Latest Forum Topics /
YZJ Shipbldg SGD
Last:3.54
+0.08
|
|
|
Blumont- Objective discussion only.
|
|||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
13-Oct-2024 21:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Rather nonsensical that a client that canceled orders, can sue for profits foregone.  This shows the ridiculous nature of Western judicial systems.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
13-Oct-2024 19:40
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thanks, that' s educational :)
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
13-Oct-2024 18:01
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (YZJ) case could have mixed effects on its stock price depending on the market' s perception of the arbitration' s outcome and the company' s prospects. Potential Positive Impact: If the market believes that Yangzijiang has a strong case, as the company claims, and that the arbitration claims are inflated, investors may view this as a sign of resilience, boosting confidence in the stock. Successful defense in arbitration could eliminate the risk of paying a large settlement, which would be seen as positive for the company' s financial stability. Potential Negative Impact: On the other hand, the fact that Yangzijiang is dealing with a claim of such a large scale (US$835 million) could introduce uncertainty and risk, potentially affecting the stock negatively. Investors may be cautious, awaiting further developments or a final resolution of the case, as losing the arbitration could result in significant financial liabilities. Overall, whether this boosts or weighs down YZJ' s stock will depend on investor sentiment about the company' s ability to win the arbitration and avoid large financial penalties. Arbitrations, especially of this scale, tend to create uncertainty, which markets usually react to with caution unless clear signals of a favorable outcome emerge. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
13-Oct-2024 17:58
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
The arbitration for Yangzijiang Shipbuilding is being conducted in London likely because of the arbitration clause included in the shipbuilding contracts. Contracts between international companies often specify a neutral location for dispute resolution to ensure fairness and neutrality, and London is a popular choice for such cases due to its reputation as a major global legal and financial center. London is home to several well-established arbitration bodies, such as the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), which is known for handling large-scale commercial disputes. Many international contracts, particularly those involving high-value transactions or complex legal frameworks, include London as the venue for arbitration due to its robust legal infrastructure, experienced arbitrators, and predictable enforcement of international arbitration awards. The choice of London likely reflects the parties&rsquo agreement to resolve disputes in a jurisdiction that is neutral, has a strong legal framework, and is experienced in handling maritime and commercial cases. moreover, nothing was ruled against yzj
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
13-Oct-2024 17:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Why in UK court not China court ? Do you think Ang Mo ruling will be unfavourable to YZJ har...
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
13-Oct-2024 13:18
|
||||
|
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
In simple terms, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding' s subsidiaries are involved in legal disputes (arbitrations) over contracts they had with other companies to build ships. The contracts, worth about US$900 million, involved building 10 ships, but the other companies canceled these contracts in early 2022. The companies that canceled the contracts are now claiming US$835 million, saying they lost money because they couldn' t profit from the ships, and they also want a refund of the payments they made. However, Yangzijiang' s subsidiaries argue that the amount the claimants are asking for is inflated, and they believe they have strong arguments to defend themselves and potentially win the case. This is all taking place in an arbitration tribunal in London, and Yangzijiang Shipbuilding is confident they will succeed in defending against these claims.  
