Back

Latest Forum Topics / SPH

Post Reply

SOILBUILD BUSINESS SPACE REIT Post Reply Rate topic
lionhill Veteran	09-May-2021 14:43        lionhill About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I agree with this blogger. Actually, the media division did not  lose money until after the pandemic. even 1 mil profit is sitll profit, right? Who so hurry to throw it away so quickly at huge loss? https://alpacainvestments.blogspot.com/2021/05/should-sph-shareholders-take-umbrage-at.html
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Farmer Master	09-May-2021 14:30        Farmer About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Unless there is positive news release, immediate support of $1.51 will be weak. Next support range will be 1.40 - 1.37 close to its revise nav of 2.08*0.65x which coincide with Dbs Tp of 1.35.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
rocketman Master	09-May-2021 13:35        rocketman About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	A lot of local Properties counters are trading at deep discount.. example.. Metro Holdings... A lot of choices now folks...This ran up too fast from Golden Dollar to Double Golden Dollar within a span of just 6 months. An intelligent prediction will be in very short term find support around 1.3X in my humble opinion..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
laksaman57 Supreme	09-May-2021 13:10        laksaman57 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Can't imagine his finger-language and voice when talking to staff 😱 😱 😱 😱 Shifu8888      ( Date: 09-May-2021 12:49) Posted: Confirmed. I re watched the clip and literally counted. He used his index fingers to point about 20 times. Before that, he was scratching his index fingers. Body languages showing his index finger dam itchy and trying to tahan his rage. The wise way is to put his whole left hand under his ARMPIT while taking URMBRAGE. At least, no finger pointing. Not so bad.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Shifu8888 Supreme	09-May-2021 12:49        Shifu8888 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Confirmed. I re watched the clip and literally counted. He used his index fingers to point about 20 times. Before that, he was scratching his index fingers. Body languages showing his index finger dam itchy and trying to tahan his rage. The wise way is to put his whole left hand under his ARMPIT while taking URMBRAGE. At least, no finger pointing. Not so bad.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
laksaman57 Supreme	09-May-2021 12:34        laksaman57 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Oops he may take umbrage at your daring suggestions to be more innovative, be creative and further study at Harvard Biz school bcos it would imply he has none of those 😱 zillion      ( Date: 09-May-2021 12:22) Posted: God Forbid! Likely he will cut cut cut parang here parang there making more people signing up for unemployment sgunited courses. Old fashioned textbook of improving bottomline figures is to downsize staff. Going forward he needs to look at more innovative, creative ways to bring SPH to higher level. All temasek staff and govt scholars must first go the Harvard Biz school before joining any glc outfits. laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 11:44) Posted: After two failed managing at ex-great NOL & SPH, his valuable experience in failing may be his greatest asset for him to bring to SIA to help do the right thing and navigate SIA out of trouble.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
zillion Master	09-May-2021 12:22        zillion About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	God Forbid! Likely he will cut cut cut parang here parang there making more people signing up for unemployment sgunited courses. Old fashioned textbook of improving bottomline figures is to downsize staff. Going forward he needs to look at more innovative, creative ways to bring SPH to higher level. All temasek staff and govt scholars must first go the Harvard Biz school before joining any glc outfits. laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 11:44) Posted: After two failed managing at ex-great NOL & SPH, his valuable experience in failing may be his greatest asset for him to bring to SIA to help do the right thing and navigate SIA out of trouble. bornloser      ( Date: 09-May-2021 10:58) Posted: He can retire soundly. Millions in his banks. Why still ask him to be CEO? Some more not his expertise area. Why KPKB if he can't perform well ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Secret_Squirrel Elite	09-May-2021 12:14        Secret_Squirrel About Contact  Quote this Post!   