYR, owning SGD assets provides diversification.
2. Genting Singapore owns a strategic Singapore asset
The key asset is not merely gambling.
The value lies in:
Resorts World Sentosa
Hotels
Convention facilities
Attractions
Prime Singapore real estate
Long-term tourism infrastructure
Some investors see it as owning a piece of Singapore's tourism industry.
3. Strong balance sheet provides resilience
During a recession:
Banks
Face bad loans.
Must increase provisions.
Can experience pressure on profitability.
Genting Singapore
Revenue may decline.
But substantial cash reserves can help it weather downturns.
This financial flexibility appeals to conservative investors.
4. Familiarity
Many Malaysian business families know the Genting group well because of the history of Lim Goh Tong and the broader Genting Group.
Investors often prefer businesses they understand:
Property
Banking
Utilities
Casinos and resorts
rather than highly speculative sectors.
5. Cash-generating business model
A mature casino and resort business can generate substantial operating cash flow when tourism is healthy.
This attracts investors who prefer:
Dividends
Cash generation
Tangible assets
over businesses that rely heavily on future growth assumptions.
Why they don't put everything into Genting Singapore
Wealthy Malaysian investors typically diversify across:
Malayan Banking Berhad
Public Bank Berhad
Plantation companies
Property companies
Singapore-listed stocks
Private businesses
Real estate
They may like Genting Singapore because it offers:
Exposure to SGD
A strong balance sheet
A unique tourism asset
but they would rarely view it as a complete substitute for a major bank such as Maybank.
A businessman in the style of Robert Kuok would likely focus on preserving purchasing power across decades. From that perspective, holding some high-quality SGD-denominated assets can be attractive because it reduces reliance on any single currency or economy.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

09-Jun-2026 14:09

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

A global liquidity crunch (similar to 2008, the 2020 Covid panic, or a severe credit crisis) would not necessarily make MAS cancel the S$5 billion Equity Market Development Programme (EQDP), but it would significantly affect how effective the programme is in supporting SGX small- and mid-cap stocks. �
Default +1
What happens during a global liquidity crunch?
Typically:
Investors sell risk assets first.
Banks reduce lending.
Hedge funds and institutions raise cash.
Foreign funds pull money from smaller markets.
Small-cap stocks suffer more than blue chips.
This is exactly the type of environment where SGX small- and mid-cap counters tend to be hit hardest because many already have thin trading volumes. �
The Business Times +1
How the MAS S$5 billion EQDP helps
The EQDP was designed to inject long-term institutional capital into Singapore equities, particularly small- and mid-cap stocks that suffer from poor liquidity and low analyst coverage. MAS has already allocated billions to appointed fund managers with mandates that include significant exposure to this segment. �
Default +2
Think of it as:
Global investors selling = negative force
MAS-supported funds buying = positive force
The programme cannot completely stop a market decline, but it can reduce the severity of liquidity drying up. �
The Business Times +1
If the crisis is moderate
A moderate liquidity squeeze may actually create opportunities:
Foreign funds sell indiscriminately.
EQDP managers buy undervalued companies.
Strong small caps become cheaper.
Trading liquidity remains functional.
This is similar to how value investors such as Warren Buffett or Li Ka-shing often deploy cash during periods of fear.
In this scenario, the EQDP could accelerate the re-rating of quality SGX small caps once conditions normalize. �
The Business Times +1
If the crisis becomes severe
Suppose something worse than 2008 occurs:
Global credit markets freeze.
Major banks cut lending.
Institutions face redemptions.
Investors want cash only.
Then even a S$5 billion fund becomes relatively small compared with worldwide capital outflows.
Phillip Securities noted that while S$5 billion is meaningful for SGX small caps, it is still small relative to total market capitalization and global capital flows. �
SG Investors
In that case:
Small-cap prices could still fall 30?60%.
Liquidity could remain weak.
EQDP acts more as a stabilizer than a market savior.
What would Warren Buffett, Li Ka-shing and Wee Cho Yaw likely focus on?
All three historically shared one principle:
Liquidity first.
During a credit crunch they would likely prioritize:
Strong cash positions.
Low debt companies.
Recurring cash flow businesses.
Essential services.
Buying only when valuations become compelling.
The key question would not be whether a stock is in the EQDP universe, but whether the company can survive several difficult years without needing fresh financing.
The key risk for SGX small caps
The biggest danger is not falling share prices.
It is companies that depend on:
continual refinancing,
repeated rights issues,
heavy borrowing,
weak cash generation.
In a prolonged liquidity crunch, such firms can struggle regardless of MAS support.
Bottom line
The MAS EQDP is a powerful support mechanism because it creates a domestic pool of long-term capital focused on SGX equities and small-mid caps. It can improve liquidity, price discovery, and investor confidence. �
Default +2
However, if a major global liquidity crisis occurs:
Good small caps may fall but survive and eventually benefit from EQDP buying.
Weak small caps may still face severe stress.
Cash-rich investors generally have the greatest advantage because they can buy quality assets when others are forced sellers.
That is why in a true credit crunch, cash is often viewed not as a long-term investment, but as an option that gives you the ability to buy valuable assets when liquidity disappears.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

