| Latest Forum Topics / Datapulse Tech Last:0.101 -- |
|
|
What news regarding TRADING HALT?
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
30-Sep-2023 11:44
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
New Datapulse chairman&rsquo s cash offer turns unconditional with 60.3% shares acquired
 
ANG Kong Meng, Datapulse Technology : BKW +7.14%&rsquo s chairman since a board reconstitution in July, has amassed more than half the total number of shares and warrants in the company, turning his cash offer unconditional in all respects.
 
As at 6 pm on Thursday (Sep 28), he had received valid acceptances of about 41.1 million shares, or 17.1 per cent of the total number of shares, as well as 4.4 million warrants, representing about 5 per cent of the total number of warrants.
 
This brought the total number of shares owned, controlled, or agreed to be acquired by him and his concert parties to around 144.6 million, representing 60.3 per cent of the total number of issued shares, and 51.9 per cent of the maximum potential share capital in the company.
 
The aggregate number of warrants reached around 54.4 million, or 61.1 per cent of the total number of warrants issued.
 
Datapulse also noted in its bourse filing on Friday that Ang will not extend the closing date on Oct 3. Acceptances received after 5.30 pm that day will be rejected.
 
On Aug 11, he had launched a mandatory conditional cash offer to acquire all the hotel and hospitality company&rsquo s shares at a unit price of S$0.09, after acquiring some 41.9 million Datapulse shares from the company&rsquo s former chairman, Aw Cheok Huat, through a married deal.
 
As at the offer announcement, Ang had a 43.2 per cent stake in the company.
 
He also made an offer for the warrants at S$0.01 apiece in cash, which was based on the highest amount paid by the offeror and concert parties in the six months before the offer announcement date.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ooptimizer
Member |
07-Sep-2023 08:58
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi, I have some shares of Datapulse. Should I sell to the offeror at 9 cents or should I keep? Please help give some advice cos I am new to shares. Thanks | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
09-Jan-2023 09:00
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Datapulse Technology
On Dec 29, Datapulse Technology : BKW +3.77% chairman and non-independent non-executive director Aw Cheok Huat acquired 411,900 shares at S$0.10 per share. The married deal increased his total interest in the hotel and hospitality property investment business from 10.00 per cent to 10.19 per cent.
 
Aw&rsquo s background spans mergers and acquisitions and corporate restructuring with some 25 years of experience in the hospitality industry.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
SmallSmall
Supreme |
03-Nov-2022 11:56
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Rights Issue 1 for 2 warrant @ $0.01. Exercise price $0.09 Rights first day trading. NAV $0.2649 for mother shares (currently trading at $0.098)  Warrants offers max leverage at a small cost for a gigantic return if the mother shares rockets one day. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
31-Oct-2022 08:47
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Datapulse Technology
 
On Oct 21, Datapulse Technology executive director Yee Chia Hsing acquired 77,900 shares at an average price of 9.7 cents per share.
 
This was his first acquisition of shares in the company since his appointment to the board on Aug 1.
 
Prior to his appointment, Yee was the director of corporate affairs at iX Biopharma and general manager of its nutraceutical business from 2021 to 2022 and head of Catalist, CIMB Bank, Singapore Branch from 2011 to 2021. He is also the lead independent director of First Sponsor Group and a member of the audit committee of Ren Ci Hospital (a Singapore charity).
 
He previously served as a Member of Parliament of Chua Chu Kang GRC, Nanyang division, from 2015 to 2020.
 
On Sep 28, Datapulse Technology reported attributable loss of SS$3.3 million for its FY22 (ended Jul 31) against a loss of S$3.7 million in FY21.
 
The hotel operations business contributed S$1.5 million of revenue through the group&rsquo s hotel, Travelodge Myeongdong City-Hall, while asset management fees and investment income each contributed S$0.2 million.
 
On Oct 20, Datapulse Technology received approval in-principle for the listing and quotation of up to 109,537,422 rights warrants and up to 109,537,422 new shares to be issued credited as fully paid upon the exercise of the rights warrants.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
24-Jan-2022 09:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Datapulse Technology executive director resigns, appoints financial controller
MAINBOARD-LISTED Datapulse Technology has appointed Lau Yin Whai as financial controller and company secretary of the company.
 
With effect from Jan 21, Lau will be responsible for the financial, accounting and corporate secretarial functions of the company and the group, Datapulse Technology disclosed in a bourse filing on Sunday (Jan 23).
 
