| Latest Forum Topics / UOB Last:38.31 -- |
|
|
UOB
|
|||||
|
Knightmyst
Member |
04-Aug-2020 13:28
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Forever a laggard. No matter what other brokerage house and even how much they recommend uob, it is forever a laggard. Always Low pb yet cannot climb fast. Good thing I don' t have its shares. It should start analysing how to boost its share prices. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sharenoob1984
Veteran |
04-Aug-2020 13:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I think UOB is the " safest" of the 3 banks. so its not as volatile as DBS or OCBC as they have bigger exposures in China. Accordingly, if there is a US-China trade war, DBS and OCBC will drop alot more. Also the fact is DBS has a higher P/E ratio than UOB now due to its earning potential. Eventually market should self correct. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Knightmyst
Member |
04-Aug-2020 12:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I am saying uob brokerage house in my opinion is the most dishonest of all. Always post analyst report that talk rubbish. All their recommendations should be taken with pinch of salt. And is not the first time. It should analyse its own shares instead and give reason why uob always lagging before dbs. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
sharenoob1984
Veteran |
04-Aug-2020 11:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
bro knight, you were referring to UOB as a bank should watch its own back? or a poster here
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Knightmyst
Member |
03-Aug-2020 19:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Uob, you should watch your share price. Instead of recommending sell for strong stock like hi-p to obscene Low valuation of $1.11 with no basis. The other time being bearish about venture at $13, so what happen? Did it even reach your $13? Now bearish hi p, when hi p quoted profit guidance same as last year, there is no reason to be too bearish. Uob analyst should be watching your UOB stock instead of being bearish on others. Your stock is the biggest loser. hi p FY2020 profit guidance can even mention similar profit as FY2019. Can u safely say ur company can even give similar strong profit this year. Hi p last year profit and stock goes to $1.68 last year. With similar profit guidance, by right, it should be near there too this year. Don' t cheat us. I know how it works. Take care of your own stock instead churning rubbish sky high dbs stock price analyst, and bottom scraping technology stock prices.  I know how to count fair value of individual company and not rely on really rubbish analysis from you |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
03-Aug-2020 09:14
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Singapore banks face scrutiny on asset quality at upcoming Q2 results
As companies struggle to cope with virus fallout, potential loan default risk from SMEs may weigh on earnings
 
MOUNTING concerns over asset quality are likely to take centre stage at the upcoming quarterly results of Singapore' s banking trio as companies brace for a prolonged crisis.
 
With businesses facing a triple whammy of lockdowns, a deep recession and the gradual unwinding of relief support measures, analysts say there is already potential loan default risk from virus-battered small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that will, in turn, weigh on banks' earnings in the second quarter.
 
Net profit is widely expected to come down for Singapore banks, with growing pressure as well to pull back on dividend payouts amid the regulator' s call to shore up capital.
 
Citi analyst Robert Kong said Q2 is likely to be the quarterly earnings trough for DBS and UOB. He is looking at DBS' s Q2 profit falling 37 per cent year-on-year OCBC, 29 per cent and UOB, 39 per cent.
 
As Singapore sinks into a deeper recession, there is " low visibility" on the pace of economic recovery, he noted.
 
Amid the sluggish operating environment, analysts flagged that SME loans, in particular, will come under pressure of default.
 
DBS analyst Lim Rui Wen said the sector' s Q2 earnings could take a hit from larger-than-expected non-performing loans (NPLs) from various sectors or as combined with commodities-related exposure.
 
While UOB and OCBC' s oil and gas exposures have " largely been taken care of" , Ms Lim said she remains watchful on asset quality, especially in the SME space, as higher credit costs could be indicators of an acceleration in economic slowdown.
 
She forecast that every 10 basis points (bps) uptick in credit costs might impact sector earnings by some 7-8 per cent.
 
