Back

Latest Forum Topics / Alita Resources    Last:0.078 --

Post Reply

alliance mineral resources move up Post Reply Rate topic
Alvin2042 Master	10-Oct-2017 18:32        Alvin2042 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	From what I know, it will not be illegical to promote the company as long as the materials used in the promotion are factual, and no misrepresentations. Not very sure about SGX. But the most it can do is give a censual, that's all. Anyway, as long as the revenue and profit come in next year as forecast, who carea whether the CEO /director talk about the SP. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:21) Posted: ALL FORUMMERS TAKE NOTE.. CEO SAY WILL RISE YO $1 IN 2018.. WHAT R U WAITING FOR BYE N BYE ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	10-Oct-2017 18:28        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Now you providing a pure laugh. Now, YuuZoo posted some analyst report you state and SGX not happy. So let me get this right, if a company posts a link etc of an analyst report then that a " No no" right? So if a " No, no" and it upsets SGX as you claim, then why does YuuZoo persists to have likes via it website of any analyst report? Surely if posting an analyst report (or link to) is a big " No, No" then surely SGX would hound them to take it down right? So how come the analyst report from OCBC Investment Research still clearly linked? Or even the one from Alpha Deal Group? The Alpha Deal Group initiated a Buy call. Heck that positive/singing praises. So if SGX so unhappy then why it still linked? bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:12) Posted: SGX NOT HAPPY WHEN YUUZOO POSTED SOME ANALYST REPORT THAT SING PRAISES TO THE STOCK.. NOW THIS IS EVN MORE SERIOUS..CEO PREDICTING SHARE PRICE HIMSELF.. CHECK ITT OUT AT YOUUZOO ANNOUNCEMENT ..ITS ALL THERE.. DONT ASK ME TO POST HERE RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:10) Posted: So if this first time you heard CEO predicting price rise in SGX then how you know SGX not be happy? You the SGX are you? You best buddies with SGX CEO? How about head of compliance? Wow....what fabricated claims
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 18:21        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	ALL FORUMMERS TAKE NOTE.. CEO SAY WILL RISE YO $1 IN 2018.. WHAT R U WAITING FOR BYE N BYE ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 18:12        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	SGX NOT HAPPY WHEN YUUZOO POSTED SOME ANALYST REPORT THAT SING PRAISES TO THE STOCK.. NOW THIS IS EVN MORE SERIOUS..CEO PREDICTING SHARE PRICE HIMSELF.. CHECK ITT OUT AT YOUUZOO ANNOUNCEMENT ..ITS ALL THERE.. DONT ASK ME TO POST HERE RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:10) Posted: So if this first time you heard CEO predicting price rise in SGX then how you know SGX not be happy? You the SGX are you? You best buddies with SGX CEO? How about head of compliance? Wow....what fabricated claims. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:03) Posted: THIS IS THE FIRST TIME ..THAT I KONW CEO PREDICTING PRICE RISE IN SGX.. SGX WILL NOT BE HAPPY...HAHHAAHAH
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	10-Oct-2017 18:10        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	So if this first time you heard CEO predicting price rise in SGX then how you know SGX not be happy? You the SGX are you? You best buddies with SGX CEO? How about head of compliance? Wow....what fabricated claims. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:03) Posted: THIS IS THE FIRST TIME ..THAT I KONW CEO PREDICTING PRICE RISE IN SGX.. SGX WILL NOT BE HAPPY...HAHHAAHAH
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
hatetrollers Member	10-Oct-2017 18:06        hatetrollers About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	You already declared here in this thread that you are here to cheat newbie retailers with different business startegies.....it is very clear that you shorted AMAL yesterday and will be downramping until you cover it.....dont think that this forum can control AMAL SP...dont be a frog in the well... andychew.eh      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:55) Posted: Now then you know this AMAL group ? They could be "syndicate " or "runners" for AMAL BBs. So retailers better dobt chase this stock. Whatever news they come out , they want the retailers to buy up to reach 50 cts. In this way, CEO no need to pay anything to Jonathan Lim. After 24 Oct, you can watch the Olympic Champion Diving show. Anthing that values BH at above $300 mil is over priced. When AM 25 cts still ok to buy. Now 33 cts ....all waiting to exit and do profit taking. E.g. Risktaker bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:41) Posted: if u cannot proof me wrong.. why dont you proof yourself right?? by quoting bye rules of sgx?? free forum indeed.. the fact you all want to dominate the discussion..n call names to every one who disagree with you.. to puy it bluntly YOU HAVE BECOMES BULLIES.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 18:04        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	YES GANG OF 6..BIG BULLIES..I KNOW MY ENGLAND IS BAD.. DO I NEED TO APOLOGISE TO U..WHEN MY ENGLAND I SBAD?? MY TYPING EBEN WORSE.. RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:00) Posted: No, you cannot prove or support your statement because you know it rubbish, and you have zero grounds for it. And actually it is " JUST PROVE ME..." not " JUST PROOF ME" . Just to help you learn something. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:56) Posted: JUST PROOF ME WRONG IS MY ANSWER TO YOU..