He has over a decade of auditing experience, serving as an audit assistant manager at PwC from 2008 to 2012, and an audit senior manager at Deloitte from 2013 to 2021.
 
Meanwhile, executive director Lee Kam Seng has resigned to pursue personal interests and devote more time to other commitments. He had taken on the role since June 2019 and will officially step down on March 27.
 
Shares of Datapulse Technology last traded on Wednesday (Jan 19) at S$0.10.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
13-May-2021 11:56
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Rebuke of Datapulse' s ex-directors leaves shareholders wanting more
NO ONE blinked last month when the Singapore Exchange (SGX) reprimanded mainboard-listed Datapulse Technology' s three former executive directors, including a long-serving co-founder who sold his entire stake and bowed out of the company in 2017, days after he was re-elected as director.
 
The SGX' s Listings Disciplinary Committee (LDC) sanctioned the trio - Ng Cheow Chye (the company' s co-founder, former chief executive and deputy chairman), his brother Ng Cheow Leng, and Si Fok Yong - for failing to ensure that the company provided an accurate and clear picture in a circular issued four years ago. Shareholders had at the time been asked to vote on a major disposal of Datapulse' s only factory and headquarters at Tai Seng Drive for S$53 million.
 
It wasn' t unthinkable that the public rebuke went largely unnoticed. Datapulse has seen plenty of drama in the form of unexpected ownership changes, shareholder spats and governance fall-outs.
 
Still, public reprimands of directors are few and far between on the SGX. The significance of this one should not be missed. This is in fact the first time the regulator has reprimanded directors on such grounds.
 
The trio had also attempted to appeal against the decision, but were turned down.
 
At the company' s extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on Sept 28, 2017, 99.61 per cent of shareholders present and voting approved the proposed disposal of the Tai Seng property.
 
But the LDC has contended that shareholders were not provided with material information - related to another acquisition of an industrial property in Toa Payoh - to make an informed decision at the EGM. The Toa Payoh property was meant to be a replacement premises for Datapulse' s business and hence was not totally separate and independent from the proposed disposal.
 
The National Environment Agency (NEA) had in fact rejected Datapulse' s application to use the Toa Payoh site for manufacturing activities. Ensuing appeals were rejected too.
 
The LDC' s position is that the acquisition of the Toa Payoh property was clearly related to and was an important part of the context of the proposed disposal. Hence, it was reasonable for shareholders to be updated on the NEA' s rejections.
 
" The natural questions that would have arisen in shareholders' minds as a result of the NEA' s rejections of the company' s appeals were whether there would be any impact on the company' s continued operations, what were the company' s alternatives, and whether it was still prudent to proceed with the proposed disposal," said the LDC.
 
The LDC further rebuffed the directors' arguments that the NEA rejections were not material. It described as " untenable" the trio' s defence that as laymen, they lacked the legal experience to ensure the company' s compliance with regulatory requirements and had deferred to the independent directors and the chairman on such matters.
 
Indeed, there was ample time for the company to disclose the NEA' s first rejection in the circular and the second rejection before the EGM. This was not done.
 
Instead, Datapulse chose to announce that it was scrapping the option to buy the Toa Payoh property two months post-EGM. That same day, filings to the stock exchange revealed that Mr Ng Cheow Chye had sold his entire block in the company for nearly S$27 million at 55 Singapore cents apiece - a substantial premium over its stock price of 36 Singapore cents when the agreement on the stake sale was inked.
 
The regulator' s admonishment of Datapulse' s past directors comes nearly four years after the breach. The year 2017 and the ensuing years were controversial periods for the company due to other perceived disclosure and governance lapses. Shareholders might, therefore, be wondering: Is this it?
 
In a post on his website, governance hawk Mak Yuen Teen, of the NUS Business School, said: " Does this mean that the other potential breaches were not breaches at all? It is possible of course that private reprimands were issued for some other breaches, but the market is none the wiser in such cases."
 
Datapulse hasn' t had any luck since it switched lanes from the ailing media storage business in 2017 and flirted with a shampoo and hairspray business. This business was sold back at a loss a year later. In 2019, it ventured into the hotel business - drawing some consternation from shareholders - which has now been hit by the pandemic.
 
While shareholders may be somewhat placated by the regulator' s recent public reprimand, they are not much better off. And it would be tough to argue that the outcome of the whole affair has been satisfactory.
 
