Latest Forum Topics /
CSE Global
Last:1.16
-0.02
|
 Post Reply
|
|
CSE Global
|
|||||
|
ayy002
Senior |
26-Jun-2026 20:39
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Looks like 1.25 coming | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
LoudShout
Master |
26-Jun-2026 09:26
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I put it to free access Google Gemini to comment on the forum contributor' s article on " Bright Day" and attach the response. Like all AI generated contents, it stands to be corrected. Quote: The article provides a solid, constructive take on the corporate governance tension at CSE Global, but it definitely views the situation through rose-tinted glasses. Calling it a " bright day" or a sweeping victory for SGX regulation overlooks some glaring structural lag times, severe market impact, and gaps in the actual regulatory process. Let&rsquo s break down the realities of this saga, looking closely at the timeline, the severe share price hit, and whether the regulatory intervention actually hit the mark. 1. The Timeline and Share Price RealitiesWhile the article celebrates SGX RegCo for extracting information, it glides right past the 14-day vacuum of public silence that punished ordinary retail investors.
The Impact of a 14-Day Information VacuumTwo weeks is an eternity in equity markets. Because the initial disclosure on June 2 was incredibly vague, the market was left to assume the absolute worst. This was magnified by the fact that CSE Global was simultaneously undergoing a high-stakes strategic review by Jefferies. Speculation went wild&mdash was there a massive accounting red flag? A hidden operational failure?As a result, the share price plummeted more than 20% during this period of radio silence. Institutional funds and nimble traders could manage risk, but retail investors who didn' t know why the lead ID and Audit Chair walked out were left holding a heavily depreciated asset. 2. Is the Clarification " Satisfactory" for SGX RegCo?Yes and no. It is satisfactory in terms of raw transparency, but deeply troubling regarding the corporate governance health it exposed.What it achieved:SGX RegCo succeeded under its " buyer beware" framework by forcing both sides to lay their cards on the table. The resulting document was unusually candid, exposing a classic boardroom clash:
Where it falls short for a Regulator:While the market now understands the nature of the dispute, the clarification leaves fundamental systemic issues completely unresolved for SGX RegCo:
3. What Needs to Be Done (and Could Be Done Better)?If SGX RegCo wants these incidents to represent a true " bright day" for regulation, the process needs teeth, speed, and proactive enforcement rather than just reactive disclosure.1. Enforce Immediate " Reason Frameworks" on Day 1Regulators should stop accepting vague, placeholder phrases like " differences with controlling shareholders" on initial resignation templates. If a director checks that box, SGX should mandate an immediate, detailed annex at the time of filing, or require an immediate trading halt until the details are ready. Allowing a stock to bleed 20% over 14 days due to regulatory lag is a failure of market orderly conduct.2. Guarding the Nominating Committee (NC)The regulator needs to look closely at how independent directors are protected from backdoor ousters. Tan was elected by ordinary minority shareholders. If a controlling shareholder can subtly pressure a lead ID to step aside because they want a different " skill set," it voids the purpose of having an independent board majority. SGX RegCo should closely monitor the selection process for Tan' s replacement to ensure Heliconia doesn' t simply install a compliant candidate.3. Investigation into Management PressureSGX RegCo' s job shouldn' t end because a document was printed. The allegation that a chairman attempted to use the Audit Committee to punish a senior manager involved in an ongoing strategic review warrants a formal, private inquiry by RegCo or the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA). They must ensure that internal whistleblowers and management personnel are protected from boardroom politics.Summary VerdictThe article is right that public conflict is better than a hushed-up board. Tan Chian Khong should be commended for refusing to slip out the back door quietly, as many directors do to protect their future directorships.However, it wasn' t a " bright day" for regulation it was a costly diagnostic scan. It exposed a flawed system where a 14-day delay can wipe out a fifth of a company' s market value, and where a controlling shareholder can effectively displace critical independent oversight right when minority shareholders need it most. Unquote Good to have a different reasonable view. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