Yells: "Stay curious but skeptical"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Anyway who is buying newspaper these days. I don' t buy physical newspaper these days. Just go to NLB to view the e-newspaper (with touch screen)  OR You can also log on to NLB website at home (your PC/laptop/tablet)  and view the Straitstimes and Business times laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 11:49) Posted: Take a deeper breath before mkt open tomolo. leleguo      ( Date: 09-May-2021 11:28) Posted: TAKE A DEEP BREATH BEFORE TAKING UMBRAGE BY now, most folks who are concerned about the future of print media in Singapore (~ The Straits Times) the share value of a media blue chip (~ Singapore Press Holdings) and thunderbolt restructuring (~ from private to company limited by guarantee CLG model) would have been amply distracted by the unwarranted response of SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung to a legitimate question, or two, by CNA?s digital reporter Chew Hui Min whether the new business model would ?pivot to emphasize editorial integrity ahead of advertiser interests?. THIS post, equally distracted, will focus purely on the journalism aspects of the Q-and-A exchange: *PRESS PROTOCOL IN GENERAL* 1. It is a press conference called by SPH. Journalists are entitled to ask questions as they deem fit in such a setting. If the firm does not wish to field questions, it could simply issue a press statement. 2. If a question is deemed irrelevant or provocative, the newsmaker can respond with a ?no comment? rephrase it to his/her advantage answer in an oblique manner or even end the event abruptly as host. Taking out your anger from your own failings on an innocent reporter isn?t one of them. *CNA AND ITS QUESTIONS* 3. CNA?s Chew was polite, even greeting the panel with a ?(good) morning? when she didn?t need to do so and ending with a ?thank you?. Can?t blame her for having a good upbringing. 4. Chew?s questions were professionally relevant: where?s the new focus and what/who went wrong. 5. Chew?s questions did not carry any provocation. It was sharp, not sarcastic. 6. Finally, Chew is a reporter. Her one and only task at the press conference was to ask questions, not to help herself with the refreshment. *NG YAT CHUNG AS A NEWSMAKER* 7. Chew?s question was meant for Chairman Lee Boon Yang. Ng does not need to respond. At all. Not at all. 8. Ng?s interjection was emotional, making his reply incoherent and ungrammatical - a bad reflection for a national English-language newspaper, coming from its head honcho. 9. Ng paraphrased Chew?s question wrongly. She did not say revenue over integrity. (Indeed Chairman Lee conceded that news media struggle with this balance.) But Ng accused her of saying so. 10. Ng pointed at Chew and said: ?... IN YOUR WORDS, conceding to the advertisers.? Chew, IN HER WORDS, never articulated IN THOSE WORDS. Ng could not even quote-unquote a correct quote. Unquote. 11. Ng dragged the other local media organizations into the mud, accusing them of being funded whereas ST was not. Not too gentlemanly. 12. Ng pointed at individuals in the conference room when he did this, making matters worse with this childish act. Those present were just reporters doing their job at a routine diary event. Why take it on them? Go scream at their employers, their organizations. Not the foot soldiers. There?s an appropriate Chinese saying 兵 来 将 挡  (The General fends off the soldiers). But Ng turned tail and did a cowardly 兵 来 将 躺 (The General flees from the soldiers). *NG YAT CHUNG AS A PERSON* 13. Ng was more than taking umbrage. He was taking advantage of the (local, female, rival, digital - four threats to him/SPH) reporter by raising his voice and bullying her into silence, if not submission, using caustic remarks like ?you dare to question...? ?where you come from ...? and ?I?m not (a gentleman).? He should pick someone his own ?size?. Wait, let me rephrase that... pick someone his own ?stature?, like an FCA (Foreign Correspondents Association) seasoned correspondent. They?ll have him for lunch and skin him alive in their response to his bullying. (Singapore journos are not timid, they are just diplomatic and perhaps too kind as well.) 14. Ng can, grudgingly, be described as a ?newspaper man? (by now based on seniority at least - even though he has never seen a day as a beat reporter, except the beating part). He should therefore respect fellow journalists even though they are many rungs below his salary and station. Okay, and his size. 15. Ng flopped at NOL and is now flip-flopping at SPH. He is better off showing humility. 16. Ng was a paper general in the SAF playing tabletop war scenarios and directing solutions. He is better off showing humility. FINALLY, two things: First: I hope CNA?s Mediacorp stand up and protect its harassed employees by responding to Ng?s uncalled-for intimidation. The poor girl must be wondering what she did wrong - when she didn?t. Second: Ng ought to apologize to Chew personally - unless he?s insisting he?s not a gentleman? IF only Ng had taken a deep breath before taking umbrage. There would have been less harm and less rage. ?- * The writer taught journalism at the former School of Journalism under SPH.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
