Latest Forum Topics /
DBS
Last:63.78
-0.36
|
|
|
DBS
|
|||||
|
john_ric
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 22:25
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
dow dropping. tmr to break 14.80 to test 14.70 | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
famouspinky
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 21:49
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Why bother? Currently longist have to support their claims very hard.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
WanSiTong
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 21:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Debt-stressed KrisEnergy exploring equity raising and asset sales AUG 16, 2016, The Straits Times While KrisEnergy has not yet breached its covenant, the firm is aware of the financial obligations lying ahead, chief financial officer Kiran Raj told The Straits Times. " Acknowledging what our capital requirements are for the next 12 to 18 months, which include potentially the refinancing of our notes, our board is looking at all options, including (the issuance of) equity and equity-linked instruments, as well as asset divestment , " he added. The amount to be raised is up to US $ 150 million (S $ 201 million) by this year end. Mr Raj was referring to two outstanding KrisEnergy bonds: $ 130 million, 6.25 per cent notes due on June 9, 2017, and $ 200 million, 5.75 per cent notes due on Aug 22, 2018. KrisEnergy reported a negative working capital position as at June 30, after the reclassification of the debt due in 2017 as current liabilities. KrisEnergy has 19 contract areas -. Essentially oil and gas fields If needed, the ones where it has high or full working interest may be tabled for divestment and capital-raising. STRATEGIC INVESTOR With a strategic investor like Keppel Corp, I do not see KrisEnergy going Swiber' s way....KGI Fraser Securities " For instance, our Udan Emas block in East Indonesia, we have 100 per cent working interest in our Bala-Balakang block we have 85 per cent working interest ... Blocks that we have a large interest in, we will always look for partners to bring us down to the 50 per cent range, " the firm' s business development director Richard Lorentz said. Keppel Corp, which owns 40.5 per cent of KrisEnergy, may also come to its rescue. Mr Raj said Keppel is represented on KrisEnergy' s board, which does not rule out a private placement as one of the equity options for capital raising. He thanked Keppel for " nurturing KrisEnergy' s relationship with DBS" . This may refer to the fact that in June, KrisEnergy transferred to DBS a US $ 108.3 million revolving credit facility, which was upsized last month to US $ 148.3 million. A DBS spokesman said: " This revolving credit facility is the only loan we have granted to Kris- Energy The facility is underpinned by a credit enhanced structure and is fully secured.." Keppel Corp declined to comment. The affiliation with Keppel is a bright spot, KGI Fraser Securities analyst Joel Ng said. " With a strategic investor like Keppel Corp, I do not see KrisEnergy going Swiber' s way. But ... with a stressed balance sheet and weak cash flow, the outlook is not very positive for at least the next six months."  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Immortal
Master |
16-Aug-2016 20:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Right on 14.81....hope dun break | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
investshare
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 16:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Agree. It also depends on your priority and assumption. Good luck to you too.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
willisow
Master |
16-Aug-2016 16:41
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hey pal, sorry for being so LOH soh..there is neither right or wrong when come to valuation becos it is an estimation..just that I see so many ppl are concern with loan provision from our local banks thus just want to share my little opinion..good luck to u guys n make more money :p |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
investshare
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 16:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi Bro willisow, thanks for your reply. I am not quoting our originals here, it is too long :) I understand where you are coming from, and yes they are valid. For myself, in DBS case, my priority now is more on protection. So the valuation method i use is book value discount method. At current price, market already discount about $4-$5b from DBS book value. This is almost equivalent to price in 50% of DBS $20b exposure in O& G will fail, and DBS can recover 50% from them. I am comfortable with this safety margin now as DBS other business is doing well. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Immortal
Master |
16-Aug-2016 16:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
as long as 14.81 can hold, got chance for upside |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
investshare
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 16:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Doesn' t really matter, I am comfortable holding DBS at a price with 10% discount from book value. Unless if bad debt higher than operating profit, which will then erode book value. Else, as we speak, it is halfway into the quarter, and DBS could hv locked in $0.5b profit already, based on $1b/quarter.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
seanpent
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 16:22
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
refused to go below 14.80 ?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
WanSiTong
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 16:10
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
KrisEnergy has a US $ 148.3 million (S $ 199.74 million) secured revolving credit facility with DBS which matures on June 30, 2018 DBS Ordinary shares: Balance at 30 June: 2,531,481,221 shares If we take the full amount of S $ 199.74 million / 2,531,481,221 shares = 7.89 cents Do not forget this is a secured revolving credit facility. A secured credit is borrowed against a tangible asset as collateral.  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
willisow
Master |
16-Aug-2016 16:00
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi pal, thanks for your reply...let me explain in details :) there are two methods of valueing a company and they are the relative (PE method) or the absolute method (cash flow and balance sheet). PE method basically is a relative relatiionship between the earning and the share price. In fact if a company earning is consistent the change in a pe ratio is a result of a change in the share price and thus we can say that pe ratio is a measurement of the mkt sentiment of the stock itself. if we use the net profit which comprises the non recurring income or expenses it will distort your pe ratio..during time when company have non recurring income it will push down the pe ration vice versa thus it will result in a volatile pe ratio, in this case it will be difficult to estimate the valuation becos the formula are based on pe multiply by earning, if the pe ratio itself is volatile meaning one part of the formula is inconsistent then your valuation will be volatile as well. you will find that at time when the company report high net profit due to non recurring high income or low non recurring expenses, your valuation will explode..example if a company sell a property or subsidiary and etc, this one time transaction will explode your valuation for that particular year and your valuation will drop drastically following the next year. if you uses the absolute method it basically explain even more clearer to you...when evaluating a company using cashflow and its balancesheet we are basically looking into two