Back

Latest Forum Topics / Vallianz    Last:0.056 --

Post Reply

Will it Break 10cents again??? Post Reply Rate topic
RedEye1811 Master	18-Jan-2016 09:27        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Agree with you that still a worry about their gearing....they at one point seem to want to improve it, but then take a step back looking to take more loans...hopefully they not going to go backwards and have gearing deteriorate again...as no announcement today and still a trading halt then must be something ' big' ....which is likely not good...for my uneducated guess feels more like a placement/rights issue...but as Charisma Energy just requested a halt perhaps they buying each other out... sheerluck      ( Date: 18-Jan-2016 00:24) Posted: Ok lah.  Mgmt just want to show how prudent they are... Anyway, expect a very much inproved gearing from Vallianz due to their FE.  Borrowing might increased.  Swiber 2 lai liao. RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 16:35) Posted: The only known outcome of the halt was price did not move. The price could have potentially gone up. If calling a trading halt how would they have known if price fall or rise? At time call halt they would not have a clue if go up or down so what is their motive to call a halt simply to ensure no price change? If market had risen (do recall US on Thursday night rose) then price could have risen so they have egg on face. In hindsight market went down, but that in hindsight. At time calling halt knowing if price go up or down is unknown. So why would they " maybe" wish as part of their strategy want to call a halt to prevent a shift (either up or down) of price? Logic of an assertion - irrelevant of if state " maybe" - is questionable...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	18-Jan-2016 00:24        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Ok lah.  Mgmt just want to show how prudent they are... Anyway, expect a very much inproved gearing from Vallianz due to their FE.  Borrowing might increased.  Swiber 2 lai liao. RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 16:35) Posted: The only known outcome of the halt was price did not move. The price could have potentially gone up. If calling a trading halt how would they have known if price fall or rise? At time call halt they would not have a clue if go up or down so what is their motive to call a halt simply to ensure no price change? If market had risen (do recall US on Thursday night rose) then price could have risen so they have egg on face. In hindsight market went down, but that in hindsight. At time calling halt knowing if price go up or down is unknown. So why would they " maybe" wish as part of their strategy want to call a halt to prevent a shift (either up or down) of price? Logic of an assertion - irrelevant of if state " maybe" - is questionable... sheerluck      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 15:40) Posted: Aiyo you must have vested interest. Anyway, that news doesn' t warrant a trading halt, right?  But Vallianz still called it.  We don' t know what is Vallianz intention for the halt but one effect out of it is the price has not chance of moving (down?) that day.  So the outcome is for sure and the intention is anyone guess.  That' s why I started my sentence with " Maybe" ......
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	17-Jan-2016 16:35        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	The only known outcome of the halt was price did not move. The price could have potentially gone up. If calling a trading halt how would they have known if price fall or rise? At time call halt they would not have a clue if go up or down so what is their motive to call a halt simply to ensure no price change? If market had risen (do recall US on Thursday night rose) then price could have risen so they have egg on face. In hindsight market went down, but that in hindsight. At time calling halt knowing if price go up or down is unknown. So why would they " maybe" wish as part of their strategy want to call a halt to prevent a shift (either up or down) of price? Logic of an assertion - irrelevant of if state " maybe" - is questionable... sheerluck      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 15:40) Posted: Aiyo you must have vested interest. Anyway, that news doesn' t warrant a trading halt, right?  But Vallianz still called it.  We don' t know what is Vallianz intention for the halt but one effect out of it is the price has not chance of moving (down?) that day.  So the outcome is for sure and the intention is anyone guess.  That' s why I started my sentence with " Maybe" ...... RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 14:06) Posted: Only small cap do it??...so how many small cap doing it then?...since start of year many small cap had big decline...how many rushing to use trading halt as way to stop price decline...Hint: not many if any...so where your logic here...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	17-Jan-2016 15:40        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Aiyo you must have vested interest. Anyway, that news doesn' t warrant a trading halt, right?  But Vallianz still called it.  We don' t know what is Vallianz intention for the halt but one effect out of it is the price has not chance of moving (down?) that day.  So the outcome is for sure and the intention is anyone guess.  That' s why I started my sentence with " Maybe" ...... RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 14:06) Posted: Only small cap do it??...so how many small cap doing it then?...since start of year many small cap had big decline...how many rushing to use trading halt as way to stop price decline...Hint: not many if any...so where your logic here... sheerluck      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 13:11) Posted: Aiyo, only small cap do such thing. big cap no time for this
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	17-Jan-2016 14:06        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Only small cap do it??...so how many small cap doing it then?...since start of year many small cap had big decline...how many rushing to use trading halt as way to stop price decline...Hint: not many if any...so where your logic here... sheerluck      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 13:11) Posted: Aiyo, only small cap do such thing. big cap no time for this. RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 11:38) Posted: Then why is not everyone doing it....relative to many counters this not the worse by any stretch...Keppel, SembCorp, etc gone down as hard if not harder...so if calling a trading halt will be a magic pill they would be all doing it...so what the logic behind such a proposition....
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	17-Jan-2016 13:11        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Aiyo, only small cap do such thing. big cap no time for this. RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 11:38) Posted: Then why is not everyone doing it....relative to many counters this not the worse by any stretch...Keppel, SembCorp, etc gone down as hard if not harder...so if calling a trading halt will be a magic pill they would be all doing it...so what the logic behind such a proposition.... sheerluck      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 11:09) Posted: Maybe also took opportunity to halt price declining