In fact, such a result can hardly be much of a deterrent for errant directors in the future.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
04-May-2021 11:34
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
REGULATORS SHOULD SEND TIMELY AND CLEAR MESSAGES REGARDING MARKET CONDUCT Mak Yuen Teen  |  Apr 25, 2021 Which brings me to the case of Datapulse Technology, one of many cases where I have highlighted potential rule breaches over the past few years. On 15 April 2021, SGX announced that the Listings Disciplinary Committee has publicly reprimanded three former executive directors of Datapulse Technology for failing to provide all information in its circular for shareholders to make an informed decision on the disposal of its property at its EGM held on 28 September 2017.  In other words, the public reprimand came more than 3.5 years after the breach. It took market players by surprise judging by the messages I received. Some have become accustomed to rule breaches being unpunished and had assumed that nothing will be done especially since several years have passed. Others were surprised that this was the only outcome from the case, since SGX said nothing about whether other action is pending or whether it has referred any matter to the statutory regulators. Does this mean that the other potential breaches were not breaches at all or did the regulators decide that certain types of breaches do not warrant action? It is possible of course that private reprimands were issued for some other breaches, but the market is none the wiser in such cases. For this reason, stock exchanges in other markets such as Malaysia have largely discontinued the use of private reprimands. SGX does not even disclose separately the number of private and public reprimands they have issued for issuers. It lumps together private and public actions and those for issuers, intermediaries and their representatives. It provides no information about what these actions are for and no information about ongoing investigations. Contrast this with countries such as Australia and Hong Kong, where regulators (the Australian Securities and Investment Commission in the case of Australia since enforcement of listing rules no longer rests with the stock exchange) disclose up-to-date statistics on ongoing investigations, including the issues that are the subject of these investigations. Our regulators should do the same. This is particularly important given the length of time it takes for our regulators to investigate and take enforcement actions. Opacity undermines confidence in the regulatory regime and encourages market misconduct to perpetuate. Our regulators should also send timely and clear messages about unacceptable market conduct and commit to investigating all serious breaches. Will our regulators step up to help rebuild market confidence? Or will the death spiral in our market continue? https://governanceforstakeholders.com/2021/04/25/regulators-should-send-timely-and-clear-messages-regarding-market-conduct/ |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
16-Apr-2021 09:28
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
SGX raps ex-executive directors of Datapulse Technology for breaching rules
 
THREE former executive directors of Datapulse Technology have been reprimanded by the Listings Disciplinary Committee (LDC) of the Singapore Exchange (SGX) for breaching a mainboard listing rule.
 
The trio are Ng Cheow Chye, Ng Cheow Leng, and Si Yok Fong @ Chin Yok Fong, SGX said on Thursday.
 
The directors failed to ensure that Datapulse had provided in its circular all information necessary for shareholders to make a properly informed decision on the disposal of its property at 15A Tai Seng Drive at the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) in September 2017.
 
Two months before that, Datapulse had announced that it had granted an option to a purchaser for the sale of its sole manufacturing premises at the property for S$53.5 million. In August, the company announced that it was granted an option to purchase a property at 5 Toa Payoh West for S$10.5 million.
 
To acquire the Toa Payoh property, Datapulse required the approval of Jurong Town Corporation, which included the approval of the National Environment Agency (NEA), for the use of the property for its manufacturing activities.
 
NEA rejected the company' s proposed use of the Toa Payoh property for its manufacturing activities on Sept 4, 2017. Subsequent appeals by the company that month were also rejected.
 
On Sept 12, 2017, Datapulse issued a circular to inform shareholders about the proposed disposal of the Tai Seng Property, a major transaction that required shareholders' approval.
 
Shareholders were to vote on the disposal at an EGM on Sept 28, 2017. During the EGM, 99.6 per cent of shareholders present and voting, approved the proposed disposal.
 
The LDC said that the NEA rejections were material and/or necessary information for shareholders to make an informed decision at the EGM.
 
" From a reading of the circular, it was clear that the acquisition of the Toa Payoh property was related to and an important part of the context of the proposed disposal," it said. " As such, it was reasonable to expect shareholders to have been informed of any material developments affecting the company' s proposed acquisition of the Toa Payoh property."
 
The LDC noted that shareholders would have had questions arising from the NEA rejections - such as whether there would be any impact on Datapulse' s continued operations, and whether it was still prudent to proceed with the proposed disposal in circumstances where it was not possible to acquire the Toa Payoh property as replacement premises.
 
