Back

Latest Forum Topics / STATS ChipPAC

Post Reply

STATSChP Post Reply Rate topic
guiren Veteran	26-Nov-2014 16:25        guiren About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Such things should not happen in Stats ,, this is our last pride ,, sharemalls      ( Date: 16-Nov-2014 07:52) Posted: Micropolis closed shop after huge losses under HC. Chartered semicon sold after losing billions over the years but doing well after sold. And now Stats with huge debt and several qtrs of losses. Isnt it obvious that TH is having the wrong kind of people running the right industry? CraigFoo      ( Date: 12-Nov-2014 19:21) Posted: If Temasek takes care of minority interest, why will they even talk to the Chinese over such a deal?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SOONEST Member	26-Nov-2014 12:01        SOONEST About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Anybody know JCET dateline??... suppose to be 30 days fr announcement date right? Otherwise no deal hor.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
tch77_pt75 Veteran	24-Nov-2014 19:08        tch77_pt75 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Thanks for the information. Didn't know that Old Chang Kee is even better than this stock!
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Du_shen Veteran	23-Nov-2014 14:24        Du_shen About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Stop loss is impt esp in stocks when their fa dun justify the price. Eg. 70c for stats. Thats like almost twice the nav for a coy with koyak fa. If u think that the authority should step in and prevent ppl from selling below ipo price.. then i tink they should also set a ceiling for price for stocks that are above ipo price. Look at old chang kee. Ipo 20c. Now alr close to $1. By setting a floor price. Theres 0 risk for the retailers and hence. What they can do is only to issue warnings to those analyst who anyhow give TP. -_-
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
tch77_pt75 Veteran	23-Nov-2014 13:31        tch77_pt75 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Quite true. But selling at below IPO price don't seem to be fair to the retail investors. For example, company can issue IPO based on the valuations but when the big fish dumps the share and if company is not doing well, then sell below IPO, would it be fair to the investors! As such, shouldn't the above mentioned process, from valuation to IPO to issue shares to shares consolidation to closing shop, be reviewed to protect the retail investors. Just my personal views Du_shen      ( Date: 23-Nov-2014 10:32) Posted: It was only 30c earlier this year. 45c is alr quite ok given e financials of this coy.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Du_shen Veteran	23-Nov-2014 10:32        Du_shen About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	It was only 30c earlier this year. 45c is alr quite ok given e financials of this coy.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
everstrong Member	22-Nov-2014 22:47        everstrong About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Hello! you may refer to the announcement made on 6-Nov below: http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/10/102129/STATSAnnouncement06Nov20141150AMwattachment.pdf Looks like we' re gonna suffer a big LOSS this time.. Invested at 70cts + and now pending for verdict till 30-Nov.. An utter disappointment indeed! WTF is TH thinking about???
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
tch77_pt75 Veteran	22-Nov-2014 13:03        tch77_pt75 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Hopefully, it can be valued at $1 per share!!!!!