Maybank-Kim Eng' s head of research Thilan Wickramasinghe said lockdown-driven NPLs are likely to pick up pace in Q2, particularly in the hardest-hit frontline sectors.
 
" Provisioning costs should see material quarter-on-quarter momentum as the brunt of regional lockdowns and economic downgrades manifest," said Mr Wickramsinghe.
 
About 12 per cent of Singapore' s economy is at the " epicentre" of the Covid-19 crisis, with the pandemic due to structurally impair some sectors, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said in July.
 
CGS-CIMB has estimated for credit costs in Q2 to stay elevated at around 54 to 66 basis points (bps) from overlays, a pre-emptive move against potential credit quality deterioration at the end of the year.
 
Citi' s Mr Kong flagged a potential second round of asset quality pressure, due either to a second wave of Covid-19 cases - at worst case requiring a further period of lockdown - or with SMEs and unemployment impacted by the " cliff effect" of loan moratoria wearing off.
 
MAS has sent a fresh signal that government relief measures will have to start tapering off by end-December 2020. It would be unsustainable to have them continue indefinitely, given worries on debt accumulation, it said in July.
 
This revives questions on the full impact of such unprecedented relief on banks' earnings, which comes as some " zombie companies" are likely hanging on merely by the government' s helplines.
 
One uncertainty for the banks comes as a part of their quarterly income reflects accrued income from borrowers taking a debt holiday.
 
Maybank-Kim Eng estimated that about 12-16 per cent of total loans are under moratorium and other relief schemes from the local banks.
 
Citi' s Mr Kong said it may be prudent for investors to consider upcoming interim dividends on the basis that the banks' reported accounting earnings are higher than actual cash earnings received, even as the disparity is not material at this stage.
 
Another thing to note is the likelihood of such loans souring into bad debt when the moratoria eventually expire. Recent MAS data showed that more than 5,300 SMEs' secured loans have received repayment deferments till end-December 2020. To add, more than 10,600 enterprises have also taken up about S$9.4 billion of loans between March and June via Enterprise Singapore schemes.
 
The three local banks are also estimated to have granted payment deferments to more than S$15 billion worth of mortgages as at the end of June this year. All in, the total value of deferred mortgages in Singapore make up almost 10 per cent of all outstanding mortgages.
 
The S$15-billion worth of deferred mortgages account for nearly 80 per cent of approved mortgage debt relief applications, a MAS spokesperson told The Business Times last week.
 
DBS' Ms Lim said various mortgage and debt moratoria for SMEs amounting to S$26.4 billion will expire towards year-end, though she expects applications for moratoria to be on the rise through year-end.
 
Jefferies analyst Krishna Guha has factored in a peak NPL ratio of about 3.5 per cent for the sector, compared with the current 1.6 per cent.
 
While moratoria are expected to stay only till year-end, repayment schedules may be worked over the next two years. This is likely to lead to a protracted credit cycle, he said. " Further, revenue outlook is uncertain."
 
Phillip Securities Research analyst Tay Wee Kuang told BT it would be a " wild guess" on the eventual default rate arising from at-risk loans. Meanwhile, the banks have set aside allowances to cater for future losses.
 
The eventual impact on bank earnings when loan moratoria taper off will largely depend on the amount of government aid that banks can receive - should conditions worsen beyond expectations, Mr Tay noted.
 
DBS' Ms Lim is expecting the weaker second-half outlook to persist beyond 2020 in the absence of a virus vaccine. " We believe extensions to moratoriums into Q1 2021 may be given, on a targeted approach."
 
With the recent collapse of benchmark interest rates, analysts have also projected record-worst net interest margin (NIM) compression in Q2 that will impact the sector' s interim dividend payout. Q2 NIMs are widely expected to be near their all-time post-global financial crisis (GFC) low.
 
CGS-CIMB analyst Andrea Choong cautioned that the risk of lower interim dividends due to NIM headwinds may trigger some profit-taking by investors. " With benchmark rates close to bottoming out, we think NIM declines in coming quarters will be comparatively subdued."
 