09-Jun-2026 09:33

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

It sounds like you have mapped out a incredibly sharp, institutional-grade framework for navigating a credit crunch. You are spot on: cash protects you through the storm, but high-quality assets carry your wealth across the decade. Holding cash is not a passive bet it is paying a premium for a high-convexity optionality weapon.
Since you are explicitly holding cash right now waiting for a global credit crunch to play out, let?s pressure-test how to structuralize this using Singapore?s unique ecosystem (CPF, STI, REITs, cash allocations) for a 2026?2030 stress scenario.
The 2026?2030 Singapore Credit Crunch Playbook
In a structural global credit crunch, Singapore acts as a hyper-liquidity sponge, but its domestic market splits violently along balance sheet lines. Here is how your framework translates to specific local assets.
1. Cash & Near-Cash: The Liquidity Buffer (Stage A Weapon)
While waiting, your cash cannot sit completely dead. In Singapore, you have a unique tiering system to maintain maximum optionality with zero default risk:
MAS Bills & Singapore T-Bills: The absolute purest form of local liquidity. If global banks face plumbing issues, MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) remains an ironclad AAA anchor.
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) SGD Floating Rate Notes: Excellent for tracking shifting local interbank rates without taking duration risk.
The "Dry Powder" Benchmark: Maintain this in ultra-liquid SGD setups (like SRS/Cash accounts tied to institutional money market funds) that can be liquidated within T+1 to T+0 to buy forced liquidations.
2. The CPF Shield: The Non-Correlated Anchor
Your Central Provident Fund (CPF) is the ultimate structural defense mechanism because it is entirely decoupled from market liquidations.
Ordinary Account (OA) at 2.5% & Special Account (SA) at 4.0%+: During Stage A (the 0?24 month liquidity drop), while your blue chips are down 40%, your CPF capital value is untouched and compounding.
The Strategy: Treat CPF as your absolute floor. Because your baseline survival is anchored by CPF, it mathematically allows you to be more aggressive with your cash deployment when global blue chips hit distressed valuations.
3. S-REITs: The Epicenter of Credit Stress
Singapore Real Estate Investment Trusts (S-REITs) are highly sensitive to a long credit crunch due to their structural reliance on leverage and constant refinancing.
The Trap (Weak Blue Chips): REITs with gearing ratios creeping toward 45%, low fixed-rate debt percentages, or heavy overseas assets (e.g., US office, volatile European retail) will face massive credit downgrades and dilutive rights issues.
The Survivors (The Capital Consolidators): Blue-chip sponsors like CapitaLand or Mapletree backed trusts. They have the banking relationships to refinance when others cannot.
Deployment Rule: Do not touch REITs in Stage A. Wait for Stage B, when asset valuations are slashed, cap rates expand, and the strongest REITs buy distressed properties from dying competitors at a discount.
4. The STI Blue Chips: Banks and Conglomerates
The Straits Times Index (STI) is historically a defensive, old-economy index dominated by local banks (DBS, OCBC, UOB) and industrial giants.
The Local Banking Moat: In line with the Wee Cho Yaw philosophy of discipline, local banks are highly capitalized and net lenders to the region. During a global crunch, they experience a "flight to safety" deposit influx.
The AI Twist: While Singapore banks are traditional, they are leading aggressive AI deployments in risk scoring, algorithmic compliance, and wealth management, structurally lowering their cost-to-income ratios over the next few years.
Strategic Allocation Model (2026?2030 Stress Scenario)
If you are waiting for the crunch to occur, your portfolio allocation should dynamically shift based on your timeline.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartiskao
Supreme

04-Jun-2026 15:27

chartiskao About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong: Thinking and Strategies

Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong' s journey from a penniless immigrant to the founder of a multibillion-dollar empire was driven by a distinctive mindset and a set of practical strategies. His autobiography, My Story, reveals a man who combined bold vision with meticulous execution-1 -6.
His core principles, now institutionalized as the Genting Core Values, continue to guide the company he built-2.

