Back

Latest Forum Topics / YuuZoo Networks

Post Reply

Yuuzoo Next Alibaba Fast -Grow E-commerce Post Reply Rate topic
commontrader Member	23-Nov-2016 11:46        commontrader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	so much sellers... Total 63 1,895.80 - 2,887.80 - - - 4,783.60
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	23-Nov-2016 09:37        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Will gems pump.and dump??? Wat roles that gems in yuuzoo?? sheerluck      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 17:38) Posted: GEM now holds 55mil share which is about 7.65%.   Need to report to SGX unless GEM has in the process disposed off those shares in open market keeping them below 5%.   Will know latest in 3 days time.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
halleluyah Supreme	23-Nov-2016 09:29        halleluyah About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Ah zoo cant b trusted...no wonder till now still din get an auditor....vry fishy business....not vested...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
commontrader Member	23-Nov-2016 09:28        commontrader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	powerless... not even a day with proper uptrend
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	23-Nov-2016 09:16        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Sgx pls query yuuzoo if informations is real...... anthonykwong      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 23:53) Posted: how come such info only disclose now ? Lurker251      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 23:46) Posted: Law360, New York (July 26, 2016, 8:18 PM EDT) -- Investors in Yuuzoo Corp. Ltd. have urged a New York federal judge to reject the social media company&rsquo s bid to disqualify  McCue Sussmane & Zapfel PC  from representing the investors as they pursue securities fraud claims, saying that Yuuzoo stretched the truth in its request.    Yuuzoo had asked for disqualification because it wants attorney Kenneth Sussmane to testify about an October 2014 meeting with Yuuzoo chairman Thomas Zilliacus. But Hecklerco LLC and fellow investors, who claim Yuuzoo executives and others used shell corporations to illegally sell company shares and report nonexistent revenue, said that Sussmane and his firm needn&rsquo t be disqualified since nothing from the 2014 meeting requires his testimony &mdash a point investors say is supported by Zilliacus&rsquo affidavit. &ldquo The Zilliacus account of the October 2014 meeting fails to raise any possibility Mr. Sussmane is a necessary witness, as Mr. Zilliacus was not willing to make the false statements under oath that defendant&rsquo s counsel was willing to make in defendant&rsquo s brief,&rdquo the investors wrote in a Monday opposition brief. Yuuzoo  had claimed  that Sussmane met with Zilliacus in October 2014 and said his clients would file a suit against the company unless a settlement could be reached. Yuuzoo claimed that during that meeting, Zilliacus admitted that the case had no factual basis and only existed in light of Yuuzoo&rsquo s &ldquo deep pocket.&rdquo The investors on Monday said that that account is inaccurate, reflected in the affidavit of Zilliacus. Even if it were true, they said, Sussmane was merely offering his opinion. &ldquo Defendants fail to identify a single fact about which Sussmane would be competent to testify,&rdquo the investors wrote. &ldquo Even if the alleged statements were made ... they would be mere statements of Mr. Sussmane&rsquo s view of the case.&rdquo Hecklerco claimed in July 2015 that Yuuzoo and its management knowingly made false statements that duped the investors into both buying tens of thousands of shares of Yuuzoo stock and making a $245,000 loan to the founder and former president of Yuuzoo, Ron Creeve. The investors claim that Yuuzoo grossly overstated its value at more than $380 million, inflated its sales figures and failed to tell investors that accounting irregularities had prompted the  U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission  to reject the company&rsquo s bid to trade publicly in the U.S. Wells Fargo Advisors LLC, which arranged and negotiated the loan, is accused of breach of fiduciary duty by the investors. Hecklerco is represented by Kenneth Sussmane of McCue Sussmane & Zapfel PC. Yuuzoo is represented by Marc Alan Pergament of Weinberg Kaley Gross & Pergament LLP. Wells Fargo Advisors is represented by Toby S. Soli of  Greenberg Traurig LLP. The case is Hecklerco LLC et al. v. Wells Fargo Advisors LLC et al., case number  1:15-cv-05779, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
anthonykwong Supreme	22-Nov-2016 23:53        anthonykwong About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	how come such info only disclose now ? Lurker251      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 23:46) Posted: Law360, New York (July 26, 2016, 8:18 PM EDT) -- Investors in Yuuzoo Corp. Ltd. have urged a New York federal judge to reject the social media company&rsquo s bid to disqualify  McCue Sussmane & Zapfel PC  from representing the investors as they pursue securities fraud claims, saying that Yuuzoo stretched the truth in its request.    Yuuzoo had asked for disqualification because it wants attorney Kenneth Sussmane to testify about an October 2014 meeting with Yuuzoo chairman Thomas Zilliacus. But Hecklerco LLC and fellow investors, who claim Yuuzoo executives and others used shell corporations to illegally sell company shares and report nonexistent revenue, said that Sussmane and his firm needn&rsquo t be disqualified since nothing from the 2014 meeting requires his testimony &mdash a point investors say is supported by Zilliacus&rsquo affidavit. &ldquo The Zilliacus account of the October 2014 meeting fails to raise any possibility Mr. Sussmane is a necessary witness, as Mr. Zilliacus was not willing to make the false statements under oath that defendant&rsquo s counsel was willing to make in defendant&rsquo s brief,&rdquo the investors wrote in a Monday opposition brief. Yuuzoo  had claimed  that Sussmane met with Zilliacus in October 2014 and said his clients would file a suit against the company unless a settlement could be reached. Yuuzoo claimed that during that meeting, Zilliacus admitted that the case had no factual basis and only existed in light of Yuuzoo&rsquo s &ldquo deep pocket.