rajsinn Member	09-May-2021 11:50        rajsinn About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	We were all on the gravy train as it moved up from 1.00.   By halting trade on Thursday 6/5/21 they didn' t give us a chance to get out in stages that day because doing so would have created a landslide & completely crashed the stock.   Institutional investors / sellers probably already decided during the halt at 1.50 (thereabouts) before market opened on Friday 7/5/21 so rest of us left hanging with the baby without the bath water (1st trade @ 08:58.45 SGD 1.52, 200 shares).   Probably previous short sellers then cashed in their profits & drove it back to 1.60 by 9.30 am, & then the expected supply > demand ratio took over to bring it back down towards 1.50.   However many left still holding because had been hoping for a gradual slide to have got out at 1.70, 1.60, etc..., so now stuck, & this resulted in an incomplete crash.   Possibly also what company was hoping for, ie not a complete crash + news was only released after ex-dividend date to keep people holding to buoyancy the price to prepapre for the fall...   Also psycological threshold is at 1.50, just like bottomed out at 1.00 & everyone was hoping to top out around 2.00. Next is what those holding do.   Be objective as the market has downpriced SPH with huge loss of assets as an unfavourable outcome from Strategic review, hence unlikely for short term gains.   More likley stabilise at 1.50 or drop more.   My feeling is with 4,000,030 shorts on Friday (https://sginvestors.io/sgx/stock/t39-sph/share-price-history) it will drop further.   Last time price was at 1.50 (thereabouts)on   31/3/21 (https://sginvestors.io/sgx/stock/t39-sph/share-price-history) shorts tried with 3,002,600 shorts but it soared above 1.50 as everybody was riding the gravy train + no bad news.   I think this time the shorts will win, so up to you if you want to get on the bandwagon & make some reverse direction profit. Next item of news is to clearly defeat this proposal at AGM (if we have the option) as clearly it' s not helpful in this uncertain time to propose such a definite loss in hope of long term gains.   Then we can get back on the train (may be one last time) to move back towards where we were on Thursday 6/5/21. leleguo      ( Date: 09-May-2021 00:20) Posted: SPH is now in the perfect storm due to General Umbrage's unfortunate outburst. It is a no brainer to short it down when the market opens on Monday. Only his resignation might turn the tide it seems.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
laksaman57 Supreme	09-May-2021 11:49        laksaman57 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Take a deeper breath before mkt open tomolo. leleguo      ( Date: 09-May-2021 11:28) Posted: TAKE A DEEP BREATH BEFORE TAKING UMBRAGE BY now, most folks who are concerned about the future of print media in Singapore (~ The Straits Times) the share value of a media blue chip (~ Singapore Press Holdings) and thunderbolt restructuring (~ from private to company limited by guarantee CLG model) would have been amply distracted by the unwarranted response of SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung to a legitimate question, or two, by CNA?s digital reporter Chew Hui Min whether the new business model would ?pivot to emphasize editorial integrity ahead of advertiser interests?. THIS post, equally distracted, will focus purely on the journalism aspects of the Q-and-A exchange: *PRESS PROTOCOL IN GENERAL* 1. It is a press conference called by SPH. Journalists are entitled to ask questions as they deem fit in such a setting. If the firm does not wish to field questions, it could simply issue a press statement. 2. If a question is deemed irrelevant or provocative, the newsmaker can respond with a ?no comment? rephrase it to his/her advantage answer in an oblique manner or even end the event abruptly as host. Taking out your anger from your own failings on an innocent reporter isn?t one of them. *CNA AND ITS QUESTIONS* 3. CNA?s Chew was polite, even greeting the panel with a ?(good) morning? when she didn?t need to do so and ending with a ?thank you?. Can?t blame her for having a good upbringing. 4. Chew?s questions were professionally relevant: where?s the new focus and what/who went wrong. 5. Chew?s questions did not carry any provocation. It was sharp, not sarcastic. 6. Finally, Chew is a reporter. Her one and only task at the press conference was to ask questions, not to help herself with the refreshment. *NG YAT CHUNG AS A NEWSMAKER* 7. Chew?s question was meant for Chairman Lee Boon Yang. Ng does not need to respond. At all. Not at all. 8. Ng?s interjection was emotional, making his reply incoherent and ungrammatical - a bad reflection for a national English-language newspaper, coming from its head honcho. 