Back

Latest Forum Topics / Alita Resources    Last:0.078 --

Post Reply

alliance mineral resources move up Post Reply Rate topic
risktaker Supreme	04-Apr-2017 09:07        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	bro common sense .... they already release their results from their drillings they intercept significant lithium.... they drill so many holes and all got lithium and covering a large area... thats just 1% of the total mining rights...U tell me what are the chances of not having a vast amount of lithium?? Its common sense the chances are extremely high... or we can say yes there are lithium.... U really donno... Stock market is forward looking ?????? now is april in 6 months time oct Coy will start producing lol... Its a bet better than casino because we know the demand is there :) sheerluck      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 09:01) Posted: I am not doubting Tawana or AMAL themselves per se.   The company is doing what they are doing.   Both legally and proper disclosure so far.   But typically of listed company, they usually give very positive outlook when market condition favours them.   Lots of Lithium companies has a good run since 2016 due to the expectation of lithium demand from EV and such. A lots of time, it is more because the market (or the operators or whoever) " played" on the company' s anouncements to their full advantages. What I am seriously wary of is that market (or operators or whoever) are pricing in something that they have not prove yet and that is the mineral estimates and I can see alot of people thought that are already tons of lithium there.   It may be but I would like to see that in a proper JORC report prepared by an independent party. risktaker      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:47) Posted: U dont trust alliance u have to trust Tawana they are the one that spent 20million.... and they say Alliance is sitting on " GOLD" Mine... :) Tawana have really experience people on board....
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
ben_kieran Member	04-Apr-2017 09:05        ben_kieran About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	push the 40c wall!
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	04-Apr-2017 09:01        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I am not doubting Tawana or AMAL themselves per se.   The company is doing what they are doing.   Both legally and proper disclosure so far.   But typically of listed company, they usually give very positive outlook when market condition favours them.   Lots of Lithium companies has a good run since 2016 due to the expectation of lithium demand from EV and such. A lots of time, it is more because the market (or the operators or whoever) " played" on the company' s anouncements to their full advantages. What I am seriously wary of is that market (or operators or whoever) are pricing in something that they have not prove yet and that is the mineral estimates and I can see alot of people thought that are already tons of lithium there.   It may be but I would like to see that in a proper JORC report prepared by an independent party. risktaker      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:47) Posted: U dont trust alliance u have to trust Tawana they are the one that spent 20million.... and they say Alliance is sitting on " GOLD" Mine... :) Tawana have really experience people on board....  sheerluck      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:44) Posted: Then how can you failed to recognised that I have no issue with the report being prepared by a Compent Person but that I am taking issue with the fact that that same person happens to be a major stakeholder?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	04-Apr-2017 08:59        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	All Shortist up lorry liao :) 888
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	04-Apr-2017 08:47        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	U dont trust alliance u have to trust Tawana they are the one that spent 20million.... and they say Alliance is sitting on " GOLD" Mine... :) Tawana have really experience people on board....  sheerluck      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:44) Posted: Then how can you failed to recognised that I have no issue with the report being prepared by a Compent Person but that I am taking issue with the fact that that same person happens to be a major stakeholder? lithiumpower      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 02:21) Posted: Hey dude, you are spot on!  There is definitely a secret agenda on the questions raised so far!   How can a person so meticulous in pointing out the fine prints failed to recognize the fact that the Report on the Exploration Results was prepared by Competent Persons in accordance to JORC code?? When AMAL releases the estimate of the lithium reserve for the initial drillings, I am sure there will be further questions raised again on whether the resource estimation is carried by a competent person in the mining industry with the relavant experience...Hahaha!