24-Jun-2026 09:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The bright side to the CSE Global clash THE silver lining in the emerging boardroom row at Singapore-listed CSE Global is that an independent director is taking a stand against the controlling shareholder, and that the market regulator has taken an interest. Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX Regco) and CSE shareholders should seek to ensure that independent directors at the company are not hindered in performing their duties. On Jun 2, veteran auditor Tan Chian Khong resigned as lead independent director at CSE, which builds integrated technology systems for industrial customers. In the disclosure form for announcing his resignation, he cited &ldquo difference of views with regard to working with controlling shareholders&rdquo as an unresolved difference in opinion on material matters. In response to a query by SGX Regco, CSE provided more details about Tan&rsquo s departure. Tan alleges that CSE non-independent and non-executive chairman Eugene Lai had asked him to resign, even though Tan&rsquo s term ends in 2028. Tan also alleges that Lai wanted Tan to step down as chair of CSE&rsquo s nominating committee. Tan said that he and Lai appeared to hold &ldquo increasingly divergent views&rdquo on strategic matters. In response to Tan&rsquo s allegations, Lai said he had not asked Tan to resign, but had privately shared his view that CSE needed to refresh its board and have a lead independent director with strong merger and acquisition (M& A) experience. Lai said that he left it to Tan to decide &ldquo what to do in the best interests of the company&rdquo . Lai is the board nominee of CSE controlling shareholder Heliconia Capital Management. CSE is in the middle of a strategic review undertaken by Jefferies. Two positive outcomes CSE shareholders can be grateful for two outcomes. The first is that SGX Regco got the company to disclose more details. As Singapore&rsquo s stock market regulation shifts further towards a &ldquo buyer beware&rdquo approach, greater transparency on potentially material matters is essential to enabling sound decisions in the market. The second positive outcome is the fact that Tan chose to raise his concerns, because there is now an opportunity to scrutinise the company&rsquo s corporate governance. While harmonious boards are generally good to have, too little conflict should raise concerns that boards might not be diverse enough or that disagreements are being hushed over. The fact is that the market for directors discourage speaking out in public, because a reputation for being difficult can close the door to other directorships. The market should therefore be comfortable with a healthy level of conflict, especially when the tension occurs in a sincere pursuit of the best interests of the company. Regardless of which side is more true, shareholders should seek assurance from CSE that its independent directors are allowed to carry out their duties without inappropriate influence from Heliconia. Shareholders should also ensure that CSE&rsquo s board has a structured approach to determining and acquiring the diverse skills and experience required to properly lead the company. It is worth challenging the wisdom of seeking to replace the only auditor on the board with an M& A expert when the seven-member board (while Tan was still included) already has three M& A experts: Lai, through his work at Heliconia non-executive independent director Ng Shin Ein, through her work as a corporate lawyer advising clients on joint ventures, M& A and fundraising and non-executive independent director Kenneth Tang, another corporate lawyer whose main areas of practice include M& A and corporate finance. This is especially relevant given that CSE could soon be involved in corporate action following the strategic review. Shareholders need to be confident that the board&rsquo s independent members are looking out for the company&rsquo s best interests and not just those of its largest shareholder, and that the board has the right balance of expertise and perspectives to help it navigate that next phase. Whether Tan or Lai is correct may ultimately have little economic impact for CSE shareholders, since Heliconia is the controlling shareholder. If Heliconia wants a new independent director instead of Tan, it is unlikely that he would have been re-elected after his current term is up. However, the conflict highlights potential corporate governance risks that shareholders should address before CSE embarks on a more consequential journey. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
tongphlp
Supreme |
22-Jun-2026 15:31
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
SK doesnt seem to be well liked....
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
whiteegg
Member |
22-Jun-2026 15:09
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
boardroom saga is opportunity for buyer look at CDL is a good example. look forward to cse going higher and break into new ground of $2 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
tongphlp
Supreme |
22-Jun-2026 12:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
who cares yah? as long as make positive returne and $ for shareholders, we can ' tan' (wait) for it to ' lai' (come)..
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
aerosolcan
Member |
20-Jun-2026 14:13
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hallelujah!