9. Ng paraphrased Chew?s question wrongly. She did not say revenue over integrity. (Indeed Chairman Lee conceded that news media struggle with this balance.) But Ng accused her of saying so. 10. Ng pointed at Chew and said: ?... IN YOUR WORDS, conceding to the advertisers.? Chew, IN HER WORDS, never articulated IN THOSE WORDS. Ng could not even quote-unquote a correct quote. Unquote. 11. Ng dragged the other local media organizations into the mud, accusing them of being funded whereas ST was not. Not too gentlemanly. 12. Ng pointed at individuals in the conference room when he did this, making matters worse with this childish act. Those present were just reporters doing their job at a routine diary event. Why take it on them? Go scream at their employers, their organizations. Not the foot soldiers. There?s an appropriate Chinese saying 兵 来 将 挡  (The General fends off the soldiers). But Ng turned tail and did a cowardly 兵 来 将 躺 (The General flees from the soldiers). *NG YAT CHUNG AS A PERSON* 13. Ng was more than taking umbrage. He was taking advantage of the (local, female, rival, digital - four threats to him/SPH) reporter by raising his voice and bullying her into silence, if not submission, using caustic remarks like ?you dare to question...? ?where you come from ...? and ?I?m not (a gentleman).? He should pick someone his own ?size?. Wait, let me rephrase that... pick someone his own ?stature?, like an FCA (Foreign Correspondents Association) seasoned correspondent. They?ll have him for lunch and skin him alive in their response to his bullying. (Singapore journos are not timid, they are just diplomatic and perhaps too kind as well.) 14. Ng can, grudgingly, be described as a ?newspaper man? (by now based on seniority at least - even though he has never seen a day as a beat reporter, except the beating part). He should therefore respect fellow journalists even though they are many rungs below his salary and station. Okay, and his size. 15. Ng flopped at NOL and is now flip-flopping at SPH. He is better off showing humility. 16. Ng was a paper general in the SAF playing tabletop war scenarios and directing solutions. He is better off showing humility. FINALLY, two things: First: I hope CNA?s Mediacorp stand up and protect its harassed employees by responding to Ng?s uncalled-for intimidation. The poor girl must be wondering what she did wrong - when she didn?t. Second: Ng ought to apologize to Chew personally - unless he?s insisting he?s not a gentleman? IF only Ng had taken a deep breath before taking umbrage. There would have been less harm and less rage. ?- * The writer taught journalism at the former School of Journalism under SPH.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
laksaman57 Supreme	09-May-2021 11:47        laksaman57 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Make SIA Great Again 📢 laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 11:44) Posted: After two failed managing at ex-great NOL & SPH, his valuable experience in failing may be his greatest asset for him to bring to SIA to help do the right thing and navigate SIA out of trouble. bornloser      ( Date: 09-May-2021 10:58) Posted: He can retire soundly. Millions in his banks. Why still ask him to be CEO? Some more not his expertise area. Why KPKB if he can't perform well ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
laksaman57 Supreme	09-May-2021 11:44        laksaman57 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	After two failed managing at ex-great NOL & SPH, his valuable experience in failing may be his greatest asset for him to bring to SIA to help do the right thing and navigate SIA out of trouble. bornloser      ( Date: 09-May-2021 10:58) Posted: He can retire soundly. Millions in his banks. Why still ask him to be CEO? Some more not his expertise area. Why KPKB if he can't perform well ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
leleguo Member	09-May-2021 11:28        leleguo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	TAKE A DEEP BREATH BEFORE TAKING UMBRAGE BY now, most folks who are concerned about the future of print media in Singapore (~ The Straits Times) the share value of a media blue chip (~ Singapore Press Holdings) and thunderbolt restructuring (~ from private to company limited by guarantee CLG model) would have been amply distracted by the unwarranted response of SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung to a legitimate question, or two, by CNA?s digital reporter Chew Hui Min whether the new business model would ?pivot to emphasize editorial integrity ahead of advertiser interests?. THIS post, equally distracted, will focus purely on the journalism aspects of the Q-and-A exchange: *PRESS PROTOCOL IN GENERAL* 1. It is a press conference called by SPH. Journalists are entitled to ask questions as they deem fit in such a setting. If the firm does not wish to field questions, it could simply issue a press statement. 