| Latest Forum Topics / Hatten Land |
|
|
Hatten Land
|
|||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
13-Jul-2026 05:37
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Not many forumers interested this stock ? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
11-Jul-2026 16:10
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This we share holders got a similar experine like Annica Holding , DMX etc , approval their proposal but  maybe got back a Toilet paper in the end...
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
11-Jul-2026 13:55
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hatten Land&rsquo s shareholders lose almost everything in RTO lifeline Somewhere in the 429 pages of the circular that Hatten Land sent to shareholders on June 30 sits a number that deserves more attention than it is likely to get: 1.3%. Heavy dilution is common in RTOs. Legacy shareholders in listed shells are rarely left with much, since the business being injected is usually worth far more than the empty shell it&rsquo s merging into. But 1.3% is thin even by that standard, and what happens to the rest of the pie is where this deal gets more interesting. The vendor, LBD Engineering, will hold about 60.2% of the listed entity, to be renamed Metrocon Holdings. The Melaka malls and Southeast Asian hospitality ambitions that once defined Hatten will be gone, replaced by bored piles, secant walls and jet grouting. It is a legitimate business, by all accounts, just not the one Hatten&rsquo s shareholders signed up for. Hatten&rsquo s shareholders will get there via a massive consolidation of every 830 existing shares into one. That ratio shows just how small many holdings already are. Based on Hatten&rsquo s shareholder list, 930 or nearly 28% of its 3,354 shareholders have fewer than 830 shares each. Even so, all 930 of them will have their holdings rounded up to one consolidated share apiece. Before trading was suspended in August 2024, Hatten had 1.86 billion shares on issue, trading at 1.17 cents each, for a market cap of about $21.7 million. After consolidation, that becomes roughly 2.24 million shares. The company still has to issue several more rounds of new shares to pay for the RTO, settle old debt, repay deal financing, and meet minimum public float rules. Each round further dilutes existing shareholders. By the time all the new shares are issued, long-suffering Hatten investors will be left with just 1.3% of the enlarged company. None of this is hidden. It is disclosed precisely and exhaustively in the circular, although many may not pore over it. The question is not whether the disclosure exists, but whether the safeguards around the RTO actually protect shareholders as intended. How Hatten got here It is worth remembering what Hatten was before it became a vehicle for someone else&rsquo s piling business. Hatten built its name on Melaka real estate: malls, hotels, condos and serviced residences. It even set its sights on becoming a leading Southeast Asian developer riding the rising tide of regional demand for integrated developments. But the Covid pandemic upended that ambition. Melaka&rsquo s tourists vanished, emptying Hatten&rsquo s malls and hotels and gutting its revenue. By mid-2020, two Hatten subsidiaries needed a court-sanctioned debt moratorium to hold off creditors. Hatten figured bricks and mortar were no longer the way to go. Instead, it threw its weight behind blockchain, the metaverse and non-fungible tokens. Its empty mall footprint, it reckoned, could be reborn as crypto real estate. But the pivot never produced the cash flow Hatten needed. What began as a subsidiary-level rescue in 2020 eventually caught up with the parent company. Trading in Hatten&rsquo s shares was suspended in August 2024 and judicial management followed a few months later. Under Catalist rules, a suspended issuer has 12 months to submit a resumption proposal or face delisting. Hatten needed three extensions to get there, pushing the deadline to June this year. The scale of the cleanup is clear in the RM322 million ($102 million) liabilities to be extinguished via a scheme of arrangement, the court-sanctioned process the judicial managers will use to wipe out what Hatten owes creditors. That is why the pro forma numbers look almost triumphant: net tangible assets per share improve from negative $37.64 to positive 7.23 cents and loss per share flips to a positive 46.46 cents once the old debt is gone and Metrocon&rsquo s earnings are consolidated. The judicial managers will point to this as proof that the rescue worked, at least for the company as a legal entity. What it does not show is how much of that recovery reaches shareholders who held on through the suspension, versus the scheme creditors, the funder who financed the RTO costs and LBD Engineering, all of whom will be paid in new shares to make the restructuring happen. One of those new parties deserves a closer look. Skyone Holdings, wholly owned by one Goh Chai Hoe, lent Hatten $700,000 to cover the RTO&rsquo s expenses. Skyone was introduced by a business associate of Hatten&rsquo s former chairman and controlling shareholder, Colin Tan. The circular discloses no relationship between Skyone and LBD Engineering or Metrocon. Yet its stake is anything but token. Skyone will hold 12% of the enlarged company ­ &mdash second only to LBD Engineering &mdash ­ and well ahead of the remaining Hatten legacy shareholders. &lsquo Fair and reasonable&rsquo According to W Capital Markets, the independent financial adviser (IFA) to the judicial managers, the financial terms of the RTO are &ldquo fair and reasonable&rdquo . The whitewash resolution, the waiver of shareholders&rsquo right to a general offer once LBD Engineering crosses the 60.2% control threshold, is also &ldquo not prejudicial&rdquo to independent shareholders. That opinion is methodologically grounded. W Capital benchmarked the deal&rsquo s implied shell premium, about $11.1 million, against six comparable RTOs since 2020, and found it sits above the $9.3 million average. In other words, Hatten&rsquo s shell fetched a reasonable price relative to precedent. Still, the IFA&rsquo s opinion is narrower than it sounds. By its own admission, W Capital did not examine Metrocon&rsquo s underlying business and financial risks or its prospects as a going concern. Those are relegated to the section on risk factors for shareholders to assess. That is not unusual. Singapore&rsquo s Takeover Code has long confined whitewash opinions to deal mechanics and pricing, not business merits. The IFA&rsquo s job was to assess whether the terms of the RTO was fair relative to comparable shell rescues, not whether it was good for shareholders, or whether 1.3% of a debt-free company was appropriate compensation for what was lost since Hatten&rsquo s suspension. Shareholders also have limited room to disagree. Approval