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
20-Jun-2026 13:50
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
CSE board clash: Who are Eugene Lai and Tan Chian Khong? [SINGAPORE] A board dispute at CSE Global : 544 +2.8% has piqued investors&rsquo interest in the protaganists involved. Chairman Eugene Lai and lead independent director Tan Chian Khong - who resigned following the clash - are both veteran corporate and management leaders. The Business Times puts together the backgrounds of these two board members whose clash sent some ripples through corporate circles. Who are Lai and Tan? Lai currently serves as the chairman of CSE Global and also chairs its controlling shareholder, Heliconia Capital Management, a Temasek subsidiary that holds 23.79 per cent of CSE. He also sits on the board of Temasek&rsquo s 65 Equity Partners and CapitaLand Investment and has held managing director and leadership roles at Southern Capital Group, JP Morgan, The Carlyle Group, and The Ascott. His background in private equity and investment banking, along with his management and leadership experience, make him a much sought candidate corporate leader. A lawyer by training, Lai holds a first class honours degree from the London School of Economics and a masters from Harvard Law School. Interestingly, he also graduated cum laude with a master&rsquo s degree from Biblical Graduate School of Theology. Across CSE&rsquo s board battle line is Tan, a veteran independent director and seasoned audit professional. Tan spent 35 years in the audit industry, including two decades as a partner at Ernst & Young until his retirement in 2016. He sits on the boards of various high-profile corporations and agencies, including Hong Leong Asia, The Straits Trading Company, Banyan Tree Holdings, SMRT Corporation and the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Singapore. Until his resignation on June 2, 2026, he served as CSE Global&rsquo s lead independent director, audit committee chairman, and nominating committee chairman. Chain of events The differences in views between the two men appeared to have come to a head during a May 19 telephone conversation, with both men later offering differing accounts of what transpired. Tan said Lai had requested his resignation as lead independent director and from his roles in CSE&rsquo s committees. He refused to step down as he had been elected by shareholders and was answerable only to them. &ldquo Chairman said he does not agree, and wanted me to step aside sooner. I believe this is a breach of good governance.&rdquo He also cited increasingly divergent views with Lai over the group&rsquo s operational direction and the handling of a member of senior management. But Lai disputed several of Tan&rsquo s assertions. He said he had merely shared his view, and that of Heliconia, that the company would benefit from a board refresh as it entered its next phase of growth, including the appointment of a lead independent director with mergers and acquisitions experience. Lai said this was not a direction for Tan to resign and that he would have respected his decision to serve out his full term. Tan eventually resigned as he felt his board position on the board had become untenable. Behind the boardroom clash Market watchers have speculated that the boardroom conflict may have its roots in CSE&rsquo s strategic review started in March. The review &ndash advised by investment bank Jefferies &ndash could lead to outcomes such as a privatisation, a sale of shares, a disposal of a major part of the business, or a merger. While the company does not own physical data centres, its business and shares have soared on the boom enjoyed by its primary engineering and systems integration partnerships with hyperscalers including Amazon. In Q1, it posted a 29.1 per cent rise in revenue to S$265.2 million for the three months ended Mar 31, boosted by fresh demand from the data-centre industry. Late last year, CSE issued 63 million warrants to the US tech giant, tied to a US$1.5 billion spending target. The deal drove the company&rsquo s shares to a 10-year high. With each warrant convertible to a CSE share at an exercise price of S$0.7671, Amazon is sitting on enviable paper gains. So too Heliconia. According the Edge Singapore, the company&rsquo s stock surge may have presented an opportune time to cash out. It postulated that an offer for Heliconia&rsquo s stake may have been on the table, but the board led by Tan could have disagreed and preferred that the same offer be extended to all shareholders through an outright privatisation. Temasek&rsquo s long links with CSE CSE Global was founded in 1985 as the engineering projects division of Chartered Electronics Industries, the electronics arm of ST Engineering. It gained independence through a management buyout in January 1997 and went public on the Singapore Exchange in 1999. Over the decades, it has grown from a regional engineering unit into a global systems integrator specialising in automation, telecommunications, and electrification. Recently, CSE Global has drawn significant market attention due to its booming data centre business. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
