|
Latest Posts By Rosesyrup
- Master
|
|
| 27-Sep-2013 13:46 |
Renaissance United
/
Neglected, Illiquid, Undervalue, Recovery counter
|
||||
|
|
My " Luo Han" fish show TP of $0.118 also. :)
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 26-Sep-2013 23:31 |
Neptune Orient L Rg
/
NOL
|
||||
|
|
Temasek is operating a bank too? New business?
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 26-Sep-2013 22:40 |
Renaissance United
/
Neglected, Illiquid, Undervalue, Recovery counter
|
||||
|
|
In short he proposed market timing with a 3months interval. As mentioned, only 16% of the professional fund managers (not traders) is successful in doing this.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 26-Sep-2013 22:36 |
Neptune Orient L Rg
/
NOL
|
||||
|
|
Wah OCBC maintains sell @95cents?  How come NOL still staying above $1 leh? You mean OCBC not abiding by their own TP?  | ||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 26-Sep-2013 20:42 |
Renaissance United
/
Neglected, Illiquid, Undervalue, Recovery counter
|
||||
|
|
=.= bro, not that I sided Iso, but get your fact right.
You can verify that. I see no reason why the two of you can get so worked up over such a small issue. And BTW,  I believe  all of us here  can make independent assessment on the buying decision, Iso's comments were merely his opinions.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 26-Sep-2013 17:45 |
Renaissance United
/
Neglected, Illiquid, Undervalue, Recovery counter
|
||||
|
|
Stay calm, don't rout. After yesterday huge spike in price, today retract is pretty much within expectation. Believe it or not, I am eyeing $0.118. Highly undervalued, compared to peers. Some might switch from long position to short in their attempt to time the market, but let them be. Researches have shown that only 16% of the traders managed to do that. Shortists have to pray hard they are part of the 16% or they are going to miss the boat. Be discipline and focus on the big fish, don't be distracted by small gains.   Vested at $0.03 |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 17-Aug-2013 22:34 |
Yoma Strategic
/
YOMA
|
||||
|
|
I remembered replying to your posts in Yongnam's forum and it appeared to me that you are heavily vested in Myanmar. I have no intention of starting another heaty argument, therefore please stay true to your view and you may ignore all my postings. Anyway I have divested mine so times ago and currently hold no position on this counter. Nevertheless, like you, I am interested to see where Myanmar is heading. POST SCRIPT: You quoted part of my comments, specifically: " we can expect to see problems surfacing in Myanmar's economy as soon as next June" . However, you missed out the front part of this sentence:  " If it is fast enough" .  Though I don't know why you left it out, to be fair to everyone, I think it's important for me to highlight it.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 16-Aug-2013 00:41 |
Neptune Orient L Rg
/
NOL
|
||||
|
|
Stay calm, don't panic. Thanks to Fed's inconsistent messages on tapering QE3, you can expect this to happen every now and then. Stock index can fluctuate wildly,  going down 3% a day and recovering 3% the next day. However, economic progress is much more stable and predictable.  Timing your investment based on economic data might be a better choice as stock index merely reflects  investors phycology which  still strongly influenced by actual economic data in the long term. Today sell off in Dow is mainly due to lower sales projections by major businesses. The following is (only) my personal opinion on this matter (NOT FACTS):
In a nutshell, I suggest ignoring the actual date of QE3** tapering and US big corporations' forecast, instead focus on the measures taken by Asian economies and the way FED is  announcing**** the end of QE3. **So long as the date fall within Jan 2014 to June 2014 it should be fine. Anything shorter would kill weak sign of recovery, while  anything longer would increase US deficit and the risk of another crisis. Despite some Fed members claiming QE3 would be ended in late 2013, considering the weak economic pulse now, I remain highly skeptical about its possibility. ****The way that the announcement is made, is more important than the actual date itself. If FED were to stop QE3 as soon as the announcement ends, leaving little time for the market to react, trampling  is bounded to happen as the panic investors rush to get out of the depreciating Asian currencies- 1997 Asian currencies crisis is almost certain to  repeat itself. The best case would be Fed giving a few months worth of warning, allowing investors to retreat in an organized manner. |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 15-Aug-2013 20:34 |
Neptune Orient L Rg
/
NOL
|
||||
|
|
Lol, not so fast yet. Try to think of the world in this way: 1) US and Europe are the world's market, they represent most of the world demand. 2) China is the world factory, they supply US and Europe with manufactured goods. 3) South East Asia (SEA)  is  the factory's backyard, providing  raw materials which are need by China to complete the goods. Thus, US and Europe might have shown sign of recovery. But it still takes some  time for their demands to first  reach China and for China to start demanding raw materials from SEA. You can use China's growth data  as a gauge to measure NOL recovery. As soon as the world factory  starts running again, NOL's ships would be kept busy transporting in and out of the factory. Though I do not have an accurate way of knowing when will this moment comes, I still attempt to forecast with trend analysis. According to my forecast, the quickest is by the end of this December, assuming Asian  economies would not be severely affected by outflow of funds.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 15-Aug-2013 01:33 |
