Latest Forum Topics /
YZJ Shipbldg SGD
Last:3.48
+0.01
|
|
|
The Only Shipbuilding Blue Chip in SGX!
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
31-Mar-2025 23:54
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yangzijiang Financial places S$139.3 million in treasury shares for maritime investments 
It says this is in line with its strategy to capitalise on industry tailwinds driven by increasing decarbonisation
 
[SINGAPORE] Yangzijiang Financial has raised net cash proceeds of S$139.3 million through a placement of its treasury shares, to redeploy them for maritime investments.
 
In a bourse filing on Sunday (Mar 30), the financial arm of Yangzijiang Shipbuilding said that it agreed to divest its entire treasury shareholding of 193.5 million shares at S$0.72 apiece.
 
The price represents a 111 per cent premium to its average buyback cost, but a 9.7 per cent discount to the weighted average price of S$0.7975 for trades done during the full market day on Mar 28.
 
The treasury shares were originally repurchased at an average cost of S$0.34 per share under Yangzijiang Financial&rsquo s S$200 million share buyback programme.
 
The purchasers &ndash Merlion Quay Capital and Operie Capital &ndash are two separate entities, each established by an investor and three senior executives of Yangzijiang Financial.
 
Net proceeds will be deployed towards the group&rsquo s core maritime investments, in line with its strategy to capitalise on industry tailwinds driven by increasing decarbonisation.
 
In the interim, proceeds may also be temporarily allocated to bank deposits or cash management activities for capital appreciation.
 
Yangzijiang Financial executive chairman and chief executive Ren Yuanlin noted that the company&rsquo s shift into maritime-related investments has already yielded promising results, with their revenue contribution more than doubling in financial year 2024.
 
&ldquo The participation of investors and senior executives in this placement is a strong vote of confidence in our long-term vision and growth potential,&rdquo said Ren.
 