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
timothylim890 Veteran	10-Oct-2017 18:04        timothylim890 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	And remember this: AMA went from a tantalum exporter facing shrinking margins to the owner of a huge lithium resource. 33 cents still seems cheap. andychew.eh      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 18:01) Posted: REMEMBER THIS : AILLIANCE MINERALS RESOURCES UP FROM 5 CTS TO CURRENT 33 CTS. MORE THAN 600% GAIN. INSIDER AND BB AND BB RUNNERS AND GROUP I THINK ALREADY BIY AT 5 CTS TO 15 CTS MAX. If 40 cts = 800% GAIN If 50 cts = 1000% GAIN ASTONISHING FOR A LOSS MAKING COMPANY NOT PRODUCING ANYTHING YET UNTIL NEXT YEAR APRIL.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 18:03        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	THIS IS THE FIRST TIME ..THAT I KONW CEO PREDICTING PRICE RISE IN SGX.. SGX WILL NOT BE HAPPY...HAHHAAHAH
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 18:01        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	TO AL FROUMMERS..IF U INTEND TO [OST YOUR VIEWS THAT ARE OPPOSIT EOF THE GANG OF 6.. WARNING.. PLEASE TO BE ABLE TO STOMACH THE GANG OF 6 BIG BULLIES RULES  FIRST.. U WILL GET ALL SORTS CYBRE BULLYING ..IF U ALLOW THEEM....DONT BE AFRAID..TO POST DIFFERENT VIEWS.. THIS IS A FORUM FOR DISCUSSIONS.. NOT A FORUM TO PROMOTE THE STOCK..UNLESS U BELONG TO THE GANG OF 6 bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:58) Posted: PLEASE WUOTE SGX BYE RULES THAT SAYS CEO CAN PREDICT SHARE PRICE.. GANG OF 6..BIG BULLIES RULES?? RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:53) Posted: This is not bullying. This is about correcting misleading statements if indeed there is. You claim and I quote: " when ceo says  stock price should rise to  $1 in 2018.. expect call from sgx...this is ano no afar as sgx is concern..for ceo/directors promoting/predicting the share price.. this ceo does not know this sgx practice????" That is your statement at 17:15. You are the one making the claim. If it against the regulations clearly articulate which one or ones. If you cannot then is your statement correct or not? If not then it misleading, and all we simply doing is ensuring misleading rubbish is shown to be that. If you can quote the regulation/section then do, and hey, how about you ring MAS/SGX to report it if such a " No, no" . They appreciate it will they not and you be a hero. But if you cannot then only conclusion is you sprouting misleading information and rubbish. So tell us given you claim to know.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
andychew.eh Senior	10-Oct-2017 18:01        andychew.eh About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	REMEMBER THIS : AILLIANCE MINERALS RESOURCES UP FROM 5 CTS TO CURRENT 33 CTS. MORE THAN 600% GAIN. INSIDER AND BB AND BB RUNNERS AND GROUP I THINK ALREADY BIY AT 5 CTS TO 15 CTS MAX. If 40 cts = 800% GAIN If 50 cts = 1000% GAIN ASTONISHING FOR A LOSS MAKING COMPANY NOT PRODUCING ANYTHING YET UNTIL NEXT YEAR APRIL.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	10-Oct-2017 18:00        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	No, you cannot prove or support your statement because you know it rubbish, and you have zero grounds for it. And actually it is " JUST PROVE ME..." not " JUST PROOF ME" . Just to help you learn something. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:56) Posted: JUST PROOF ME WRONG IS MY ANSWER TO YOU..   RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:53) Posted: This is not bullying. This is about correcting misleading statements if indeed there is. You claim and I quote: " when ceo says  stock price should rise to  $1 in 2018.. expect call from sgx...this is ano no afar as sgx is concern..for ceo/directors promoting/predicting the share price.. this ceo does not know this sgx practice????" That is your statement at 17:15. You are the one making the claim. If it against the regulations clearly articulate which one or ones. If you cannot then is your statement correct or not? If not then it misleading, and all we simply doing is ensuring misleading rubbish is shown to be that. If you can quote the regulation/section then do, and hey, how about you ring MAS/SGX to report it if such a " No, no" . They appreciate it will they not and you be a hero. But if you cannot then only conclusion is you sprouting misleading information and rubbish. So tell us given you claim to know.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