of the whitewash resolution is a condition for completion. Vote it down, and the acquisition doesn&rsquo t happen. That&rsquo s not a criticism of the structure. Distressed situations rarely offer clean choices. But it means &ldquo fair and reasonable&rdquo is the bare minimum, not a stamp of approval. Related on all sides What happens after completion deserves as much scrutiny as the deal itself. LBD Engineering won&rsquo t just be Metrocon Holdings&rsquo controlling shareholder. It is already the largest customer, accounting for 59%, 49% and 64% of Metrocon&rsquo s revenue over FY2023 to FY2025. LBD Engineering is also a key supplier. It provided up to 35% of Metrocon&rsquo s construction materials in the last three years. What&rsquo s more, most of the heavy machinery Metrocon uses is rented from LBD Engineering and a sister company, LBD Machinery, after Metrocon sold its own equipment to those same two entities in 2024. Metrocon&rsquo s proposed interested person transaction mandate covers exactly such dealings, and more: piling and geotechnical work, soil disposal, equipment and vehicle rental, labour supply, and dormitory rental. All of that runs through LBD Engineering, LBD Machinery, and Thong Huat Brothers, the last of which is majority-owned by Alvin Lim, the man who controls LBD Engineering and is set to become non-executive chairman of the new listed entity. The mandate exists because these dealings recur constantly in Metrocon&rsquo s operations, and seeking shareholder approval each time would be impractical. But since the same people sit on both sides of these deals, it needs a way to prevent pricing from simply favouring the controlling shareholder. To guard against that, every transaction under this arrangement requires quotes from two outside providers with no stake in it, with Metrocon going with the cheaper one. This is reviewed by an audit and risk committee that doesn&rsquo t yet exist and applies only to amounts above $100,000. On paper, this is standard Catalist practice for companies where one shareholder calls the shots. In substance, Lim will chair the board responsible for policing these related-party deals, while also controlling the company on the other side of these transactions. That relationship runs through most of Metrocon&rsquo s revenue and a third of its cost base. The people proposed to run the enlarged group are worth a closer look, too. LBD Engineering is a family business: Lim Ban Dian holds 53.9%, while his son Alvin Lim holds the remaining 46.1% and will helm the board. Tan Kean Seng, Metrocon&rsquo s current chief executive, becomes executive director and CEO of Metrocon Holdings. The proposed chairman and CEO are described in the circular as personally &ldquo pivotal&rdquo and &ldquo crucial&rdquo to the business, meaning the group&rsquo s fortunes will be tied to two men whose commercial interests, through LBD Engineering, sit on both sides of the ledger. Succession planning is a common risk for any founder-led business. What&rsquo s not-so-common here is how much rides on one person. Post-RTO, Lim is chairman, but he also controls Metrocon&rsquo s biggest customer and its main equipment supplier. If something happens to him, all these ties could be at risk. Selling below value A curious detail turns up in the numbers. The $28 million purchase consideration is less than Metrocon&rsquo s independent business valuation of between $34.64 million and $39.65 million. Usually, it&rsquo s the opposite that draws scrutiny in RTOs: vendors accused of overpricing a business to extract inflated consideration shares from a captive shell. Here, LBD Engineering agreed to sell Metrocon for less than its own valuers valued the business. There are benign explanations. A lower price means fewer consideration shares at 26 cents each, resulting in less dilution for Hatten&rsquo s shareholders than a higher price would have. It is also possible LBD Engineering simply values the listing vehicle more than it does the extra few million dollars a higher price would have brought. Or the independent valuation may simply reflect more upbeat assumptions than the negotiated price. Whatever the case, the circular does not explain the gap. Given how precisely everything else in the circular is spelt out, that gap stands out, and it&rsquo s reasonable to ask why at the upcoming EGM. What&rsquo s the vote really about? Strip away the mechanics and the July 22 EGM comes down to a single, mostly unavoidable choice. Vote for the whitewash resolution, the consolidation, and the share issuances, and Hatten becomes Metrocon Holdings, a cash-generating business with an $85 million order book, inside a shell finally free of RM322 million in liabilities. Vote against it, and Hatten&rsquo s lifeline is gone, most likely leaving the firm to face delisting with no alternative rescuer in sight. The terms of the RTO may be fair and reasonable, but whether $28 million, a 60.2% stake for one family, and a web of related-party transactions add up to a good outcome for shareholders remains an open question. Metrocon itself is a legitimate business with a credible growth story. That is not in dispute. What is worth being clear about is the difference between saving a company and protecting the shareholders who helped build it, and the numbers show which one this deal does. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
piscesmonkey
Supreme |
05-Jul-2026 19:04
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/metrocon-eyes-sgx-listing-through-hatten-land | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
TraderBen
Supreme |
01-Jul-2026 19:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
But suay also. New rules no more watchlist don' t need to delist. Leave it to rot next time still got chance 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
piscesmonkey
Supreme |
01-Jul-2026 17:23
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Smi not much asset.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
TraderBen
Supreme |
01-Jul-2026 17:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
wts.. its like getting back sheetsss..
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
treetops
Elite |
01-Jul-2026 16:40
Yells: "Moments Today, Memories Tomorrow!" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Share Consolidation: 830 existing shares will be consolidated into 1 consolidated share.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
TraderBen
Supreme |
01-Jul-2026 15:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Consolidate how many shares to 1? Nb SMI don?t have such fortune
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
piscesmonkey
Supreme |
01-Jul-2026 13:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Wow white knight | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Volmax
Elite |
15-Apr-2026 23:01
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
 
