Back

Latest Forum Topics / OUE Healthcare    Last:0.046    +0.006

Post Reply

IHC Post Reply Rate topic
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 23:04        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Is there a clause inserted (subject to sgx exch approval) to say they don't have to buy up the rest of the remaining share?. In case o, if this n is that... teeth53      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 22:56) Posted: Mandatory offered at $0.106c n unless they says so (eg: like final offer) if they don't, then they hust leave it as it is... n if they does @$0.107c. They will have to pick up the rest @$0.107c to go private (90%). Wondering was IHC going private?, for HMC. Think they want to retain listing statue. For Auric Pacific case. They said is the final offered. TechnicalTrader      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 21:49) Posted: isn' t it that if they buy from one fellow .107, they must buy all at .107? Just some investors expecting a bigger offer..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
happyharvest Elite	17-Feb-2017 23:02        happyharvest About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	do you have the link? teeth53      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 23:00) Posted: By the way. Quarz CapItal Mgt. I read that they want to tender out their services. Their stakes in IHC.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
TechnicalTrader Master	17-Feb-2017 23:01        TechnicalTrader About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Technical   Mood: Yells: "Traders perform TA using TI. Success rely on Technique used"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	don' t think so hard... out of our control.... wait see how price move  teeth53      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 22:56) Posted: Mandatory offered at $0.106c n unless they says so (eg: like final offer) if they don't, then they hust leave it as it is... n if they does @$0.107c. They will have to pick up the rest @$0.107c to go private (90%). Wondering was IHC going private?, for HMC. Think they want to retain listing statue. For Auric Pacific case. They said is the final offered. TechnicalTrader      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 21:49) Posted: isn' t it that if they buy from one fellow .107, they must buy all at .107? Just some investors expecting a bigger offer..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 23:00        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	By the way. Quarz CapItal Mgt. I read that they want to tender out their services. Their stakes in IHC.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 22:56        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Mandatory offered at $0.106c n unless they says so (eg: like final offer) if they don't, then they hust leave it as it is... n if they does @$0.107c. They will have to pick up the rest @$0.107c to go private (90%). Wondering was IHC going private?, for HMC. Think they want to retain listing statue. For Auric Pacific case. They said is the final offered. TechnicalTrader      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 21:49) Posted: isn' t it that if they buy from one fellow .107, they must buy all at .107? Just some investors expecting a bigger offer.. teeth53      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 20:07) Posted: IHC Pre-mkt. Price Q-ing willing to trade @0.107c. Were Riady' s going to pick from open mk or oni @0.106ct?. Like Auric Pacific. They only willing to pick up @1.65c (no more, no less).
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
TechnicalTrader Master	17-Feb-2017 21:49        TechnicalTrader About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Technical   Mood: Yells: "Traders perform TA using TI. Success rely on Technique used"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	isn' t it that if they buy from one fellow .107, they must buy all at .107? Just some investors expecting a bigger offer.. teeth53      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 20:07) Posted: IHC Pre-mkt. Price Q-ing willing to trade @0.107c. Were Riady' s going to pick from open mk or oni @0.106ct?. Like Auric Pacific. They only willing to pick up @1.65c (no more, no less). happyharvest      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 14:28) Posted: still trading halt. what news they gona release? merging of HMC and IHC?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
happyharvest Elite	17-Feb-2017 21:04        happyharvest About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	why Riady want to pick from open mkt at higher price? teeth53      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 20:07) Posted: IHC Pre-mkt. Price Q-ing willing to trade @0.107c. Were Riady' s going to pick from open mk or oni @0.106ct?. Like Auric Pacific. They only willing to pick up @1.65c (no more, no less). happyharvest      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 14:28) Posted: still trading halt. what news they gona release? merging of HMC and IHC?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 20:07        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	IHC Pre-mkt. Price Q-ing willing to trade @0.107c. Were Riady' s going to pick from open mk or oni @0.106ct?. Like Auric Pacific. They only willing to pick up @1.65c (no more, no less). happyharvest      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 14:28) Posted: still trading halt. what news they gona release? merging of HMC and IHC?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 19:59        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	A chk on Auric Pacific, oso target to go private by Riady' s. Another 165,200 shr were pick up from open mkt. Yesterday were 80.04%. Today added, reached 80.17% or +0.13% happyharvest      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 15:42) Posted: agree. hold on for better times pool100      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 14:58) Posted: Oxley selling to OUE at dirt cheap price doesn' t mean that the rest of the shareholders have to kamikaze and do the same. Fact is the NAV is much higher than the offer price. 10.6 cent should now be the floor going forward now that OUE are willing to pay that much for Oxley' s stake. Remaining shareholders should reject the mandatory offer and hold tight for much better price.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