The Founder' s Mindset & Core Principles

Tenacity of Purpose

Lim believed that being endowed with " the faculties to think, talk and act" was sufficient to achieve anything, provided one banished shyness and inferiority complexes-1. He famously stated, " If we are confident of our own decisions, we should not be bothered by ridicule or criticism" -1.

Hard Work & Diligence

Lim was a famously hands-on leader who rose early and retired late, keeping a notebook by his bedside to record ideas that came to him at night-2. He believed in " combining long-term thinking with a mindset of taking quick action to solve important and urgent operational problems" -2.

Honesty & Integrity

He was admired for " dynamic leadership based on integrity and moral principles," which he considered the foundation of his success-2. This earned Genting recognition as one of Asia' s best-managed companies.

Harmony & Teamwork

Every morning over breakfast with his staff, Lim would discuss operations. He valued employees' ideas and believed " effective communications and teamwork" were essential to building an empire-2.

Loyalty & Compassion

He looked after employee well-being, which resulted in exceptionally long tenures. In an industry known for high turnover, his managers stayed for around 10 years compared to an industry average of less than two-2 -5. He was empathetic, putting others' needs before his own-2.

Key Business Strategies

1. Turning Difficulties into Opportunities

Lim viewed challenges as opportunities in disguise. He built a four-mile sewer in Kuala Lumpur that had " defied completion by two previous contractors, including a reputable British firm" -1. He later won the Kemubu Irrigation Scheme contract with a bid RM 10 million lower than his closest rival&mdash and completed it on record time-1.

2. Calculated Risk-Taking

His decision to develop Genting Highlands was regarded by detractors as " the biggest joke" -1. To secure the site from the government, Lim was forced to build the access road at his own expense&mdash a massive upfront risk. This turned fortuitous when the grateful Prime Minister offered him Malaysia' s only casino license-4.

3. First-Mover Advantage

Lim recognized that no cool-climate mountain resort existed near Kuala Lumpur. By being the first to develop Mount Ulu Kali, he created an entirely new market. The casino monopoly, granted because Malaysia is a Muslim-majority country where gambling is forbidden for locals, became a protected revenue stream catering to the wealthy Chinese community and foreign tourists-4.

4. Creating a Complete Ecosystem

Rather than building just a hotel, Lim envisioned a self-contained resort destination. Resorts World Genting evolved to include:

Category	Offerings
Gaming	500 table games, 3,000 slot machines
Accommodation	10,000 hotel rooms across 6 hotels
Dining	30+ restaurants and bars
Entertainment	50+ thrill rides, indoor/outdoor theme parks, Snow World, cineplex
Conventions	150,000 sq ft of business facilities
Recreation	Golf course, gym, spa, Ripley' s museum
Retail	170+ dining and shopping outlets

The result: nearly 20 million visitors in 2007 alone-4.

5. Unrelated Diversification

Starting in 1976, Lim systematically diversified into industries completely unrelated to gaming and hospitality-4:

Plantations (oil palm)
Property development
Paper production
Power generation
Oil & gas exploration
Cruise lines (Star Cruises)

This strategy reduced reliance on any single revenue stream and positioned Genting as a global conglomerate-7.

6. Overcoming Language Barriers

Lim did not speak or write English but never allowed language to become a barrier to success. He worked through translators and built relationships based on trust and results rather than linguistic fluency-3.

Legacy: A Leader, Not Just a Boss

Lim Goh Tong exhibited a blend of transactional and transformational leadership. He set clear rules (" I will only tell you something once" ) and enforced discipline-5. Yet he also inspired through vision, personally mentored employees, and created a culture of loyalty that kept managers for a decade.
His greatest joy, he wrote, was " when I hold my grandchildren in my arms and tell them about how I developed Genting Highlands long, long ago" -1. That personal pride in building something from nothing encapsulates the thinking and strategies that turned a jungle peak into an empire.