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Qanghoo Supreme	19-Nov-2014 09:24        Qanghoo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	This place seem t enjoy buy high n sell low.  Sell POSB  1.6 bil.  Buy Dao Heng 9.6 bil  n write off 1 bil.  Now sell Stats low?  Different entities, but seem to be same kind of minds. SOONEST      ( Date: 19-Nov-2014 09:16) Posted: Yes... many pple who borrowed cheaply fr POSB ended stuck with DBS... so sad
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SOONEST Member	19-Nov-2014 09:16        SOONEST About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yes... many pple who borrowed cheaply fr POSB ended stuck with DBS... so sad
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Qanghoo Supreme	18-Nov-2014 23:09        Qanghoo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I like how u are putting it.  Years back, I mentioned that they also sold POSB for a song. SOONEST      ( Date: 18-Nov-2014 20:41) Posted: While our super brilliant technocrats run the co to the ground ..our super managed state own co is selling it to our motherland competitor for a song .. and of course china will turn the co around once they corner niche market. Rip SG. InvestNotTrade      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:33) Posted: Regarding Vard' s facts, you are correct as I was quoting off the top of my mind. As for stats case, I' m just providing an alternative opinion so readers can weigh and decide their own risk appetite :) TH may jolly well reject offer and price may drop after that because stock market is pretty unpredictable. Just my 2c.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SOONEST Member	18-Nov-2014 20:41        SOONEST About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	While our super brilliant technocrats run the co to the ground ..our super managed state own co is selling it to our motherland competitor for a song .. and of course china will turn the co around once they corner niche market. Rip SG. InvestNotTrade      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:33) Posted: Regarding Vard' s facts, you are correct as I was quoting off the top of my mind. As for stats case, I' m just providing an alternative opinion so readers can weigh and decide their own risk appetite :) TH may jolly well reject offer and price may drop after that because stock market is pretty unpredictable. Just my 2c. Qanghoo      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:19) Posted: By the way Vard' s offer price was 122.  Anyway, don' t recall price falling < offer price while offer was open.  In Stats' case, even before actual  offer, although the offeror has disclosed what it intends to do (45c+-), price already fall below.  Counting the Taiwan ops, today' s price is abt 10% below.  Qn is not whether there is any risk, rather what level at this juncture.  Level of risk has a time horizon.  At this point, with a high level of knowledge of what' s gonna happen, one wld have reasonably assessed that chances of holding out for at least 45 is pretty high.  So, I remain convinced that price is being deliberately pressed down.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Qanghoo Supreme	18-Nov-2014 18:09        Qanghoo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Oh, and I just read from BT that there are nine China SOE stocks here - which gives investors a  real choice of gems here.  So, why need to hook up to HKS link? Qanghoo      ( Date: 18-Nov-2014 17:20) Posted: That' s the reality of the market here, my friend.  Hallmark of world class financial centre, don' t you see? SOONEST      ( Date: 18-Nov-2014 14:28) Posted: Daylight robbrry in progress...shout pc high high and unload... Now shout low low and sell whole freakg com... and no police around...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Qanghoo Supreme	18-Nov-2014 17:20        Qanghoo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	That' s the reality of the market here, my friend.  Hallmark of world class financial centre, don' t you see? SOONEST      ( Date: 18-Nov-2014 14:28) Posted: Daylight robbrry in progress...shout pc high high and unload... Now shout low low and sell whole freakg com... and no police around... Qanghoo      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:47) Posted: Thx for sharing.  Good to have a wide spectrum of views for us to think deeper.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
SOONEST Member	18-Nov-2014 14:28        SOONEST About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Daylight robbrry in progress...shout pc high high and unload... Now shout low low and sell whole freakg com... and no police around... Qanghoo      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:47) Posted: Thx for sharing.  Good to have a wide spectrum of views for us to think deeper. InvestNotTrade      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:33) Posted: Regarding Vard' s facts, you are correct as I was quoting off the top of my mind. As for stats case, I' m just providing an alternative opinion so readers can weigh and decide their own risk appetite :) TH may jolly well reject offer and price may drop after that because stock market is pretty unpredictable. Just my 2c.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Qanghoo Supreme	17-Nov-2014 17:47        Qanghoo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Thx for sharing.  