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	04-Apr-2017 08:44        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Then how can you failed to recognised that I have no issue with the report being prepared by a Compent Person but that I am taking issue with the fact that that same person happens to be a major stakeholder? lithiumpower      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 02:21) Posted: Hey dude, you are spot on!  There is definitely a secret agenda on the questions raised so far!   How can a person so meticulous in pointing out the fine prints failed to recognize the fact that the Report on the Exploration Results was prepared by Competent Persons in accordance to JORC code?? When AMAL releases the estimate of the lithium reserve for the initial drillings, I am sure there will be further questions raised again on whether the resource estimation is carried by a competent person in the mining industry with the relavant experience...Hahaha!       KopRed75      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 00:56) Posted: I can't help but think that you have a secret agenda. While you correctly pointed people to the fine prints under the Competent Persons Statement, why did you not complete the fine prints below it which states that the metallurgy and metallurgy test work has been reviewed by Mr Noel O'Brien who is not an employee of Tawana, but is employed as a contract consultant. Mr O'Brien is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, ...... You seem meticulous in sowing doubts hence it is difficult to give you the benefit of the doubt that you miss this paragraph right after the paragraph you used to carry out your attack
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
MooMoo Senior	04-Apr-2017 08:40        MooMoo About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	But if  US$1.08 is indeed a good estimate of the share value, then the current price has a lot of catching-up to do. papayaface      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:29) Posted: Think so too. If a con job, why a listed ASX company dare to throw $10m into it to get 50% share ?  Tawana directors will be grilled and risk losing their jobs, dont you think so. It may not be a con job but rather overhype and price may have shot way ahead of fundamentals.  Good luck    risktaker      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:24) Posted: i think cannot compare to   ABL ... ABL is con job lol
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
sheerluck Supreme	04-Apr-2017 08:36        sheerluck About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Work for your money first then let your money work for you"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Wave involvement is on the capital and operating cost asect and no on the mineral resource estimates. Whether conspiracy or not, I do not know. But there is no mineral resource estimates, it is just a resource target (just out JORC   code for the differences!), so the company is selling hope and not fact yet. KopRed75      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 01:32) Posted: You do know that Tawana is not the original partner of AMAL but became one when they exercised the option to acquire Lithco No.2 who was the original JV partner of AMAL though CalderWood is a common director in the two companies (I think), don't you? My point is it requires a lot of conspiracy for a company listed in Australia and South Africa to acquire another company to form a dubious JV if the resources aren't real though not impossible. "A concept study has commenced with the the addition of a 1Mtpa spod umene concentrator. The study is undertaken by Wave International with a team of consultants....." This is an extract from an announcement made by AMAL dated 12 December 2016. While I agree that some works are conducted by Tawana, there are external parties involved as well which should not be ignored. sheerluck      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 01:04) Posted: Because metallurgy test work is about the quality of the sample ie the grade,   I am questioning on the quantity.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
papayaface Supreme	04-Apr-2017 08:29        papayaface About Contact  Quote this Post!   Yells: "This is the best time to enter....when everythings uncertain"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Think so too. If a con job, why a listed ASX company dare to throw $10m into it to get 50% share ?  Tawana directors will be grilled and risk losing their jobs, dont you think so. It may not be a con job but rather overhype and price may have shot way ahead of fundamentals.  Good luck    risktaker      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:24) Posted: i think cannot compare to   ABL ... ABL is con job lol davidtang9      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:21) Posted: This is exactly like blumont in the making HAHAHA. Mining company, no substantial fundamentals, people speculating to new highs. I think it's possible to make a lot of money from it, but if you time it wrongly, good luck lol.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	04-Apr-2017 08:24        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	i think cannot compare to   ABL ... ABL is con job lol davidtang9      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 08:21) Posted: This is exactly like blumont in the making HAHAHA. Mining company, no substantial fundamentals, people speculating to new highs. I think it's possible to make a lot of money from it, but if you time it wrongly, good luck lol.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
davidtang9 Member	04-Apr-2017 08:21        davidtang9 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	This is exactly like blumont in the making HAHAHA. Mining company, no substantial fundamentals, people speculating to new highs. I think it's possible to make a lot of money from it, but if you time it wrongly, good luck lol.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	04-Apr-2017 08:19        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Alliance has huge potential and sky is its limit.... Off take from China is huge.... Last time China ride bicycle... now change to electric scooter.... 888
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
timothylim890 Veteran	04-Apr-2017 08:12        timothylim890 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Fundamental
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Many interesting views exchanged last night and this morning. Long or short, each has his own views I find that views that cast doubt on AMAL are useful in that those of us who are long will be further convinced of our positon by backing up our arguments with sound information and logic. Time will tell who is right! DYOR and DYODD. Best of luck!