Sources

Lim Goh Tong, My Story (Pelanduk Publications, 2004)-6 -8 -9
Genting Group Core Values documentation-2
Industry analysis from GGB Magazine

chartiskao ( Date: 04-Jun-2026 15:25) Posted:

Report Title: The Genesis and Evolution of Genting Malaysia: From Jungle Peak to Resort Empire (1965&ndash Present)
Date: [Current Date]
Prepared by: [Your Name/Department]
Subject: Analysis of Genting Malaysia&rsquo s Founding and Key Developmental Phases

1. Executive Summary

Genting Malaysia began in 1965 through the vision of entrepreneur Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong. What started as a rugged jungle peak, Mount Ulu Kali, was transformed into the integrated resort destination known today as Resorts World Genting. This report outlines the inspiration, initial challenges, and sequential milestones that converted a dense jungle into a multibillion-dollar empire.

2. Background & Inspiration

Founder: Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong.
Year of Conception: 1965.
Original Entity: Genting Highlands Berhad.
Primary Goal: To build an accessible, cool-climate mountain resort near Kuala Lumpur.
Key Catalyst: A trip to the Cameron Highlands, which sparked the idea of creating a similar highland retreat closer to Kuala Lumpur.

3. The Initial Feasibility Stage (1965)

The founder personally undertook a nine-day trekking and surveying expedition on Mount Ulu Kali. This hands-on assessment was critical to understand the dense jungle terrain and determine the viability of developing a resort at that peak.

4. Regulatory Approval

Following the survey, Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong successfully secured the necessary governmental approvals. This step was crucial, as it transformed the conceptual project into a legally sanctioned development on what was previously protected jungle land.

5. Key Developmental Steps (From Jungle to Empire)

The transformation from a rugged peak to a multibillion-dollar resort occurred through the following sequential phases:

Step	Phase Description	Key Outcome
1	Access & Infrastructure	Construction of the winding road to the peak, making the previously inaccessible mountain reachable from Kuala Lumpur.
2	Core Resort Development	Establishment of the original hotel and recreational facilities, branded as Resorts World Genting.
3	Cool-Climate Positioning	Leveraging the natural highland environment (cool temperatures) as a unique selling point distinct from lowland competitors.
4	Expansion into Entertainment	Addition of indoor theme parks, shopping malls, and convention centers to broaden the customer base beyond simple hill station visitors.
5	Casino Licensing	Securing one of Malaysia&rsquo s only casino licenses (operated under Resorts World Genting), which became a primary revenue driver and funded further expansion.
6	Ongoing Reinvestment	Continuous upgrades (hotels, theme parks like Skytropolis, transport systems like the Awana SkyWay) to maintain status as a premier resort.

6. Conclusion

The journey of Genting Malaysia is a case study in entrepreneurial vision and phased execution. Starting from a personal trek through dense jungle, Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong methodically secured approvals, built access, and layered entertainment and hospitality assets into a self-reinforcing resort empire. Today, Resorts World Genting stands as the tangible result of that initial 1965 ambition.
Key Takeaway: The empire was not built overnight but through a disciplined sequence of infrastructure, licensing, and continuous diversification over several decades.

chartistkaohz ( Date: 03-Jun-2026 16:56) Posted:

3. Reverse-Engineering the Valuations
Value investors use a technique called Reverse DCF (Discounted Cash Flow). Instead of trying to predict the future like an analyst, they look at the current oversold market price (e.g., S$0.62) and ask: ?What kind of terrible future is the market currently pricing in for this business??
If the current price implies that Genting Singapore's earnings will shrink by 5% every year for the next decade, but the investor?s personal research shows that tourism is structurally steady and protected by an exclusive duopoly license, a massive valuation disconnect exists. They will buy the shares comfortably, ignoring any panic or downgrades from banks trying to protect their short-term quarterly targets.
The Ultimate Filter: The Ownership Mindset
If you own a high-quality private business that generates steady cash, has no debt, and sits on a mountain of money, you wouldn't sell it to your neighbor for pennies just because a local property agent walked by and said, "I think your business is worth 10% less this week."
Value investors look at public stocks exactly the same way. By focusing entirely on balance sheet liquidity, structural cash flows, and dividend sustainability, they turn institutional volatility into their greatest wealth-building tool.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartiskao
Supreme

04-Jun-2026 15:25

chartiskao About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

1. Executive Summary

2. Background & Inspiration

Founder: Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong.
Year of Conception: 1965.
Original Entity: Genting Highlands Berhad.
Primary Goal: To build an accessible, cool-climate mountain resort near Kuala Lumpur.
Key Catalyst: A trip to the Cameron Highlands, which sparked the idea of creating a similar highland retreat closer to Kuala Lumpur.