things, future cashflow at present value and balance sheet at present value. loan provision will be added back to the cashflow becos firstly they are not cash related and we do not expect the same amount of provision to be provided in the future coming years. Example if a company get into a litigation issue most company will set aside an amount as provision for the litigation just in case they lose the lawsuit, this expense will be added back into the cashflow becos it is an non recurring item, we do not expect the company to provide the same provision year after year into the future and at infinity,. however this provision will be deducted from the balancesheet and most of the time as an investor we do not take amount declared by the company as the real provision for deduction. Example if a company announce they set aside 1million, as a investor we shouold raise this number by 50% or more..by deducting from the balancesheet it will be recorded as a one time transaction. Not only non recurring items are deducted from the balancesheet in fact we need to adjust the balancesheet..reason being is very simple, the balancesheet record item on accounting basis and not market value basis (some will show market value but not for all item). Example under the fixed assets, if a company have fixed assets as vehicle, in the balancesheet will show the net book value after deducting the accumulated depreciation from the cost of buying the vehicle however that net book value doesnt mean it is the market value becos we want to know the estimated cash from the balancesheet plus the future cashflow from the operation to find out the estimated value of the company, thus we cant take the figure as given by the company but will have to adjust the value of the fixed asset by ourselve. someone who own a car will know that once he drive his new car down the road the mkt value is not equal to his purchase value, The market value could be just 70% of his purchase value...thus the amount of loan provision provided by banks will not be taken into consideration both from the pe ratio (relative method) or the cashflow from the operation but it wil be deducted from the balancesheet of the bank and we will have to increase that provison by ourselve and not taking what the bank provided for. Thank you :)
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
willisow
Master |
16-Aug-2016 16:00
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi pal, thanks for your reply...let me explain in details :) there are two methods of valueing a company and they are the relative (PE method) or the absolute method (cash flow and balance sheet). PE method basically is a relative relatiionship between the earning and the share price. In fact if a company earning is consistent the change in a pe ratio is a result of a change in the share price and thus we can say that pe ratio is a measurement of the mkt sentiment of the stock itself. if we use the net profit which comprises the non recurring income or expenses it will distort your pe ratio..during time when company have non recurring income it will push down the pe ration vice versa thus it will result in a volatile pe ratio, in this case it will be difficult to estimate the valuation becos the formula are based on pe multiply by earning, if the pe ratio itself is volatile meaning one part of the formula is inconsistent then your valuation will be volatile as well. you will find that at time when the company report high net profit due to non recurring high income or low non recurring expenses, your valuation will explode..example if a company sell a property or subsidiary and etc, this one time transaction will explode your valuation for that particular year and your valuation will drop drastically following the next year. if you uses the absolute method it basically explain even more clearer to you...when evaluating a company using cashflow and its balancesheet we are basically looking into two things, future cashflow at present value and balance sheet at present value. loan provision will be added back to the cashflow becos firstly they are not cash related and we do not expect the same amount of provision to be provided in the future coming years. Example if a company get into a litigation issue most company will set aside an amount as provision for the litigation just in case they lose the lawsuit, this expense will be added back into the cashflow becos it is an non recurring item, we do not expect the company to provide the same provision year after year into the future and at infinity,. however this provision will be deducted from the balancesheet and most of the time as an investor we do not take amount declared by the company as the real provision for deduction. Example if a company announce they set aside 1million, as a investor we shouold raise this number by 50% or more..by deducting from the balancesheet it will be recorded as a one time transaction. Not only non recurring items are deducted from the balancesheet in fact we need to adjust the balancesheet..reason being is very simple, the balancesheet record item on accounting basis and not market value basis (some will show market value but not for all item). Example under the fixed assets, if a company have fixed assets as vehicle, in the balancesheet will show the net book value after deducting the accumulated depreciation from the cost of buying the vehicle however that net book value doesnt mean it is the market value becos we want to know the estimated cash from the balancesheet plus the future cashflow from the operation to find out the estimated value of the company, thus we cant take the figure as given by the company but will have to adjust the value of the fixed asset by ourselve. someone who own a car will know that once he drive his new car down the road the mkt value is not equal to his purchase value, The market value could be just 70% of his purchase value...thus the amount of loan provision provided by banks will not be taken into consideration both from the pe ratio (relative method) or the cashflow from the operation but it wil be deducted from the balancesheet of the bank and we will have to increase that provison by ourselve and not taking what the bank provided for. Thank you :)
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
seanpent
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 15:58
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
still sitting on nice profit probably break even if it retreat to around 14.63 - 14.65 (taking into consideration commissions) ?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Immortal
Master |
16-Aug-2016 15:57
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I hope 14.81 can hold |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
investshare
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 15:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Possible. My average is $14.9, after dividend is $14.6.  Vested:    05/08 $14.86  08/08 $14.91    10/08 $14.90  12/08 $15.05      
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
seanpent
Supreme |
16-Aug-2016 15:47
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
is 14.60 or 14.50  the next immediate support ?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
haruta
Elite |
16-Aug-2016 15:46
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I thought somebody said wait for $10? Or below?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lionking
Member |
16-Aug-2016 15:41
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
waiting to buy at 14.60 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
infoshare
Senior |
16-Aug-2016 14:41
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
  : http://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/krisenergy-warns-debt-covenants-may-come-under-stress   Outlook of NPL for DBS seems not positive was want to imagine   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