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
risktaker Supreme	04-Apr-2017 07:42        risktaker About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Flexible   Mood: Yells: "Posts are opinions. Do not take it as investment advise "
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	CEO has set a base of 30c for Alliance.... :) This stock shall not fall below 30c now !!! Huat ah Going to rock today
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
syajun1981 Member	04-Apr-2017 07:42        syajun1981 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Hi friend, even if CEO buy 3 million shares, you will question him why not buy 10 million shares. If you don't believe the company, why waste time to post here? Just don't touch it. This CEO is quite good to support the share price when share price drop so much just because broker firm's restrictions. Just ask yourself as the shareholder, you like this kind of CEO or some CEO just do nothing with the fat pay. WL123456      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 02:54) Posted: The CEO's purchase added further mystery to the case . He already had 164,149,762 of shares . Why bother to buy just another 300k to boost confidence . In fact he just need to make an announcement given that he is the SSH. 300k doesn't make much of difference . In fact it's only 0.07% increase . If he is so confident he should take it right through to 49.9% just 0.1% of the threshold . It's quite a risk to hold the shares at 0.38 when there are question marks on results . I think it's safer to invest when the contracts are announced . Right now it's very cloudy and all these speculation got the brokerages worried . What if the results go the other way? Or it could be a fraud for all you know ? That's why the brokerages has to limit trade . And the CEO shouldn't be worried by buying on open market with just 300 lots . I will be confident if he added another 3 million but 300k is just not convincing . And if the results are going to be good , he should just let the market priced the shares. Eventually the price will reflect its true worth.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
MKMQMJ Member	04-Apr-2017 07:15        MKMQMJ About Contact  Quote this Post!   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I believe he/she will buy from us above 0.45 ✌ 🏽 papayaface      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 06:51) Posted: How many lots? The CEO will like to buy from you. Haha. Good luck MKMQMJ      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 06:42) Posted: I am selling at 0.45
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
KopRed75 Veteran	04-Apr-2017 07:10        KopRed75 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I believe he is buying merely to use the opportunity to lash out at the brokerage firms hence the quantum of shares he bought is secondary. I do agree that the brokerage firms have the rights to restrict ttades provided it is all done in accordance to established in-house guidelines or policies and not because of their own secret agenda. I think this is an area that SGX and/or the relevant authority should step in to conduct random audit to assess if the relevant protocols are observed. WL123456      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 02:54) Posted: The CEO's purchase added further mystery to the case . He already had 164,149,762 of shares . Why bother to buy just another 300k to boost confidence . In fact he just need to make an announcement given that he is the SSH. 300k doesn't make much of difference . In fact it's only 0.07% increase . If he is so confident he should take it right through to 49.9% just 0.1% of the threshold . It's quite a risk to hold the shares at 0.38 when there are question marks on results . I think it's safer to invest when the contracts are announced . Right now it's very cloudy and all these speculation got the brokerages worried . What if the results go the other way? Or it could be a fraud for all you know ? That's why the brokerages has to limit trade . And the CEO shouldn't be worried by buying on open market with just 300 lots . I will be confident if he added another 3 million but 300k is just not convincing . And if the results are going to be good , he should just let the market priced the shares. Eventually the price will reflect its true worth.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
papayaface Supreme	04-Apr-2017 06:51        papayaface About Contact  Quote this Post!   Yells: "This is the best time to enter....when everythings uncertain"
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	How many lots? The CEO will like to buy from you. Haha. Good luck MKMQMJ      ( Date: 04-Apr-2017 06:42) Posted: I am selling at 0.45
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
MKMQMJ Member	04-Apr-2017 06:42        MKMQMJ About Contact  Quote this Post!   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I am selling at 0.45
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
WL123456 Supreme	04-Apr-2017 02:54        WL123456 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	The CEO's purchase added further mystery to the case . He already had 164,149,762 of shares . Why bother to buy just another 300k to boost confidence . In fact he just need to make an announcement given that he is the SSH. 300k doesn't make much of difference . In fact it's only 0.07% increase . If he is so confident he should take it right through to 49.9% just 0.1% of the threshold . It's quite a risk to hold the shares at 0.38 when there are question marks on results . I think it's safer to invest when the contracts are announced . Right now it's very cloudy and all these speculation got the brokerages worried . What if the results go the other way? Or it could be a fraud for all you know ? That's why the brokerages has to limit trade . And the CEO shouldn't be worried by buying on open market with just 300 lots . I will be confident if he added another 3 million but 300k is just not convincing . And if the results are going to be good , he should just let the market priced the shares. Eventually the price will reflect its true worth.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   7461-7480 of 10377   Older>   Last