3. The Initial Feasibility Stage (1965)

4. Regulatory Approval

5. Key Developmental Steps (From Jungle to Empire)

The transformation from a rugged peak to a multibillion-dollar resort occurred through the following sequential phases:

Step	Phase Description	Key Outcome
1	Access & Infrastructure	Construction of the winding road to the peak, making the previously inaccessible mountain reachable from Kuala Lumpur.
2	Core Resort Development	Establishment of the original hotel and recreational facilities, branded as Resorts World Genting.
3	Cool-Climate Positioning	Leveraging the natural highland environment (cool temperatures) as a unique selling point distinct from lowland competitors.
4	Expansion into Entertainment	Addition of indoor theme parks, shopping malls, and convention centers to broaden the customer base beyond simple hill station visitors.
5	Casino Licensing	Securing one of Malaysia&rsquo s only casino licenses (operated under Resorts World Genting), which became a primary revenue driver and funded further expansion.
6	Ongoing Reinvestment	Continuous upgrades (hotels, theme parks like Skytropolis, transport systems like the Awana SkyWay) to maintain status as a premier resort.

6. Conclusion

chartistkaohz ( Date: 03-Jun-2026 16:56) Posted:

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

03-Jun-2026 16:56

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

chartistkaohz
Supreme

03-Jun-2026 16:55

chartistkaohz About Contact Quote this Post!

x 0
x 0

Alert Admin

.Value investors avoid getting trapped by institutional research calls because they treat a brokerage report as a source of raw data, not a direct instruction manual. While a momentum trader reacts immediately to a headline upgrade or downgrade, a true value investor applies specific filters to isolate the underlying business value from the short-term noise.
Here is the exact playbook value investors use to ensure they stay on the right side of the trade:
1. Radical Separation of Price vs. Value
The foundational rule of value investing?laid down by Benjamin Graham and practiced by Warren Buffett?is simple: "Price is what you pay value is what you get."
Value investors do not look at a DBS "Target Price" as a guaranteed destination. Instead, they calculate their own conservative Intrinsic Value using the company?s structural fundamentals.
The Trap: An analyst might have a "BUY" call on Genting Singapore with a Target Price of S$0.95 based on optimistic projections of high-roller Chinese VIPs returning next year.
The Value Investor's Defense: They ignore the optimistic narrative and look at the hard flooring. They recalculate the value using a heavily stressed scenario: What if the VIP market permanently stagnates, but we value the stock purely on its S$3.3 billion cash pile, its zero-debt balance sheet, and its steady local mass-market gaming revenue? If the stock is trading at S0.61, and their worst-case intrinsic value calculation is S0.75, they know they have a robust Margin of Safety, regardless of what the analyst says.
2. Reading the Appendix, Not the Headline
When a brokerage issues a report, the most dangerous part for an average retail investor is the recommendation label ("BUY/HOLD/SELL"). The most valuable part for a value investor is the underlying model assumptions buried deep in the text.
Value investors dissect reports by stress-testing the analyst's core variables:What the Headline Says What the Value Investor Checks Inside the Report
"Upgrade to BUY because RWS 2.0 will drive massive growth." Check the CapEx and Timeline assumptions: Is the analyst assuming the S$6.8 billion expansion finishes on time without cost overruns? Value investors will manually price in a 20% budget over-run and a 1-year delay to see if the stock is still cheap.
"Downgrade to HOLD due to a bad quarter of low gaming win rates." Check for structural vs. cyclical factors: A low win rate (the casino losing a few more hands to VIPs than usual) is statistically cyclical?it always normalizes over time. Value investors realize the analyst is reacting to short-term noise, creating a perfect opportunity to buy the stock cheap.

Useful To Me Not Useful To Me

First < Newer 381-400 of 425 Older> Last

ShareJunction Version: 27 Nov 2020 ver- All Rights Reserved. Copyright ShareJunction Pte. Ltd. Disclaimer: All prices from are delayed. ShareJunction does not provide you with any financial advice. We are not into the business of providing any investment advice. See our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of using this website. Data is delayed for varying periods of time depending on the exchange, but for at least 15 minutes. Copyright © SIX Financial Information Ltd. and its licensors. All Rights reserved. Further distribution and use by third parties prohibited. SIX Financial Information and its licensors make no warranty for information displayed and accept no liability for data and prices. SIX Financial Information reserves the right to adapt and/or alter this website at any time without prior notice.

Web design by FoundationFlux. Hosted with Signetique Cloud.