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	17-Jan-2016 11:38        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Then why is not everyone doing it....relative to many counters this not the worse by any stretch...Keppel, SembCorp, etc gone down as hard if not harder...so if calling a trading halt will be a magic pill they would be all doing it...so what the logic behind such a proposition.... sheerluck      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 11:09) Posted: Maybe also took opportunity to halt price declining. RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 09:12) Posted: It was no news...announcement on January 7 already indicated this...this simply confirmation...this announcement really not something need a trading halt on...as they yet to request a lifting of trading halt, I have suspicion they have more significant announcement yet to make...if they buying two new vessels then if in financial distress stupid to be buying vessels...so now have doubts it a rights issue or placement...could be wrong but would seem silly..perhaps they acquiring another firm, being sold off or perhaps they got a contract with an Iranian firm and with sanctions about to be lifted then timing would fit...only guessing but last announcement not meaningful so suspect something else to follow as trading halt not lifted...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	17-Jan-2016 11:09        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Maybe also took opportunity to halt price declining. RedEye1811      ( Date: 17-Jan-2016 09:12) Posted: It was no news...announcement on January 7 already indicated this...this simply confirmation...this announcement really not something need a trading halt on...as they yet to request a lifting of trading halt, I have suspicion they have more significant announcement yet to make...if they buying two new vessels then if in financial distress stupid to be buying vessels...so now have doubts it a rights issue or placement...could be wrong but would seem silly..perhaps they acquiring another firm, being sold off or perhaps they got a contract with an Iranian firm and with sanctions about to be lifted then timing would fit...only guessing but last announcement not meaningful so suspect something else to follow as trading halt not lifted... LC1188      ( Date: 16-Jan-2016 19:30) Posted: http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/VHL_Annt.receipt.of.LQ.notice.for.consideration.shares.15.01.2016.ashx?App=Announcement& FileID=386058   Gd news or bad news?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	17-Jan-2016 09:12        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	It was no news...announcement on January 7 already indicated this...this simply confirmation...this announcement really not something need a trading halt on...as they yet to request a lifting of trading halt, I have suspicion they have more significant announcement yet to make...if they buying two new vessels then if in financial distress stupid to be buying vessels...so now have doubts it a rights issue or placement...could be wrong but would seem silly..perhaps they acquiring another firm, being sold off or perhaps they got a contract with an Iranian firm and with sanctions about to be lifted then timing would fit...only guessing but last announcement not meaningful so suspect something else to follow as trading halt not lifted... LC1188      ( Date: 16-Jan-2016 19:30) Posted: http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/VHL_Annt.receipt.of.LQ.notice.for.consideration.shares.15.01.2016.ashx?App=Announcement& FileID=386058   Gd news or bad news?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
LC1188 Member	16-Jan-2016 19:30        LC1188 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/VHL_Annt.receipt.of.LQ.notice.for.consideration.shares.15.01.2016.ashx?App=Announcement& FileID=386058   Gd news or bad news?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	15-Jan-2016 16:53        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	doubt they post any statements/announcements today....likely going to be Monday morning at the earliest...if a placement like they did back in middle 2014 then be several days before know...so if holding not going to be a comfortable weekend...placement or rights issue?? Which will it be...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
LC1188 Member	15-Jan-2016 16:52        LC1188 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	if not bcos of suspension i already jib this morning at 4.2cent. Heng ahh.....
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
LC1188 Member	15-Jan-2016 16:26        LC1188 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	placement share or right issues at current sentiment mean the company is in financial distress.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
DummyA Senior	15-Jan-2016 15:30        DummyA About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	if there is a rights issues, the better way is to sell and cut loss.. and buy back at a later stage.. BB will sure to press the price down so that they can collect rights.. and once the rights exercised, they will then pump it up again.. not 100% but it happens very often this way
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	15-Jan-2016 14:41        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	The share placement or rights issue is my view also....not good....only negative news to come... moron101      ( Date: 15-Jan-2016 09:33) Posted: Could be shares placement or rights issues. . Need monies as they bought new vessels recently..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
moron101 Supreme	15-Jan-2016 09:33        moron101 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Could be shares placement or rights issues. . Need monies as they bought new vessels recently..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
LC1188 Member	15-Jan-2016 08:28        LC1188 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Trading halt.....gd news or.........???
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
jackong1979 Master	09-Jan-2016 07:30        jackong1979 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Next week time for this counter. Enjoy the huat for cny 2016 cheers
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
moron101 Supreme	07-Jan-2016 17:35        moron101 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Si liao. 4 cents.. who is still buying.. better wake up.. oil may drop to 30 usd soon..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Jeromelow Senior	29-Dec-2015 15:13        Jeromelow About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	0.05 cents is a wall , when it breaks through , it will go up and up
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   2021-2040 of 2773   Older>   Last