The company expects the proposed sale to be completed by Jun 26. The sale shares represent 5.27 per cent of the total number of issued shares in the company.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
31-Mar-2025 23:39
|
||||
|
x 2
x 0 Alert Admin |
Because Blackrock or Vanguard will hire smarter people :)
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
kepoh88
Veteran |
31-Mar-2025 15:28
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You think they have no interrest? They have been here before , holding mpore than 5% YZJSB before, their country is very far behind compare yto CHINA, Korea and Japan on ship building  therefore resort to this evil and unfair tactic to contain China, try to buy and control as many port and will imposes tariff and port fees to all China build ship. Follow their present in some stakes in cerytian stock, SATS is one of it. The question is why they raise the stakes ? I dont think merely buying for fun.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
behonest
Senior |
31-Mar-2025 13:13
|
||||
|
x 0
x 3 Alert Admin |
Tks dragon girl. This could maintain high oil price and lng price 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Cadence88
Veteran |
31-Mar-2025 11:05
|
||||
|
x 0
x 2 Alert Admin |
&ldquo Trump Floats Fresh Sanctions on Russian Oil&rdquo https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-03-30/trump-floats-fresh-sanctions-on-russian-oil
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
31-Mar-2025 09:11
|
||||
|
x 1
x 1 Alert Admin |
Blackrock or Vanguard won' t waste their time here. It' s just people who wants to offer contratrian views. No harm, they have pretty warped ideas but interesting nonetheless.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kepoh88
Veteran |
30-Mar-2025 22:56
|
||||
|
x 4
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hahaha... sounds like there are blackrock or vangaurd agent in this forum. smear campaign and what is the motive! |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
30-Mar-2025 13:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 7 Alert Admin |
Feel free to dislike n rebuke if you have opinions  trump pushing to lift sanction for Russia.  If former President Donald Trump lifted sanctions on Russia, the potential impact on global oil prices, LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas), and companies like YZJ Shipping (Yangzijiang Shipbuilding) could be as follows: 1.  Oil Price Impact:
2.  LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) Market:
3.  Effect on YZJ Shipping (Yangzijiang Shipbuilding):
In summary, lifting sanctions on Russia could cause oil and LNG prices to drop, signaling a potential reduction in global shipping demand. This decrease in demand could negatively impact YZJ Shipping, as fewer ships would need to be ordered and built. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
BinderyT
Elite |
30-Mar-2025 08:40
|
||||
|
x 2
x 3 Alert Admin |
I agree that a watered down version that has close to zero impact will be proposed.   Just to save face and allow the politicians to continue with their China bashing soundbites. Where I' m concerned, its a buying opportunity and will continue adding if it dips some more :).
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
29-Mar-2025 13:21
|
||||
|
x 0
x 5 Alert Admin |
if u all disagreed , feel free to reply feedback constructively or dislike  There are several ways in which Hyundai&rsquo s  $21 billion investment  in the U.S. could  negatively affect YZJ Shipbuilding (Yangzijiang Shipbuilding), particularly in terms of competition, market dynamics, and geopolitical factors. Here are the potential challenges: 1.  Increased Competition in LNG Carrier Market
2.  Tariffs and Trade Barriers
3.  Shift in Market Demand and Supply Chain Dynamics
4.  Technological Advancements and Innovation Pressure
5.  Stronger Position of Hyundai in U.S. Market
6.  Geopolitical Tensions
7.  Possible Shift in Global Supply Chains
Conclusion:While Hyundai&rsquo s investment in the U.S. presents growth opportunities for certain sectors, it could negatively affect  YZJ Shipbuilding  in several ways. Increased competition, particularly in the LNG carrier market, higher costs due to steel tariffs, technological advancements by Hyundai, and geopolitical factors could all place pressure on YZJ Shipbuilding' s ability to compete effectively in both the global and U.S. markets. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
29-Mar-2025 13:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 4 Alert Admin |
IF U All disagree, feel free to reply with ur constructive reasoning and dislike  In a recent announcement on March 24, 2025, Hyundai Motor Group revealed a substantial $21 billion investment in the United States, which was highlighted during a ceremony at the White House with President Donald Trump. This investment encompasses several key initiatives:
Hyundai' s announcement reflects its continued commitment to the U.S. market, boosting its manufacturing capabilities and technological advancements while creating thousands of new jobs. This investment is part of a broader trend of companies responding to political pressures, such as President Trump' s focus on increasing U.S. production and reducing trade imbalances.   The $21 billion investment announced by Hyundai Motor Group in the United States does not directly relate to shipbuilding, but there are some indirect connections that could tie into the broader context of Hyundai' s business, especially regarding the  LNG  component and their shipbuilding division:
So while the primary focus of this specific investment is on automotive, energy, and advanced technologies, the  LNG  and  steel production  aspects could indirectly support Hyundai&rsquo s shipbuilding sector.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
29-Mar-2025 13:03
|
||||
|
x 0
x 4 Alert Admin |
It' s doesn' t matter anymore  Hyundai just announce investment for steel plant and most of LNG in USA. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
hkl8828
Member |
29-Mar-2025 07:04
|
||||
|
x 2