Good to have a wide spectrum of views for us to think deeper. InvestNotTrade      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:33) Posted: Regarding Vard' s facts, you are correct as I was quoting off the top of my mind. As for stats case, I' m just providing an alternative opinion so readers can weigh and decide their own risk appetite :) TH may jolly well reject offer and price may drop after that because stock market is pretty unpredictable. Just my 2c. Qanghoo      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:19) Posted: By the way Vard' s offer price was 122.  Anyway, don' t recall price falling < offer price while offer was open.  In Stats' case, even before actual  offer, although the offeror has disclosed what it intends to do (45c+-), price already fall below.  Counting the Taiwan ops, today' s price is abt 10% below.  Qn is not whether there is any risk, rather what level at this juncture.  Level of risk has a time horizon.  At this point, with a high level of knowledge of what' s gonna happen, one wld have reasonably assessed that chances of holding out for at least 45 is pretty high.  So, I remain convinced that price is being deliberately pressed down.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
InvestNotTrade Senior	17-Nov-2014 17:33        InvestNotTrade About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental   Mood: Yells: "seekingprivatereturns.blog"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Regarding Vard' s facts, you are correct as I was quoting off the top of my mind. As for stats case, I' m just providing an alternative opinion so readers can weigh and decide their own risk appetite :) TH may jolly well reject offer and price may drop after that because stock market is pretty unpredictable. Just my 2c. Qanghoo      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 17:19) Posted: By the way Vard' s offer price was 122.  Anyway, don' t recall price falling < offer price while offer was open.  In Stats' case, even before actual  offer, although the offeror has disclosed what it intends to do (45c+-), price already fall below.  Counting the Taiwan ops, today' s price is abt 10% below.  Qn is not whether there is any risk, rather what level at this juncture.  Level of risk has a time horizon.  At this point, with a high level of knowledge of what' s gonna happen, one wld have reasonably assessed that chances of holding out for at least 45 is pretty high.  So, I remain convinced that price is being deliberately pressed down. InvestNotTrade      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 16:09) Posted: Anyone remembered the Vard takeover bid? New majority shareholder volunteered to buy vard at $1.28 when it was trading at $1.37+. Nobody could believe or understand why would the price drop below offer price. Takeover did fail but price continued dropping because of deteriorating business (ie ex-shareholder cashed out at the peak)  So... buying now still have risk. TH may reject bid but who knows if the price will continue dropping after that.. hmm..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Qanghoo Supreme	17-Nov-2014 17:19        Qanghoo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	By the way Vard' s offer price was 122.  Anyway, don' t recall price falling < offer price while offer was open.  In Stats' case, even before actual  offer, although the offeror has disclosed what it intends to do (45c+-), price already fall below.  Counting the Taiwan ops, today' s price is abt 10% below.  Qn is not whether there is any risk, rather what level at this juncture.  Level of risk has a time horizon.  At this point, with a high level of knowledge of what' s gonna happen, one wld have reasonably assessed that chances of holding out for at least 45 is pretty high.  So, I remain convinced that price is being deliberately pressed down. InvestNotTrade      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 16:09) Posted: Anyone remembered the Vard takeover bid? New majority shareholder volunteered to buy vard at $1.28 when it was trading at $1.37+. Nobody could believe or understand why would the price drop below offer price. Takeover did fail but price continued dropping because of deteriorating business (ie ex-shareholder cashed out at the peak)  So... buying now still have risk. TH may reject bid but who knows if the price will continue dropping after that.. hmm..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
InvestNotTrade Senior	17-Nov-2014 16:09        InvestNotTrade About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental   Mood: Yells: "seekingprivatereturns.blog"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Anyone remembered the Vard takeover bid? New majority shareholder volunteered to buy vard at $1.28 when it was trading at $1.37+. Nobody could believe or understand why would the price drop below offer price. Takeover did fail but price continued dropping because of deteriorating business (ie ex-shareholder cashed out at the peak)  So... buying now still have risk. TH may reject bid but who knows if the price will continue dropping after that.. hmm..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RoundRound Elite	17-Nov-2014 12:30        RoundRound About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Tikam Tikam can also"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Same thought here. Why need to sell below offer px Qanghoo      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 12:16) Posted: I' m just trying to understand:  If there' s an offer on the table for 45 (or there abouts), and still with some crumbs left, why wld anyone want to sell for less.  Must be people trying to press down to collect on the cheap. RoundRound      ( Date: 17-Nov-2014 12:09) Posted: Today is dumping ground day for Stats....44 and selling down. Not a good sign.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   141-160 of 1650   Older>   Last