Yongnam
/
Yong nam
|
||||
|
|
If that's truly the  case, your worries  were unfound. As I mentioned in one of my previous post, I have no intention of entering Yongnam, at least for the next 2 years- my current focus  is on  STI blue chips. In additions, what we discussed here have no impact on the market forces which are dominated by huge fund managers. Fund managers transact ten  thousands lots at once. While most  retail investors like you and I trade tens  lots at best (although hundreds lots is still possible for rich individuals, considering the need to diversify). We are insignificant, don't overestimate ourselves. Thanks Kandic and Warrenbegger for the mediation.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 14-Aug-2013 22:38 |
Yongnam
/
Yong nam
|
||||
|
|
Yup. For  the convenience of  others, the full Kim Eng report can be accessed  here: http://sgx.i3investor.com/servlets/ptres/4944.jsp    
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 14-Aug-2013 21:17 |
Yongnam
/
Yong nam
|
||||
|
|
Lol your comments have degraded from making accusation to pure personal attacks. Though quicker than what I would expect from a wiseguy, it appeared to me that you have run of relevant points to debate about Yongnam. Since there is nothing relevant to clarify, I shall not engaged in a " coffee-shop" style of argument with you. However, if you are interest in that magic stone, do PM me. Price is highly negotiable. PS: It doesn't take a  wiseguy (literally)  to understand that the discussion among retail investors here, will not affect the market which is dominated by fund manager.   |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 14-Aug-2013 20:55 |
Yoma Strategic
/
YOMA
|
||||
|
|
Agree with you, overvalued. My  most optimistic  TP for this is merely 56cents. The presses have been reporting about " great opportunities" in Myanmar, economic risks that are highly possible have been downplayed. If it is fast enough, we can expect to see problems surfacing  in Myanmar's economy as soon as next June. You can easily verify  the risk that  I claimed  from Googling. Some advices when trading with Myanmar related  stocks: 1) Avoid hinging decision on the recommendation of one analyst. Get a bigger picture from different analysts. 2) Do valuation with realistic growth rate and discount rate. 3) Always diversify portfolio and limit the weightage of such risky counter. To the others who are still bullish about this counter,  stay true to your view please. Who knows? Maybe it might just hit 90.5 cents just like DBS said.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 14-Aug-2013 20:18 |
Yongnam
/
Yong nam
|
||||
|
|
Haiz, once again you opened your mouth and removed all doubt. 1)First of all, I did not claimed that 24.5 cents or 22 cents will definitely be breached. You need a pair of glasses to help you with the reading? Anyway go back to read again what I have written for these two prices- read carefully this time round. I got tired of reiterating.  2) Secondly, never ever had I demanded any trust from anyone using this forum. In fact I urge every single soul here to do their own assessment. Seriously, are you that gullible to believe there is credibility behind such free account? How about this, I sell you a magic stone that is expected to generate a 50% return per annual? LOL.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 14-Aug-2013 14:04 |
Yongnam
/
Yong nam
|
||||
|
|
Read the previous posts, " genius" ! Which sentences gave you the idea that I ever shorted Yongnam? In fact, I advised against it due to its high volatility. You just opened your mouth and removed all doubt. TSK TSK TSK. Seems like financial knowledge is not the only thing you fall short of- zero analytical skill. Do your homework and you can rein in that " luck" component, remember this is not casino. Opps, look what am I expecting from you? Homework? You simply copy and paste an old report (claiming a TP of 41cents) from DBS to support your bullish argument. And 4 days later, the same DBS issued a new report calling for a TP of only 28 cents. Typical example of merely following what other said.  If you want to know how much homework I did for Yongnam, just keep your provocations coming. 1) NAV of 26.2cents is nothing! You can't just barge into Yongnam's office and start grabbing tables & chairs to justify your 26.2cents per share worth of investment. Thus it is more appropriate to value Yongnam using Future Value, which is the benefit that you can get from the investment. 2)   As I have previously mentioned, the construction industry is going to undergo a shake out phase, which is expect to begin in Sept 2013 and last till 2020. During this period of time, Yongnam might take losses which would hurt its NAV. 3) Agree that Yongnam has strong fundamental now. However the status quo is hardly relevant as rules of game in the industry is about to change significantly. In order to survive, Yongnam needs flexibility not strong fundamental.  Cheers.  |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 13-Aug-2013 11:53 |
Yongnam
/
Yong nam
|
||||
|
|
Alright " smarty" , knew you need (or rather use) no theory in your decision. Whether 26.5cents is the lowest depend on valuation not mere guts feeling or brave words. I just had enough of these " Battle Of Words" , just continuing your  longing and time will tell the " smart" from dumb. Empty words are worth nothing more than used tissue papers.  
