| Latest Forum Topics / SPH |
|
|
SPH - A new diversified conglomerate
|
|||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
21-Nov-2021 20:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If you see 2 Govt linked entities slugging it out so openly, do you not think there is bigger money to be made?  Hahaha.  Not so stupid to sign and give away my rights to additional moolah to be made.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
singsong
Member |
21-Nov-2021 17:41
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
My layman?s thinking is like this on the possible value of SPH : if both Cuscaden and Keppel are willing to pay about $2.40 per share , they surely must be of the view that the price is worth much more than that . You try purchase at the best lowest price . Their expectation must be that they can make a decent profit on their purchase . What is decent profit ? I would expect at least 25%-30% , or more otherwise why spend the billions on purchasing . Say we be optimistic and peg it at 30% . We are already looking at a price of $3.12 per share . That?s what I think SPH price per share ought to be | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
19-Nov-2021 20:28
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The company is healthy financially and chock full of assets. This was not shareholder imitated
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Citigold
Senior |
19-Nov-2021 18:16
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Fully agreed with you. With the Media business hived off & improving Covid 19 situation around the globe, SPH share price is set to soar nxt year.    The fact is that the offer of $2.36 cash per SPH share shows that SPH share price is undervalued by the market. SPH can continue runs its business,increase dividend payout and the value will unlock by itself. In 2022 ,SPH have a exicting story to tell and i believe Mr Ng ,CEO of SPH can lead SPH to greater heights. He is the man who deserves recongition because he hive off the draggy Media business which needs a lot of courage to do it. Why should we sell  cheap to other parties? Many shareholders of SPH have gone through up & down cycles of SPH business and they dont deserve to be buy out cheap by others. And when the skies is clear,other party zoom in for the kill to reap the rewards whereas we stick through thick & thin have to suffer with losses. This is totally unfair & unaccepctable, we dont deserve it. I strongly urge SPH shareholder to make each of vote counts, make yourself available  & vote against the 2 deals. Dont leave regrets behind as most of the shareholders are retirees . This is our only way to show our stand. We as a shareholders of SPH should strongly vote against the 2 deals.  Untied we stand ,divided we fall. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
JoeJordan
Member |
19-Nov-2021 14:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Both offers by keppel and cuscaden undervalue SPH' s worth. Current NAV is $2.56 if I have not mistaken. A fair price should be at least between $2.56 and $2.81.  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
SureStrike
Veteran |
19-Nov-2021 13:31
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yes. U have my support. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
beng1102
Elite |
19-Nov-2021 13:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Frankly I don' t like SPH to be sold. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
19-Nov-2021 09:32
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
SPH stands ready to continue on its own if shareholders do not approve privatisation offers
SINGAPORE - As the bidding war intensifies for Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), some investors have asked if the company can remain independent or as a " rebranded and renamed" listed entity.
 
Shareholders said the competing offers from Keppel Corp and Cuscaden Peak indicate that SPH is seen as being a viable business after the media arm is hived off, with valuable assets that can be reorganised or merged with others to derive more value for stakeholders.
 
The proposals and questions from the shareholders were outlined in a filing lodged by SPH with the Singapore Exchange on Wednesday (Nov 17).
 
SPH, which publishes The Straits Times, responded to several of the questions on Wednesday, ahead of its annual general meeting on Thursday afternoon.
 
The company said it aims to keep expanding its business if shareholders reject the privatisation offers: " We have a brand, a strategy and we have proven that we have been able to, through a fairly short period of time, grow an attractive portfolio of business."
 
Apart from the media unit, all businesses under continuing operations - retail and commercial, purpose-built student accommodation, aged care and digital - improved in the 2021 financial year, it noted.
 
Shareholders also questioned the need for share buybacks given the company is in the midst of a buyout offer.
 
SPH said the principal mission of its directors and management is to constantly increase shareholder value and improve the return on equity of the group, among other things.
 
" SPH believes that share buybacks at the appropriate price level are one of the ways through which the return on equity of the group may be enhanced," it noted.
 
It added that the buyback will enable directors to return part of the group' s surplus funds, in excess of its financial and possible investment needs, to shareholders if the proposed privatisation does not come to fruition.
 
" This is an expedient, efficient and cost-effective way of returning surplus cash to shareholders.
 
" The group also has greater flexibility to control the share capital structure, and repurchased shares... may be transferred for the purposes of employee share schemes. This also mitigates the dilution impact on existing shareholders."
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
16-Nov-2021 09:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Cuscaden raises SPH bid to S$2.36 all cash, or S$2.40 in cash and SPH Reit units
THE CONSORTIUM comprising Hotel Properties (HPL), businessman Ong Beng Seng, and two Temasek-linked entities, CLA and Mapletree, has raised its offer for Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), days after rival offeror Keppel raised its bid too.
 