The trio, who resigned as directors in December 2017, have filed a notice of appeal against the decision of the LDC. However, SGX said an appeal would not be heard, as the chairman of the Listings Appeals Committee is of the opinion that grounds for appeal have not been met.
 
Datapulse was in the media-storage business since its listing in 1994 until FY2018. It is now principally engaged in hotel and hospitality property investment.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
13-Apr-2020 10:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Datapulse: very low occupancy of Seoul hotel to partly hit full-year results SUN, APR 12, 2020 - 4:28 PM DATAPULSE Technology gave an update on Saturday on the operations of its hotel Travelodge Myeongdong  City Hall in Seoul. The property was formerly known as Hotel Aropa. " The novel coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak is continuing to have a significant adverse impact on the hospitality industry in South Korea, with both international and domestic travel restrictions and flight suspensions affecting hotel occupancy levels. The group&rsquo s results for the financial year ending July 31, 2020 will be adversely impacted as a result of, among other things, the very low occupancy of Travelodge Myeongdong City Hall," Datapulse said in its regulatory filing with the Singapore Exchange. The group will continue to implement cost-cutting measures to mitigate the negative effects arising from the Covid-19 situation and will also use this opportunity to focus on the completion of the last phase of the hotel&rsquo s refurbishment plans, it added. The counter last traded on Thursday at 26 Singapore cents, up 6.5 cents from the 19.5 cents closing price on the previous day. Datapulse' s net loss for the first-half ended Jan 31, 2020 widened to S$768,000 from a (restated) net loss of S$205,000 in the year-ago period. \The group is principally engaged in the hotel and hospitality property investment business. It was previously involved in the media storage business and haircare business. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/datapulse-very-low-occupancy-of-seoul-hotel-to-partly-hit-full-year-results |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
12-Mar-2019 16:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
More damning report on this clown stock by Prof Mak Y.T........................ Datapulse Technology: Here we go again&hellip . Published February 21, 2019By Mak Yuen Teen On March 14, Datapulse Technology will hold an EGM to consider seven resolutions. Minority shareholders should carefully study the circular and consider voting against 1, 2 and 7 which relate to the expansion of the business to hotels and hospitality assets, the acquisition of the hotel in Seoul for KRW35 billion (about S$42.7 million or  57% of the cash balance based on the FY2019 Q1 results), and the interested person transactions (IPTs) with ICP Group.  They should also consider voting against the change of name of the company to Capiti Property Partners Ltd under resolution 4 as that is part of sealing the fate of the company in a business that I believe it is highly unlikely to succeed in. In my opinion, they should vote for resolution 3 to approve the disposal of Wayco Manufacturing, the onerous acquisition made by the previous board. It should not have been bought in the first place &ndash a fact that many shareholders knew but the then board thought otherwise, and the proposed hotel acquisition may be deja vu with a different board. As for resolution 5, which relates to the adoption of a new constitution, I have not gone through the new constitution being proposed. I would like to see strict provisions in the constitution dealing with situations where directors have a personal interest in transactions, beyond just disclosure and abstention from voting. This is because there is already going to be a resolution relating to interested person transactions (IPTs) and shareholders cannot rule out recurring situations of directors having interests in transactions. The constitution should require directors with a direct or indirect interest in any shape or form to disclose, abstain and recuse. Better still if they completely avoid such conflicts &ndash but I think that may be expecting too much as the chairman is already having an interest in two companies that will be transacting with each other. For resolution 6 on the proposed change of external auditors from KPMG LLP to EY LLP, I am ambivalent about retaining KPMG. They have been auditors since 1993 and the partner-in-charge did not even acknowledge an email and a reminder I sent to her asking some questions as a shareholder. While I understand external auditors often see themselves as working for the company &ndash and in effect the board which is often appointed by controlling shareholders &ndash they are appointed by and report to members of the company. I will have more to say on this issue in a later post, especially why I think we should look to the laws in Australia which make external auditors much more accountable to shareholders generally. However, I am not convinced that Ernst & Young LLP (EY) is the right choice because EY did substantial work for the company in reviewing its entry into the haircare business and the financial and tax due diligence on the Wayco acquisition. They must have earned substantial fees from such work and developed a close relationship with the company &ndash even if it was a different part of the firm which did that work and EY may claim &ldquo Chinese walls&rdquo . Certainly, shareholders should question the fees earned from those services and whether the work that has been done poses a conflict to its role as external auditors going forward. Given the recent breakdown in trust in external auditors, particularly the Big 4 firms, external auditors more than ever need to be whiter than white. EY (Singapore) is of course the auditor under scrutiny for the audit of the Noble Group subsidiary here. I hope to post a series of short articles on my website about some of the resolutions closer to the EGM although I cannot promise. I also plan to write an article summarising all that have gone wrong at Datapulse based on the more than 20 articles I have written, the rules that I believe have been bent or broken, and the regulatory responses or lack thereof thus far. The proposed title of this article? &ldquo Why minority shareholders don&rsquo t stand a chance&rdquo . Sadly, this really applies to the market here as a whole.   https://governanceforstakeholders.com/2019/02/21/datapulse-technology-here-we-go-again/ |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