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 12-Aug-2013 20:45 |
UOB
/
UOB
|
||||
|
|
Here's what boosted Singapore's impressive GDP in 2Q  'Modest improvements' seen in other segments. According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Singapore's GDP growth came in at +3.8% in 2Q, above expectations and earlier flash  estimate of +3.7%. Higher reading came from stronger services (+5.5% vs. +5%  flash estimate), despite softer manufacturing (+0.2% vs. +1.1% flash) and construction (+5.1% vs. +5.6% flash). On a quarter-on-quarter seasonally adjusted annualized basis, GDP expanded a sharp +15.5% from the first quarter. Growth was led by services, in particular financial services (+13.1% in 2Q vs. +10.6% in 1Q),  wholesale & retail services (+5.6% vs. +0.2% in 1Q). A sharp turnaround was seen in transport & storage (+2.5% vs. -0.9% in 1Q). Other services components also showed modest improvements, including business services (+3.7%), info-com (+3.5%), hotels & restaurants (+3.2%) and ?other services? (+1.7%). Visitor arrivals remained healthy, supporting the tourismrelated segments.        SOURCE: YAHOO FINANCE LINK: http://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-boosted-singapores-impressive-gdp-062800701.html  |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 12-Aug-2013 20:42 |
OCBC Bank
/
What is the magic in OCBC rising price?
|
||||
|
|
Here's what boosted Singapore's impressive GDP in 2Q  'Modest improvements' seen in other segments. According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Singapore's GDP growth came in at +3.8% in 2Q, above expectations and earlier flash  estimate of +3.7%. Higher reading came from stronger services (+5.5% vs. +5%  flash estimate), despite softer manufacturing (+0.2% vs. +1.1% flash) and construction (+5.1% vs. +5.6% flash). On a quarter-on-quarter seasonally adjusted annualized basis, GDP expanded a sharp +15.5% from the first quarter. Growth was led by services, in particular financial services (+13.1% in 2Q vs. +10.6% in 1Q), wholesale & retail services (+5.6% vs. +0.2% in 1Q). A sharp turnaround was seen in transport & storage (+2.5% vs. -0.9% in 1Q). Other services components also showed modest improvements, including business services (+3.7%), info-com (+3.5%), hotels & restaurants (+3.2%) and ?other services? (+1.7%). Visitor arrivals remained healthy, supporting the tourismrelated segments.    SOURCE: YAHOO FINANCE LINK: http://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-boosted-singapores-impressive-gdp-062800701.html  |
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 12-Aug-2013 20:25 |
Neptune Orient L Rg
/
NOL
|
||||
|
|
Not bad, moved up by nearly 1 percent. Might see faster improvement as news of world economy recovery start flowing in  in 3Q.
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| 12-Aug-2013 16:23 |
OUE HTrust
/
OUE Hospitality Trust IPO Listing
|
||||
|
|
Keep all the negative posting to your self if its not news. Not Interested AH Sound familiar?
|
||||
| Good Post Bad Post | |||||
| First < Newer   501-520 of 564 Older> Last |