happyharvest Elite	17-Feb-2017 15:42        happyharvest About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	agree. hold on for better times pool100      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 14:58) Posted: Oxley selling to OUE at dirt cheap price doesn' t mean that the rest of the shareholders have to kamikaze and do the same. Fact is the NAV is much higher than the offer price. 10.6 cent should now be the floor going forward now that OUE are willing to pay that much for Oxley' s stake. Remaining shareholders should reject the mandatory offer and hold tight for much better price.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
pool100 Veteran	17-Feb-2017 14:58        pool100 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Oxley selling to OUE at dirt cheap price doesn' t mean that the rest of the shareholders have to kamikaze and do the same. Fact is the NAV is much higher than the offer price. 10.6 cent should now be the floor going forward now that OUE are willing to pay that much for Oxley' s stake. Remaining shareholders should reject the mandatory offer and hold tight for much better price.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
happyharvest Elite	17-Feb-2017 14:28        happyharvest About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	still trading halt. what news they gona release? merging of HMC and IHC?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
happyharvest Elite	17-Feb-2017 14:00        happyharvest About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	the future is bright for IHC and HMC shareholders! hang on there while both are being merged to form a bigger group. cost will be reduced as well! gogogo teeth53      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 12:38) Posted: Update Feb 17 - OUE takeover bid brings relief to IHC bondholders OUE has launched a takeover bid, bringing a sense of relief to long-suffering bond and equity investors of the IHC Grp.. OUE acquired a 35.77% stake from IHC major shareholders Ching Chiat Kwong, Low See Ching, Low Been Lan and Tee Wee Sien, bringing its overall shareholding to 57.60% and triggering a mandatory general takeover.  On Jan 23.OUE announced a 12.54% stake in IHC and further lifted its holding to 21.83% in early Feb. IHC's bond terms stated, a change of control will occur if n when the combined stakes of Fan, Aathar Ah Kong Andrew and Jong and their family members fall under 30% of the issued share capital. Noted - Fan reduced his direct n indirect stake from 23% to 13.4% in early Feb.  Bondholders are expected to welcome the takeover bid as it brings firepower and a long-term investor to IHC. IHC has faced financial and shareholder challenges for several mths, including a delayed coupon payment last August. Both Ching n Low, Oxley Holdings, after taken control of IHC's board thereafter, Oxley n two individuals offered convertible loan upto S$50m to resolve IHC's liquidity, including repayment of a bond due in April. IHC has two outstanding bonds - a S$50m 7% bond due on April 27 and a S$50m 6% note due Feb 6 2018. OUE is offering to takeover via subsidiary Treasure Int'l Holdings, with Standard Chartered and Credit Suisse as advisers. Offering S$0.106 in cash, a 1.9% premium over share price on Feb 14, before a trading halt was called on Feb 15. OUE is also making a takeover bid for Healthway Medical Corp (HMC) via Lippo Grp. Both Lippo and OUE were business empire of Indonesia's Riady family.  If they are eventually merged through OUE, IHC n HMC will have come full circle. IHC was set up as a joint venture with HMC to own and operate overseas medical centres while HMC is one of the largest private healthcare in Singapore. Thomsonreuters.com
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 12:38        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Update Feb 17 - OUE takeover bid brings relief to IHC bondholders OUE has launched a takeover bid, bringing a sense of relief to long-suffering bond and equity investors of the IHC Grp.. OUE acquired a 35.77% stake from IHC major shareholders Ching Chiat Kwong, Low See Ching, Low Been Lan and Tee Wee Sien, bringing its overall shareholding to 57.60% and triggering a mandatory general takeover.  On Jan 23.OUE announced a 12.54% stake in IHC and further lifted its holding to 21.83% in early Feb. IHC's bond terms stated, a change of control will occur if n when the combined stakes of Fan, Aathar Ah Kong Andrew and Jong and their family members fall under 30% of the issued share capital. Noted - Fan reduced his direct n indirect stake from 23% to 13.4% in early Feb.  Bondholders are expected to welcome the takeover bid as it brings firepower and a long-term investor to IHC. IHC has faced financial and shareholder challenges for several mths, including a delayed coupon payment last August. Both Ching n Low, Oxley Holdings, after taken control of IHC's board thereafter, Oxley n two individuals offered convertible loan upto S$50m to resolve IHC's liquidity, including repayment of a bond due in April. IHC has two outstanding bonds - a S$50m 7% bond due on April 27 and a S$50m 6% note due Feb 6 2018. OUE is offering to takeover via subsidiary Treasure Int'l Holdings, with Standard Chartered and Credit Suisse as advisers. Offering S$0.106 in cash, a 1.9% premium over share price on Feb 14, before a trading halt was called on Feb 15. OUE is also making a takeover bid for Healthway Medical Corp (HMC) via Lippo Grp. Both Lippo and OUE were business empire of Indonesia's Riady family.  If they are eventually merged through OUE, IHC n HMC will have come full circle. IHC was set up as a joint venture with HMC to own and operate overseas medical centres while HMC is one of the largest private healthcare in Singapore. Thomsonreuters.com