16-Nov-2018 18:07
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Another joke of a stock in SGX.    Lol. Datapulse U-turns on haircare business, will sell back for less than entitled to expedite disposal FRI, NOV 16, 2018 - 9:48 AM DATAPULSE Technology has changed its mind on a recently acquired haircare business, and now wants to sell it back for less than an initially agreed amount to expedite the disposal. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/datapulse-u-turns-on-haircare-business-will-sell-back-for-less-than-entitled-to   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Grouchycabi
Master |
01-Oct-2018 17:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Two trades in one day. This type how to trade??? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
29-Sep-2018 16:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Another ZOO discovered........ Datapulse&rsquo s compliance review: a big letdown Published September 28, 2018 By Mak Yuen Teen On 18 September 2018, The Business Times ran a report following the release of the executive summary of the review with the headline &ldquo No systemic failure by Datapulse in M& A due process: review&rdquo .  By expanding the scope of the review to 2000, the company has managed to change the narrative and divert attention from its recent appalling corporate governance. Extending the review back to 2000 is a waste of shareholders&rsquo monies and has very limited usefulness..... However, it is not only the scope of the review that undermines the whole exercise and renders it rather useless in my opinion. The report makes clear who is calling the shots in the review and who it is for. It says it is intended  for, and only for,  the benefit of the Board, the AC and  no other person. Not for SGX which ordered the review, or for shareholders who are paying for it. It goes on to say that Lee and Lee &ldquo do not accept or assume responsibility for our work, and this Report thereof, to anyone except the AC&rdquo .  In other words, Lee and Lee have no responsibility for its work to SGX Regco or shareholders. The trouble is that the AC consists of the same directors whose actions are the subject of the review. Datapulse has taken &ldquo ownself check ownself&rdquo to a whole different level. It is a case of &ldquo ownself appoints a reviewer to review what ownself wants to be reviewed and then report to ownself&rdquo . Frankly, this is absurd. It is because of cases such as this that third party reviews, including for example the review commissioned by the Noble Group in response to questions about its accounting and disclosure practices, often lack credibility. https://governanceforstakeholders.com/2018/09/28/datapulses-compliance-review-a-big-letdown/ |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
simpleguy123
Elite |
23-Jul-2018 18:30
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Wow, my dad bought 10 lots at $0.28. And at that time: i called him crazy, and he called me a fool. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
simpleguy123
Elite |
18-Jul-2018 18:40
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This Ms Ng is the Majority Family Owner, or the Fund Management trying to takeover???
Heard there were 2 Ms Ngs
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
18-Jul-2018 18:37
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Ms Ng sold shares to another SSH at 55c ...why ?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
simpleguy123
Elite |
22-Jun-2018 18:21
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Any news of this share? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ccakg88
Member |
10-Apr-2018 07:10
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Is diversifying into hair care the right move? http://youtu.be/FB76SXC9vlw Let us STOP this diworsification by removing the board on 20 April EGM How to fill up the proxy  form: https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/...1522651727 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ccakg88
Member |
10-Apr-2018 07:09
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Calling all Datapulse Technology shareholders to unite and vote out the Board led by Low Beng Tin this upcoming EGM on 20 April! This is a close fight, every vote counts big or small! Vote in person or by proxy (need to be submitted at least 48hours before) Message from group of concerned minority shareholders (English): https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/...1522651661 Message from group of concerned minority shareholders (Chinese): https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/...1522651742 Prof Mak Yuen Teen' s guide to voting: https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/...1522651736 How to fill up the proxy form: https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/...1522651727 Credentials of Proposed Directors: https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/...1522651703 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

