| Latest Forum Topics / SingHoldings Last:0.5 -- |
|
|
Sing Holdings - Grossly undervalued
|
|||||
|
iinvestor
Veteran |
04-Oct-2019 12:49
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Why sell at this price...? The Lees must be happy...RNAV easily above 80cts soon once PB is recognised. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
03-Oct-2019 19:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Lee family found some sellers for 2.5m shares of Sing Holdings at below market price to do the married deal with them.  The breakdown is as follows: 500k shares by Lee Sze Hao' s wife, Soh Shin Yann, Susan at $0.375 100k shares by Lee and wife' s vehicle, Laurels Investments at $0.37 700k shares by the Lee family vehicle, deemed interested by the 3 brothers, FH Lee Holdings at $0.37 600k shares by Lee Sze Leong at $0.37 600k shares by Lee Sze Siong at $0.37 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
20-Sep-2019 15:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Today' s caveats release for Parc Botannia show that 641/735 caveats are lodged = 87.21% sold (+9 for the week).  Total revenue is $622,478,067 for 481,286sq ft sold.  Average psf inches up to 1293.36psf. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lifeisgood
Supreme |
13-Sep-2019 18:36
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Perhaps he might make an offer. Do note that the Lee brothers have not done any share purchase for quite some time already.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
13-Sep-2019 16:30
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
they will either secure one at a good price or secure NONE at all lol.  i still wonder why he doesn' t just make us an offer to privatise.  almost risk free $100m upside for him even if he offers us $0.60.  why doesn' t he do it?
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
lifeisgood
Supreme |
13-Sep-2019 16:14
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I believe so. Good or bad, this is SH style. Lets hope they manage to secure a good one at a good price.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
13-Sep-2019 16:01
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
they tried but failed to secure the clementi site (decent bid but beaten by UOL).  the EC bid was more lowball.  they sat out of the 3 sites which closed last week.  clearly, they only believe in securing sizeable plots for mass market which they believe are easier to sell and lower risk (of getting stuck or losing money).
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lifeisgood
Supreme |
13-Sep-2019 15:44
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
As PB is closed to being 100% sold, SH undoubtedly will feel the pressure to acquire some landbank. Will be interesting whether SH will be able to pickup something good just in time
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
13-Sep-2019 15:37
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
According to agents' fb posts, there are 73 units left for sale ie 662/735 sold = 90% sold.  Based on the latest caveats, 632/735 sold = 86% sold.  30 caveats still not lodged possibly for reasons previously discussed.  Total revenue is $611.265m for the 472,706sq ft sold so far.  Average Selling Price has inched up to 1293.12psf. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
19-Aug-2019 10:15
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
From Wee Hur' s results announcement on 14/8: " The sales status for the Group&rsquo s co-developing development, Parc Botannia, is currently at about 89% sold to-date. The Group will monitor the market situation closely and will continue its effort in selling the remaining units. The construction is in progress and is expected to be completed by 2020." Seems like they are confident of completing the construction by 2020 vs Singholdings who seems to be more conservative in continuing to mention 2021 as the TOP date. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
runaway
Senior |
08-Aug-2019 22:52
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This discussion is closed between you and me. Have a great long weekend.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
08-Aug-2019 22:36
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
The 20% net profit margin as I told you includes the land cost which has already been paid for by the debt.  Its fine if you think I don' t understand it.  We shall see as the results are announced over the next 2 years whether the equity has increased and debt decreased or vice versa.  No point continuing our discussion here when we are on different frequencies.  Have a good long weekend.     
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
runaway
Senior |
08-Aug-2019 22:19
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Your calculation is flawed. I want to stress again. Revenue is NOT profit and you cant use that revenue number to reduce your debt. The complete project collects revenue of  $500 mil. You have to take away all the costs associated with building the project and  you are left with 20% profit margin, which is $100 mil. You can then use this $100 mil profit to pay your debt, pay dividend etc. Mind you, the $100 mil profit will only be fully realized when you complete the project in 2-3 years. If you cant understand this, pls talk to one who does.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
08-Aug-2019 20:00
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
I think you are not aware that the margins do increase for later stages of the development?  Even the most basic savings from paying down debt reduces interest expenses and increases profits, no? Even if I take 20% net margins, you have already overlooked one thing.  The debt had been used to pay for the land cost UPFRONT.  The $500m need not be used to repay debt AND land cost (which reduces the net margins to 20%).  That would be double counting. Specially for you,  I ignore all the other numbers (e.g. cash + receivables exceeds all other liabilities by 14m) and just use the most conservative measures. I reduce the remaining revenue to $500m-$160m debt = $340m.  I used $400psf for all in costs at 75% of the project and round up to $170m for you.  $340m-$170m= $170m net cash.  This assumes that they do not bid for any other land since our discussion had been centred on you saying that they are unable to even cover their current and only Parc Botannia project.  
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
runaway
Senior |
08-Aug-2019 19:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 1 Alert Admin |
Your understanding of revenue = profit is amusing, Tell me how $500mil pre-sold project can clear the $200 mil debt and with leftover of $200 mil cash? The profit margin on the $500 mil is 20%.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
08-Aug-2019 19:22
|
||||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
From the Q2 results announcement: " The Group has an ongoing private condominium development at Fernvale Road known as Parc Botannia. As at the date of this announcement, approximately 88% of the units have been issued options to purchase, amounting to sales value of about S$635.2 million. Revenue from sales will continue to be recognised progressively over time based on construction progress. This project is undertaken by a 70:30 joint venture between the Group and Wee Hur Development Pte. Ltd." There is a further 12% of the project to be sold with a conservative sales value of about $90m.  So the total sales value is around $725m or more. Base on previous annual reports, $15m of revenue was recognized in FY2017 and $70m was recognized in FY2018.  For Q1, the group' s revenue was $52.9m and for Q2, the group' s revenue was $54.6m.  A small part of the revenue is attributable to the hotel ops, I' ll conservatively estimate that to be $3.5m.  That means a further $104m has been recognized in Q1 and Q2 so far. $725m-$15m-$70m-$104m=$536m revenue from Parc Botannia that is yet to be recognized.  Granted you can say property price may crash and they are unable to sell the 12% for 90m.  Even if they chop the remaining price by 30% and earn 27m less, there is still > $500m to be recognized.  The revenue recognition/billing should be somewhere between 25 and 30% at the end of Q2.  That means for those buyers who had purchased their units, they will be billed for at least a further 70% of their purchase price over the next 2 years (TOP is expected by mid 2021).
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
TonyGan
Senior |
08-Aug-2019 18:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Who say 200m cash cannot pay 160m debt???? And where got 200m cash, go n read the latest q2 bs   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
runaway
Senior |
08-Aug-2019 17:31
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I cant verify $500+ mil pre-sold. Where? Even if I give you the benefit of doubt, profit margin is 20%, and that will give you $100 mil in 2-3 years when the project is completed and TOP ready. How is that enough to repay fully the $160+ mil debts next year with net cash balance of $200+ mil. I think you have confused revenue with profit.   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
stockinvestor
Master |
08-Aug-2019 16:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
they have $500m+ of pre-sold which is still not recognized.  when the property market collapses, they will not only have repaid their $160m debt but have > $200m in net cash waiting to buy its next plot of land.  you should be able to see from future results over the next half a year how quickly they are paying down their debt and how quickly their cash is going to grow as the buyers pay for each stage of the project completed.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
iinvestor
Veteran |
08-Aug-2019 14:56
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Wonderful exposition of debt... Oh floating rate debt is getting cheaper too....haha
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