From Judicial Management To Reverse Takeover &ndash Hatten Land FY2025https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeyheITdCQk![]()   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Volmax
Elite |
15-Apr-2026 18:00
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
For Shareholders Who Want To Know More About The Prospective Owner! Lim Ban Dian Construction https://opengovsg.com/corporate/46841000K LBD Construction Group! https://lbdgroup.com.sg/ ![]()   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Volmax
Elite |
15-Apr-2026 13:19
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Metrocon Owner Is LBD Engineering (LBD Group Of Companies - 万 年 集 团 ) https://www.facebook.com/LBDgroupofcompanies/ View Company' s Project & Capabilities! https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=237579765186667& set=pb.100068106354134.-2207520000 ![]()   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
24-Nov-2025 09:55
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hatten Land targets RTO acquisition of construction business for S$24 million
 
Hatten Land, which is under judicial management, is proposing to acquire a construction business in a reverse-takeover deal worth $24 million.
 
The developer, known for its Malacca developments, plans to pay for the acquisition of Metrocon by paying its owner, LBD Engineering, some 5.57 billion new shares.
 
If this deal goes ahead, LBD Engineering, a building contractor, will end up owning around 60% of Hatten Land.
 
The target business, Metrocon, is in general building construction, including piling and major upgrading works.
 