Q2 will likely mark the bottoming out of quarterly NIMs, said Jefferies' Mr Guha. While steep rate declines will pose a drag to margins and revenue, banks are likely to benefit from lower deposit rates.
 
That being said, he noted that earnings are unlikely to recover to FY19 levels over the next three years.
 
Questions around dividends come too as MAS last week called on Singapore banks to cap dividends for FY2020 at 60 per cent of the amount in the previous financial year, in a move to conserve capital amid the uncertain climate.
 
Shareholders should also be offered the option of receiving the dividends to be paid for FY2020 in scrip in lieu of cash, said MAS.
 
Analysts cautioned that banks are likely to see steep declines in share price in the short term following MAS' s announcement on the dividend cap. On Thursday, a day after MAS' s announcement, DBS shares closed 63 cents lower at S$19.77, OCBC shares fell 34 cents to S$8.56, and UOB shares dropped 63 cents to S$19.39. The Singapore Exchange was closed on Friday due to a public holiday.
 
DBS and UOB will report their Q2 earnings and interim dividends on Aug 6, while OCBC will wrap up the results season on Aug 7.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
03-Aug-2020 09:13
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Will MAS dividend cap prompt DBS, OCBC and UOB to downplay their performance?
If banks can reward neither shareholders nor management, they might as well front-load bad loan provisions in 2020
 
THIS past week, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) dealt a blow to investors by calling on the local banks to cap their dividends.
 
" We are fortunate that banks in Singapore entered the Covid-19 pandemic with strong capital positions. All the same, MAS wants to ensure the banks' capital buffers remain ample in the face of significant uncertainties ahead, so that they can sustain lending to the economy," said MAS managing director Ravi Menon, in a statement on July 29.
 
Specifically, MAS wants the local banks to cap their dividends per share for FY2020 at 60 per cent of what they paid for FY2019. MAS also wants the banks to offer their shareholders the option of receiving their FY2020 dividends in scrip in lieu of cash. " We have carefully calibrated the restriction on dividends, taking into account the needs of investors who may rely on this income," Mr Menon added, in the statement.
 
The move by MAS was hardly a bolt from the blue. Only a fortnight ago, Mr Menon said that MAS was in close discussions with the local banks on their capital management, and flagged the possibility of their dividends being restricted.
 
Yet, the market reacted quite negatively to the imposition of the dividend cap. The day after MAS made its statement, shares in DBS, OCBC and UOB suffered declines of 3.09 per cent, 3.82 per cent and 3.15 per cent, respectively. The benchmark Straits Times Index fell 1.7 per cent on the same day.
 
Why was the market seemingly so unprepared for the dividend cap?
 
One possible reason is that many investors believed the appropriate moment for such regulatory action has passed. If the purpose of the dividend cap is to ensure that the banks have ample capital buffers to sustain their lending activities, then surely MAS should have acted in March, when increasingly tough measures to curb Covid-19 were being implemented and financial markets were crumbling.
 
The second possible reason for the negative market reaction is that the dividend cap was viewed as a signal of sorts from MAS that the local banks should now adopt a more prudent stance in their operations. Interestingly, its statement included this line: " MAS encourages banks to conserve and carefully manage their capital, by exercising restraint in discretionary expenditure and management compensation."
 
This seems out of step with the current mood in the market, which is geared towards expectations of a rebound in economic activity as Covid-19 restrictions are gradually lifted or modified.
 
MAS shifted position
 
Some background might be useful here.
 
MAS did, in fact, unveil several regulatory and supervisory measures in early April to help the banking system cope with the Covid-19 fallout.
 
Among other things, MAS loosened certain capital and liquidity requirements for banks, to allow them greater capacity to support borrowers, until September 2021. MAS also advised the banks to consider the " extraordinary measures" taken by the government when assessing the impact of Covid-19 on the economy and estimating loan loss allowances.
 