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Lepin888 Veteran	17-Feb-2017 08:23        Lepin888 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Property property property...this is what it has but....hope hope hope is what it needs so downside is 10.6
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 07:09        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Look more likely, their  intention is to maintain the listing status of the Company. happyharvest      ( Date: 17-Feb-2017 00:16) Posted: voluntary offer has condition which if not met, the offer is invalid.   mandantory offer has no condition which the offerer can receive as many acceptance as possible. I think this should be the difference? happyharvest      ( Date: 16-Feb-2017 23:56) Posted: meaning shareholders can choose not to accept the offer? If by mandantory, means all shareholders have to sell the shares at the offer price? But OUE also want to maintain listing status.  Confusing.. haha " The Offeror' s present intention is to maintain the listing status of the Company. However, in the event the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied at the close of the Offer, the Offeror will assess the options available at that time. Accordingly, the Offeror may decide not to take steps to preserve the listing status of the Company on the SGX-ST if the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied"
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Lepin888 Veteran	17-Feb-2017 00:57        Lepin888 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I think the Otley pair was more than happy to exit this mess....hahaha...pass the baby on..phew
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
happyharvest Elite	17-Feb-2017 00:16        happyharvest About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	voluntary offer has condition which if not met, the offer is invalid.   mandantory offer has no condition which the offerer can receive as many acceptance as possible. I think this should be the difference? happyharvest      ( Date: 16-Feb-2017 23:56) Posted: meaning shareholders can choose not to accept the offer? If by mandantory, means all shareholders have to sell the shares at the offer price? But OUE also want to maintain listing status.  Confusing.. haha " The Offeror' s present intention is to maintain the listing status of the Company. However, in the event the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied at the close of the Offer, the Offeror will assess the options available at that time. Accordingly, the Offeror may decide not to take steps to preserve the listing status of the Company on the SGX-ST if the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied" checkmate      ( Date: 16-Feb-2017 23:34) Posted: Offer is for all. They were generous to offer a 1.9% premium over last done with 21.5% below NAV, and threw in a freebie threat to delist.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
teeth53 Supreme	17-Feb-2017 00:05        teeth53 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Was wondering what will be happening to HMC S70 millions, who sponsor name called - Gateway fund.   happyharvest      ( Date: 16-Feb-2017 23:56) Posted: meaning shareholders can choose not to accept the offer? If by mandantory, means all shareholders have to sell the shares at the offer price? But OUE also want to maintain listing status.  Confusing.. haha " The Offeror' s present intention is to maintain the listing status of the Company. However, in the event the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied at the close of the Offer, the Offeror will assess the options available at that time. Accordingly, the Offeror may decide not to take steps to preserve the listing status of the Company on the SGX-ST if the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied" checkmate      ( Date: 16-Feb-2017 23:34) Posted: Offer is for all. They were generous to offer a 1.9% premium over last done with 21.5% below NAV, and threw in a freebie threat to delist.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
happyharvest Elite	16-Feb-2017 23:56        happyharvest About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	meaning shareholders can choose not to accept the offer? If by mandantory, means all shareholders have to sell the shares at the offer price? But OUE also want to maintain listing status.  Confusing.. haha " The Offeror' s present intention is to maintain the listing status of the Company. However, in the event the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied at the close of the Offer, the Offeror will assess the options available at that time. Accordingly, the Offeror may decide not to take steps to preserve the listing status of the Company on the SGX-ST if the Free Float Requirement is not satisfied" checkmate      ( Date: 16-Feb-2017 23:34) Posted: Offer is for all. They were generous to offer a 1.9% premium over last done with 21.5% below NAV, and threw in a freebie threat to delist. happyharvest      ( Date: 16-Feb-2017 22:45) Posted: as you mentioned in the other thread, oxley may be needing this money. this offer is only to the " vendors" not to the other shareholders if I' m not wrong
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   241-260 of 1131   Older>   Last