 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
AhTan888
Senior |
12-Oct-2024 22:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Perfect reason for shortist on Monday
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
12-Oct-2024 22:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Sounds like a frivolous lawsuit.   Paid $3.32m but wants commensation for $835m?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Winnertakeall
Elite |
12-Oct-2024 21:33
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding subsidiaries have reasonably good prospect of success in arbitration claimsOctober 12 2024   Yangzijiang Shipbuilding says its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Jiangsu Tianchen Marine Import & Export Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Yangzi Xinfu Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu New Yangzi Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., have a reasonably good prospect of success in the arbitrations levelled against them.    According to Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Oct 12 announcement, arbitration proceedings were commenced at an arbitration tribunal in London by certain unnamed entities on June 10, 2022, and on Sept 26, 2022, against three of the group wholly-owned subsidiaries.    The claims are for 10 shipbuilding contracts valued at US$900 million and entered into between the group subsidiaries and the unnamed entities. Four of the vessels were purchased on Nov 5, 2021, while six vessels were purchased on Dec 30, 2021. The contracts were terminated by the claimants on March 24, 2022, and May 16, 2022, respectively.    Notices for the commencement of the arbitration proceeds were served for the four vessels on June 10, 2022, while similar notices were issued for the remaining six vessels on Sept 26, 2022.    Yangzijiang announcement noted that the claimants were seeking US$835 million, which comprises the loss of bargain, loss of profits and refund of the payments made by the claimants. The group adds that the claimants paid only US$3.32 million for the 10 contracts.    After substantive progress in the arbitrations, which took place this year, Yangzijiang says it continues to have good arguable defences and a good arguable case that the claims should be denied . The amount requested by the claimants is also incorrectly measured and highly inflated.   The first tranche of the arbitrations is scheduled for November this year. Yangzijiang adds that the claims are not expected to materially impact its financial position for the FY2024 ending Dec 31.    Shares in Yangzijiang Shipbuilding closed 2 cents higher or 0.81% up at $2.50 on Oct 11.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
12-Oct-2024 18:12
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
No body interested ?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
12-Oct-2024 12:58
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This YZJ ship kenna claim by people about USD 900M for termination of 10 shipbuilding but it said not such claim will defend it in court.... | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
11-Oct-2024 17:26
|
||||
|
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
idiot bb. manipulate the price | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
fuzzyshares
Veteran |
11-Oct-2024 10:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I agree. Just take a good look at Genting Singapore. Before the announcement of the excellent 1st quarter 2024 results it was institutional selling that brought it down from above a dollar to 0.90. Even with the excellent results, the stock could not maintain the momentum and more selling followed until the decent but good 2nd quarter 2024 results saved after hitting 52-week low. Just some thought on the power of institutions.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
fuzzyshares
Veteran |
11-Oct-2024 09:19
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
Interesting postings. The yeas and the nays, positives and negatives. After the promotion to the higher league in late May, YZJSH now belongs to the deeper pockets and the mature, and trading volumes reflect that. No more million queues to buy and sell.
Still remember when YZJSH was trading below $2? A quick jump of 0.20 would drive both investors and punters alike crazy only to see it fell back to earth in a week or two. Now belonging in another orbit, a fluctuation of 0.40 is a norm, nothing to get excited about. Barring negative news and more injection of positive news, should see the stock creeps towards the next higher level. Another injection of funds like that in late May should see YZJSH remain in the next higher level for good and even better.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Login20
Master |
10-Oct-2024 21:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 2 Alert Admin |
For those who is interested to read on my past informations on 3Q24 contract wins, tonight will be my last posting on them, I will start delete all those postings for morgany, probably he already read all and had benefitted the inofrmations and talk rubblish now. I am watching his postings. He better watch up not talking nonsense again. I will whack him word by word. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Login20
Master |
10-Oct-2024 21:18
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I try to trace your earlier message, seem you are talking nonsense, what logic is this when Banks is stagnant and YZJSB will rise? what rule is this?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
10-Oct-2024 20:53
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You can also buy DLZW :).   It is 5x YZJ leveraged ETF.   So if YZJ move up 1%, it moves up 5%.   Of cos, vice versa applies.   Damn, shouldn' t be telling people how to gamble ... | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
10-Oct-2024 20:44
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
No prob.   I wouldn' t recommend CFD because of high leverage and financing cost.   That 6.75% will eat into your profit.   And a 10% move will be margin call.   So please reserve 30% in cash even though margin is 10%.   Else your broker might force close.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
pkli899
Supreme |
10-Oct-2024 20:30
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thanks for the clarification. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
10-Oct-2024 20:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
For YZJ CFD - Finance charge is 6.75% long and 4% short.   Margin is 10%.   Actually, you are betting against the market indirectly.   When you buy a CFD, the MM will buy the equilvalent shares from the market as a hedge.   Similarly, when you sell a CFD, the MM will short the same number of shares from the market.   You pay brokerage based on full value of the shares, not the margin amount.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