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Holdings Ltd (YZJSGD SP): USTR' s public hearing this week, what do we expect?   Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Holdings Ltd (YZJSGD SP): USTR' s public hearing this week, what do we expect?DBS Group Research  25 Mar 2025
Combing through the 60 testimonies submitted at USTR portal,  we observed  75% of organisations request to appear at the public hearing expressed concerns  on the hefty port fees&rsquo potential impact to US businesses and economies as well as doubts about the effectiveness of the measures against Chinese shipbuilding dominance. (See excel attached for details) Though, there are also some supportive voices from labour unions, steel producers, and U.S. shipbuilding advocates. The debate underscores the challenge of balancing trade enforcement with economic realities. It remains to be seen if the proposed action will be passed after  public hearing on 24th and 26th Mar. However, the odds seem to be in favour of  watered-down  actions if USTR is pressing ahead, with some panellists suggesting  alternative fee structure, phased implementation, exemption on existing fleet and orders etc. Good opportunity to accumulate Yangzijiang on unwarranted pullback.    The proposed actions have  dampened sentiment on Chinese shipbuilders, though, we believe impact might be limited at this point.  The US proposed actions targeting at Chinese shipbuilding might affect  near-term ordering  activities, which has slowed down in 1Q25 due in part to long delivery lead time with slots available from 2028. This could also cause divergence in  newbuild and secondhand prices  of Chinese and non-Chinese built vessels to some extent. It is probably hard to quantify impact for now, as most shipping companies have guided passing through the  higher port fees  to cargo owners. Both Chinese ship operators and shipbuilders are also  exploring solutions  such as shifting routes, forming allies or seeking production base outside of China to deal with the situations. We find comfort that  key shipyards are full  for next 3-years providing sufficient time to react to potential policy change. Shipbuilding capacity remains tight  driven by fleet rejuvenation, energy transition trend and rising demand for defence vessels, making it challenging to find available slots outside of world largest shipbuilding nation China (> 50% global capacity) as well. In addition, shipbuilding  value chain takes years to build, require access to cost competitive steel supply and skilled labour.  Yangzijiang is the only listed key shipping/shipbuilding company in the region that is heavily penalised (down 20-30% vs the Chinese shipbuilding and shipping peers that are largely steady) on USTR news, which could be driven by some profit-taking after a good rally prior to the news. As the world 3rd largest shipbuilding group by orderbook with strong balance sheet, we believe Yangzijiang has wide economic moat to weather this through and emerge stronger. Valuation is  attractive at 7x FY25PE  and  1.6x PB, considering  24-25% ROE  and  5-6% dividend  yield with  ~8-10% CAGR. Don&rsquo t miss the boat! What&rsquo s happening Based on USTR Comments Portal, there are 66 submissions requesting to appear at public hearing to be held on 24th and 26th Mar concerning proposed action pursuant to the Section 301 Investigation of China&rsquo s Targeting of the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance. We combed through the 60 testimonies submitted and here are some key takeaways: 1) 75% expressed concerns  Most acknowledge government&rsquo s good intent on reviving US Shipbuilding industry, but 75% of the organisations expressed  concerns  on hefty port fees and potential implications on business and consumers. In particular,    shipping, port, agriculture, energy, mining and retail industries overwhelmingly oppose the proposed measures, citing economic harm and inefficacy. 
Some  supportive  voices came from labour unions, steel producers, and U.S. shipbuilding advocates.  2) Reasons for Concerns  Key Concerns Across Sectors:
3) Counter-Proposals Counter-Proposals Suggested:
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
rayokc
Senior |
28-Mar-2025 15:42
|
||||
|
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
punctured. everyday drops a few cents. soon to go below $2. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
minichart
Member |
28-Mar-2025 08:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://www.minichart.com.sg/2025/03/28/from-oil-rigs-to-green-ships-veteran-analyst-lim-siew-khee-maps-the-future-of-energy-and-shipping/   From Oil Rigs to Green Ships: Veteran Analyst Lim Siew Khee Maps the Future of Energy and Shipping
For companies repurposing offshore support vessels for wind projects offers a &ldquo sweet spot.&rdquo Thank you
  |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
beng1102
Elite |
27-Mar-2025 20:13
|
||||
|
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
Short selling in many counters surged today likely due to the latest auto tariff.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
joehoe
Member |
27-Mar-2025 14:18
|
||||
|
x 2
x 0 Alert Admin |
US plan to tax Chinese ships hits choppy waters as backlash intensifiesShipping bodies urged US policymakers to scrap a controversial port-fee proposal during hearings in Washington" The US government is facing growing opposition over its plans to introduce steep fees targeting Chinese-linked ships entering American ports, with global shipping bodies and industry experts slamming the proposals as &ldquo disruptive&rdquo and counterproductive. The comments come as the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR)  holds two days of public hearings  in Washington over the policy, which would impose charges of up to US$1.5 million per port call for any shipping operator with Chinese-made vessels in their fleets or newbuilding orders with Chinese shipyards.
USTR has claimed the port fees, which it  first proposed last month, are necessary to protect America&rsquo s national security and combat the dominance of China&rsquo s shipbuilding industry, which the USTR judges to be built on unfair government subsidies.
 