Cuscaden Peak is now offering each SPH shareholder the option of an all-cash offer of S$2.36, or S$2.40 per share comprising S$1.602 cash and 0.782 of an SPH Reit unit through a distribution-in-specie by SPH.
 
Cuscaden had initially offered S$2.10 per share in cash, to rival Keppel' s initial bid of S$2.099 in cash and units of both Keppel Reit and SPH Reit. On Nov 9, Keppel beefed up the cash component of its initial offer by S$0.20 per share. This took its offer up to S$2.351 per share, consisting of S$0.868 per share in cash, 0.596 of a Keppel Reit unit and 0.782 of an SPH Reit unit. A counter to Cuscaden' s revised bid is not expected as Keppel had said its Nov 9 offer price was final. Cuscaden' s latest offer implies a total equity value for SPH of S$3.9 billion.
 
Independent directors of SPH, which publishes The Business Times (BT), have preliminarily recommended that shareholders vote against the Keppel scheme and vote in favour of the Cuscaden scheme, subject to the independent financial adviser&rsquo s opinion and the absence of a superior competing offer. 
 
SPH chief executive Ng Yat Chung said Cuscaden&rsquo s new offer represents a substantial premium of 60 per cent over SPH&rsquo s undisturbed price as at Mar 30 before the announcement of the strategic review.
 
The offer also represents a premium of 10.1 per cent over SPH&rsquo s FY2021 pro forma net asset value per share of S$2.18.
The Cuscaden scheme consideration will not be adjusted for SPH&rsquo s FY2021 final dividend of S$0.03 per share, or the break fee of S$34 million payable by SPH to Keppel. The break fee is only payable if the Cuscaden scheme or any other competing offer succeeds.
 
SPH said it will proceed to hold the Keppel scheme meeting by Dec 8. The Cuscaden scheme meeting can only proceed if SPH shareholders vote against Keppel&rsquo s offer at the Keppel scheme meeting.
 
David Gerald, chief executive of the Securities Investors Association (Singapore) (Sias) told BT that Cuscaden has called for a meeting with Sias. The meeting will be held on Tuesday (Nov 16).
 
Said Gerald: " The Cuscaden revised offer, as it stands, is certainly superior to Keppel&rsquo s revised offer. It looks like the end to the bidding game, unless another unsolicited offer appears on the scene, which is unlikely."
 
Other market watchers opined that shareholders are likely to go for Cuscaden' s latest offer. 
 
UOB Kay Hian analyst Llelleythan Tan said: " Given Cuscaden' s offer has a higher cash consideration, better price stability, they should be inclined to accept it."
 
He added that the all-cash option is likely to have a higher take-up from investors. However, he also noted that there is still a risk that a majority of SPH' s shareholders may approve the Keppel scheme on Dec 8.
 
Phillip Securities analyst Terence Chua also termed Cuscaden' s revised offer " more superior" than Keppel' s " final and irrevocable" offer, meaning shareholders are more likely to go for the former. 
 
Justin Tang, United First Partners' head of Asian research, said Cuscaden' s latest offer will " suit the individual needs of shareholders" . However, he warned that Keppel' s offer would trump Cascaden' s cash and scrip offer if Keppel Reit and SPH Reit " rally in a huge way" . 
 
" If the status quo remains, economically rational shareholders will vote down the Keppel offer and approve the SPH offer," he added. 
 
Terence Wong, chief executive of fund management company Azure Capital, acknowledged that Keppel' s offer presents a " quicker completion timeline" of 8 weeks, while Cuscaden' s offer could potentially take longer.
 
" But shareholders who are waiting to get out shouldn&rsquo t be too concerned about the timeline. They can sell anytime with this beefed up offer," said Wong. 
 
CGS-CIMB analyst Eing Kar Mei noted that Keppel had said their previous offer was final.
 
&ldquo Although they can launch a general offer on SPH, we think they are unlikely to pursue,&rdquo she said. &ldquo If Keppel&rsquo s scheme arrangement offer does not go through, the price overhang on Keppel Reit&rsquo s shares will be removed.&rdquo
 
As part of the Cuscaden scheme, SPH will undertake a distribution-in-specie of the SPH Reit units it currently holds. This will be up to 45.2 per cent of the total SPH Reit units outstanding. 
 
Depending on which option SPH shareholders select, the Cuscaden scheme may result in a chain offer for all remaining SPH Reit units. If this happens, the minimum chain offer price the consortium has to offer will be S$0.964 per SPH Reit unit, fully in cash. 
 
Cuscaden said in a separate statement on Monday (Nov 15) that it recognises that each SPH shareholder has different investment objectives. 
 
&ldquo It has tailored its offer to provide maximum flexibility and value certainty to suit SPH shareholders&rsquo individual investment needs,&rdquo the consortium said in a bourse filing posted by HPL. 
 