timothylim890 Veteran	10-Oct-2017 17:59        timothylim890 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I am starting to wonder whether bernardc is a chatbot. a poorly programmed one... RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:57) Posted: You claimed it a " No, no" and they will expect a call from SGX. If it a " No, No" then there must be a rule telling, instructing directors etc they cannot do it. So tell us where that rule is? Or is this some imaginary informal issue. If so please provide a legal case or other example where SGX or MAS has prosectuted or fined or reprimanded a director. Come on. Provide evidence. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:52) Posted: PLEASE SEE MY POST FOR THE EXACT WORDS.. I SAY..PROMOTING SHARE PRICE N PREDICTING SHARE PRICE IS A SGX NO NO.. U TAKE OFFENCE AT THIS STATEMENT?? GANG OF 6 BULIIES RULES?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 17:58        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	PLEASE WUOTE SGX BYE RULES THAT SAYS CEO CAN PREDICT SHARE PRICE.. GANG OF 6..BIG BULLIES RULES?? RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:53) Posted: This is not bullying. This is about correcting misleading statements if indeed there is. You claim and I quote: " when ceo says  stock price should rise to  $1 in 2018.. expect call from sgx...this is ano no afar as sgx is concern..for ceo/directors promoting/predicting the share price.. this ceo does not know this sgx practice????" That is your statement at 17:15. You are the one making the claim. If it against the regulations clearly articulate which one or ones. If you cannot then is your statement correct or not? If not then it misleading, and all we simply doing is ensuring misleading rubbish is shown to be that. If you can quote the regulation/section then do, and hey, how about you ring MAS/SGX to report it if such a " No, no" . They appreciate it will they not and you be a hero. But if you cannot then only conclusion is you sprouting misleading information and rubbish. So tell us given you claim to know. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:47) Posted: gang of 5 is iT?? BIG BULLIES RULES ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	10-Oct-2017 17:57        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	You claimed it a " No, no" and they will expect a call from SGX. If it a " No, No" then there must be a rule telling, instructing directors etc they cannot do it. So tell us where that rule is? Or is this some imaginary informal issue. If so please provide a legal case or other example where SGX or MAS has prosectuted or fined or reprimanded a director. Come on. Provide evidence. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:52) Posted: PLEASE SEE MY POST FOR THE EXACT WORDS.. I SAY..PROMOTING SHARE PRICE N PREDICTING SHARE PRICE IS A SGX NO NO.. U TAKE OFFENCE AT THIS STATEMENT?? GANG OF 6 BULIIES RULES?/ RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:48) Posted: Hey, you the one who made the claim. So it your responsibility to back it up. You stated very clearly it was against SGX regulations. That is your claim so own it. Hence, it is your responsibility to back it up. If no rule exists then how am I meant to specify a section? But you the one claiming the regulation exists so prove it. And this nothing to do with disagreeing. It about correcting misleading statement if indeed there is one. If your claim is correct well substantiate it. Do you have the courage? Hey, if I am wrong I happy to admit it, but if you unwilling or cannot substantiate your claims then (a) do not make them in first place, and (b) do not cry about it if someone calls you on it
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
andychew.eh Senior	10-Oct-2017 17:57        andychew.eh About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	The" real mining " here is actually " share mining " that gives fast cash profits to the BBs and groups. andychew.eh      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:55) Posted: Now then you know this AMAL group ? They could be "syndicate " or "runners" for AMAL BBs. So retailers better dobt chase this stock. Whatever news they come out , they want the retailers to buy up to reach 50 cts. In this way, CEO no need to pay anything to Jonathan Lim. After 24 Oct, you can watch the Olympic Champion Diving show. Anthing that values BH at above $300 mil is over priced. When AM 25 cts still ok to buy. Now 33 cts ....all waiting to exit and do profit taking. E.g. Risktaker bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:41) Posted: if u cannot proof me wrong.. why dont you proof yourself right?? by quoting bye rules of sgx?? free forum indeed.. the fact you all want to dominate the discussion..n call names to every one who disagree with you.. to puy it bluntly YOU HAVE BECOMES BULLIES.