&rdquo The investors on Monday said that that account is inaccurate, reflected in the affidavit of Zilliacus. Even if it were true, they said, Sussmane was merely offering his opinion. &ldquo Defendants fail to identify a single fact about which Sussmane would be competent to testify,&rdquo the investors wrote. &ldquo Even if the alleged statements were made ... they would be mere statements of Mr. Sussmane&rsquo s view of the case.&rdquo Hecklerco claimed in July 2015 that Yuuzoo and its management knowingly made false statements that duped the investors into both buying tens of thousands of shares of Yuuzoo stock and making a $245,000 loan to the founder and former president of Yuuzoo, Ron Creeve. The investors claim that Yuuzoo grossly overstated its value at more than $380 million, inflated its sales figures and failed to tell investors that accounting irregularities had prompted the  U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission  to reject the company&rsquo s bid to trade publicly in the U.S. Wells Fargo Advisors LLC, which arranged and negotiated the loan, is accused of breach of fiduciary duty by the investors. Hecklerco is represented by Kenneth Sussmane of McCue Sussmane & Zapfel PC. Yuuzoo is represented by Marc Alan Pergament of Weinberg Kaley Gross & Pergament LLP. Wells Fargo Advisors is represented by Toby S. Soli of  Greenberg Traurig LLP. The case is Hecklerco LLC et al. v. Wells Fargo Advisors LLC et al., case number  1:15-cv-05779, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Lurker251 Senior	22-Nov-2016 23:46        Lurker251 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Law360, New York (July 26, 2016, 8:18 PM EDT) -- Investors in Yuuzoo Corp. Ltd. have urged a New York federal judge to reject the social media company&rsquo s bid to disqualify  McCue Sussmane & Zapfel PC  from representing the investors as they pursue securities fraud claims, saying that Yuuzoo stretched the truth in its request.    Yuuzoo had asked for disqualification because it wants attorney Kenneth Sussmane to testify about an October 2014 meeting with Yuuzoo chairman Thomas Zilliacus. But Hecklerco LLC and fellow investors, who claim Yuuzoo executives and others used shell corporations to illegally sell company shares and report nonexistent revenue, said that Sussmane and his firm needn&rsquo t be disqualified since nothing from the 2014 meeting requires his testimony &mdash a point investors say is supported by Zilliacus&rsquo affidavit. &ldquo The Zilliacus account of the October 2014 meeting fails to raise any possibility Mr. Sussmane is a necessary witness, as Mr. Zilliacus was not willing to make the false statements under oath that defendant&rsquo s counsel was willing to make in defendant&rsquo s brief,&rdquo the investors wrote in a Monday opposition brief. Yuuzoo  had claimed  that Sussmane met with Zilliacus in October 2014 and said his clients would file a suit against the company unless a settlement could be reached. Yuuzoo claimed that during that meeting, Zilliacus admitted that the case had no factual basis and only existed in light of Yuuzoo&rsquo s &ldquo deep pocket.&rdquo The investors on Monday said that that account is inaccurate, reflected in the affidavit of Zilliacus. Even if it were true, they said, Sussmane was merely offering his opinion. &ldquo Defendants fail to identify a single fact about which Sussmane would be competent to testify,&rdquo the investors wrote. &ldquo Even if the alleged statements were made ... they would be mere statements of Mr. Sussmane&rsquo s view of the case.&rdquo Hecklerco claimed in July 2015 that Yuuzoo and its management knowingly made false statements that duped the investors into both buying tens of thousands of shares of Yuuzoo stock and making a $245,000 loan to the founder and former president of Yuuzoo, Ron Creeve. The investors claim that Yuuzoo grossly overstated its value at more than $380 million, inflated its sales figures and failed to tell investors that accounting irregularities had prompted the  U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission  to reject the company&rsquo s bid to trade publicly in the U.S. Wells Fargo Advisors LLC, which arranged and negotiated the loan, is accused of breach of fiduciary duty by the investors. Hecklerco is represented by Kenneth Sussmane of McCue Sussmane & Zapfel PC. Yuuzoo is represented by Marc Alan Pergament of Weinberg Kaley Gross & Pergament LLP. Wells Fargo Advisors is represented by Toby S. Soli of  Greenberg Traurig LLP. The case is Hecklerco LLC et al. v. Wells Fargo Advisors LLC et al., case number  1:15-cv-05779, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
anthonykwong Supreme	22-Nov-2016 23:26        anthonykwong About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	so you mean yuucorp or yuuzoo have another e commerce website ? what is it ? golden_SGX      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 23:01) Posted: try to visit : www.alibaba.com don' t tell me what you see .... enjoy yourself ! thank you anthonykwong      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:33) Posted: try visit your company : www.yuuzoo.com browse around tell me what you see thank you
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
anthonykwong Supreme	22-Nov-2016 23:15        anthonykwong About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	it shows your ignorance ! go shopping dont go alibaba we go taobao tmall golden_SGX      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 23:01) Posted: try to visit : www.alibaba.com don' t tell me what you see .... enjoy yourself ! thank you anthonykwong      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:33) Posted: try visit your company : www.yuuzoo.com browse around tell me what you see thank you
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