The consortium said both options it has offered are of &ldquo superior value&rdquo to Keppel&rsquo s final offer. The all-cash option, in particular, has no price volatility, monetisation risk and will also not attract brokerage fees. 
 
&ldquo Since the initial announcement of the Keppel scheme on Aug 2, the implied market value of the Keppel scheme consideration fell to as low as S$2.201 per share on Sep 20,&rdquo the consortium noted.
 
It is &ldquo working expeditiously&rdquo with SPH for the transaction to be completed by February 2022. Unlike the Keppel scheme, the Cuscaden scheme does not depend on the approval of the offeror' s shareholders, it added. 
 
SPH' s Ng said at a briefing on Monday that the board would also consider any other unsolicited competing offer that may arise ahead of the Cuscaden scheme meeting and make recommendations to shareholders accordingly.
 
The lifting of restrictions under the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act - which currently imposes certain shareholding restrictions on SPH -   would happen on or around Dec 1, he noted.
 
When asked if there were risks of parties taking a significant stake in SPH who could block deals, Ng said it was not for him to speculate on.
 
&ldquo In any scheme proposal, whether somebody can come up and buy a stake to block it, is a possibility that affects every other counter,&rdquo he said. &ldquo Some even may believe that that&rsquo s a factor, which is why the earlier we can convene the Cuscaden scheme meeting, the better.&rdquo
 
Travis Lundy of Quiddity Advisors, who publishes on Smartkarma, said that it is possible someone new could come in, but noted that Keppel would not be able to do so, and two other Temasek-related entities are already part of the Cuscaden consortium.  
 
" I am not sure who else would come in," he said. " I expect any competitor could wait until after the Keppel deal has failed, and wait until things settle down. A new bidder can wait to see if Singapore opening leads to better near-term economic growth."
 