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 17:56        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	JUST PROOF ME WRONG IS MY ANSWER TO YOU..   RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:53) Posted: This is not bullying. This is about correcting misleading statements if indeed there is. You claim and I quote: " when ceo says  stock price should rise to  $1 in 2018.. expect call from sgx...this is ano no afar as sgx is concern..for ceo/directors promoting/predicting the share price.. this ceo does not know this sgx practice????" That is your statement at 17:15. You are the one making the claim. If it against the regulations clearly articulate which one or ones. If you cannot then is your statement correct or not? If not then it misleading, and all we simply doing is ensuring misleading rubbish is shown to be that. If you can quote the regulation/section then do, and hey, how about you ring MAS/SGX to report it if such a " No, no" . They appreciate it will they not and you be a hero. But if you cannot then only conclusion is you sprouting misleading information and rubbish. So tell us given you claim to know. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:47) Posted: gang of 5 is iT?? BIG BULLIES RULES ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
andychew.eh Senior	10-Oct-2017 17:55        andychew.eh About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Now then you know this AMAL group ? They could be "syndicate " or "runners" for AMAL BBs. So retailers better dobt chase this stock. Whatever news they come out , they want the retailers to buy up to reach 50 cts. In this way, CEO no need to pay anything to Jonathan Lim. After 24 Oct, you can watch the Olympic Champion Diving show. Anthing that values BH at above $300 mil is over priced. When AM 25 cts still ok to buy. Now 33 cts ....all waiting to exit and do profit taking. E.g. Risktaker bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:41) Posted: if u cannot proof me wrong.. why dont you proof yourself right?? by quoting bye rules of sgx?? free forum indeed.. the fact you all want to dominate the discussion..n call names to every one who disagree with you.. to puy it bluntly YOU HAVE BECOMES BULLIES.. RedEye1811      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:34) Posted: Fact you cannot quote/specify the section merely confirm you full of it, and you pure " fake" , and an utter coward. I already done my research and I declared that I found nothing. So I had the courage to say it. You a weak coward who too scared to correct me. If you got courage and can state section of regulations covering it and I am wrong then happily admit I am wrong. But as you too guttless to support your statement then just evidence you a coward who sprout rubbish with legitimate knowledge
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
bernardc Elite	10-Oct-2017 17:54        bernardc About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	SGX IF U ARE READING THIS.. CEO PROMOTING N PREDICTING SHARE PRICE WILL RISE TO $1
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
RedEye1811 Master	10-Oct-2017 17:53        RedEye1811 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	This is not bullying. This is about correcting misleading statements if indeed there is. You claim and I quote: " when ceo says  stock price should rise to  $1 in 2018.. expect call from sgx...this is ano no afar as sgx is concern..for ceo/directors promoting/predicting the share price.. this ceo does not know this sgx practice????" That is your statement at 17:15. You are the one making the claim. If it against the regulations clearly articulate which one or ones. If you cannot then is your statement correct or not? If not then it misleading, and all we simply doing is ensuring misleading rubbish is shown to be that. If you can quote the regulation/section then do, and hey, how about you ring MAS/SGX to report it if such a " No, no" . They appreciate it will they not and you be a hero. But if you cannot then only conclusion is you sprouting misleading information and rubbish. So tell us given you claim to know. bernardc      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:47) Posted: gang of 5 is iT?? BIG BULLIES RULES ?? hatetrollers      ( Date: 10-Oct-2017 17:34) Posted: When you give some statements, it is your duty to back it up with some proof though most of the fearmongers/cheaters give foolish/baseless statements as this is a free forum. Look at guys like Redeye, Atom, Luanboo, Furnace who share valuable informations with supporting links
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   1-20 of 10377   Older>   Last