Latest Forum Topics /
Advanced
Last:0.128
+0.001
|
|
|
Cash 35c nav 70c...share px only 23c...foc ??
|
|||||
|
Thi654321ABCDEF
Master |
09-Oct-2023 15:01
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Voting is the final
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
nngeeh
Veteran |
06-Oct-2023 16:55
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It is very odd that the volume increased and price dropped to 0.235 one day before the EGM. The volumes was low prior to it. MD said  he only made his final decision at the time of voting at the EGM .....   
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
FrancisLim
Elite |
06-Oct-2023 16:08
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
The MD suddenly has a dream...  He changed his mind and voted NO.    The Exchange is a joke.  Reminds me of another Co, Datapulse Technology where much had been written on the change of management and also the cos change of business plan. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
nngeeh
Veteran |
05-Oct-2023 14:03
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I hope SGX will investigate the share transaction if the sellers are mainly concentrated on a few invidivual accounts. If SGX found any wrongdoing, or breach and provide repriments then ... the affected shareholders might be able to group together to take legal action against the board of directions, and especially Dr Wong.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
cumzilla
Member |
05-Oct-2023 13:37
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just an excuse I guess, like others had mentioned, if this is a material information involving potential investment, the company is obligated to make an annoucement prior to the EGM. Now already 4 days since the EGM, no annoucement yet on the ' potential investment' .
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
nngeeh
Veteran |
05-Oct-2023 12:22
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Dr Wong is a totally irresponsible director. When he decide to propose cash, he should have decided it will not be allocating this cash for any investment opportunity.
Now, due to his irresponsible action, those bought at 0.24 is now trapped due to his action.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
05-Oct-2023 10:38
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Advanced Holdings' MD voted against cash distribution plan as he is pondering another deal
Wong Kar King, managing director and controlling shareholder of Advanced Holdings BLZ 0.00% , voted against a capital reduction and cash distribution plan, as he was mulling a potential investment.
 
The proposed investment came about after the company' s board put forward the proposal and before the EGM was held on Sept 29.
 
Under the plan, each Advanced Holdings shareholder would receive a cash distribution of 23.2 cents, in a bid by the company to reduce its capital and account for the accumulated losses of more than $15 million as at Dec 31 2022 over the years.
 
Under this plan, Wong would personally receive $9.6 million, based on his stake of more than 41.4 million shares.
 
However, the proposal did not go through, with 81.01% of the shares voting against, outnumbering the 18.99% shares in favour.
 
At the EGM held on Sept 29, Wong apparently left halfway as " he was not feeling well" .
At a subsequent meeting with the rest of the board, Wong said he had " pondered hard" but chose " at the time of voting" at the EGM to vote against.
 
In response to queries put forth by SGX and investors' grouping SIAS, Advanced Holdings says that Wong " was made aware of certain business and / or investment opportunities and had preliminary discussions to explore these opportunities, which would require capital."  
 
" Given the impending EGM date, Wong did not have the latitude to analyse and review such opportunities in full."
 
Therefore, Wong, believing that is in the " best interests" of   Advanced Holdings to retain the capital until these opportunities can be fully reviewed by the board.
 