United First' s Tang noted that as of now, the likelihood of new offerors emerging is slim. " Given the string of events and the passage of time since Keppel' s offer, any potential counterbidders would likely have surfaced by now," he said. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lukewong82
Master |
16-Nov-2021 08:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
no leh.. they can waive the requirement if they want.. but they did not.. so many shareholders curse like mad
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
16-Nov-2021 07:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
TH said I will not buy Keppel if their result no good you forgotten what TH said first meh...TH won't buy cannot blame it lah...everybody know.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lukewong82
Master |
16-Nov-2021 07:15
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I dun think they will care if they look silly :) TM aborted their buy out of Keppel ($6+) and they dun even care when many shareholders were cursing them as share price tanked from $6+ to $4+ after announcement of their aborted offer .. now only recover slightly to $5.3+  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
TA_Expert
Supreme |
16-Nov-2021 02:44
Yells: "The World has changed" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Look at how the big sharks play the game. Imagine the minority shareholders accepted the first offer. SPH is set up by the 1G leaders. How can it be sold for $2? Super disgrace. We only have a big media company in Singapore since independence, yet it is mismanaged until needs to sell at lelong price.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
n3wbie
Elite |
16-Nov-2021 00:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Most M& A transactions will have conditions precedent that requires fulfilment but the CPs in this case look largely similar to Keppel' s. If you refer to Slide 5 of the presentation slides, outstanding regulatory approvals include MAS approval for acquisition of the REIT managers, formal approval from IMDA for indirect acquisition of M1 stake and the FIRB. Of which, all applications have already been submitted. They' ve also confirmed their financing ability. Other CPs include the completion of media business restructuring which has been widely communicated that it will be around 1 Dec. The remaining conditions are pretty obvious, shareholders' approval at EGM for the DIS and scheme meeting as well as court sanction. Given the credibility of Cuscaden' s consortium, notwithstanding that they hired Morgan Stanley as financial advisor, I would imagine that its quite hard for them to just walk away given that at this stage, they had even waived the material adverse effect condition. For the purpose of facilitating a constructive discussion, I presume there is this remote possibility that they walk away but the board and all will look really silly give that the indepedent directors had even provided their preliminary recommendation to vote for Cuscaden and to vote down Keppel. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
antifragile
Senior |
16-Nov-2021 00:19
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
DONT BE DISTRACTED BY THESE 2 OFFERS. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lukewong82
Master |
16-Nov-2021 00:08
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I no expert, but i believe the offer can withdraw their offer at the last minute even when an EGM is called... Remember Addvalue tech was supposed to be taken over by a china company then in the end aborted withour even giving any reasons.. ?? So it means an offer can withdraw it' s offer anytime? Any expert can comment?  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lukewong82
Master |
16-Nov-2021 00:02
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Maybe I rephrase. The offer is conditional upon a few conditions. Remember TM abort it' s offer for Keppel for > $6 becos some conditions were not met, so TM was not actually " legally binding" if conditions were not met.. Imagine if the Cruscaden were to abort the offer becos some conditions are not met? So actually this is not in a sense a legally final offer ... as in the case of TM aborted offer for Keppel..  So anything can happen. At least Keppel' s offer for SPH has cleared most of the conditions thats why now EGM is coming. For Cruscaden, more unknowns. So if u vote for Keppel' s offer, 99% chance u going to get ur $2.31. But if u vote down Keppel' s offer and wait for Cruscaden, there is a chance, no matter how small that Cruscaden MAY abort the offer becos some conditions are not met, just like how TM aborted it' s offer for Keppel recently. So there is a risk if u choose Cruscaden. Just my thought. Still remember Keppel was trading over $6 to $7 then when TM abort it' s offer for Keppel, share price tanked to $4+, now hovering $5+, never recover to $6+.. Quote: 6.3 Termination 6.3.1 Right to Terminate. (i) If any of the Scheme Conditions set out in paragraphs 1 (in relation to approval of the Cuscaden Scheme by the Shareholders), 2 (in relation to approval of the DIS by the Shareholders), 3 (in relation to completion of the Media Business Restructuring), 4 (in relation to the grant of the Scheme Court Order), 5 (in relation to the lodgement of the Scheme Court Order) or 6 (in relation to Regulatory Approvals) of Schedule 1 to this Joint Announcement is not satisfied, or if the Cuscaden Scheme has not become effective in accordance with its terms on or before 5.00 p.m. on the date falling six months from the Cuscaden Joint Announcement Date or such other date as may be agreed in writing between the Parties (the & ldquo Cut-Off Date& rdquo ), either Party may immediately terminate the Cuscaden Implementation Agreement by notice in writing to the other Party. (ii) If the Scheme Condition set out in paragraph 7 (in relation to there being no illegality) of Schedule 1 to this Joint Announcement is not satisfied, or is 16 incapable of being satisfied, or if applicable, has not been or will not be waived, on or before 5.00 p.m. on the Cut-Off Date, either Party may immediately terminate the Cuscaden Implementation Agreement by notice in writing to the other Party. (iii) If any of the Scheme Conditions set out in paragraph 8(b) (in relation to any Prescribed Occurrences relating to any SPH Group Company or Woodleigh JV), 9 (in relation to any material breach of warranties by the Company) or 11 (in relation to there having been no Material Adverse Effect) of Schedule 1 to this Joint Announcement is not satisfied, or is incapable of being satisfied, or if applicable, has not been or will not be waived, on or before 5.00 p.m. on the Cut-Off Date, the Offeror may terminate the Cuscaden Implementation Agreement by notice in writing to the Company. (iv) If any of the Scheme Conditions set out in paragraphs 8(a) (in relation to any Prescribed Occurrences relating to the Offeror) or 10 (in relation to any material breach of warranties by the Offeror) of Schedule 1 to this Joint Announcement is not satisfied, or is incapable of being satisfied, or if applicable, has not been or will not be waived, on or before 5.00 p.m. on the Cut-Off Date, the Company may terminate the Cuscaden Implementation Agreement by notice in writing to the Offeror. (v) If any Competing Offer (as defined below) becomes or is declared or is capable of being declared effective or unconditional (in all respects) and/or is completed, either Party may immediately terminate the Cuscaden Implementation Agreement by notice in writing to the other Party. (vi) If (a) the Keppel Scheme is approved by the shareholders of Keppel Corporation Limited (& ldquo Keppel& rdquo ) at the extraordinary general meeting to be held by Keppel (b) the Keppel Scheme-DIS17 is approved by the Shareholders at the extraordinary general meeting to be held by the Company (c) the Keppel Scheme is approved by the Shareholders at the Keppel Scheme Meeting, and (d) the Keppel Scheme has been sanctioned by the Court, either Party may immediately terminate the Cuscaden Implementation Agreement by notice in writing to the other Party. For the avoidance of doubt, the Offeror and/or the Company (as the case may be) may only invoke the non-satisfaction of any of the Scheme Conditions, or any other right of termination, to terminate the Cuscaden Implementation Agreement if it has first consulted the Securities Industry Council (the & ldquo SIC& rdquo ) and the SIC gives its approval for, or states that it has no objection to, such termination ......
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
des_khor
Supreme |
15-Nov-2021 23:48
Yells: "Tell me who is God or Market Fortune Teller in this forum ??" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
两 头 不 是 岸 !
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
n3wbie
Elite |
15-Nov-2021 23:37
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Do you mind clarifying your understanding that the bid by Cuscaden is not legally binding? SPH has announced that they' ve entered into an implementation agreement as published in this morning' s joint announcement so I believe the proposed scheme is legally binding.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Goldfinger
Supreme |
15-Nov-2021 22:44
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I am going to sit and wait for better generous offers from private equity firms when the market recovers | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