20-Jun-2026 13:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Citing recent share price correction as an opportunity to board, Maybank&rsquo s Seet maintains &lsquo buy&rsquo call on CSE Global Jacrick Seet of Maybank Securities has maintained his &ldquo buy&rdquo call on CSE Global (SGX:544) despite the recent weaker market sentiments and resignation of its lead independent director, Tan Chian Khong. &ldquo We believe that the recent share price correction of more than 20% represents an attractive opportunity for investors to accumulate shares of CSE Global,&rdquo Seet states in his June 18 report. From Seet&rsquo s perspective, he believes that the recent resignation of Tan will not affect the core fundamentals of CSE Global and there will be no adverse impact on CSE&rsquo s management personnel in the performance of its duties. &ldquo Meanwhile, CEO Lim Boon Kheng has increased his stake in the company from 3.7% to 3.71% by taking up the option of a scrip dividend, highlighting his confidence in the core potential of the company,&rdquo Seet states. The Maybank analyst also thinks that Tan&rsquo s resignation may also act as a check while also highlighting that management is the company&rsquo s key value driver. On the business side of things, Seet predicts that CSE Global will incur higher than normal up-front costs from labour and rent in 1HFY2026, especially with the new site before it ramps up. &ldquo As a result, we expect margins to be impacted in 1HFY2026. Margins should improve in 2HFY2026 after the ramp-up of the new site. With the new-leased facility ready, production for its data-centre client is now in the midst of ramping up, and we expect q-o-q revenue improvement, especially from 2QFY2026 to 3QFY2026,&rdquo Seet predicts. Apart from that, Seet foresees that CSE Global&rsquo s key data centre client could potentially channel more orders to the company if it could complete its orders at a much faster pace. Overall, Seet remains bullish on CSE Global&rsquo s outlook and sees potential for a multi-year growth story. &ldquo The company expects to more than triple capacity by FY2027 and FY2028, and we expect it will secure another data centre client by 1QFY2027,&rdquo Seet predicts. As such, he is keeping a &ldquo buy&rdquo recommendation on CSE Global with unchanged target price of $2.25 and he sees CSE Global as a proxy for the AI data centre boom in the US. Meanwhile, Alfie Yeo of RHB Bank Singapore sees the recent share price volality in CSE Global was mainly due to internal disagremeent. " With Tan' s exit and the clarification made this week, we believe that the direction of CSE Global' s growth will continue in the way that it has intended, steered by the chairman and the Board," Yeo says. Yeo believes the resolution should stabalise CSE Global' s stock volatility, barring any major developments to the strategic review. " Otherwise, we see earnings growth being driven by the US$1.5 billion worth of Amazon orders that are anticipated over the next five years. We have projected a sturdy 27% earnings CAGR for FY2025 to FY2028," Yeo predicts. As such, Yeo is keeping " buy" on CSE Global with a target price of $1.94, which represent a potential upside of 42% with FY2027 dividend yield potentially at 3%. " Following this week&rsquo s clarification to the SGX, the Board is now more aligned to take company forward. CSE Global, valued at below 1 time PEG ratio, is trading at around 20 times forward P/E &ndash which is below its FY2025 - FY2028 earnings CAGR of 27%," Yeo concludes. As of 9.28am, Shares of CSE Global are trading 2 cents higher, or 1.39% up at $1.45. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
aerosolcan
Member |
19-Jun-2026 11:13
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Did you even read the release.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ruanlai
Elite |
19-Jun-2026 09:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Something found out not legally right by that director and decided to quit before get prosecuted.
Insiders knew best, if the company iss operating in good on going concern then why he left. Better stay sideline and watch for the next qtr report before being trap in. DYODD |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
LoudShout
Master |
19-Jun-2026 09:10
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
With the differences being put behind, this counter should revert to its price before the annoucment of the resignation of the ILD. All these dramas. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
tongphlp
Supreme |
19-Jun-2026 07:34
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
dragon boat festival, yes...
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
SmallSmall
Supreme |
18-Jun-2026 15:56
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You missed the point completely. Already said sell on rumours buy on facts. It does not matyter who is right and who is wrong. No law suit. Full stop Company' s operations not affected. Only thing I do not like is the data centre situation in US....It' s looking more like a bubble where everyone is racing to the bottom with the massive spendings.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
muifan
Supreme |
18-Jun-2026 15:50
Yells: "Take the leap of faith dont regret 20 years later!" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
this one strong today man....settle dispute liao ? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
7ocean
Master |
18-Jun-2026 11:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
When 2 giant elephants fighting they crush ants | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ayy002
Senior |
18-Jun-2026 11:03
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Currently ,2 versions of storyline. see who wants to start the fire to defend personal reputation
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chinhm88
Member |
18-Jun-2026 09:57
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Look at the price action last 2 days, it is going to run up, don't miss the boat | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
LoudShout
Master |
18-Jun-2026 09:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Looks like the whole matter was poorly handled. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
aerosolcan
Member |
17-Jun-2026 17:08
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Looks like a nothingburger. Chairman wants to quickly do M&A, wants to get a pro M&A lead ID in. Nobody likes being sacked, so current lead ID disagreed. If anything, this adds fuel to the M&A talk around this counter. I'd say it gets bought out 10% above average analyst target price. So approx $2.20 | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||