It has a paid-up capital of $18 million and as at Sept 30, an unaudited book value and net tangible asset value of $7.38 million each.
 
In the most recent 9MFY2025, Metrocon generated earnings of $1.98 million and revenue of $41.3 million.
 
Hatten Land has appointed Navi Corporate Advisory to do an independent valuation and the final consideration might be subject to further adjustments.
 
Hatten Land shares have been suspended from trading since last August and in the same month, put under the judicial management of Deloitte Singapore SR& T Restructuring Services.
 
" The judicial managers are of the view that the proposed acquisition will enable the company to venture into a business area that has potential for growth, and the opportunity to engage with its creditors to restructure and reorganise its financial position," reads Hatten Land' s Nov 21 SGX filing.
 
Separately but in conjunction, following a creditors' meeting on Oct 31, the judicial managers were given the go-ahead to place a Hatten Land subsidiary, Hatten MS, into liquidation.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
08-Oct-2025 11:36
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hatten Land: Proposed acquisition of Metrocon for S$24 million
 
Metrocon is principally engaged in the business of general building construction, including piling and major upgrading works.
 
The Judicial Managers have been focusing their efforts on stabilising the Group&rsquo s financial position, while exploring strategic business and investment opportunities with a view to restructuring the financial condition of the Group and a resumption of trading of the Shares.
 
The Judicial Managers are of the view that the Proposed Acquisition enables the Company to venture into a business area that has potential for growth, and the opportunity to engage with its creditors to restructure and reorganise its financial position.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
29-Mar-2024 09:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hatten Land gets notice of default, letter of demand for RM14 million, appoints financial adviser
MDSA Resources, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Hatten Land : PH0 0%, has received a notice of default and a letter of demand from Kenanga Investment Bank for a total of RM14,114,652.15 (S$4 million), it said on Thursday (Mar 28).
 
The sum owed was in relation to Hatten Land&rsquo s medium-term note (MTN) programme.
 
Hatten Land has engaged Deloitte & Touche Financial Advisory Services to develop a restructuring plan and explore fundraising strategies amid its financial challenges.
 
The notice of default from the trustee representing Kenanga Investment Bank &ndash the principal adviser, lead arranger, lead manager and facility agent of the MTN programme &ndash was in relation to the RM12,350,000 Notes issued by MDSA Resources under the programme.
 
The sum of RM12,350,000 and RM492,646.58, being the outstanding principal sum and coupon of the programme respectively, should be paid to the trustee no later than Apr 5, 2024, said the notice, dated Mar 25, 2024.
 
MDSA Resources also received a letter of demand dated Mar 25 from the solicitor representing Kenanga in relation to the MTN programme, for the outstanding amount of RM1,272,005.57 as at Mar 20.
 
This sum, together with late payment interest accrued at 10 per cent per annum from Mar 21, 2024, till the date of full settlement, should be paid to Kenanga no later than seven days from the date of the letter, the letter said. 
 
The notice and letter are the latest in a series of financial troubles for the real estate developer. The company, or its subsidiaries, have also received notices or letters from Haitong International Financial Products (Singapore), Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia, certain bondholders and HSBC Bank.
 
Haitong International asked for US$21.5 million, Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia demanded RM60 million, bondholders sought US$23 million, and HSBC Bank is looking for RM6 million.
 
Hatten Land &ldquo remains committed in engaging proactively with Kenanga&rdquo with its financial adviser&rsquo s assistance to resolve the matter, it said.
 
The company&rsquo s controlling shareholders have entered into a term sheet with a reputable financial institution in Singapore in their personal capacity for fundraising facilities, which will be secured with their personal assets, Hatten Land added. This is meant to provide a shareholders&rsquo loan to the company for it to repay its secured bonds.
 
It is currently at the legal documentation stage.
 
&ldquo Barring any unforeseen circumstances, the group expects to drawdown the fundraising facilities in FY2024.&rdquo  
 
On whether it has resolved issues relating to previous letters of demand, Hatten Land said it continues to engage its lenders.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
13-Feb-2024 10:46
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hatten Land&rsquo s Q2 loss widens to $5.8 million on lower revenue
 
The weaker showing in Q2 was chiefly due to a 21.3% decline in revenue to RM3.8 million from RM4.9 million. 
SINGAPORE - Real estate developer Hatten Land on Feb 12 reported a net loss of RM20.7 million (S$5.8 million) for its second fiscal quarter ended December 2023, significantly deeper than the loss of RM4.3 million it recorded in the year-ago period.
 