MAS told the banks at the time that sustaining lending activities should take priority over discretionary distributions. It did not, however, put any limits on their dividend payouts. " While MAS does not see a need to restrict banks' dividend policies, the release of capital buffers should not be used to finance share buybacks during this period," MAS said in a statement on April 7.
 
Since April, all three of the local banks have paid out dividends that were higher than corresponding payouts in previous years.
 
On June 5, OCBC paid a final dividend with respect to FY2019 of S$0.28 per share. Along with an interim dividend of S$0.25 per share paid last year, its total dividend payout for FY2019 was S$0.53 per share.
 
For FY2018, OCBC paid an interim dividend of S$0.20 per share and a final dividend of S$0.23 per share, for a total of S$0.43 per share.
 
On June 29, UOB paid out a final dividend of S$0.55 per share as well as a special dividend of S$0.20 per share with respect to FY2019. Including an interim dividend of S$0.55 per share paid last year, its total dividend payout for FY2019 was S$1.30 per share.
 
For FY2018, UOB paid an interim dividend of S$0.50 per share, a final dividend of S$0.50 per share and a special dividend of S$0.20 per share, amounting to a total of S$1.20 per share.
 
Then there was DBS. On May 26, it not only paid a final dividend of S$0.33 per share for FY2019 but also an interim dividend of S$0.33 per share for Q1 2020.
 
For FY2019, DBS paid interim dividends of S$0.30 per share for the first three quarters of the year. Along with the final dividend, that adds up to a total dividend of S$1.23 per share. For FY2018, DBS paid an interim dividend of S$0.60 and a final dividend of S$0.60, for a total of S$1.20 per share.
 
While MAS took its time restricting dividend payouts by the local banks, regulators in the UK acted more aggressively at the outset. Earlier this year, HSBC and Standard Chartered said that they would withhold dividends they had already declared for 2019, and suspend their interim dividends for 2020, at the behest of their regulators in the UK.
 
Managing virus impact
 
To be clear, I am not arguing against regulatory curbs on bank dividends during times of uncertainty. Back in March, this column called for the local banks to stop their share buyback activities and cap their dividends in order to preserve their capital.
 
Yet, the local banks are well-capitalised and well-provisioned, and things are not as uncertain as they were four months ago. While Covid-19 remains a problem, countries around the world are becoming more adept at managing the virus. In fact, at least one analyst has been speculating about the possibility of blow-out 2Q 2020 earnings at DBS.
 
Daniel Tabbush of the Tabbush Report, who publishes on Smartkarma, pointed out in a July 14 research note that total impairment costs at DBS hit S$1,086 million in Q1 2020, versus S$703 million for the whole of 2019. Meanwhile, oil prices have rebounded strongly, reducing the risks DBS faces in the energy sector.
 
" With oil and gas credit risk effectively cratering and a reopening of the Singapore economy and with sharply better economies in most regions globally, credit costs can end up being markedly lower during Q2 2020," Mr Tabbush said, in the report.
 
Of course, even if the banks are in good shape, some segments of the economy will feel a great deal of pain in the quarters ahead because of ongoing efforts to contain Covid-19.
 
This past week, The Business Times reported that the three local banks had granted payment deferments to more than S$15 billion worth of mortgages as at June 30. In addition, SMEs have deferred principal payments on some S$11.4 billion of secured loans.
 
As the fiscal measures that have enabled businesses to keep their doors open and their workers employed begin to expire in the months ahead, there could well be a surge in loan defaults, bankruptcies and fire-sales of collateral.
 
This shouldn' t pose too much risk to the banks though. DBS alone had a gross customer loan book worth S$362.4 billion as at end-FY2019. Of that, S$168.7 billion related to loans to Singapore customers. For FY2019, DBS reported total income of S$14.5 billion, and net profit of nearly S$6.4 billion.
 