golden_SGX Master	22-Nov-2016 23:01        golden_SGX About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	try to visit : www.alibaba.com don' t tell me what you see .... enjoy yourself ! thank you anthonykwong      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:33) Posted: try visit your company : www.yuuzoo.com browse around tell me what you see thank you HongLimPark      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:06) Posted: Bought 100k shares at 0.162 and keeping till it reaches at least 0.205
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Lurker251 Senior	22-Nov-2016 22:59        Lurker251 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Of course there is money to be made. Once a while you may heng heng buy before a big   annoucement..  But the risk reward is extremely low. May give you a 10% upside.  Once the audit blew up again or revenue found to be paper revenue. This stock might be worrh 0. I do not hold any position in this stock. My aim is just to prevent fellow investor from getting burnt.   golden_SGX      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 21:04) Posted: Wonder what go thru people' s mind when they DON' T buy this stock.... yet come here to post. must be those katek, possible trying to spread bad rumors. Lurker251      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 20:38) Posted: Wonder what go thru people' s mind when they buy this stock. Year end coming, auditor still no news.  Revenue cannot be proven Asset cannot be proven High Franchiee revenue but never say which ecommerce website is using their Yuuzoo engine.  High turnover in senior management Stock exchange annoucement not transparent, like to play up numbers. Share price usually go UP before major annoucement.   i guessed if retailer like us get burnt, can only say we deserved it.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
anthonykwong Supreme	22-Nov-2016 22:46        anthonykwong About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	the e commerce web design keeps changing ... once there were wines to be ordered... even have charity purchases something like that....like you buy something, they say they donate a % to charity (not sure which charity though) ... i want to order something ? simple, taobao xxx and have shipment tracking updates too edwinjup      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:42) Posted: Download the app also... anthonykwong      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:33) Posted: try visit your company : www.yuuzoo.com browse around tell me what you see thank you
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	22-Nov-2016 22:42        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Download the app also... anthonykwong      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:33) Posted: try visit your company : www.yuuzoo.com browse around tell me what you see thank you HongLimPark      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:06) Posted: Bought 100k shares at 0.162 and keeping till it reaches at least 0.205
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
anthonykwong Supreme	22-Nov-2016 22:33        anthonykwong About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	try visit your company : www.yuuzoo.com browse around tell me what you see thank you HongLimPark      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 22:06) Posted: Bought 100k shares at 0.162 and keeping till it reaches at least 0.205
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
HongLimPark Senior	22-Nov-2016 22:06        HongLimPark About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Bought 100k shares at 0.162 and keeping till it reaches at least 0.205
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
anthonykwong Supreme	22-Nov-2016 22:06        anthonykwong About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	i will not touch this stock why ? reason : cos some holder called me Chink here (nah, i not so petty, say it for fun) i agree with Lurker251 points of view and i will study GEM Funds later p.s. i still prefer to manage my own $. when we put our $ with funds management companies, question is : do we have a control over it?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
golden_SGX Master	22-Nov-2016 21:04        golden_SGX About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Wonder what go thru people' s mind when they DON' T buy this stock.... yet come here to post. must be those katek, possible trying to spread bad rumors. Lurker251      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 20:38) Posted: Wonder what go thru people' s mind when they buy this stock. Year end coming, auditor still no news.  Revenue cannot be proven Asset cannot be proven High Franchiee revenue but never say which ecommerce website is using their Yuuzoo engine.  High turnover in senior management Stock exchange annoucement not transparent, like to play up numbers. Share price usually go UP before major annoucement.   i guessed if retailer like us get burnt, can only say we deserved it.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
gavin211 Member	22-Nov-2016 20:58        gavin211 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	i finish shorting liao. time to long bros
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Lurker251 Senior	22-Nov-2016 20:38        Lurker251 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Wonder what go thru people' s mind when they buy this stock. Year end coming, auditor still no news.  Revenue cannot be proven Asset cannot be proven High Franchiee revenue but never say which ecommerce website is using their Yuuzoo engine.  High turnover in senior management Stock exchange annoucement not transparent, like to play up numbers. Share price usually go UP before major annoucement.   i guessed if retailer like us get burnt, can only say we deserved it.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
edwinjup Supreme	22-Nov-2016 17:55        edwinjup About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Hee...if never report....think gems already unload...to u all liao... sheerluck      ( Date: 22-Nov-2016 17:38) Posted: GEM now holds 55mil share which is about 7.65%.   Need to report to SGX unless GEM has in the process disposed off those shares in open market keeping them below 5%.   Will know latest in 3 days time.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   1741-1760 of 7931   Older>   Last