On a per share basis, this translated to a loss of RM0.0111 compared with RM0.0023 in the comparable year-ago period, the group said in a bourse filing. No dividend was declared for the quarter under review.
 
The weaker bottom line showing in the second quarter was chiefly due to a 21.3 per cent decline in revenue to RM3.8 million from RM4.9 million. Hatten Land said its sales and marketing strategy is continuing in line with the progress of securing anchor tenants for its malls, which would potentially increase the value and attract more attention to its unsold properties.
 
Cost of sales for the quarter fell 43 per cent to RM1.6 million.
 
For the six-month period ended December 2023, Hatten Land&rsquo s net loss swelled to RM31.7 million from RM21 million. Revenue for the half-year period was down 6.4 per cent to RM14.2 million.
 
Hatten Land said that as at end-December 2023, its total loans and borrowings amounted to RM393.8 million &ndash of which RM391.8 million were classified as current liabilities and exceeded the group&rsquo s cash and bank balances of RM3 million.
 
The company&rsquo s liabilities of about RM1.1 billion also exceeded its current assets that totalled just RM876.8 million.
 
However, the company said it was still presenting a net asset position of RM43.7 million as at end-December last year.
 
Hatten Land said its directors believe the group can continue operating on a going-concern basis as the Malaysian property market is showing signs of gradual improvement and there is optimism for the recovery of its hospitality and property-related activities in Melaka. The company said it holds a &ldquo steadfast focus&rdquo on its core property development business.
 
Hatten Land said the total market value of its development properties crossed RM1.1 billion as at end-June 2023, of which RM663 million constitutes unsold completed properties that it intends to sell gradually.
 
The company said it continues to work with its creditors to extend or restructure payment plans that include payment structure as well as contra payments with its property units. It is also working with its banks for the roll-over and extension of the repayment obligations, which aligns with the company&rsquo s requirements for the current business climate, and channels its cash flow for operational purposes.
 
Hatten Land has also begun the strategic restructuring of its subsidiary GMSB, in a bid to rejig its legacy contractual obligation to achieve a more sustainable capital structure. This will in turn reduce the pressure on the company&rsquo s cash outflows in the future.
 
One of the executive directors, who is also a controlling shareholder of Hatten Land, has undertaken to provide necessary financial support in the form of debt, equity, or a combination of both, in the event that is required by the group to sustain its operations.
 
In its outlook statement, Hatten Land said Melaka&rsquo s slower pace of recovery &ndash when compared to major urban cities such as Kuala Lumpur and Johor Bahru &ndash is further compounded by the growing competition in the region.
 
A majority of the group&rsquo s unsold completed properties are commercial spaces that have been non-operational since the pandemic and the introduction of government control measures. In response, Hatten Land is focusing on &ldquo transforming these spaces into versatile and attractive areas&rdquo . It has established partnerships in various sectors and is consistently pursuing fundraising activities.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
01-Feb-2024 17:53
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hatten Land receives notice of default from Haitong over US$20 million loan
 
Hatten Land has received a notice of default dated Jan 30 from Haitong International Financial Products (Singapore), over a US$20 million convertible loan.
 
The loan, extended back in May 21 2020, was to help finance the Hatten City Project, among others.
 
The loan is secured by a corporate guarantee from a Hatten Land PH0 0.00% subsidiary in Malaysia, a charge of over 760 million Hatten Land shares, 345 retail units within the project, plus personal guarantees by " certain directors" of Hatten Land. They were not named.
 
This update via the stock exchange was issued in the name of Colin Tan, Hatten Land' s executive chairman and managing director (picture)
 
According to Hatten Land, Haiton is asking for US$21.5 million (including interests) to be paid within five business days of Jan 30. 
 
Hatten Land, after a follow-up with Haitong, says the latter is " prepared to agree to withhold taking recovery actions" up until March 31.
 
In the meantime, the parties are negotiating a settlement agreement.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Stocky901
Supreme |
17-Nov-2023 09:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You answered your own question wahaha. 🤣 🤣 🤣
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
noobnub
Supreme |
17-Nov-2023 09:37
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
oh you here also. bye
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||