2. If a question is deemed irrelevant or provocative, the newsmaker can respond with a ?no comment? rephrase it to his/her advantage answer in an oblique manner or even end the event abruptly as host. Taking out your anger from your own failings on an innocent reporter isn?t one of them. *CNA AND ITS QUESTIONS* 3. CNA?s Chew was polite, even greeting the panel with a ?(good) morning? when she didn?t need to do so and ending with a ?thank you?. Can?t blame her for having a good upbringing. 4. Chew?s questions were professionally relevant: where?s the new focus and what/who went wrong. 5. Chew?s questions did not carry any provocation. It was sharp, not sarcastic. 6. Finally, Chew is a reporter. Her one and only task at the press conference was to ask questions, not to help herself with the refreshment. *NG YAT CHUNG AS A NEWSMAKER* 7. Chew?s question was meant for Chairman Lee Boon Yang. Ng does not need to respond. At all. Not at all. 8. Ng?s interjection was emotional, making his reply incoherent and ungrammatical - a bad reflection for a national English-language newspaper, coming from its head honcho. 9. Ng paraphrased Chew?s question wrongly. She did not say revenue over integrity. (Indeed Chairman Lee conceded that news media struggle with this balance.) But Ng accused her of saying so. 10. Ng pointed at Chew and said: ?... IN YOUR WORDS, conceding to the advertisers.? Chew, IN HER WORDS, never articulated IN THOSE WORDS. Ng could not even quote-unquote a correct quote. Unquote. 11. Ng dragged the other local media organizations into the mud, accusing them of being funded whereas ST was not. Not too gentlemanly. 12. Ng pointed at individuals in the conference room when he did this, making matters worse with this childish act. Those present were just reporters doing their job at a routine diary event. Why take it on them? Go scream at their employers, their organizations. Not the foot soldiers. There?s an appropriate Chinese saying 兵 来 将 挡  (The General fends off the soldiers). But Ng turned tail and did a cowardly 兵 来 将 躺 (The General flees from the soldiers). *NG YAT CHUNG AS A PERSON* 13. Ng was more than taking umbrage. He was taking advantage of the (local, female, rival, digital - four threats to him/SPH) reporter by raising his voice and bullying her into silence, if not submission, using caustic remarks like ?you dare to question...? ?where you come from ...? and ?I?m not (a gentleman).? He should pick someone his own ?size?. Wait, let me rephrase that... pick someone his own ?stature?, like an FCA (Foreign Correspondents Association) seasoned correspondent. They?ll have him for lunch and skin him alive in their response to his bullying. (Singapore journos are not timid, they are just diplomatic and perhaps too kind as well.) 14. Ng can, grudgingly, be described as a ?newspaper man? (by now based on seniority at least - even though he has never seen a day as a beat reporter, except the beating part). He should therefore respect fellow journalists even though they are many rungs below his salary and station. Okay, and his size. 15. Ng flopped at NOL and is now flip-flopping at SPH. He is better off showing humility. 16. Ng was a paper general in the SAF playing tabletop war scenarios and directing solutions. He is better off showing humility. FINALLY, two things: First: I hope CNA?s Mediacorp stand up and protect its harassed employees by responding to Ng?s uncalled-for intimidation. The poor girl must be wondering what she did wrong - when she didn?t. Second: Ng ought to apologize to Chew personally - unless he?s insisting he?s not a gentleman? IF only Ng had taken a deep breath before taking umbrage. There would have been less harm and less rage. ?- * The writer taught journalism at the former School of Journalism under SPH.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bornloser Senior	09-May-2021 10:58        bornloser About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	He can retire soundly. Millions in his banks. Why still ask him to be CEO? Some more not his expertise area. Why KPKB if he can't perform well ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
laksaman57 Supreme	09-May-2021 10:55        laksaman57 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	His educational background in engineering and mathematic would be more suited for a very high tech engineering company like SIA. Shifu8888      ( Date: 09-May-2021 10:31) Posted: He used his index finger more than 10 times in the clip. Well SIA shareholders will bite off that finger I guess.... Because who like finger pointing CEO? Chief EXCUSE Officer finger pointing Armpit General. laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 09:42) Posted: Parachute him into SIA and see how the mkt respond lah
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