But the idea has sparked intense criticism from within the shipping industry, with insiders arguing the fees will harm the competitiveness of America&rsquo s own maritime sector while  failing to curtail China&rsquo s lead.
 
&ldquo If implemented as proposed, it will be an extremely large disruptive event for shipments to and from the US, and with ripple effects which will subsequently be felt also in non-US trades,&rdquo said Lars Jensen, CEO of industry consultancy Vespucci Maritime, in a social media post on Tuesday. During the first day of the hearings on Monday, representatives from several maritime groups &ndash including two Chinese industry associations &ndash urged policymakers to rethink the proposal and pursue a more effective approach to reviving America&rsquo s shipping industry, according to testimonies and comments posted on the USTR website. The China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry (CANSI), which was represented at Monday&rsquo s hearing by its secretary general, Li Yanqing, described the proposed port fees as &ldquo erroneous and inoperative&rdquo in its testimony. CANSI insisted it was open to the US&rsquo efforts to revitalise its shipbuilding sector, and that China could even be a potential partner in this process. But the US was simply using its accusations against China as an &ldquo excuse&rdquo to impose port service fees on global shipping companies, the association argued.   The China Shipowners&rsquo Association (CSA), which had four representatives at Monday&rsquo s hearing, said the proposed actions targeting Chinese-built vessels and Chinese shipping companies directly infringed upon China&rsquo s status as a &ldquo most-favoured nation&rdquo under World Trade Organization rules. The CSA also alleged the proposal was in direct contravention of the 2003 Sino-US Maritime Agreement, particularly Article 6, which stipulates that vessels from the two countries shall receive fair and non-discriminatory treatment regarding port access, services and fees when calling at each other&rsquo s ports. &ldquo The decline of the US merchant fleet predates the rapid development of China&rsquo s shipping industry,&rdquo the CSA said in its comment. Joe Kramek, president of the World Shipping Council (WSC), a non-profit association representing the liner shipping industry, stated at Monday&rsquo s hearing that the WSC &ldquo strongly opposes&rdquo the USTR&rsquo s port-fee plan.  
Though a revitalisation of the US maritime sector would be very positive, the introduction of &ldquo backward-looking, retroactive fees on shipping companies&rdquo   would be unlikely to achieve this, Kramek said, adding that USTR should work with stakeholders of all types to develop &ldquo practical and thoughtful ways&rdquo to achieve its goals.
The proposed fees would raise costs for shipping companies by millions of dollars per voyage, as container vessels serving the US market typically call at three to four ports in the country per trip, according to Kramek. About 98 per cent of all US port calls could be subject to the charges, which would amount to an additional tax on American consumers of up to US$30 billion annually, according to WSC estimates. The damage to US imports and exports would be significant, and jobs and businesses that rely on ports would also be affected, Kramek added. Meanwhile, Kramek pointed out that there were currently only 30 US-built container ships active today, with an average age of 24 years &ndash meaning most are near the end of their typical lifespan of 20-30 years. The US&rsquo ability to quickly build and flag a larger fleet is also severely limited by a lack of shipbuilding labour and certified mariners, he added. Therefore, &ldquo the proposed requirements for exportation on US-built vessels and US-flagged vessels, if applied to container ships, would not be realistic for many years into the future&rdquo , Kramek said. The Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO), another leading global shipping association, warned of the risk of a segregated US market, as operators may reallocate their fleets to avoid the port fees. US imports and exports account for about 12 per cent of global seaborne trade, so any reorganisation of maritime trade would have a much larger impact on the US than on the rest of the world, while &ldquo their impact on Chinese dominance is much less certain&rdquo , BIMCO said in a letter to USTR published last week. American business groups have also voiced opposition to the proposals. On Monday, the National Retail Federation and the Retail Industry Leaders Association submitted joint comments to the USTR, warning that the proposal&rsquo s harmful effects would ripple across the national economy. &ldquo US businesses and consumers will take the brunt of these service charges and be forced to bear increased costs for a wide array of commodities with little to no alternatives as many, if not all, of the leading ocean carriers capable of meeting US shipping needs use Chinese-built vessels in their fleets,&rdquo the two organisations wrote. "   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ssw518
Supreme |
27-Mar-2025 13:45
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
Most of the counters, short covering is during closing, just look at the matching volume you know. Just need to hold tight, when no seller, it will auto move up. Meanwhile, trader might get caught left or right.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
beng1102
Elite |
27-Mar-2025 12:47
|
||||
|
x 0
x 2 Alert Admin |
So much negative news is helping short covering to buy back at low price.  It is boring so far.  I have temporarily switch to ISDN.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
dontbetray
Master |
27-Mar-2025 10:58
|
||||
|
x 0
x 5 Alert Admin |
good or bad?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