" Retaining the capital in the company would thus provide more options than proceeding with the cash distribution, which remains an option should there be no conclusive outcome on the other opportunities," the company states.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
luckyguy3
Master |
05-Oct-2023 06:18
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
YES! 100% something fishy going on.. but our sgx and authority is anti small investors, nothing will be done. As usual just some queuries from SGX and the irony, the person involved replied to SGX query himself. Is really ownself check ownself
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
surewin73
Member |
05-Oct-2023 01:45
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yes, but do you notice that after the capital reduction news was announced, the share have many seller and keep selling and even sell at 0.235 which I was wondering will the EGM fail. I strongly believed someone knows better than us. Just check the seller for the beginning will find out more details. But this Only SGX can check..
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
luckyguy3
Master |
05-Oct-2023 01:29
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yes, u are right. It does not matter whether there is a new investor(Amara) or new business/investment (Advanced) or new material information like the Africa scandal (OLAM) etc.. As long as the information is MATERIAL enough then he must make an  annoucement especially with the EGM approaching. Why do I say the information is material? BECOS HE SAYS IT HIMSELF !!!. The information was material enough to make him change his mind and  voted NO, so why did he hide the information from other shareholders? He should also let the other shareholders know about the potential new business/investment so that other shareholders can make an informed choice before/during the EGM.  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Kandee
Senior |
05-Oct-2023 00:33
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The MD technically withheld material information from the existing shareholders.  Knowing this material information, he did not vote for this resolution.    If this was material information that the MD could change his mind, SGX should still query the board as to why it was not made public nor call off the EGM?    I don' t think it was too late to call it off.    Why till today, 4 working days after the EGM, has this material information not been announced?  The question is whether this is an afterthought after being questioned or genuine.    If it was genuine, the MD could have stayed back during the EGM and explained it directly.  It would have been a good platform to clarify the matter. Noted the chairman said that the MD was not feeling well and left halfway through the EGM.  Again, looking at the result, in the mind of the majority this was an excuse as he dared not face the shareholders during the EGM.  PS.  The way I read LuckyGuy3' s post is that I believe LuckyGuy3 was making a point about Amara making announcement on business dealings that could have a material impact on the stock and not investors per se. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
investshare
Supreme |
04-Oct-2023 21:07
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Read carefully, when did he say got new investor???
He said got business / investment opportunity. This is normal in the course of running business.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
FrancisLim
Elite |
04-Oct-2023 21:04
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
He had the Eureka moment. What is the purpose of the Board and the deliberations by the Board? The Board was also not aware and is responding to the various queries (SGX and SIAS..) What is happening to Corporate Governance? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
luckyguy3
Master |
04-Oct-2023 20:44
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Quote: " The Board understood that subsequent to the Board& rsquo s Recommendation and announcement of the notice of EGM on 7 September 2023 and before the date of the EGM on 29 September 2023, Dr Wong was made aware of certain business and / or investment opportunities and had preliminary discussions to explore these opportunities, which would require capital.  so he keep this material information secret and never inform shareholders? isn' t this like market manipulation? U look at Amara hotel annoucement, the CEO/major shareholders will inform shareholders that they are holding discussions with potential investors etc... Why this Dr Wong never inform shareholders?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
cumzilla
Member |
04-Oct-2023 20:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
SGX-ST&rsquo s Query 2: We note that the Controlling Shareholder, Dr Wong Kar King (&ldquo Dr Wong&rdquo ) is currently the Managing Director and a Board Member of the Company. From the EGM Results, we note that Dr Wong did not vote for the Resolution for the Proposed Capital Reduction and Cash Distribution. Did Dr Wong attend and vote at the EGM? If so, please provide his rationale for the inconsistency in the Board&rsquo s Recommendation vis-à -vis the EGM Results for the Proposed Capital Reduction and Cash Distribution. Company&rsquo s response to Query 2: Dr Wong attended and personally voted against the resolution at the EGM. After voting, Dr Wong left the EGM as he was not feeling well. Dr Wong informed the Board at a meeting subsequent to the EGM that he had pondered hard on his decision to vote for or against the Resolution as a majority shareholder, and only made his final decision at the time of voting at the EGM, believing it to be in the best interests of the Company. This decision was made despite knowing that he will not be receiving Cash Distribution of about S$9.6 million. The Board understood that subsequent to the Board&rsquo s Recommendation and announcement of the notice of EGM on 7 September 2023 and before the date of the EGM on 29 September 2023, Dr Wong was made aware of certain business and / or investment opportunities and had preliminary discussions to explore these opportunities, which would require capital. Given the impending EGM date, Dr Wong did not have the latitude to analyse and review such opportunities in full and Dr Wong took the view that it is in the best interests of the Company to retain the capital until these opportunities can be fully analysed and/or reviewed by management and/or its advisors and discussed by the Board. Retaining the capital in the Company would thus provide more options than proceeding with the Cash Distribution, which remains an option should there be no conclusive outcome on the other opportunities.  |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
04-Oct-2023 18:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Dr Wong talk to himself in the Sgx reply said money keep for future use in business opportunity under discussion recently lah.. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
nngeeh
Veteran |
04-Oct-2023 11:22
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hope SGX will demand a special audit on this. Recalled that SGX demanded this on another before ..
And hope sgx will fully onvestigate the transaction as well.
.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
04-Oct-2023 11:04
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Sias seeks clarifications from Advanced Holdings after capital reduction exercise fails
 
Sias president David Gerald said the failed proposal came as a &ldquo shock&rdquo to shareholders.
SINGAPORE - Investors&rsquo watchdog Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, on Tuesday raised questions over why engineering firm Advanced Holdings&rsquo capital reduction exercise appears to have failed.
 
In an Aug 23 announcement signed by Advanced Holdings&rsquo managing director (MD) Wong Kar King, the company said it was proposing to undertake a capital reduction exercise to write off accumulated losses of the company amounting to $15.18 million as at Dec 31, 2022. It also proposed to return to shareholders the company&rsquo s surplus capital through a cash distribution of approximately 23.2 Singapore cents for each ordinary share.
 
However, the proposal did not succeed at the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) held on Sept 29 &ndash an outcome that Mr David Gerald, founder, president and chief executive of Sias, said came as a &ldquo shock&rdquo to shareholders.
 
Only 18.99 per cent of the votes were for the proposal.
 
&ldquo What has mystified shareholders is that the number of shares that voted against the proposal was 41,405,109 &ndash almost the exact number held by Dr Wong, which was 41,402,109 as disclosed on page 13 of the Sept 7 letter to shareholders,&rdquo said Mr Gerald.
 
&ldquo In other words, it appears to observers that your managing director initially proposed the capital reduction exercise, then changed his mind and voted against it,&rdquo he added.
 
Mr Gerald said Sias is hoping to clarify the situation on behalf of the company&rsquo s minority shareholders.
 
It is asking who proposed the capital reduction, and whether there was unanimous support within the ranks of the board and senior management, including Dr Wong.
 
It also asked about the nature of the working relationship between Dr Wong and the board, and if the board could provide shareholders an assessment of Dr Wong&rsquo s performance.
 
&ldquo A shareholder who attended the EGM has reported that the MD left in the middle of the meeting, and the chairman told those present that the reason for the MD&rsquo s departure was that &lsquo he was not feeling well&rsquo ,&rdquo Mr Gerald said.
 
Sias is asking if there are plans to conduct a special audit on the events surrounding the EGM and the apparent change of heart by the MD.
 
With the proposal having failed, Sias is also questioning how the company plans to accomplish its objectives.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
nngeeh
Veteran |
04-Oct-2023 10:12
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just write to sgx to pressure the investigation. The more the better... we cannot control the outcome, but we are entitled to voice out and demand an official reply from both the company and sgx.
Those who bought above 0.235 are stuck due to their action.
I hope sgx is able to investigate share transaction during this period...
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
luckyguy3
Master |
04-Oct-2023 09:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
i think he must have consulted his lawyer first and THEN HE KNOWS SGX WUN DO ANYTHING TO HIM as usual.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