oldbirdy Senior	09-May-2021 10:41        oldbirdy About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Maybe die road 1 way.... You think share holders date to accept? laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 09:42) Posted: Parachute him into SIA and see how the mkt respond lah. Shifu8888      ( Date: 09-May-2021 08:13) Posted: GLC needs to revamp the protocol for their recruitment process. Direct parachute for retired generals seems to me no proper check and balance. What kind of fit can someone who spent decades in army qualified in a corporate honcho job? Certainly a failed resume of running NOL aground qualify this Armpit general into another top notch job
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
tonyja Elite	09-May-2021 10:39        tonyja About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Matthew Liang - Below is written by an angry shareholder: Ng Yat... | Facebook Below is written by an angry shareholder: Ng Yat Chung, former HJC student and ex-CDF general,  How you behaved yesterday was terrible. You have discredited your uniform, behaving like a curmudgeon. You have also rankled current and former students of Hwa Chong. You were so besotted with your position and forgot your temperament, Revealing your snooty nature and appearing as a rasping termagant. Such manners never inculcated in Hwa Chong or any school in Spore, Don&rsquo t forget you are not in the military anymore. The reporter that asked two questions spoke politely, You, however, were haughty and behaved belligerently. Your self-assured hubris should now be shaken due to SPH&rsquo s performance, Reflecting your lack of knowledge, inexperience and ignorance.  Your management of NOL and SPH were egregious, You sold away an asset once regarded as precious, And turned a profitable media business into losses. Everyone can make a mistake,  That shareholders can tolerate, But you don&rsquo t even ingratiate with us, Turning our SPH shares into dust. With dividends you were very flinty, Rewarding yourself, you took plenty. Hiving off the media business with SPH&rsquo s money, Is an iniquitous trade that is taking away our honey. Those years you spent being rotated within Temasek, Presumably to prepare you as a CEO candidate, Now seems futile and was a complete waste, Of taxpayers&rsquo money, sadly this is a true case. Your behaviour yesterday I find it odious and pugnacious, Totally unnecessary for a meeting that should have been gracious. You ought to be gracious and resign to take accountability, For the terrible performance and your lack of creativity. Digitilisation occurred before you joined SPH,  With your credentials you should have the edge, Yet you behaved like a troglodyte, ignorant of what lies ahead.  And now another business is given away, To find new talent and pave a more prosperous way, Leaving us shareholders frustrated and immiserated. So perform an honourable and valiant act, Put on your General&rsquo s hat,  And disappear into the sunset.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
leleguo Member	09-May-2021 10:38        leleguo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	He was done for the moment he proclaimed to the world he is not a gentleman at his company's press conference. Shifu8888      ( Date: 09-May-2021 10:31) Posted: He used his index finger more than 10 times in the clip. Well SIA shareholders will bite off that finger I guess.... Because who like finger pointing CEO? Chief EXCUSE Officer finger pointing Armpit General. laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 09:42) Posted: Parachute him into SIA and see how the mkt respond lah
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Shifu8888 Supreme	09-May-2021 10:31        Shifu8888 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	He used his index finger more than 10 times in the clip. Well SIA shareholders will bite off that finger I guess.... Because who like finger pointing CEO? Chief EXCUSE Officer finger pointing Armpit General. laksaman57      ( Date: 09-May-2021 09:42) Posted: Parachute him into SIA and see how the mkt respond lah. Shifu8888      ( Date: 09-May-2021 08:13) Posted: GLC needs to revamp the protocol for their recruitment process. Direct parachute for retired generals seems to me no proper check and balance. What kind of fit can someone who spent decades in army qualified in a corporate honcho job? Certainly a failed resume of running NOL aground qualify this Armpit general into another top notch job
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
f16force Senior	09-May-2021 10:29        f16force About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	head of SIAS was right to question why divesting SPH media requires SPH to  Transfer about $300 million in cash/shares and assets, instead of getting bidders to  bid for it, which may generate some $$$ for shareholders? A very unconscionable strategic review indeed! A strategic review followed  with execution theoretically enhances the value of the company shares, which in this case,  does the opposite. will increase
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   281-300 of 753   Older>   Last