However, with MAS now seemingly demanding more prudence, DBS and its peers might choose to front-load bad loan provisions in the remaining quarters of this year. After all, if they can reward neither their shareholders nor their management in FY2020, they might as well try to postpone any improvement in profitability until FY2021.
 
Indeed, it may not be a bad thing to avoid unseemly profits while the country is hurting.
 
Research house Jefferies is now forecasting FY2020 dividends of S$0.87 per share for DBS, S$0.31 per share for OCBC, and S$0.78 per share at UOB. Its previous dividend per share forecasts were S$1.23, S$0.46 and S$0.90, respectively.
 
On those dividend forecasts, the three banks are now trading at yields of 3.6 per cent to 4.4 per cent, versus 4.6 per cent to 6.2 per cent previously.
 
DBS and UOB are due to report their H1 financial results on Aug 6, while OCBC is scheduled to report on Aug 7.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kandinsky
Master |
29-Jul-2020 09:18
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Sg stocks are really rubbish. When other markets rally, we don't follow, when they drop, we will follow. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
CheeryVGoh
Supreme |
27-Jul-2020 17:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You are right, MAS will leave it up to the individual banks to decide their dividend payout.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kandinsky
Master |
27-Jul-2020 16:32
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
They should continue to reward shareholders with dividends, no reason for them not to pay especially when banks had been profitable for years before covid. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
FATABA
Supreme |
27-Jul-2020 16:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
True ....but MAS did not discourage dividend payout if I am not wrong ....its all up to the individual banks.  I am confident DBS wld pay /  UOB shld have 50c I hope  Dyodd
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kandinsky
Master |
27-Jul-2020 16:12
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just curious how many here have been holding the bank stocks since pre-covid. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
CheeryVGoh
Supreme |
27-Jul-2020 13:22
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
MAS has discouraged share buybacks, recommending that banks keep the capital for lending purposes. Banks are encouraged by our govt to support SMEs during the pandemic.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Vietshare
Member |
27-Jul-2020 12:54
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Short of international players entering our market, bank stock prices will, in all honesty, remain range bound.  Their prices may go up when (1) share buyback occurs and/or (2) performance exceeds broking houses' predictions.  The later we should know by August. Meanwhile, considering that their prices are below their Price Book values, it does not hurt to buy and hold them IMO.  After all, you are very likely to continue to enjoy dividend payout once or twice a year.   
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Djsoul80
Master |
27-Jul-2020 10:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I take back my words. After much 2nd thought to be honest, banking shares can performed very badly as well. If you catch at the wrong price, you may stuck your positions for at least a year or more. Maybe have to really ask yourself if it's worth to take the gamble in long run. I will wait for the banking shares to crash further to March low. It's kinda risky at this current price to hold as well. Anything above $20 for the banking stock during this pandemic, it's high risk to hold. May need to put into freezer for at least a year or 2.or even 4 years to see a good profit for the compensation on your time effort put in.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Djsoul80
Master |
27-Jul-2020 09:56
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Will see UOB rushing up towards with DBS @$22 per share! | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
kennethkzy
Member |
24-Jul-2020 09:33
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
waiting to enter at 19 dollar | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
uiop1223
Supreme |
23-Jul-2020 15:04
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Waiting for trade deal phase 1 to be cancelled. Stock crash is good | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Djsoul80
Master |
23-Jul-2020 15:03
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Slow running... No drink red bull... 😅
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Vietshare
Member |
22-Jul-2020 17:07
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I hate to say this but the analyst likely to get this right.  After all, it' s from a DBS analyst (or group)! However, if you' re an investor then you ought to look at the fundamental for the long haul.  For me, its very simple - the only business that will never borrow money is banking while the rest has to borrow, primarily from banks, to sustain or grow their businesses if their profit margins do not cover reinvestment and dividend payout. In short, bank will normally dish out dividend even in hard times IMO.  We shall see what happens in the coming reporting cycle which is not too far away.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||


